Checked baggage being cut from Boston Section of Lake Shore?

Discussion in 'Amtrak Rail Discussion' started by lordsigma, Dec 1, 2018.

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

  1. Dec 6, 2018 #51

    Siegmund

    Siegmund

    Siegmund

    Train Attendant

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2018
    Messages:
    64
    Location:
    northwestern Montana
    Spokane switching westbound is the easiest thing in the world:

    Combined train stops alongside the platform. Lead unit pulls ahead and out of the way. Uncouple just ahead of the lounge car. The former 2nd unit remains in place, becomes the Seattle section's engine, and departs. The original lead unit backs onto the lounge car and departs for Portland ~20 minutes later.  HEP is off for 10ish minutes in the Portland section.

    Eastbound I have been asleep. Portland section still arrives first, and the end result is still the Portland engine being on the point after departure. But it must require at least one extra move-- I don't know if that extra move is the Seattle section going past the parked Portland section and backing into the platform ahead of it, or something else. Nor do I know if the Portland engine "hides" east or west of the station while waiting for the Seattle section to pass it.

    I doubt that the combined Builder has ever *needed* 3 units. It routinely ran with 2 F40s in the 80s and early 90s, and routinely runs with 2 P42s now, summer and winter. In seven trips and several dozen sightings, the only time I've ever seen a 3rd unit, it was a BNSF freight unit leading a 4-hours-late westbound, presumably after a failure somewhere west of Spokane.

    There was a gap of several years when I neither saw nor rode it -- approximately 2005-2013. Were there times when the Seattle section was heavy enough to need 2 units? Do not know. If it had 2 seattle sleepers and 3 seattle coaches, perhaps it would.  I don't recall ever seeing 3 seattle coaches, either - it would be a rarity to need them, since there are always 2 portland coaches which tend to have lots of extra capacity, and anyone not actually going past Spokane on the Seattle section is likely to get placed in them.
     
  2. Dec 7, 2018 #52

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    The EB actually runs with two engines east of SPK, not three. As to the switching operations in SPK, it’s relatively simple. On the westbound, it goes as follows:

    1. The leading locomotive uncouples from the rest of the train
    2. The Seattle section, pulled by what was the trailing locomotive, uncouples from the Portland section
    3. That first locomotive backs in and attaches to the Portland section
    4. Both sections go on their way
    And of course, on the eastbound:

    1. The Portland section locomotive uncouples
    2. The Seattle section backs onto the Portland section
    3. What was the Portland section locomotive, couples to the front of the combined train
    4. Off to Chicago
    EDIT: Darn it. Didn’t see Siegmund’s reply when I posted.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 7, 2018
  3. Dec 7, 2018 #53

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Amtrak does actually have certain locomotives designated as “pair only”, meaning that they are considered unreliable enough that they can only run together. But as I understand it, for the most part Amtrak only runs multiple locos for the motive power, and not simply so that there is a back up.
     
  4. Dec 7, 2018 #54

    lordsigma

    l

    lordsigma

    Lead Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2017
    Messages:
    489
    I saw 448 tonight. It was running with a single diesel.
     
  5. Dec 7, 2018 #55

    PVD

    P

    PVD

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2015
    Messages:
    4,091
    Location:
    NYC/Queens
    2 units on 448/9 to/from Boston is totally unnecessary, Albany to Chicago is a different story.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 7, 2018
  6. Dec 7, 2018 #56

    bratkinson

    bratkinson

    bratkinson

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    621
    Location:
    QB 101
    Amtrak has run, and continues to run LD trains with a single locomotive, especially those that are 'flat land' running.  They've run the LSL multiple times ALB-CHI with one locomotive.  After all, it IS the famed Water Level Route of the New York Central!   It's a Catch-22 to run with a single loco.  In particular, it all comes down to numbers:  How much is saved every day in fuel and maintenance costs if the 2nd locomotive is not used.  And how much is the cost in dollars if the one unit fails enroute?  Unfortunately, it would seem that passengers are not a major consideration in the latter calculation...especially if your name is Anderson.
     
  7. Dec 7, 2018 #57

    bmjhagen9426

    bmjhagen9426

    bmjhagen9426

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2014
    Messages:
    760
    Location:
    Klamath Falls, Oregon
    In December 2016 I was on the eastbound EB that had three P42s that left Portland and Seattle on December 10, 2016. After the merger in SPK, it was of the following consist, as I recall: 3 P42's, Viewliner baggage car, Trans dorm, 2 Seattle sleepers, Diner (Seattle), 2 Seattle coaches, Lounge (Portland), Portland coach-bag, Portland coach, Portland sleeper (in that order). It was particularly snowy during my trip.
     
  8. Dec 7, 2018 #58

    Triley

    T

    Triley

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,390
    Location:
    Somewhere between VAC and EUG
    This part isn't true at all, as that's not how the ticketing works on this train. Since according to Amtrak there are two trains that operate Chicago to Seattle (7 and 27), you must go in the coaches for the side of the train you purchased your ticket for.



    Yes. It can happen to the electrics too.
     
  9. Dec 7, 2018 #59

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    24,441
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    I was under the impression that electrics were run in pair for a little while when one of them had just come out of a major maintenance.
     
  10. Dec 8, 2018 #60

    Thirdrail7

    T

    Thirdrail7

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2014
    Messages:
    3,993
    That's true of any of the road power. After it comes out of major maintenance. software updates or overhaul, it will run with another unit as a test. There are other engines that may have a running repair that may operate as a pair.

    Other than that, there are only a few trains that actually require multiple units for the terrain. Most of it is for the schedule.
     
  11. Dec 8, 2018 #61

    Acela150

    Acela150

    Acela150

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,408
    Location:
    In a Sea of Foam
    IINM, The engines that take the train from CHI to SEA stay on the train in SPK. And there is a unit for the train to Portland in SPK. No locomotive swapping needed. 

    The main reason for 2 units on 448/449 is that the Boston section of the LSL is on the front of the train. And the two units will take the entire train from ALB. 

    Overall for both the LSL and EB if they add a unit or remove a unit from a train it would dramatically extend the dwell time. 
     
  12. Dec 8, 2018 #62

    brianpmcdonnell17

    brianpmcdonnell17

    brianpmcdonnell17

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2016
    Messages:
    1,164
    Location:
    Chicago, Illinois
    In my experience, if not travelling west of Spokane the ticketed train number has no influence on the assigned car. For example, on my recent trip to Essex all coach passengers going to Essex were placed in the Portland section, while all on the return were placed in the Seattle section.
     
  13. Dec 8, 2018 #63

    PVD

    P

    PVD

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2015
    Messages:
    4,091
    Location:
    NYC/Queens
    It is clearly a time saver if you are sending 2 to Chicago, what I was trying to point out is that the choice of 1 or 2 to Chicago has a lot more points to debate than Albany to Boston. When it was temporarily a shuttle, it had no reason to use 2.
     
  14. Dec 8, 2018 #64

    lordsigma

    l

    lordsigma

    Lead Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2017
    Messages:
    489
    There is a push for expanded Boston - Springfield service possibly extending out to Pittsfield. If they desired to go the Amtrak corridor route for this service I could see the Boston section being eliminated and converted to a Shuttle that would operate as part of that corridor and timed to meet 48/49 especially if it was decided to have Albany as the west end of the corridor.
     
  15. Dec 8, 2018 #65

    neroden

    n

    neroden

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2014
    Messages:
    7,297
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY
    News.  On 448 today, checked luggage at Boston was "pick up at trainside".  Which worked.  Hopefully this means they are keeping checked baggage.
     
  16. Dec 8, 2018 #66

    AG1

    A

    AG1

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2018
    Messages:
    769
    I have always "picked up at trainside" at Boston, both LSL and  66. One of the smaller bags is mine. I agree there isn't much baggage on the ALB-BOS route, although this was an April trip, not peak travel season..

    DSC00097.JPG
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 8, 2018
  17. Dec 8, 2018 #67

    neroden

    n

    neroden

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2014
    Messages:
    7,297
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY
    There was an entire cart of transfer bags coming off 448 (presumably for 67?), so discontinuing checked bags at Boston would be a big mess.

    Get the bag dorms delivered, Mr Anderson!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 8, 2018
  18. Dec 8, 2018 #68

    lordsigma

    l

    lordsigma

    Lead Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2017
    Messages:
    489
    According to website last day of checked baggage is 1/6
     
  19. Dec 8, 2018 #69

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    As long as they are going to Pittsfield, why not go all in and continue on to Albany? It’s not much further and you get connections two five other routes.
     
  20. Dec 8, 2018 #70

    keelhauled

    k

    keelhauled

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2014
    Messages:
    810
    Location:
    Camorr
    As long as Massachusetts is funding service, it's in their interest to promote travel within the state, and to better integrate the western part of the state with the Boston MSA, instead of providing a route for people to spend money in New York.  Although the point is probably moot in all of our lifetimes anyway, given how long it will take to negotiate capacity increases from Worcester to Springfield with CSX, then to fund them, then to build them...then do the whole thing again to Pittsfield, except this time with more challenging topography.
     
  21. Dec 8, 2018 #71

    TiBike

    TiBike

    TiBike

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    637
    Location:
    Alta California
    They still have bicycle and pet slots for sale, though. Probably a glitch, but it's been long enough that you'd think they would have caught it. Maybe it's real?
     
  22. Dec 8, 2018 #72

    AG1

    A

    AG1

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2018
    Messages:
    769
    The expansion talk about Boston to Springfield is for MBTA commuter rail service , not Amtrak.
     
  23. Dec 8, 2018 #73

    lordsigma

    l

    lordsigma

    Lead Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2017
    Messages:
    489
    I don’t think those details have been determined yet. Right now they are studying different options and nothing has been decided. MBTA has been talked about, as well as Amtrak converting some of the Springfield Shuttles into New Haven - Boston. The first determination will be the western terminus - either Springfield or Pittsfield and trip time. The method of operations and operator will surely be decided later after they determine station stops, trip time, etc.
     
  24. Dec 8, 2018 #74

    lordsigma

    l

    lordsigma

    Lead Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2017
    Messages:
    489
    If they decided to go with Amtrak as the operator And wanted to go as far as Pittsfield I wouldn’t be surprised if they went all the way to Albany. But it may only terminate at Springfield and in that case they may do a New Haven - Boston option. They may also do neither and operate it as MBTA commuter service.
     
  25. Dec 8, 2018 #75

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Sorry, when you say “converting some of the New Haven-Springfield Shuttles to New Haven - Boston”, would that be via Springfield, or the standard route through Providence?
     

Share This Page

arrow_white