#7(10) service disruption

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah, if this was just for a month or so none of us would be having this discussion. EB #8 is over 9 hours late this AM BTW. We shall see how long this continues.
But it is just a month, actually not even yet.
it seems a lot longer to some of us "armchair engineers" as we recall what seemed to be some questionable weather related delays and cancellations through the winter and the suspension of service before the resumption in july.
 
Two additional reasons for delays:

1. New priorities (shorter end-to-end times) for BNSF Z trains with UPS traffic. I believe that if BNSF fails to deliver a Z train on time, the customers don't have to pay - or something like that - and that probably adds up to a lot more $$ than FRA fines.

2. Bakken Shale oil extraction activity west of Minot. Much of this oil will be shipped by unit trains, and the loop tracks to load oil are under construction now. At the moment delays are occurring because shipments of pipe and fracking sand are set out on sidings for transloading, thus preventing meets on these sidings. In the future there will be unit oil trains adding to congestion on the line.

I still give BNSF credit for good dispatching, or at least that was the case on my two recent trips (#7-29 and #8-6). While some trains are delayed up to two hours for freight issues, the really late trains (>4 hours) have encountered something more major. And if Amtrak wants the freight RRs to take them seriously about needing to stay on schedule, they ought to do a better job of getting trains out of Chicago on time.

Mark
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top