VentureForth
Engineer
!
Yes, I was only asking for whether or not private cars are scheduled. What cars they are and who are on them does not concern me.No but apparently the DEA could tell you. I didn't see the OP asking for the car identification or passenger list. He's simply asking if there's a way to ask Amtrak for a date that doesn't have any private cars scheduled. Or at least that's how I read it. Seems like something that Amtrak could provide if it wanted to without giving up personal information on any of the passengers. Besides, if you've been reading the news recently it doesn't sound like Amtrak considers personal privacy to be something they care about in the least.I can't call Amtrak up and ask if John Madden is riding the CZ next Tuesday.
If one is running 3 hours late and have an upcoming connection with a 3 1/2 hour window, the additional one hour delay becomes very significant.Sounds like a lot of trouble to avoid a short delay. One hour on a long distance traln? That's nothing.
Thanks for this suggestion. I will check those sort of sites.Maybe you can take a look at the public trip schedule on larail.com and other similar sites and keep an eye on the upcoming trips they are selling. The date and what train they are attaching to are pretty open. Since the adhoc ones aren't published its not 100% accurate but will at least give you an idea of the days when you know it will be attached.
In Denver there were three operations: (1) detach private cars to shorten the train to fit the platform. (2) Move to the correct platform to load/unload passengers. (3) re-attach the private cars. 1 and 3 took a total of over 1 hour to accomplish. I don't know if this is typical or not.I don't think attaching PVs should cost an hour. What does it take? Pull the train forwards, throw a switch, push the train back, connect the air hoses and things, do a check, and then pull out.Sounds like a lot of trouble to avoid a short delay. One hour on a long distance traln? That's nothing.
If you're well organized, that should be doable in under 10 minutes.
I think it's long enough to hold a private car, maybe two, in addition to the regular consist. Certainly not long enough for *four*.And the new platform used by Amtrak at Denver is not long enough.Not if the platform isn't long enough.
It absolutely should not take that long; half an hour at most. I suspect the manually thrown switches are slowing things down. Hopefully that will change in 2016 when the signalling system for Denver Union Station is installed.In Denver there were three operations: (1) detach private cars to shorten the train to fit the platform. (2) Move to the correct platform to load/unload passengers. (3) re-attach the private cars. 1 and 3 took a total of over 1 hour to accomplish. I don't know if this is typical or not.
Sounds a bit like the new Miami station. I wonder how long until we hear similar complaints from there.You would think Amtrak would have required the 'new' station to have sufficient trackage to accommodate longer trains that include PV's.
This is the key change here; 20th St Viaduct was demolished and 20th Street is now mostly on an underpass. I think this has narrowed the station throat significantly. This is, as I said earlier, the limiting factor which they were working around. The street work done by the City of Denver in past years limited their options.I can't remember just how long the platform on former Track One at DUT was, but the pre-Superliner SFZ in the summer would stretch around 16 cars. The locomotive would rest under the 20th Street Viaduct
Even before all of this station work, getting the Zephyr in and out of Union Station was a bit of a ballet, due to the need to wye the train, either coming or going. I get the feeling that things are now actually worse.While there should be some inevitable delay in cutting and adding cars at Denver, it could probably be made faster. I am told that dispatcher control of the switches is not in place yet (though I have read that it should be in place when the commuter rail is opened in 2016); this may allow faster moves.
So, if there was a 2 hour delay due to three Amtrak dead-head (is that the correct term?) cars, it would have been perfectly OK?On a recent trip on the CZ (5/3) from Chicago to Emeryville there were 3 private cars at the rear of the train. In Denver this caused over an hour of additional delay, as at least one of the private cars had to be uncoupled and left on a separate track (and after passenger loading, recoupled). I was told this was because, with the 3 cars and the fact that trains must back into the Denver station, the train was so long the engine would not have been in a position in which it could be refueled.
So, if there was a 2 hour delay due to three Amtrak dead-head (is that the correct term?) cars, it would have been perfectly OK?On a recent trip on the CZ (5/3) from Chicago to Emeryville there were 3 private cars at the rear of the train. In Denver this caused over an hour of additional delay, as at least one of the private cars had to be uncoupled and left on a separate track (and after passenger loading, recoupled). I was told this was because, with the 3 cars and the fact that trains must back into the Denver station, the train was so long the engine would not have been in a position in which it could be refueled.
I think the root of the problem is having just three additional cars on the consist, not necessarily what those cars are, true?
Enter your email address to join: