Not wearing the proper uniform or PPE isn't quite the same as trying to provide good customer service. Sorry!
A rule is a rule, and a violation is a violation. Whether it is PPE or use of cell phones while on duty, it is really as simple as that. You start applying gray areas or subjective analysis to what is a true/false situation, then the rule quickly becomes unenforceable. There are plenty of ways to provide "good customer service" without breaking the rule about cell phone use. It is not an either/or.Not wearing the proper uniform or PPE isn't quite the same as trying to provide good customer service. Sorry!
And yet the LSA is required to use a cell phone to call in their order as the trains approach NYP and end points too, if the train is to go right back out.A rule is a rule, and a violation is a violation. Whether it is PPE or use of cell phones while on duty, it is really as simple as that. You start applying gray areas or subjective analysis to what is a true/false situation, then the rule quickly becomes unenforceable. There are plenty of ways to provide "good customer service" without breaking the rule about cell phone use. It is not an either/or.Not wearing the proper uniform or PPE isn't quite the same as trying to provide good customer service. Sorry!
Well, That's bad news. That's the same car I'm on in a few weeks.Actually it is car 2730! But my SCA on the LSL was from Chicago and he was super attentive.Just more evidence of Amtrak's biggest problem within its control, very inconsistent customer service. Hope you will take the time to contact Customer Service about your experience, complaints about this kind of service (and commendations for service like you got on the LSL) is the only way that has a change of changin. Just to satisfy my curiosity, and possibly to confirm my own preconceptions, are you in the Portland sleeper (2730) or one of the Seattle sleepers (0730/0731)? The Portland sleeper is crewed out of the Chicago crewbase, while the Seattle sleepers are crewed out of the Seattle crewbase. And I agree with sending pix. Then there is evidence, instead of just "he said, she said".
Running the train into another train or derailing because the engineer missed a slow order would be a bit more of a quality hit than not getting your morning newspaper on time.
I don't mean to make the argument that poor customer service is acceptable. It isn't. But the conductor has far more on his place. What is needed is either a return of the Chief of OBS onboard (and for them to be effective) or more manager presence on trains (although when your boss is around, you tend to not slack off).
Until one of both of them happen, all we can do is report the bad apples and wait for the complaints to have an impact (which they do).
I will be on that car in early July as well. Let's hope he will be on another consist or better yet canned by then.Well, That's bad news. That's the same car I'm on in a few weeks.Actually it is car 2730! But my SCA on the LSL was from Chicago and he was super attentive.Just more evidence of Amtrak's biggest problem within its control, very inconsistent customer service. Hope you will take the time to contact Customer Service about your experience, complaints about this kind of service (and commendations for service like you got on the LSL) is the only way that has a change of changin. Just to satisfy my curiosity, and possibly to confirm my own preconceptions, are you in the Portland sleeper (2730) or one of the Seattle sleepers (0730/0731)? The Portland sleeper is crewed out of the Chicago crewbase, while the Seattle sleepers are crewed out of the Seattle crewbase. And I agree with sending pix. Then there is evidence, instead of just "he said, she said".
is there a general problem with Portland sleeper (I.e. Chicago crew)? Traveling tomorrow out of portland so I'm curious.Just more evidence of Amtrak's biggest problem within its control, very inconsistent customer service. Hope you will take the time to contact Customer Service about your experience, complaints about this kind of service (and commendations for service like you got on the LSL) is the only way that has a change of changin.
Just to satisfy my curiosity, and possibly to confirm my own preconceptions, are you in the Portland sleeper (2730) or one of the Seattle sleepers (0730/0731)? The Portland sleeper is crewed out of the Chicago crewbase, while the Seattle sleepers are crewed out of the Seattle crewbase.
And I agree with sending pix. Then there is evidence, instead of just "he said, she said".
AlohaIf a "Chief Of Board Services" position is union, then a "On-Board-Manager" is management.
What did the conductor say to that?About 15 years ago........ ancient history I know...... my wife and I were returning from our honeymoon on the Empire Builder and an elderly passenger in our car flagged down the conductor and asked "Are you the person to talk to if I have a problem?" The conductor, who had just come on at the last stop answered "I'll go find your car attendant. It's his job to deal with your problem." The passenger answered "But the car attendant IS my problem."
That's a nice deflection of the question, so I will be more precise:Actually, it takes far more than a minor "rules" infraction to get tossed from the train.
If the conduct doesn't rise to these levels, it isn't important enough for the conductor to get involved in.Whose conduct is objectionable (such as, but not limited to, being under the influence of alcohol or narcotics);
Whose personal hygiene makes them offensive;
Who pose a health, safety or security hazard to other passengers or employees;
Who refuse to comply with safety or security rules or with instructions of Amtrak personnel;
Who would require Amtrak personnel to provide personal care services or otherwise do not meet the essential requirements for the receipt of Amtrak services; or
Who refuse to consent to Amtrak security inspections of persons and/or baggage onboard Amtrak trains and/or at designated areas, such as train platforms and passenger boarding or waiting areas.
THAT is the crux of the question I had!I don't think a conductor has the authority to discipline a service employee for not doing their job. The conductor does have the authority to remove a passenger for being drunk and/or disruptive.
I have to agree with you on this.That's a nice deflection of the question, so I will be more precise:Actually, it takes far more than a minor "rules" infraction to get tossed from the train.
Are you saying that the conductor is too busy doing other things to deal with "disciplining" an attendant? If so, then you are also saying that s/he is too busy to "discipline" a paying customer, aren't you?
We all know the second half of that statement is not true, so I submit that the first half is not either. Your rebuttal, please?
I believe they do.THAT is the crux of the question I had!I don't think a conductor has the authority to discipline a service employee for not doing their job. The conductor does have the authority to remove a passenger for being drunk and/or disruptive.
Do conductors have the authority to discipline an employee for not doing their job correctly? That is the question I would like to have answered.
If not, who does?
Enter your email address to join: