Viewliner II Part 2: Dining Car Production, Delivery, Speculation

Shop deals on ebay
Advertise with us
shop deals on amazon
Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
cpotisch said:
AmtrakBlue said:
cpotisch said:
Just-Thinking-51 said:
cpotisch said:
And there is no chance that the Star would get a dining car before the LSL. The Lake Shore lost the dining car due to Heritage diner shortages. The Star lost its dining car to cut costs. Because the Silver Star doesn't have a diner, the train now only needs one locomotive, and they ditched ALL the diner staff.
Click to expand...
Sorry dont think the Star dinning staff was cut, I recall they are still working, but on a longer schedule. In example ever 9th day compares to ever 7th day. Random numbers used for explanations. Now it been a few years, one think simple turnovers, and retirement would downsize the crew base. Be interesting if the Unions would fight to stop the crew from going back to the normal work schedule?
Click to expand...
What do you mean? The Silver Star doesn’t have a dining car, so it obviously doesn’t have dining car staff. Sorry if I’m misunderstanding your post.
Click to expand...
They're probably working other trains, like the Meteor. Or they working in other capacities on the Star.
Click to expand...
Oh, I see. I would have thought that Amtrak would ‘cut loose’ some of the staff, if they were no longer needed for the SS diner. There were probably around 20 total dining car staff on the Star (between the four consists). Does Amtrak really have use for all of them elsewhere?
Click to expand...
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of how Amtrak staffing works. The crew for any single train is a drop in the bucket for their overall staffing numbers.
 
68017 is released for service. Thanks for the pictures, Fleet One and Fleet Three. (I always forget about MGL!)

lordsigma said:
Though If the reason is they have changed their minds and want to keep the current "diner-lite" setup, technically there is nothing forcing them to restore a full menu even with the Viewliner diners. I could see them putting the new cars on the LSL and Cardinal but keeping the same current menu. One way Amtrak could alter its diner operations is to use a diner-lite style menu at off peak times of the year and then offer a fuller menu at peak times that takes full advantage of the car's facilities. One could argue it makes sense for them to still replace the old rolling stock with the new Viewliner cars on those trains even if they don't want to resume a full Diner menu. This is of course just speculation, but they aren't necessarily forced to expand the menu immediately just by using the physical car on the train.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif


While the cars may enter service, they may end up being diner lites, cafe/lounges, full service dining cars or cafeteria cars. We'll see what the summer brings.

Time will tell but as Jis mentioned, I just don't get the feeling you'll see a full service dining car return to the LSL..in the immediate future.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jis said:
I was merely guessing that they will do it with the time table change for the Summer or some such. I don;t think they will do it the day after they have sufficient number of Diners.
Click to expand...
Now with the GCT shuffle seemingly lasting till Labor Day, perhaps Diner Service can safely be written off until Labor Day. Again, jus ta thought based on nothing concrete.
 
jis said:
jis said:
I was merely guessing that they will do it with the time table change for the Summer or some such. I don;t think they will do it the day after they have sufficient number of Diners.
Click to expand...
Now with the GCT shuffle seemingly lasting till Labor Day, perhaps Diner Service can safely be written off until Labor Day. Again, jus ta thought based on nothing concrete.
Click to expand...
I was thinking the same thing. Boston is not set up to service and stock a full service diner. Getting them set up from a catering and maintenance standpoint for just three months does not seem worth the aggravation. Meanwhile, they can get some more cars delivered, get Chicago up to speed with the new diners over the summer, and return the full service diner to the Lake Shore when it makes its triumphant return to NYP in September.
 
Personally I wish the diner was based out of Boston, with the longer trip and getting back well into the evening hours. But, I understand that operationally it makes more sense to have it in New York. Wishful thinking, the diner based out of Boston with a Bag/Dorm to support the staff.
 
stappend said:
Personally I wish the diner was based out of Boston, with the longer trip and getting back well into the evening hours. But, I understand that operationally it makes more sense to have it in New York. Wishful thinking, the diner based out of Boston with a Bag/Dorm to support the staff.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Southampton Street would throw an apoplectic fit if they were asked to handle a Diner I would imagine. They have enough problem with a single Sleeper as it is.
default_smile.png
 
I don't know if this fits the topic but from another group, heritage diner 8505 will be used as an axle count car
 
cpotisch said:
CHvision said:
I don't know if this fits the topic but from another group, heritage diner 8505 will be used as an axle count car
Click to expand...
What's an axle count car?
Click to expand...
It's a non-revenue car tacked onto the end of a train so that the train has enough axles to be allowed to run on the host railroad's tracks. CN is the only railroad I know of that has this requirement for some of the Midwest Corridor trains.

peter
 
The history is that about 10-15 years ago, Amtrak had a couple of grade crossing collisions on the CN where the gates reportedly failed to activate. It was determined that apparently CN's track circuits were shitty enough that four- or five-car train (or whatever the length was) wasn't enough to trigger the crossing gates. Ever since, both the Carbondale line and the Port Huron line have had minimum axle counts (and possibly different minimum counts for each line...not sure), so even if Amtrak only needs 2 or 3 cars for the passenger load, they have to run a bunch of deadhead cars just to get enough axles, because apparently fixing grade crossings is too hard for CN to do in only a decade.
 
a lot of it has to do with car maintenance, the axles have ground bushes on them, but if you do not maintain those the light railcars of today simply won't shunt.

same played a roll in bearing failures on NJT EMU's a few years back .
 
So Montpelier and Nashville are currently in Hialeah? And Montgomery is in service on the Meteor?

Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum
 
Hi,

Does anyone have the floor plan for the upcoming V-2 baggage/sleeper combine and full sleepers?
 
DSS&A said:
Hi,

Does anyone have the floor plan for the upcoming V-2 baggage/sleeper combine and full sleepers?
Click to expand...
I don’t have an actual floor plan but the Bag-Dorms will be 8 Roomettes, with the rest the baggage area. Full sleepers have the exact same layout as the V-Is, with the exception of the two roomettes that were replaced with shared bathrooms.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top