Like buttons can keep a thread from getting bloated with short posts saying "This", "I agree", etc.
Trump and Amtrak/Budget cutting funding
- Thread starter tommylicious
- Start date
Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:
Ryan
Court Jester
^^^ What she said.
The functionality is there, just needs to be turned on.
The functionality is there, just needs to be turned on.
WoodyinNYC
Conductor
You're right. I only know some of his NYC buildings and hadn't paid attention to this one in Vegas. But yes:
Does this mean the White House could become the Gold House? 
I would guess Trump would occupy a middle ground between a couple of candidates who are perhaps likely to propose budgets that would increase Amtrak funding and a couple of candidates who are perhaps likely to propose budgets that would decrease Amtrak funding (just looking at the Top 5 candidates, 2 Ds, 3 Rs). Or maybe it would be better to say he is a big question mark - perhaps increase, perhaps decrease, perhaps status quo, in regards to Amtrak funding.
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Remember that the President only proposes numbers, which are typically mostly ignored by Congress. It is Congress that comes up with the numbers that actually become law.
PerRock
Engineer
JoeBas
Conductor
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2011
- Messages
- 1,214
I INSIST on a "Meh" button.
Devil's Advocate
⠀⠀⠀
I'm EXTREMELY lukewarm to this request.
Philly Amtrak Fan
Engineer
We all talk about if the right candidates get voted in then Amtrak will flourish.
Well Amtrak hasn't flourished since its inception from what I remember. We've had many more cuts and many cities lose service than we have gains/expansions (and I believe most if not all of the gains have been state funded).
Have we just voted in the wrong people for over 40 years? Or maybe Congress doesn't really have as much an effect on Amtrak as we think they do?
Well Amtrak hasn't flourished since its inception from what I remember. We've had many more cuts and many cities lose service than we have gains/expansions (and I believe most if not all of the gains have been state funded).
Have we just voted in the wrong people for over 40 years? Or maybe Congress doesn't really have as much an effect on Amtrak as we think they do?
Were it not for Congress, Amtrak would not exist. Two different Presidential administrations - Reagan and Bush - proposed to end all subsidies for Amtrak (sometimes with a vague, fictional promise that private interests would pick up the "profitable" portions).
In the horse trading necessary to pass a budget through a dysfunctional Congress every year, Amtrak is always shortchanged, with compromises that provide just enough funding to keep the trains rolling another year. But it survives every fiscal year too - thanks to the same Congress.
Such shortsighted planning has to change, of course, a point which was made previously - circa 1981 as I recall. Amazing how little the politics have changed.
Last edited by a moderator:
Philly Amtrak Fan
Engineer
There's a lot of cities for which Amtrak didn't survive and others who still have service but lost one or more trains (like Philly who lost the Broadway Limited/Three Rivers) for example. Don't ask someone from Phoenix or Las Vegas about Amtrak "surviving" because Amtrak didn't survive for them.
Last edited by a moderator:
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
And it should also be remembered that there are many cities which did not have service on A-Day got service. and some then lost it. Sunset East, Pioneer and Desert Wind are case in point. OTOH Lake Shore Limited was added after A-Day. So there has been ebbs and flows in the history of Amtrak. But make no mistake - Amtrak is a creation and creature of Congress and it lives and dies by what Congress does with it. People who think that an Amtrak CEO can brazenly defy Congress (and even just powerful chairmen in Congress) and go his own way are living in a fool's paradise.
I'm reserving my vote for Mr. Hud....er Jim....uh Bob Dylan until I know who his running mate will be!!!
The list of AU'ers would be long and illustrious.
Radvlad
Train Attendant
How the heck can Las Vegas not support service from Amtrak? Even if it was just Los Angeles/San Francisco to Vegas? I'm also surprised that Phoenix couldn't hang on to service. Wow.
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2003
- Messages
- 8,507
Let's keep this focused on what we think is or will be Donald Trump's position on Amtrak. In that regard, discussion of the comparative Amtrak positions of other candidates of both parties is fine. To discuss issues like Phoenix and Las Vegas service, please start a new topic.
I'm suspending my campaign, and hereby announce that, if Trump is nominated and elected, Everything, including Amtrak, will be HUGE!!!
( and someone else will pay for it!)
( and someone else will pay for it!)
Last edited by a moderator:
greatcats
Engineer
Bob- I am writing you in, anyway.
sldispatcher
Train Attendant
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2008
- Messages
- 78
As others have stated, I would think Amtrak could actually get a boost from Trump. Not sure about the LD trains, but the day trains could really get a pop.
NW cannonball
Conductor
I don't have a clue what the big D might do, or not. The best info I got is, from some source or other, that The Donald was into sponsoring Pro Wrestling a while back.
His candidacy so so far seems like the stuff that "pro wrestlers" spout from the ring before their (fixed) bouts happen. Duh.
I doubt that this dude with his own private Boeing jet has any clue at all about Amtrak users, he's targeting a different demographic now.
Maybe, if elected, he might choose to sponsor "Trumptrak" or not. Who knows?
His candidacy so so far seems like the stuff that "pro wrestlers" spout from the ring before their (fixed) bouts happen. Duh.
I doubt that this dude with his own private Boeing jet has any clue at all about Amtrak users, he's targeting a different demographic now.
Maybe, if elected, he might choose to sponsor "Trumptrak" or not. Who knows?
andersone
Conductor
Well from an Ohio perspective if we relecTED (Ted Strickland ) to the senate the former congressman and governor actually started down the 3C path until he was replaced by Kasich who deep sixed it. That should give inspiration for two elections !!!
Last edited by a moderator:
Devil's Advocate
⠀⠀⠀
Not even Trump himself has stated he would boost Amtrak. Trump has simply claimed, in the most simplistic terms possible, that he would fix all of Americas infrastructure problems with no explanation as to how any of his "plans" would actually work or why the establishment wing of either party would capitulate to his demands. What other people have tried to say, and you have apparently ignored, is that Trump is no position to control Amtrak's purse strings regardless of his largely undefined position. In order to have any direct control over Amtrak's future Trump would have to threaten a veto over lack of Amtrak funding. Which is a position that would likely incur a serious opportunity cost and force the expenditure of substantial political capital. This seems unlikely to me considering all the other controversies Trump has created or bought into. I think it's virtually guaranteed that the NEC will remain intact in some form regardless of who is elected, but the likelihood that Trump (or any other GOTP candidate) supports having Amtrak run it seems exceedingly unlikely to me. It seems far more likely to me that Trump's "solution" will be to privatize Amtrak as part of a giveaway to one or more of his fellow cronies, just like Putin or Burlesconi would.
Last edited by a moderator:
