the_traveler
Engineer
As long as the ship is not named "Titanic"!It was "something" and to do it again is another item on my bucket list. Making tentative plans for next year!
As long as the ship is not named "Titanic"!It was "something" and to do it again is another item on my bucket list. Making tentative plans for next year!
The ads at the top of the page are influenced by the words in the posts for that topic. So any topic that mentions something about a plane is quite likely to have some sort of ad related to planes at the top.I have to admit though, that I have found it slightly funny that a site dedicated to passenger rail travel regularly has Alaska Airlines on the header.
I think it is a little more complicated then that. The ads are "behaviorial driven." In other words, they are based on recent searches and browsing by the user. I was checking availability and pricing of a Westin hotel this morning. A Westin ad appeared on AU this afternoon. If a user clicks on the small "AdChoices" icon on the banner ad (little triangle in a corner), they can read the policy, and can opt-out.The ads at the top of the page are influenced by the words in the posts for that topic. So any topic that mentions something about a plane is quite likely to have some sort of ad related to planes at the top.I have to admit though, that I have found it slightly funny that a site dedicated to passenger rail travel regularly has Alaska Airlines on the header.
The AdChoices icon appears on sites that use Google's AdSense program to show ads. While Google often shows you ads based on the content of the page you are viewing, we also show some ads based on the types of websites you visit, view, or where you interact with an ad or other Google product supported by Google's advertising services. In doing this, Google doesn't know your name or any other personal information about you. Google simply recognizes the number stored in your browser on the DoubleClick cookie, and shows ads related to the interest and inferred demographic categories associated with that cookie. It's our goal to make these ads as relevant and useful as possible for you. Google doesn't create categories, or show ads, based on sensitive topics such as race, religion, sexual orientation, or health.
Point well taken!As long as the ship is not named "Titanic"!It was "something" and to do it again is another item on my bucket list. Making tentative plans for next year!If so, you better have everything else on your bucket list done first!
Yeah...it's fun seeing the offers to fly to Lagos, Nigeria for some amount or another. First, I don't like flying; and second, why the [bleep] would I want to go to sub-Saharan Africa?The ads at the top of the page are influenced by the words in the posts for that topic. So any topic that mentions something about a plane is quite likely to have some sort of ad related to planes at the top.I have to admit though, that I have found it slightly funny that a site dedicated to passenger rail travel regularly has Alaska Airlines on the header.
The solution is easy. Just avoid all topics that mention planes or flying in their title What the heck are you doing reading those blasphemous topics anyway?Yeah...it's fun seeing the offers to fly to Lagos, Nigeria for some amount or another. First, I don't like flying; and second, why the [bleep] would I want to go to sub-Saharan Africa?The ads at the top of the page are influenced by the words in the posts for that topic. So any topic that mentions something about a plane is quite likely to have some sort of ad related to planes at the top.I have to admit though, that I have found it slightly funny that a site dedicated to passenger rail travel regularly has Alaska Airlines on the header.
That marks the first bad thing I've heard about Virgin Atlantic. What're the issues with them?^Virgin America?
Virgian Atlantic is awful, its barely any better than Delta. Of course no airline is worse than AA.
Not having status on any airline, I find no particular difference between legacy airlines in how badly I'm treated in coach.Of course no airline is worse than AA.
I disagree. Or rather I don;t think they are any more evil than any other transportation company including AmtrakPlanes arent evil, airlines are, well, American airlines anyway.
In India a Railroad Engineer, i.e. the guy that sits up front operating the locomotive is called a Loco Pilot! So we shall banish them from AU tooOr pilot, airline or otherwise ... :blink:Woah, hate to see what you guys would do to an actual airline employee...
Thinking that European Carriers are all better than the US carriers for TATL service is 1990's thinking. Today, I would rank CO and even US (aircraft with the new Envoy) up with or better than European carriers for both the hard and soft products.At some point, I know that I will fly again. However:
1) It will likely be on a non-American carrier (Virgin Atlantic is the most likely, followed by British Airways, followed by just about any other European carrier).
2) It will likely be in one of the "premium" classes (trying to phrase it as "not economy/coach" is probably the best, but sorting between "Premium Economy", "Business", and "First" for BA versus the three differently-phrased classes on Virgin versus Lord Only Knows What Else on other airlines is a puzzle in and of itself without a handy table to use).
I can say for sure that E+ in UA has more leg room than Lufthansa or BA Y (BA Y+ is much more expensive than UA E+ and is better than UA E+) or Virgin. Virgin's Y is literally cattle class and their IFE sucks. Lufthansa is yet to get around to put in lie flat beds in J. They still have those 15 deg tilted contraptions in their 747s.Thinking that European Carriers are all better than the US carriers for TATL service is 1990's thinking. Today, I would rank CO and even US (aircraft with the new Envoy) up with or better than European carriers for both the hard and soft products.At some point, I know that I will fly again. However:
1) It will likely be on a non-American carrier (Virgin Atlantic is the most likely, followed by British Airways, followed by just about any other European carrier).
2) It will likely be in one of the "premium" classes (trying to phrase it as "not economy/coach" is probably the best, but sorting between "Premium Economy", "Business", and "First" for BA versus the three differently-phrased classes on Virgin versus Lord Only Knows What Else on other airlines is a puzzle in and of itself without a handy table to use).
On out-of-date thinking: You're lucky to get me out of the 1950s sometimes!I can say for sure that E+ in UA has more leg room than Lufthansa or BA Y (BA Y+ is much more expensive than UA E+ and is better than UA E+) or Virgin. Virgin's Y is literally cattle class and their IFE sucks. Lufthansa is yet to get around to put in lie flat beds in J. They still have those 15 deg tilted contraptions in their 747s.Thinking that European Carriers are all better than the US carriers for TATL service is 1990's thinking. Today, I would rank CO and even US (aircraft with the new Envoy) up with or better than European carriers for both the hard and soft products.At some point, I know that I will fly again. However:
1) It will likely be on a non-American carrier (Virgin Atlantic is the most likely, followed by British Airways, followed by just about any other European carrier).
2) It will likely be in one of the "premium" classes (trying to phrase it as "not economy/coach" is probably the best, but sorting between "Premium Economy", "Business", and "First" for BA versus the three differently-phrased classes on Virgin versus Lord Only Knows What Else on other airlines is a puzzle in and of itself without a handy table to use).
I can understand opting for an East Asian carrier over American. Several of them are truly superior in my experience. But choosing a random European carrier over a UA or DL or even US, just shows ignorance more than anything else IMHO. Of course for real kicks go for Ryan Air to experience quality European LCC.
Y = Economy Class...For the unfamiliar (i.e. me), Y is economy and J is First Class?
Thanks a bunch. And I know what you mean...last time I flew cross country, someone else booked the tickets and presumably got a special fare. I was willing to spring for the first class upgrade onsite on the way home (they were hawking such an upgrade at the gate...the flight wasn't empty, but it wasn't packed, either), but my ticket was ineligible.* As to the piles of codes, I recently saw a BA code listing...I think that listed something like 13 or 15 different codes (there were three "redemption" codes, three "full fare" codes, and then a bunch of discount/special codes including an ex-Concorde code.Y = Economy Class...For the unfamiliar (i.e. me), Y is economy and J is First Class?
J or C = Business Class
F - First Class
Those are generalities that are typically used as shorthand on air travel discussion sites. In practice, there are numerous fares and letters associated with each seating class.
Well, at least they removed the Redemption Codes for Concorde. I have at least two friends who used BA and AA miles respectively to fly free on the Concorde.Thanks a bunch. And I know what you mean...last time I flew cross country, someone else booked the tickets and presumably got a special fare. I was willing to spring for the first class upgrade onsite on the way home (they were hawking such an upgrade at the gate...the flight wasn't empty, but it wasn't packed, either), but my ticket was ineligible.* As to the piles of codes, I recently saw a BA code listing...I think that listed something like 13 or 15 different codes (there were three "redemption" codes, three "full fare" codes, and then a bunch of discount/special codes including an ex-Concorde code.
*On the one hand, this seems dumb of the airline (they could at least offer the upgrade with the payment of an add-on surcharge...that might make me wince and pass, but either way it would be money in their pockets that they wouldn't have otherwise).
The only thing E+ gives you is a couple extra inches of pitch. That’s it. Everything else is identical to standard coach seats. In my view UA’s, BA’s, LH’s, and VS’ economy cabins are not that much different from any other coach cabin outside of a few things like PTV options. If one is cattle class they’re all cattle class, E+ included.I can say for sure that E+ in UA has more leg room than Lufthansa or BA Y (BA Y+ is much more expensive than UA E+ and is better than UA E+) or Virgin. Virgin's Y is literally cattle class and their IFE sucks. Lufthansa is yet to get around to put in lie flat beds in J. They still have those 15 deg tilted contraptions in their 747s.
I’d suggest he just buys on price and schedule. Otherwise there’s not much reason to have a preference. Unless he is flying frequently enough to earn status and/or is too tall to fit into conventional Y pitch.I can understand opting for an East Asian carrier over American. Several of them are truly superior in my experience. But choosing a random European carrier over a UA or DL or even US, just shows ignorance more than anything else IMHO. Of course for real kicks go for Ryan Air to experience quality European LCC.
To be fair, I’m not sure I could come up with a less logical pairing among US airlines if I tried. :lol:More seriously, I remember insulting someone here who either is a fan of or who works at JetBlue by lumping Spirit and JetBlue together as LCCs.
I don’t quite follow the question? Are we talking about the age of the airframe or the seats or the IFE or something else?And hearing bad things about Lufthansa...mind you, it was the 90s, but I used to hear relatively good things about them. They just slow in updating their fleets?
How do they fare? Y is still Y no matter what airline you’re on. Variations do exist but they’re almost too minor to even notice anymore. The one biggie is seat pitch, which generally suffers compared to US carriers, but you can often snag an emergency exit row if you’re a tall American flying on a tiny Asian carrier.As to the East Asians...setting aside the Flying Pullmans that Singapore put in the air, how do the "non-compartment" planes fare on those routes?
Those would generally be full-fare codes, so don’t be surprised if it’s nowhere in your fare basis unless you paid the walk-up rate. Most of the codes you’ll actually purchase are for some form of discount (and limitation) in effect and available at the time of purchase. These codes also vary by airline. On United Airlines codes like F & A are first class while J, C, D & Z are business class. Y, B, E, M, U, H, Q, V, W, T, S, K, L & G generally refer to coach class.Y = Economy Class
J or C = Business Class
F - First Class
So you do agree completely with me. Good! BA Premium Economy is actually significantly better than plain economy - wider seats and footrest, and of course extra legroom. UA E+ gives you enough additional space so that you can actually work on a 17" laptop. Minor difference from plain E, not much, but useful difference when you are trying to work on your laptop on a 10 hour flight.The only thing E+ gives you is a couple extra inches of pitch. That’s it. Everything else is identical to standard coach seats. In my view UA’s, BA’s, LH’s, and VS’ economy cabins are not that much different from any other coach cabin outside of a few things like PTV options. If one is cattle class they’re all cattle class, E+ included.I can say for sure that E+ in UA has more leg room than Lufthansa or BA Y (BA Y+ is much more expensive than UA E+ and is better than UA E+) or Virgin. Virgin's Y is literally cattle class and their IFE sucks. Lufthansa is yet to get around to put in lie flat beds in J. They still have those 15 deg tilted contraptions in their 747s.
He may be considering traveling by something other than Economy. I think there are significant differences between airlines for more or less the same fare when you get to Business Class. Of course if one wants to get the cheapest ticket then your advice is a good one.I’d suggest he just buys on price and schedule. Otherwise there’s not much reason to have a preference. Unless he is flying frequently enough to earn status and/or is too tall to fit into conventional Y pitch.I can understand opting for an East Asian carrier over American. Several of them are truly superior in my experience. But choosing a random European carrier over a UA or DL or even US, just shows ignorance more than anything else IMHO. Of course for real kicks go for Ryan Air to experience quality European LCC.
Enter your email address to join: