VIA Rail Coach Equipment Poll

Shop deals on ebay
shop deals on amazon
Advertise with us
Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

What are your favourite VIA Rail Coaches?

  • Budd 62/60-seat Long Distance Coach (HEP)

    Votes: 5 45.5%

  • Budd 68/56-seat Short Distance Coach (HEP-II)

    Votes: 2 18.2%

  • Bombardier 68/56-seat LRC Coach

    Votes: 2 18.2%

  • Metropolitan-Cammell 48-seat Renaissance Coach

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • Total voters
    11
Swadian Hardcore

Swadian Hardcore

Engineer
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
7,364
Location
On The Road
I've been wanting to do this for a while. Very few people seem to compare the various coaches operated by VIA Rail, there's informal sleeper polls, loco discussions, etc., but nothing much about the coaches. VIA Rail has a lot of interesting, unique coaches from a wide timespan, they all have their own advantages and disadvatages, but it's hard to find a good source of information on their different characteristics. Note that most Amtrak coaches are reletively similar in interiors, seating, etc..

Choose your favourite coach and maybe describe why it's your favourite. Here are your choices:

Budd 62-seat Long Distance Coach (HEP)

8100-8129 ex-Canadian Pacific

8130-8145 from US roads

8145-8147 from US roads (60 seats and bar)

http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/our-fleet/coach-car-units-8100-8147

Used throughout the network. Rarely used on Corridor.

Budd 68-seat Short Distance Coach (HEP-II)

Budd 56-seat Short Distance "Business Class" Coach (HEP-II)

4100-4125 from US roads (68-seat galley installed)

http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/our-fleet/coach-car-units-4100-4125

4000-4009 from US roads (56-seat galley installed) BC

http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/our-fleet/galley-club-car

Used on Corridor and Skeena.

Bombardier 68-seat Short Distance "Light Rapid Comfortable" Coach

Bombardier 56-seat Short Distance "Light Rapid Comfortable Business Class" Coach

REPRESENTS ALL LRC'S

3300-3399 built for VIA Rail (68-seat galley installed)

http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/our-fleet/lrc-coach

3451-3475 built for VIA Rail (56-seat galley installed) BC

http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/our-fleet/lrc-club-car-units-3451-3475

3600-3601 built for VIA Rail (56-seat galley installed) BC

http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/our-fleet/lrc-club-car-units-3600-3601

Used on Corridor only.

Metropolitan-Cammell 48-seat "Renaissance" Coach

COACH AND CLUB ARE IDENTICAL

7100-7113 built for cancelled Nightstar (BC actually identical)

http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/our-fleet/renaissance-club-car

7200-7232 built for cancelled Nightstar

http://www.viarail.ca/en/about-via-rail/our-fleet/renaissance-coach-car

Used on Corridor and Ocean.

Of course, the HEP-II and LRC cars are put together because if the different versions were put to the test against each other, obviously the Business Class would win over the Economy Class cars. For the Renaissance cars however, the Business and Economy cars are identical.

Hopefully this poll/thread gets more than just a few votes/posts. Would really like to know what you guys think, with some loving the Budds, some loving the LRC's (especially rebuilt ones), and some loving the Renaissance cars. Don't know much about VIA myself.
 
Disclaimer: I've never ridden VIA.

I picked the Renaissance/Mk4 cars, as I like the MK4 cars over in the UK. However the if I were picking lounges it would have to be the Park cars.

peter
 
PerRock said:
Disclaimer: I've never ridden VIA.

I picked the Renaissance/Mk4 cars, as I like the MK4 cars over in the UK. However the if I were picking lounges it would have to be the Park cars.

peter
Click to expand...
You've never ridden VIA at all? Do note that the Renaissance cars have very different interiors from the Mark 4 cars.

I've tried the LRC on a short joyride but did not like the poor legroom. I've heard the HEP-II coaches have a bit better legroom even though they have the same interior. Seemed like less legroom than Amtrak SD coach.
 
I agree with Anderson, I also picked the Budd Coaches! Ive enjoyed my many rides on the VIA Corridor between Windsor, Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal! (they made a pretty decent Sleeping Car and Dome Car also! ;) I only rode in a LD Budd Coach from Vancouver to

Jasper but found it Comfortable!)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anderson said:
The Corridor Budds have given me some of the best rail rides I've ever had, hence I picked them.
Click to expand...
Ah, I see the Corridor Budds may well be better than the LRC originals! Maybe I ought to try them out if I can get on the Skeena this year.

How do they compare versus the LD Budds? I know they have a bit more seating (=less legroom?) but maybe their seats are better, maybe the interior, or the ride quality?
 
Swadian Hardcore said:
Anderson said:
The Corridor Budds have given me some of the best rail rides I've ever had, hence I picked them.
Click to expand...
Ah, I see the Corridor Budds may well be better than the LRC originals! Maybe I ought to try them out if I can get on the Skeena this year.

How do they compare versus the LD Budds? I know they have a bit more seating (=less legroom?) but maybe their seats are better, maybe the interior, or the ride quality?
Click to expand...
At least in BC, they were very comfortable (moreso than the seat I wound up with on the VIA Adirondack). That said, I've never actually done coach in Canada, so I feel unqualified to answer that question.
 
Corridor: Renaissance for the huge tray-table for working on and the option to have a single seat. Other than that, the LRC equipment is just fine and comfortable to ride. The HEP-II’s have comfortable seats and nice interiors but I found the ride quality rough.

Long Distance Coach: The original CPR Canadian HEP-I coaches.
 
But how does the LRC compare against the HEP-II? I heard that the HEP-II actually ride quite smoothly if you sit towards the middle.

So as far as the seats themselves, the HEP-I is definitely the best? Probably has the most legroom too. Are the Ren seats widest, since they have only three a row?
 
Seats in the LRCs and HEP-IIs are nearly identical. One shortcoming of both…..the tray-table is very small and folds out of the armrest.



And I’ve always found the ride quality of the old Budds to be rougher but as you say, it improves towards the middle, away from the wheels.



I’ve never measured Ren seats but they do seem a bit wider perhaps due to only three-across but the actual width of the car is narrower than standard North American equipment.



Here’s a Ren interior.



DSC00394.JPG




…..and the large Ren tray-table compared to the LRC (Breakfast in Business Class – first course)



DSC00393.JPG
 
The Rens are an awkward setup from my point of view; they're not bad...I'm just not a fan. The Budds, IMHO, have a smoother ride, and at least in BC the seats have seemed to line up quite well with the windows.
 
Nice pics, NS VIA Fan. Thanks a bunch for those files you sent me. According to the HEP-II file, a page 47 caption says (paraphrashed), "While the interior resembles that of the LRC cars, the new generation of seats feature a number of improvements over those used in the LRCs."

So if comparing the seats, are they really better? I guess the window seat must be better on the Budd HEP-II's because I didn't like the slanted sides on the LRC.

I agree with Anderson that the Renaissance cars look awkward, interior looks like a glorified regional jet. I don't think I would like the curved sides, which is one of the reasons I don't like to fly and also affects my bus preferences.

From this thread I assume that the HEP-II's ride rougher than LRC's but are somewhat more comfortable? Then Rens are really out for debate, some like them, some hate them. I have heard they are very unreliable.

What about HEP-I vs HEP-II?
 
About the only improvement in a HEP-II seat over an LRC I can think of is the placement of the tray-table. It flips out of the side armrests on a HEP-II instead of the centre armrest on the LRC. This allows the centre armrest on the HEP-II to be folded up when the adjacent seat is not occupied for more room. Seat comfort is the same.
 
NS VIA Fan said:
About the only improvement in a HEP-II seat over an LRC I can think of is the placement of the tray-table. It flips out of the side armrests on a HEP-II instead of the centre armrest on the LRC. This allows the centre armrest on the HEP-II to be folded up when the adjacent seat is not occupied for more room. Seat comfort is the same.
Click to expand...
I haven't ridden on any of the cars under discussion, but since I am of average build, I kind of like the idea of having a more substantial center armrest (that contains the tray tables), simply to insure that some larger than average person occupying the adjacent seat is less likely to encroach upon my space....
 
Then I guess if I had to choose between the HEP-I and HEP-II on the Skeena I would have to go with the HEP-I. Their seats seem to be the beat in both comfort and legroom.

Who made these seats? I hear Heywood-Wakefield made them, the same company that made the Sleepy Hollow seats. Anyone know who exactly made them?

Railiner, nice to see you back. Another vacation?

Found a picture: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hPo8aXtoFKE/T9LJZJsPzLI/AAAAAAAAAKQ/aiEPV9ktzY0/s1600/seats.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Heywood-Wakefield http://www.heywood-wakefield.com/ , is a different company that purchased the name of the famous, long defunct company that built the wonderful Sleepy Hollow seats, long ago....the current company does not have a commercial seating division like the old one did.

I haven't been away, except for vacation from 5-17 January.....but thanks for the welcome, anyway... :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just busy at the station?

Thanks for the heads-up about Heywood-Wakefield, Jason of Rapido Trains has ex-VIA Heywood-Wakefield seats in his living room: http://www.rapidotrains.com/blog/2012/01/26/immersed-in-trains/.

So I was thinking that VIA's light blue "Daynighter" seats might also be made by Heywood-Wakefield. Looking at multiple pictures of the Sleepy Hollows, I see their signature is those banded cushions which I can't find anywhere else. If anyone has ridden in Daynighter seats, how are they in comparison to the Sleepy Hollow?

Edit: These seats in the Park Car dome look like Sleepy Hollow: http://johnnyjet.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/GeorgieJet-Via-RailBritish-Columbia-2012-5.jpg.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When the Dayniters were first introduced by CN in the early ‘70s.......this was the style of seats. They were built in the company shops.

Image%2520%25283%2529.jpg


Image%2520%25284%2529.jpg


Image.jpg


Image%2520%25282%2529.jpg
 
Those are Dayniter seats? But they really do look very different from the seats in VIA's HEP-I coaches. Where did the HEP-I seats come from anyway? I thought they were "Daynighter" seats but it appears not to be the case, unless there is a difference between "Dayniter" and "Daynighter".

I guess what I'm really trying to decide right now is HEP-I vs HEP-II, since they both run on the Skeena.

And do any of these coaches smell real bad? I know that different bus models smell very different, a few models make me gag while some others actually smell pleasent.
 
Here http://streamlinermemories.info/?p=261 is a link with the story behind the supremely comfortable, Sleepy Hollow seats....

They were made in a variety of versions... short-back such as shown in a link in previous post #17, to allow visibility in Vista-Domes, high-back, singles, doubles, reclining and rotating, with or without footrests and legrests....

IMHO, they are the most comfortable seat for long-distance travel ever made, and I include the latest lie-flat seats in First Class airliner cabins....

I could easily do a "west coast turnaround" in one of them..... :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest posts

Back
Top