trainaddict
Train Attendant
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 27
I didn't read this whole article, but I think the title says it all
http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=3209
Please explain.
http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=3209
Please explain.
No offense to Jim... but, I think that would be pretty scary. :lol:i wish amtrak would let the folks on this forum to run amtrak for
just 48 hours, i would vote to put jim hudson in charge of running amtrak
and then we would have progress
Actually I suspect Amtrak does not lie... simply that the OP wishes they did thereby lending credence his preconceived agenda.Jim running Amtrak. - that is scary!
He couldn't even find SDY on the train last March. He got off the ML in Utica instead!
And "Amtrak lies" and loses money, yet just 1 airline loses $1,000,000 a month or ever a day and that's OK? And I agree, the OP should ask Amtrak themselves, not AU. We don't know why "Amtrak lies" - we don't lie!
jim is just a good ol boy from austin, anyone from austin can run it ask anyone on the drag at ut :giggle: :giggle: :hi:No offense to Jim... but, I think that would be pretty scary. :lol:i wish amtrak would let the folks on this forum to run amtrak for
just 48 hours, i would vote to put jim hudson in charge of running amtrak
and then we would have progress
If you're not willing to even bother reading the whole article, much like you seem unwilling to read the many posts from people telling you that we're NOT Amtrak, then there is little point in anyone trying to explain anything to you. And the fact that you went digging for an old article, from an unreliable and anti-rail source no less, also doesn't speak well for you.I didn't read this whole article, but I think the title says it all
http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=3209
Please explain.
Enter your email address to join: