Amtrak Siemens Charger locomotive (SC44, ALC42, ALC42E) (2015 - 1Q 2024)
- Thread starter randomguy65
- Start date
Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:
- Status
Pere Flyer
Lead Service Attendant
Man, I cannot get enough of that “Amtrak Midwest” livery. Looks sleek and classy and makes me proud to be a Midwesterner.
cpotisch
Engineer
I like the livery, but I don't love the Charger itself. My main quips are the (seemingly) tiny windows, and the fact that the front suddenly drops away and recedes a bit. If it didn't look like the front end had gone through a mandoline, I'd be all for it.
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
My favorite Charger livery ...
cpotisch
Engineer
frequentflyer
Conductor
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,172
Would look lovely in Phase 3 livery. Its a shame that nose wouldn't make it a month out on Amtrak's system.I'm personally not too in love with the Brightline livery (though it's grown on me a bit), but I absolutely love the shape of the SCB-40. Sleek and simple - it reminds me of the Thalys and Eurostar locomotives.My favorite Charger livery ...
cpotisch
Engineer
It's also about 400 horsepower less powerful than the SC-44, which wouldn't be ideal for hauling 10+ car bi-level trains.Would look lovely in Phase 3 livery. Its a shame that nose wouldn't make it a month out on Amtrak's system.I'm personally not too in love with the Brightline livery (though it's grown on me a bit), but I absolutely love the shape of the SCB-40. Sleek and simple - it reminds me of the Thalys and Eurostar locomotives.My favorite Charger livery ...
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
That 400HP derating specified by Brightline was to reduce cost of maintenance and extend engine life. It makes sense for them since they intend to use two units with 10 car single level trains.
west point
Engineer
Brightline does need that extra HP on an essentially flat track. Wonder if the HP can be temporarily increased in case of one loco failing ?
keelhauled
OBS Chief
Very much doubt that Cummins would let the customer have that kind of control over the ECU.
PerRock
Engineer
It's just a aerodynamic bolt on nose. All someone would have to do is unbolt the existing "nose" and bolt on the Brightline one. There's a picture somewhere of one of the Brightline engines being built & it has the same front end as the Amtrak ones.
peter
peter
frequentflyer
Conductor
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,172
The Genesis had a bolt on nose too so that it could be changed quickly after grade accidents.
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
It is a short railroad. It would be no problem for a train to complete its trip only slightly behind schedule with a single engine and 400 extra hp won’t make that much of a difference.
cpotisch
Engineer
I feel like an extra 400 hp wouldn't make much difference, especially since it's only pulling 10 single level cars, on a 1 hour 15 minute (eventually 3 hour) route. It runs a little slower, gets to the end of the line, and has the engine fixed/replaced.
EDIT: Just saw jis's post. I guess great minds think alike.
Last edited by a moderator:
bcanedy
Train Attendant
Does the connection between the Brightline Chargers and passenger cars use a conventional coupler or is it a drawbar making it more time consuming to disconnect?
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Their intention is to keep the consists together when they are out on the road, and make any changes, including loco substitution, only at maintenance facilities, except I guess when things like derailment or collision recovery is involved.
chrsjrcj
OBS Chief
It's the same as between the passenger cars.
The only standard coupler is on the front of the loco, hidden behind the nosecone.
frequentflyer
Conductor
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,172
What proprietary couple does Siemens have and why? What are its advantages?
chrsjrcj
OBS Chief
Brightline went with the semi-permanent sets, not Siemens.
Why Brightline did it? I don't know. But for what it's worth, their Chief Mechanical Officer (Tom Rutkowski) worked on the Acela at one point. That might have played a roll.
Aren't a couple of the new single level cars for California semi-permanently coupled too?
Why Brightline did it? I don't know. But for what it's worth, their Chief Mechanical Officer (Tom Rutkowski) worked on the Acela at one point. That might have played a roll.
Aren't a couple of the new single level cars for California semi-permanently coupled too?
brianpmcdonnell17
Conductor
I don't know the specifications of the California cars, but the Midwest ones are set up so that certain cars are permanently attached to each other.
chrsjrcj
OBS Chief
Ok, maybe it was the Midwest cars. Could not remember off the top of my head.
chrsjrcj
OBS Chief
Right. I found the PowerPoint presentation http://www.highspeed-rail.org/Documents/NGEC_annual%20meeting%202018_CALIDOT%20presentation.pptx that shows it.
So I guess both are getting semi-permanently coupled cars, in some capacity.
cirdan
Engineer
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,659
How would that work in practice?
Would rescue / wrecking crews be instructed in how to unbolt the permanent couplers?
Or is there even some trick for an easy release?
Or would they just saw them through and let the workshop guys work out how to take it from there?
At one railroad museum where I volunteered a long long time ago, we were rescuing a steam loco from another museum who had dumped it outseide and basicalyl let it rot.
We had a contractor in to lift the engine with a crane or place it on a flatbed truck.
Unfortuantely, they were in a hurry, and rather than consult with the museum guys on how best to separate the tender, they just cut through the drawbar without asking, causing a lot of unnecessary damage.
- Status
