The problem with the Hoosier State is that it has been allowed to get so slow. Which is due to total disinterest in passenger rail from the Indiana state government for most of 40 years.
If the trackage were upgraded (perhaps bought by Indiana and then upgraded), as in Michigan, Illinois, Maine, and so many other states, the Hoosier State could be a highly successful and popular train. But it hasn't been. It shouldn't be a question of "Should Indiana spend $3 million a year for the current Hoosier State", it should be a question of "Is Indiana willing to support passenger rail", and if it is, the state should put in serious money and upgrade the route -- which would, of course, reduce the yearly operational subsidy needed, as well as providing a more useful passenger service.
However, it seems absoutely clear that the Indiana DOT wants to cut bait, and kill the train -- and probably lose Beech Grove in 5-10 years as a result, since Beech Grove will become completely economically untenable if anything happens to the Cardinal (which it might) -- and there's lots of good locations for a new heavy maintenance shop in Chicagoland.
It may be possible for the *cities* along the Hoosier State route to save it, but that's a long shot. I hope they manage to talk Indiana DOT out of its destructive attitude -- which is bad for the entire state -- but I'm not optimistic.
My Indiana friends finally observed that they'd been looking for an excuse to visit Chicago, so instead they will be driving to join us in IL. So I was all set to spend $$ in Bloomie and Indy and instead some IN residents are going to be dropping (even more as, let's be honest, museum hopping ain't cheap) $$ in Chicago. WAY TO GO, INDIANA.
This is the future of Indiana until the politics change. :-(
Beech Grove is no longer "as central as possible to minimize overall travel time" -- it's now located so as to maximize overall travel time.
Amtrak's shops are already having a problem with "cars not arriving as scheduled" (due to intensive use of the fleet). Accessing Beech Grove only three days a week on one of the most unreliable Amtrak trains (to Indianapolis, followed by a switcher job to Beech Grove!) can only make this problem worse! It would then generally be faster to get to shops located in *Denver*, because the Zephyr runs daily!
I hadn't thought of Denver; it would work. There isn't much of any free space for a railyard in Denver, though. There's actually still a certain amount of ex-railyard space in Chicago despite recent expansions. There's far more ex-railyard space in northwestern Indiana.
And of course there's insane amounts of cheap rail-connected space in Detroit; Detroit might actually be the most sensible location, with lots of cheap, rail-connected land and multiple trains per day -- on a line which is largely Amtrak-controlled. If South of the Lake ever gets built, it would be a 100% Amtrak route to Detroit.