johnny.menhennet
Conductor
Right at the Lemon St. underpass, just east of the platforms used by the Surfliners, there is a crossover that would allow this to happen.
X-Train Chugging Along?
- Thread starter Anderson
- Start date
Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:
Aloha
After my post I looked at the Google maps of the area. Tracks 1 & 2 turn towards Riverside. The Platforms are on Tracks 1 & 3. There is no way that a train from track 3 can make the turn towards Riverside and reach Vegas. This is why the Desert Wind, when it ran, and Southwest Chief East bound board at track 1.
johnny.menhennet
Conductor
I understand that without a crossover, it would be impossible for a train from the southbound (#3 as we're calling it) to get to Riverside. I still believe that that crossover exists though. I guess we'll just leave it here at a polite disagreement, both of us at least aware of the situation.
Both tracks 1 and 3 at Fullerton can proceed to the BNSF San Bernardino sub/Riverside. However, the Southwest Chief always uses track 1 due to the amount of checked baggage and the issues with getting that baggage across the tracks over to track 3.
Metrolink 700-series trains to Riverside will use track 3, because they do not have the checked baggage requirement. If the Chief did not have those baggage issues, it would use track 3 as well.
If you look on Google Earth, you'll see that there is a left-hand crossover immediately east of the platform at FUL that a train on track 3 could use to continue to Riverside.
Edit: Here's a view of the location (I'm not sure if this link leads directly to the Google Earth view, or if you have to go into the corner of the screen and change it manually): http://goo.gl/maps/P3CmM
Metrolink 700-series trains to Riverside will use track 3, because they do not have the checked baggage requirement. If the Chief did not have those baggage issues, it would use track 3 as well.
If you look on Google Earth, you'll see that there is a left-hand crossover immediately east of the platform at FUL that a train on track 3 could use to continue to Riverside.
Edit: Here's a view of the location (I'm not sure if this link leads directly to the Google Earth view, or if you have to go into the corner of the screen and change it manually): http://goo.gl/maps/P3CmM
Last edited by a moderator:
johnny.menhennet
Conductor
Thank you Trog. That is the crossover I was referring to.
Swadian Hardcore
Engineer
Those are Superliners AFAIK, not the cars to be used on the X-Train or ex-Metra carts.
johnny.menhennet
Conductor
Not quite. These are the Hi-Levels.Those are Superliners AFAIK, not the cars to be used on the X-Train or ex-Metra carts.
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
You have no idea how strange it is to be actually getting passenger rail news off of stock market reports.
Actually, a corporate history question: It says in the report that Liberty Capital Asset Management bought out LVRE and took on their name. Who owned/ran the previous LVRE?
Actually, a corporate history question: It says in the report that Liberty Capital Asset Management bought out LVRE and took on their name. Who owned/ran the previous LVRE?
Aloha
Today at the NSRM we were discussing the Xtrain and we concluded the train would fit in the track schedule, what we could not figure out where the train would be serviced and stored in the California end of the route.
Today at the NSRM we were discussing the Xtrain and we concluded the train would fit in the track schedule, what we could not figure out where the train would be serviced and stored in the California end of the route.
stntylr
OBS Chief
If they are using Amtrak employees it would seem they would be planning on using the Amtrak yard in L.A.
Not necessarily. From what I can tell, the MoU only covers conductors and engineers.
johnny.menhennet
Conductor
I don't know if I had seen it mentioned, but something that really needs to be done for the X-Train is to add a stop in San Bernardino. The Inland Empire is a huge market for Vegas, and nobody in their right mind will drive to Fullerton to go right back through San Bernardino/Riverside on the train. It would add 5-10 minutes, but be so worth it. Heck, you could even probably charge almost the same amount of money. It seems like in many of these plans, the IE is left out. I mean driving the 25-30 miles to Victorville would be really annoying, or much further if from Riverside.
More news on the X-Train. Las Vegas Railway Express states that they have reached an conditional agreement with Union Pacific to use UP tracks to Vegas. If the agreement holds, big step forward for the X-Train.
Aloha
Reading that article, it reinforces what I believe, that it will not be useful to Vegas residents wanting to go to the LA area
Reading that article, it reinforces what I believe, that it will not be useful to Vegas residents wanting to go to the LA area
Which article?
And Rob: I tend to agree...this seems to be a case of "Get something, anything, running and go from there."
Edit:
I've glanced over LVRE's financials a few times. Right now, the objective seems to be to run the most simple, most straightforward operation possible with the least capital investment possible. That means only using two stations, grabbing old equipment, running a limited number of trains, etc.
If the operation is successful, I'd expect them to try to add sets of equipment, buy a few more slots in the schedule, and potentially add another couple of stations (San Bernadino and LAUS are the obvious ones). But let's all remember that even the San Joaquins began as one train per day OKJ-BFD and it's now 4/day OJK-BFD and 2/day OKJ-SAC. Even big things start small, and it's not like LVRE has a couple hundred million dollars laying around to buy three slots per day in each direction, build new stations, and buy new trains.
Last edited by a moderator:
A link to a SEC filing by Las Vegas Railway Express summarizing the agreement with UP was posted on Trainorders. Has some interesting numbers: LVRE has to place $27.4 million in escrow to reimburse UP for certain improvements prior to start of service, then LVRE has to place an additional $29.2 million in escrow within 2 years for additional improvements. That is a lot of money for a twice a week train service. Either LVRE has plans for expanded service, such as daily, in the future to justify $56.6 million in UP improvements or maybe they have casino backers who think they can use the X-Train service to attract enough high rollers from LA to justify the expense.
If LVRE does manage to pay for $56 million in UP track improvements and then goes under, Amtrak could use those track improvements to start their own LA to Las Vegas daily train, but with subsidies from either state of Nevada or the city of Las Vegas as a subsitute until the Xpress West HSR service is up and running.
If LVRE does manage to pay for $56 million in UP track improvements and then goes under, Amtrak could use those track improvements to start their own LA to Las Vegas daily train, but with subsidies from either state of Nevada or the city of Las Vegas as a subsitute until the Xpress West HSR service is up and running.
That's slightly steep, but in terms of the price of a slot in most cases does seem to run about $100 million for a once-daily round trip (or at least, that seems to be the working assumption in VA, all else being equal). So, that's ot actually an unreasonable price, especially considering that serious requests do tend to vary in what they go for.
Possibly not that much, except for full up trackage fees. There have been capacity and track improvements in the LA and Inland Empire region funded by the state, local, & federal governments for freight and Metrolink. The Colton flyover is supposed to be completed by 2013, IIRC. BNSF has completed upgrades to its Transcon line with a 3rd track. These improvements were called out in the 2007 Las Vegas to LA corridor service study, so the X-Train can take advantage of the improvements between Fullerton to Barstow by starting service late next year without having to pay for them. The upgrades that have not been done, if I following it right, are the upgrades for the UP line from Barstow to Vegas. I think much of the data, planning and backup documentation for the X-Train proposals come from that 2007 study.
Still, $27.4 million upfront to pay UP for track improvements is going to be a major test of how viable and real LVRE is. If they want to start service late 2013, I think they would have to put up the $27.4 million soon so UP can get started on the track upgrades.
Swadian Hardcore
Engineer
Is the X-Trains seriously going to make a profit or will it just be a flop? Many private trains in the USs were supposed to make money but went bankrupt.
Yet many bankrupt companies made millions for their owners.
Aloha
Swadian Hardcore
Engineer
Oh, I mean, bankrupt then shut down.
