guess that ends the discussion, eh?Thank you for contacting us.
You are correct. As of October 30th, the Pacific Parlor Car on the Coast Starlight will be taken off the train.
(It may not be available of every train even before the 30th.)
We hope this information will be of assistance.
Sincerely,
Amtrak Customer Service
Thank you for contacting us. You are correct. As of October 30th, the Pacific Parlor Car on the Coast Starlight will be taken off the train.
(It may not be available of every train even before the 30th.)
We hope this information will be of assistance.
Sincerely,
Amtrak Customer Service
I'd agree with you regarding the PPC's (Pacific Parlour Cars), as they are 50+ year old cars, they require an LSA to staff them, along with other associated expenses. I agree that it would be nice to see them continue, but in light of the expenses and the congressional mandates, I can reluctantly understand their being retired.I am sure there are regular riders on the West Coast who simply love the Parlour Cars, but for the majority of the long distance trains in the nation wide system, the Parlour Car is not important. When the improved and upgraded services were introduced on the Coast Starlight, the Parlour Cars, libraries, kiddie cars, wine tastings were all tremendous improvements, however given the congressional mandates and the focus on costs, these kinds of amenities cannot be supported by the prices charged for tickets and the associated labor costs prohibit their continuation.
Would I like to see them continue? Yes, or course, but it is not the end of the world if they don't - and it is a good thing to eliminate them if they are too expensive to repair and if the labor and mechanical costs are not met by potential revenue.
Tell me what to say and exactly where to send it....I would suggest everyone who has an interest in these cars send emails and call to share your opinions.
I would send them to Customer Service and ask that they be forwarded to the appropriate Vice President and to the CEO.
I agree that they must be a headache to repair...since they are so old, I wonder if Amtrak shop forces are having to fabricate their own parts to keep them running? And how long can they honestly do that before the cost overwhelms their meager shop budget? I too would be sorry to see them go!Allright then, so how many of us are going to fly west after arriving on the last "Metroliner" and ride on the last Parlor Car voyage? j/k!
Shame to see them go, but I think I can honestly imagine the headache they may have been to maintain as of late.
I'd agree with you regarding the PPC's (Pacific Parlour Cars), as they are 50+ year old cars, they require an LSA to staff them, along with other associated expenses. I agree that it would be nice to see them continue, but in light of the expenses and the congressional mandates, I can reluctantly understand their being retired.
I have many pictures I could email or post on this board if there is a way to do so.Are there pictures anywhere on the web of the interior of these Parlour Cars?
One of the replies in the following thread has some very nice interior photos-Are there pictures anywhere on the web of the interior of these Parlour Cars?
AlohaAre there pictures anywhere on the web of the interior of these Parlour Cars?
Allright then, so how many of us are going to fly west after arriving on the last "Metroliner" and ride on the last Parlor Car voyage? j/k!
Shame to see them go, but I think I can honestly imagine the headache they may have been to maintain as of late.
If your report is true, that's certainly good news. However, even though I personally tend to agree with your political sentiment, please refrain from making overly political statements on this forum that don't directly relate to passenger rail (i.e. your comments regarding the middle & lower classes). I find that those comments tend to spark needless arguments on the forum and don't really advance the cause of passenger rail.
But James,Sorry for the political angle, if it wasn't related - let's just say that "privatizing" (if I spelled that right) has been the stated purpose for the bleeding of Amtrak for may years. It's no secret. During my 4 day and 2 nights on the Starlight I didn't know about the mechanical problems, but I don't see why repeated repairs on a particular train's favorite car is any less a mentionable than up-keep on the drive units or any other car (30 hours of maintanence is required for each hour a fighter jet is in the air <_< , just for comparison). In closeing, I promise to add whatever I learn about Amtrak - as I repeatedly take it to and from Chicago as well as California. Until now, the loss of the smoking car on the Northern run was my biggest gripe but it sure doesn't compare to current problems. Thank you.
i agree that aimless political rants aren't needed. i also think we cannot consider passenger rail in isolation. if we were in al gore's second term instead of bush's, i believe, we would be having different and more optimisitic discussions of the future of amtrak and passenger rail. being from the "middle and lower classes" i feel the bush administration and friends have no concern for my transportation needs,my family budget or the environment. to advance the cause of passenger rail we must be politically active.If your report is true, that's certainly good news. However, even though I personally tend to agree with your political sentiment, please refrain from making overly political statements on this forum that don't directly relate to passenger rail (i.e. your comments regarding the middle & lower classes). I find that those comments tend to spark needless arguments on the forum and don't really advance the cause of passenger rail.
Enter your email address to join: