detroit to ann-arbor commuter rail
#61
Posted 14 November 2010 - 10:59 PM
#62
Posted 14 January 2011 - 05:30 AM
#63
Posted 22 January 2011 - 12:47 PM
Work is nearly complete on the refurbishment of a locomotive, coach car, and cab car for the Ann Arbor - Detroit Regional Rail Project. View the photos below to see the progress that has been made on MiTrain.
Click on amtrakwolverine's link above for more. Note that the photos appear to be large files and thus load slowly. How many train sets will there be? Are they refurbishing one loco, coach, and cab car at a time?
#64
Posted 22 January 2011 - 06:25 PM
#65
Posted 22 January 2011 - 07:03 PM
peter
#67
Posted 30 January 2011 - 11:27 AM
#68
Posted 30 January 2011 - 11:48 PM
Probably because they'd be a higher initial cost, and because except for the new units Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit is buying from Nippon Sharyo, and the (now defunct) Colorado Railcar DMUs, available DMUs don't meet FRA crash standards, and because any DMU would be years away from seeing the rails.
Texas is buying DMU's for its Newer lines that share with freight. NJT runs the Riverline that shares with freight....it seems to me the FRA does not care.
#69
Posted 31 January 2011 - 08:17 AM
Probably because they'd be a higher initial cost, and because except for the new units Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit is buying from Nippon Sharyo, and the (now defunct) Colorado Railcar DMUs, available DMUs don't meet FRA crash standards, and because any DMU would be years away from seeing the rails.
Texas is buying DMU's for its Newer lines that share with freight. NJT runs the Riverline that shares with freight....it seems to me the FRA does not care.
NJT's Riverline cars don't meet FRA crash standards to share the tracks with active freight trains. Freight only runs on the tracks during the late night hours when the Riverline doesn't operate; something called temporal separation. Newark's light rail system also has a temporal separation with freight on the last few miles of the line in Newark & Belleville. They even have a big gate that the freight crews have to unlock before they can roll out onto the shared tracks.
And the FRA cares quite a bit. In fact if there was ever a violation of the temporal separation, some people would have some major explaining to do. And quite possible could be looking for a new job.
Take care and take trains!
#70
Posted 31 January 2011 - 09:22 AM
Probably because they'd be a higher initial cost, and because except for the new units Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit is buying from Nippon Sharyo, and the (now defunct) Colorado Railcar DMUs, available DMUs don't meet FRA crash standards, and because any DMU would be years away from seeing the rails.
Texas is buying DMU's for its Newer lines that share with freight. NJT runs the Riverline that shares with freight....it seems to me the FRA does not care.
NJT's Riverline cars don't meet FRA crash standards to share the tracks with active freight trains. Freight only runs on the tracks during the late night hours when the Riverline doesn't operate; something called temporal separation. Newark's light rail system also has a temporal separation with freight on the last few miles of the line in Newark & Belleville. They even have a big gate that the freight crews have to unlock before they can roll out onto the shared tracks.
And the FRA cares quite a bit. In fact if there was ever a violation of the temporal separation, some people would have some major explaining to do. And quite possible could be looking for a new job.
Why do we still have these 19th Century rules , time to join the rest of the planet... Aussieland has the same of trains we do and they have no issues...
#71
Posted 10 October 2011 - 02:24 PM
#72
Posted 19 June 2012 - 10:40 PM
Could be running by the end of the year or 2013. it will run during events only. Right now the cars can run up to 40MPH. 79MPH tests to start in july.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











