wayman
Engineer
I once had lunch -- on Amtrak, natch -- with a woman who worked in the Moscow office of the State Department. We talked about visa costs (it's about $200 for a visa allowing Americans to enter Russia). Her explanation: the US has long charged that much for Russians to obtain a visa to enter the US, because something like 5% of Russians who enter the US with a legal visa overstay their visa (which costs the US a lot of money, because we try to find them and, er, encourage them to leave the country). Because we charge, they charge. (And that's the only reason -- it's not like there are many Americans who overstay their visa in Russia.) In theory, if the rate of Russians overstaying their visa in the US drops below some level -- 1% maybe? -- we'll drop the fee, but if and only if the Russians agree to drop their fee at the same time. And she thought the odds of the overstay rate dropping to that level within the next few decades was approximately zero, and thus that the visa fee would never go away.Huh? The US charges Indians $150 to give them a visa to enter the US too. So I guess it is equal opportunity mutual robbery then, no?He was robbed!I can think of half a dozen countries where you have to pay for a Visa to enter. I think my dad had to pay $150 for his visa to enter India.
Presumably similar reasoning is behind visa fees with other countries. It's unfortunate that these tariffs wind up punishing individual travelers who in almost all cases do absolutely nothing wrong, and presumably also deter many individuals from visiting (and spending spending spending) which sort of shoots each country in the foot, but that's the way it is.