St. Paul Union Station (SPUD)

Advertise with us
Shop deals on ebay
shop deals on amazon
Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
When I stopped in for a look-see in June 2014 an Amtrak ticket agent said he hated the new station because of the "parking", which I assume in a big city means you have to pay dearly for it. Could that have driven away some customers?
 
I agree with jebr - I don't think the change in stations had much if anything to do with ridership changes at MSP. Passenger traffic at MSP started falling well before Amtrak changed from Midway Station to Union Depot in mid-2014. If anything, traffic has stopped dropping and held steady since the move.

Ridership on the Empire Builder overall has fallen from 5-10 years ago when the massive service disruptions on the line really started. Just looking at traffic at MSP without comparing it to overall Empire Builder traffic doesn't exactly paint a complete picture.
 
The disproportionate decline at MSP compared to the ridership change with the Empire Builder took place before the move to St. Paul Union Depot. The move to SPUD does not seem to have impacted ridership at MSP.

Amtrak moved to SPUD on May 7, 2014 (midway through FY2014). From FY2006 to FY2013, Empire Builder ridership grew 7.9% (from 497,020 to 536,391, with a high of 554,226 in FY2008). In that same period, ridership (boardings and alightings) at MSP dropped 14.7% (from 137,227 to 116,991, with a high of 147,791 in FY2008). While the EB gained nearly 40,000 riders, the count at MSP dropped by over 20,000.

From FY2013 (last full year at MSP Midway) to FY2016, the relative change in ridership between the EB and MSP has been pretty close to proportionate. The EB has dropped 15.2% to 454,525, and MSP has dropped 17.5% to 96,539.

EBvMSP.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
niemi24s said:
When I stopped in for a look-see in June 2014 an Amtrak ticket agent said he hated the new station because of the "parking", which I assume in a big city means you have to pay dearly for it. Could that have driven away some customers?
Click to expand...
I think PRR60 shows that the parking issue has relatively little to do with it. I'd generally agree - while I'm sure a few customers have either decided to get on at St. Cloud or Red Wing because of the free parking, it's unlikely to be the cause of a major ridership drop. Parking in the far lot at SPUD is $6/day weekdays, $4/day weekends. For city parking that's pretty reasonable.

I would speculate that the abnormal drop at MSP is a mix of inexpensive bus service offering a cheap ground alternative to Amtrak, especially eastbound, and the MSP - Chicago market becoming extremely competitive on the airline side, causing airfares to become rather inexpensive. It's not uncommon to find airfares even cheaper than Amtrak's Saver fare from MSP - Chicago even on Southwest or the legacy carriers. That certainly doesn't help Amtrak out.
 
attachicon.gif
EBvMSP.png

If we take the difference of 2016 SPUD ridership from 2006 Midway it is 41,688 add that to 2016's 454,625 = 506,313 which is more than Builder's total ridership in 2006 of 497,020. So maybe we can conclude that SPUD alone contributed to the Empire's total decline in ridership ? Now to further muddy the waters does those figures include both loadings and unloading's ? Then it would 1/2 of 41.688 = 20,844 or 454,625 = 471,469 which is somewhat less than 2006.

It may be actual figures some where in between ?

Isn't statistical math fuzzy ?,

Now if any of you thinks this poster believes any of this ------ I have this bridge
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A big part of the drop in ridership between 2006 and 2016 occurred before the move from Midway Station to Union Depot - can't really blame ridership declines from 2008 to 2011 on Union Depot.
 
willem said:
The name of the restaurant really was (and is, in the other two locations) Christos, not Christo's. It does look foreign to American eyes, probably because it is foreign. If it were possessive (it's not), in English it would be Christos', and in Greek it would be Christou.

Who knows, this might be on the test.
Click to expand...
In Chicago, we add an 's to everything!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top