MikefromCrete
Engineer
I think this same discussion raged on last year.
I attended Palmetto Junior High School in Kendall. I think I went in 1966.What school were you from penny? Mr. Bosco from North Miami Junior High put that Washington trip together every year for all the north east dade schools. I went in eight grade.
Actually, you're way off base, but I'll take this with the post below.Finally someone speaks some senseI'm not attacking Safety Patrol, but what makes me upset is when Amtrak allows people to book these dates, knowing in advance they'd be cancelled, like my Texas Eagle. The track work they were doing was scheduled months before I booked for the dates I was travelling (unbeknownst to me, because I didn't check), and yet Amtrak allowed me to book it, Then cancelled it a week in advance.
You both assume that the answer is always know in advance. How many times has track worked been extended, or just popped up? Sure I can venture to say that CSX will perform work on the Peninsula Subdivision at some point between June and August. They pretty much do it every year necessitating bus operation and/or termination on the route. Same goes for NS and their track work between ATL-BHM. However, it is not confirmed UNTIL the hosts confirm it, which may not come until week before the date. Sometimes, it comes days before the date.Given that Amtrak, IIRC, either knows the dates in advance or should have an idea of them (given 40-odd years of working with them directly) you'd think Amtrak could work something out whereby they'd block the two sets of dates up until a certain point and slap a service notice on the website, with the SP having a reasonable "drop dead date" sometime in the fall to secure the trains. The alternative would be to put a coach and a sleeper (which ought to handle the early bookers) on the front end of the train and work with the SP people (and the crew) to keep the "regular" pax separate from the SP pax.
There's one other thing I'd do with this now, and that is (on the days in question) giving the Star a diner (and possibly an extra sleeper) for the one round-trip in question. When it was a "simple" question of switching trains for someone on the A-line that was one thing; now that there's a measurable difference in service on the trains, the services are not interchangeable.
You know as much about this as you do turboliners. They have more then a leg to stand on and without going into details, has been upheld. Remember something...Amtrak is often beholden to the whims of those who fund it. I'm VERY sure that CSX and Amtrak will operate this train as long as someone wants it to operate. h34r:If someone sued Amtrak, I doubt Amtrak would have a leg to stand on. This isn't an unforseen operational reason, or "act of God," or something forced on them by the host railroads (see NS trackwork truncation of Crescent), this is Amtrak making a conscious decision to host one set of passengers over another which can't possibly be legal under common carrier standards.
I'll set my watch for next year.I think this same discussion raged on last year.
Yes, and I remember it was really cold that night (for a kid from Miami without a coat).I went in 66 as well. Did your group spend your last night in a big amusement park?
I stand by my assessment that this is a totally Mickey Mouse discussion every year.I stand by my assessment that this is a totally mickeymouse operation which degrades the political case for Amtrak being an actual transportation service. Obviously it's legal for Amtrak to do this; it is probably financially beneficial in the short term; and from what ThirdRail is implying, there are Congressmen backing this operation. It's still a ridiculous way to do things and no civilized country would do it this way. But then we live in an uncivilized country.
The operation is a black mark on Amtrak and helps make the case to cancel the Florida services. After all, this proves that they're just cruise trains, right? They're not operated for anyone who has to be anywhere on a particular DAY. Charters take priority over them, so they obviously aren't regular scheduled service.
Figured that....they probably get a free ride, and leave the overnight 'chaperoning' to the train crew.......The sleepers from what I've heard are used for the chaperones and the teachers.
And this probabilistic observation based on exactly what facts? Just curious.Figured that....they probably get a free ride, and leave the overnight 'chaperoning' to the train crew.......The sleepers from what I've heard are used for the chaperones and the teachers.
You're the Mickey Mouse, Neorden. This is a long-standing program that actually puts potential future riders on the rails. If Amtrak had the extra equipment and CSX wasn't a jerk about running extra trains, there wouldn't be this "problem." I highly doubt that two round trips a year are a political case for canceling the Florida trains. This kind of over the top commentary helps negates any actual useful opinions that you post here.I stand by my assessment that this is a totally mickeymouse operation which degrades the political case for Amtrak being an actual transportation service. Obviously it's legal for Amtrak to do this; it is probably financially beneficial in the short term; and from what ThirdRail is implying, there are Congressmen backing this operation. It's still a ridiculous way to do things and no civilized country would do it this way. But then we live in an uncivilized country.
The operation is a black mark on Amtrak and helps make the case to cancel the Florida services. After all, this proves that they're just cruise trains, right? They're not operated for anyone who has to be anywhere on a particular DAY. Charters take priority over them, so they obviously aren't regular scheduled service.
I stand by my assessment that this is a totally mickeymouse operation which degrades the political case for Amtrak being an actual transportation service. Obviously it's legal for Amtrak to do this; it is probably financially beneficial in the short term; and from what ThirdRail is implying, there are Congressmen backing this operation. It's still a ridiculous way to do things and no civilized country would do it this way. But then we live in an uncivilized country.
The operation is a black mark on Amtrak and helps make the case to cancel the Florida services. After all, this proves that they're just cruise trains, right? They're not operated for anyone who has to be anywhere on a particular DAY. Charters take priority over them, so they obviously aren't regular scheduled service.
And this probabilistic observation based on exactly what facts? Just curious.Figured that....they probably get a free ride, and leave the overnight 'chaperoning' to the train crew.......The sleepers from what I've heard are used for the chaperones and the teachers.
Okay....you're both correct...I should not have expressed my opinions on this without some basis in fact, other than just feelings....I apologize to anyone offended by this.Likely the same place he pulled out
"I suspect that the promoters of this annual event get 'more out of it' then the children do in the way of free travel as chaperones or other financial gain...."
Who cares, anyways. It's not like it's actual *people* or something we're insulting on the internet. They'll probably never read it, so we can make up whatever baseless accusations we feel like about them.
Not sure how this got into the conversation, but....There was no regular passenger service to Miami on CSX in those years, FEC had one until the tressell at Greynolds Park got blown up during the strike, they never resumed passenger service. this was a charter train. I think that trip kindled a passion in me that still 50 years latter has me planning my next train trip.
This is the Internet, you can't admit you're wrong or apologize?Okay....you're both correct...I should not have expressed my opinions on this without some basis in fact, other than just feelings....I apologize to anyone offended by this.
Yes, I remember that. My father was a heavy scheduler of business dinners and banquets. Whenever he had a reservation at a restaurant for dinner for himself, and found it unexpectedly closed without warning due to a special event, he *blacklisted that restaurant*. He's not the only one who had that reaction. Restaurants which behaved in that irresponsible way did have a tendency to close pretty quickly compared to restaurants which operated like actual restaurants.Years before the internet, it was not uncommon to show up to something like a restaurant or an amusement park and find it closed for some sort of special event.
Thanks (?) ..... :unsure:This is the Internet, you can't admit you're wrong or apologize?Okay....you're both correct...I should not have expressed my opinions on this without some basis in fact, other than just feelings....I apologize to anyone offended by this.
Seriously, that is a classy move. :hi:
Enter your email address to join: