Viewliner II Part 3: Bag/Dorm Car Production, Delivery, Speculation

Discussion in 'Amtrak Rail Discussion' started by Thirdrail7, Jul 14, 2018.

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

  1. Jul 19, 2018 #76

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Because the staff would have to swap out halfway through the trip.
     
  2. Jul 19, 2018 #77

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Hah! Great minds think alike!
     
  3. Jul 19, 2018 #78

    me_little_me

    m

    me_little_me

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,732
    I get it - 20 months after 2020 ends. Or is it 20 years later? [​IMG]
     
    cpotisch likes this.
  4. Jul 19, 2018 #79

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Well played.
     
  5. Jul 20, 2018 #80

    railiner

    railiner

    railiner

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,070
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    Why not just cut the sleeper in and out at Washington, and use a Washington based attendant thru to Boston, and return?
     
  6. Jul 20, 2018 #81

    Maglev

    Maglev

    Maglev

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2016
    Messages:
    682
    Location:
    Orcas Island, Washington
    If the bag/sleeper is cut in and out at Washington, couldn't the beds already be made up such that no attendant is necessary?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 20, 2018
  7. Jul 20, 2018 #82

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    But then you've got the issue of there being one train that offers sleeping accommodations without an SCA. And what if passengers don't want to have their room made down? It just seems impractical. If they can't make it work with an attendant, they probably shouldn't do it at all.
     
  8. Jul 20, 2018 #83

    PVD

    P

    PVD

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2015
    Messages:
    3,983
    Location:
    NYC/Queens
    I would think it would be a legit safety issue....probably a CBA issue as well
     
    cpotisch likes this.
  9. Jul 20, 2018 #84

    Triley

    T

    Triley

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,389
    Location:
    Somewhere between VAC and EUG
    Careful what you suggest. Next thing you know, maybe that'll become the standard.

    In addition to the other responses that have been given, I'm sure the union would have something to say about it.

    I would say lost revenue. The car will be sitting unused in WAS waiting for 66 to come in. May as well leave it in the consist and bring in some revenue.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 20, 2018
    daybeers, cpotisch and AmtrakBlue like this.
  10. Jul 20, 2018 #85

    railiner

    railiner

    railiner

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,070
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    It might lose some, I'll admit. But it would be during mostly daylight hours. If the car cut in and out at Washington, it would have a lot more time to be properly serviced and maintained, as well as having its linens and supplies restocked.

    And it could allow early occupancy at Washington, sort of like the 'Executive Sleeper' that set in/out at New York.
     
  11. Jul 20, 2018 #86

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Conductor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    17,977
    Location:
    Austin Texas
    This.
     
    IndyLions likes this.
  12. Jul 20, 2018 #87

    tommylicious

    t

    tommylicious

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2013
    Messages:
    586
    So when are these supposed to start hitting the system?
     
  13. Jul 20, 2018 #88

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Assuming they're delivered within the next couple days, I would expect about a month from now for the diners. I don't know what the bag-dorms need to undergo before entering service, so I have no idea when we'll first see 69000 out on the rails.
     
  14. Jul 20, 2018 #89

    west point

    w

    west point

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1,791
    Explain something : If it is cut off at WASH how is baggage handled NPN <> WASH ?
     
    cpotisch likes this.
  15. Jul 21, 2018 #90

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    cpotisch

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    7,509
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Oh right. Good point. I guess there really aren't any good spots on a Regional to put even a small number of checked bags?
     
  16. Jul 21, 2018 #91

    PVD

    P

    PVD

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2015
    Messages:
    3,983
    Location:
    NYC/Queens
    The overnights are unique in that they are the only NER trains to have checked baggage. And since the Carolinian, Palmetto, Crescent, Cardinal, and Silvers don't go to Boston, they are the only checked bags past NYP on the corridor.
     
  17. Jul 21, 2018 #92

    railiner

    railiner

    railiner

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,070
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    I think I 'missed' something here...are we talking about putting a bag dorm on 66 and 67, or a full sleeper? If the former, then I will have to re-think this.

    Sorry, if I misunderstood the proposal....
     
  18. Jul 21, 2018 #93

    PVD

    P

    PVD

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2015
    Messages:
    3,983
    Location:
    NYC/Queens
    People have long advocated for return of a sleeper to the overnights. There was just some thoughts tossed around by some folks as to whether a bag dorm would be sufficient. and how it might be implemented. Unanswered of course is whether the rooms could be sold as revenue rooms, and if so, how would the car be staffed (as an example, an SCA would leave you with 7 rooms for sale, and how could it be staffed in a logical fashion. Would I consistently generate enough additional revenue to pay for an additional crew member? Even though WAS is a good place to add/drop a car since there is a power change anyway, it doesn't solve the problem of baggage South of WAS, and you know they aren't going to work 2 cars.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 21, 2018
  19. Jul 21, 2018 #94

    Thirdrail7

    T

    Thirdrail7

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2014
    Messages:
    3,951
    Which is why the night owl is good place to test the bag dorm. You can test the market for reinstating sleeping service on the corridor. Additionally, 67/66 doesn't carry a ton of luggage although it has a decent share of express.

    What is wrong with doing a crew change in NYP or an around the world out of WAS? That's why we have crew bases.....to provide crews. If the demand is there, the cost of the attendant(s) shouldn't be a hindrance as two fares would likely pay for their presence. Besides, with chef positions being eliminated, I'm willing to bet some of them would appreciate the opportunity to have something else to bid on.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 21, 2018
    daybeers likes this.
  20. Jul 21, 2018 #95

    Heading North

    H

    Heading North

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Messages:
    155
    No idea how occupancy levels worked back in the Twilight Shoreliner era, but I imagine there would be some through traffic south of WAS in sleeper (and not just because I would benefit in ALX). From Boston, the train overnight would be a better connection to morning NY departures like the Palmetto/Carolinian/Cardinal and (for the first two) the transfer could even be in RVR for folks wanting to sleep in. It also makes the New York calling times a little more doable for the Peninsula compared to losing a whole day on the train. I havent taken it north in years, but recall coach being sold out often from WAS to PHL and sometimes at other points too.

    Re: staffing, unless I am missing something, a crew change in WAS wouldnt be the end of the world. The Virginia shift would be easy, returning to WAS each night, while the WAS-BOS shift would be kinda wonky. Or could crews deadhead to PHL and do a handoff there? That seems closest to halfway.
     
    cpotisch likes this.
  21. Jul 21, 2018 #96

    PVD

    P

    PVD

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2015
    Messages:
    3,983
    Location:
    NYC/Queens
    I'd be happy to have it available. I'm pretty sure I was in a slumbercoach up to Boston in 96 for the World Hockey Summit. Ran a practice in Long Beach, had the 2nd assistant drop myself and another coach at Penn, got off at Back Bay and walked over to the Sheraton Boston.
     
  22. Jul 21, 2018 #97

    railiner

    railiner

    railiner

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,070
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    How would this work, for an "around-the-world" assignment?

    Day one Chicago to Boston Train 448

    Day two Boston to Newport News Train 67

    Day three Newport News to Boston Train 66

    Day four Boston to Chicago Train 449

    Day five Home

    If too intense, the Chicago attendant could layover an extra day at Newport News to rest. No longer than a west coast turn.....
     
  23. Jul 21, 2018 #98

    Acela150

    Acela150

    Acela150

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,333
    Location:
    In a Sea of Foam
    I just did some quick planning.. That's about 8 days on the road. When 448 would arrive into BOS they'd have to stay in Boston until the next day. Same with 66 to 449. The train arrives way to late for someone to hop on 67. The LSA on 67/66 already lays over for a day in NPN. So technically the run would look like this.

    Day 1: Depart Chicago

    Day 2 Arrive Boston

    Day 3: Layover until night time departure of 67

    Day 4: Arrive Newport News goto Hotel

    Day 5: Depart Newport News in the evening

    Day 6: Arrive Boston and goto Hotel

    Day 7: Depart Boston on 449

    Day 8: Arrive Chicago.

    Long Distance trains are 6 on 4 off I believe. So you'd have to do 8 on and at least 5 off for a job like this. Not to mention they'd either have to hire quite a few people to work these jobs. It'd be easier to train BOS LSA's and hire a few for BOS.

    Bottom line.. Chicago LSA's won't be going to Newport News.
     
  24. Jul 21, 2018 #99

    Triley

    T

    Triley

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,389
    Location:
    Somewhere between VAC and EUG
    In the long run there would be too much deadheading involved. If not deadheading BOS <-> NYP, then you'd have to add a hotel room in Boston for the SCA to make the 66/67 turn.
    Either way, hopefully we see this happen, even as a test.
     
  25. Jul 21, 2018 #100

    Thirdrail7

    T

    Thirdrail7

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2014
    Messages:
    3,951
    Again, if there is enough revenue generated, it will pay for the cost of the attendant and there is no reason for anyone to deadhead. You can either split the job at NYP

    66 NYP-BOS

    67 BOS-NYP

    67 NYP-NPN

    66 NPN-NYP

    or if you want to push it, open a position (like they did for the Cardinal) and around the world them at WAS.

    67-WAS-NPN

    66-NPN-BOS

    67-BOS-WAS

    This isn't that much different than some of the regional runs. I prefer the around the world over the full split. After all,you'll have the same problem if they ever reinstate a full sleeper.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 21, 2018

Share This Page

arrow_white