I get that, but there are other methods of getting places besides federally subsidized train service. Just cause you don't like flying doesn't mean I should help buy you a ticket.
If there is demand for service between those places you mention, then why aren't those routes profitable?
I love trains as much as the next guy, but I just don't see the purpose of using them for long distance travel in the US. NYC to LAX on the train takes three days and is $291 for a seat in coach. A direct flight on United costs $219. I don't understand why we need to use tax payers money to fund...
This might be hard to find, but what is the longest non-stop bus route in the US? I'd have to believe its no more than 4 hours or so, but I'm sure in some remote areas it could be longer.
Me too, but not all of us have 3+ days to travel coast to coast. The furthest I'd take the train would be something like Boston-Washington DC. Anything beyond that is just too long to spend travelling.
"deadheading" is the crew riding as a passenger on another train, correct?
8 hours of rest is not much, speaking from personal experience. 10 hours of rest sometimes isn't enough either.