Texas Central Railway

Discussion in 'High Speed and Other Non-Amtrak Intercity Rail' started by The Davy Crockett, Aug 25, 2013.

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

  1. Aug 25, 2013 #1

    The Davy Crockett

    T

    The Davy Crockett

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    3,313
    Location:
    ALX
    205 mph Shinkansen passenger service between DFW and Houston in 8 years? :unsure:

    The Texas Central Railway claims it could be a reality.

    This proposal, and that is really all it is at the moment, does seem almost as 'pie-in-the-sky' as Xpress West to me, but since there has been very little talk of it here at AU, other than this unclearly named thread, I thought I'd give it a proper thread of its own, as the addition of one person to the payroll has some folks taking the project a bit more seriously.

    From dallasnews.com...

    "Editorial: Boost for Texas bullet train project" :

    One thing that is for sure: The TCR website could use some updating...

    As they say, everything is bigger in Texas. Could be the bullets, the opportunities, and/or the BS... :eek:

    And speaking of opportunities, I see a chance for Jim Hudson to get onboard as a spokesperson to educate his fellow Texans that these bullet trains would be for riding on, not shooting at! :p :p :p
     
  2. Aug 26, 2013 #2

    mfastx

    mfastx

    mfastx

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2010
    Messages:
    182
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    As a native Houstonian, I'm cautiously optimistic about this proposal. But there's been rumors of HSR between Texas cities for decades, and even though it's a complete no-brainer, local politics and other obstacles have made it impossible.

    I hope that the trend is reversed, but I'm not holding my breath.
     
  3. Aug 26, 2013 #3

    rrdude

    rrdude

    rrdude

    Conductor AU Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,670
    Location:
    No AGR Status anymore... Baltimore, MD Area
    You wanna see some dirt actually get turned over for this? Get SWA to buy in, as an equity partner....imagine feeding the hubs they have, JUST in Texas!

    Won't ever happen though
     
  4. Aug 26, 2013 #4

    afigg

    a

    afigg

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,896
    Location:
    Virginia
    Yes, the proposal to build a Dallas - Houston HSR line deserves a new thread. I read the current effort as a serious one which is bringing some of the power brokers in Texas on board, which is a key step in a state where the power brokers and corporate interests have a lot of say in the state government.

    No way the HSR line is running by 2021 and the knowledgeable players know that. It will years of environmental studies, selection of the route, design engineering, property acquisition, political maneuvering before construction can start. They are putting out a by 2021 date as a teaser to get backing for the project. However, I do think the odds are pretty good that a Dallas to Houston HSR line will be under construction in 10 years.

    As for SWA, it is not the 1980s or 1990s any more. The airlines do not make much of a profit, if they make a profit at all, on short haul routes any more. The cost of fuel along with the price wars have undercut the airline market for short haul routes. The money is made in longer haul flights. SWA may not stand in the way of a Dallas to Houston HSR corridor, especially if the corridor connects to or provides single transfer trips to the airports for longer haul connecting flights.
     
  5. Aug 26, 2013 #5

    Devil's Advocate

    Devil's Advocate

    Devil's Advocate

    Conductor

    Joined:
    May 24, 2010
    Messages:
    10,428
    Location:
    Америка
    Texans have been hearing variations on this story for decades, each time with different criteria, but absolutely nothing at all to show for it. These days I try to avoid making blanket comments but I honestly don’t see this happening in my lifetime.

    I’ve flown WN, AA, and COdbaUA many times. In general the planes they use for intrastate flights are paid off, the flights are almost always full, and the fares are double or even triple what they were in the pre-merger era. WN and COdbaUA are much larger and stronger now than they've ever been in the past while US and AA are trying their best to follow in their footsteps. The idea that their combined influence is reduced or restricted does not seem accurate to me. If you want to see who really runs Texas just take a look at how much time and effort we continue to dump into the DFW money pit.

    -CRW
     
  6. Aug 26, 2013 #6

    rrdude

    rrdude

    rrdude

    Conductor AU Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,670
    Location:
    No AGR Status anymore... Baltimore, MD Area
    I agree, I was president of TexArp for a short time in the 80's, and we went around back then showing a film, (yes they had color films back then, maybe it was BetaMax, I dunno.........) about the advantages of HSR, and what the "Texas Triangle" would look like with HSR...Mostly videos of French, Japanese, and German HSR at the time.

    Interesting to think that China was still running mainline steam engines at the time, and had not probably even thought about HSR.

    My how far things have come. Now China is a world leader in HSR, and Texas is stuck running a few, very few, LD trains. (sans commuter operations in DFW-Metroplex, Austin, and a few other areas.)

    "Hey Texas, China just kicked yer ass when it comes to HSR."

    May THAT's what the Texas politicians and business leaders need to here, get the spirit of competition moving...........
     
  7. Aug 26, 2013 #7

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Conductor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    17,836
    Location:
    Austin Texas
    These schemes come up all the time in Texas and have for Years as was said!, Mostly they are floated by a bunch of hustlers and confidence men that Texas has plenty of! On this I'm from Missouri, they'll have to Show Me! :help:
     
  8. Oct 7, 2013 #8

    Anderson

    A

    Anderson

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    9,012
    Location:
    Virginia
    it's been a while, but there's now a story on the Texas Central operation providing at least a few scattered details on the plans:
    http://fwbusinesspress.com/fwbp/article/1/2534/Breaking-News/Bullet-train-bound-for-Fort-Worth-officials-learn-details.aspx

    The big news IMHO is that they seem to be looking at three stations in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Two other fun excerpts:

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 7, 2013
  9. Oct 7, 2013 #9

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Conductor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    17,836
    Location:
    Austin Texas
    Dont want to Be Negative Cliff, but Again as a Native Texan and having Interest in all Things Rail and Political , Maybe Some of our Younger Members May get to see this get Off the Ground in their Lifetimes! :unsure: This Scheme has been Kicking Around for Many Decades in Texas and it Comes and Goes Regularly, only the Names Involved Change! ( Would you put your Money into this Scheme as an Investment? If I had any, I wouldn't! )I'm from Missouri on this One! ;)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 7, 2013
  10. Oct 7, 2013 #10

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    23,960
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    Arguably, China has been kicking Texas' behind on anything to do with R for a while now. :) The HS part is just the icing on the cake.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 7, 2013
  11. Oct 7, 2013 #11

    mfastx

    mfastx

    mfastx

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2010
    Messages:
    182
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Construction tentatively scheduled for 2016? Wouldn't that be something. I'll believe it when I see it.
     
  12. Oct 7, 2013 #12

    Anderson

    A

    Anderson

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    9,012
    Location:
    Virginia
    I'm ignoring the timetable, except for possibly the environmental work starting. We all know how often, even in a favorable environment, construction timetables are kept. Even FEC seems to have lost significant time in setting things up.
     
  13. Oct 10, 2013 #13

    Shawn Ryu

    S

    Shawn Ryu

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,092
    Location:
    NYC or Chicago
    Knowing NIMBYS realistic date is 2040.
     
  14. Oct 10, 2013 #14

    FrensicPic

    FrensicPic

    FrensicPic

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,754
    Location:
    CWT
    Not holding my breath here in California :unsure:
     
  15. Oct 15, 2013 #15

    cirdan

    cirdan

    cirdan

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,281
    Some guys in suits posing for press photographs spade-in-hand maybe. But I'm not betting on any meaningful construction for many years beyond that.
     
  16. Jan 8, 2014 #16

    CHamilton

    CHamilton

    CHamilton

    Conductor AU Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,275
    Location:
    Seattle
    Dallas to Houston in 90 Minutes May Soon Become a Reality
     
  17. Jan 8, 2014 #17

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    23,960
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    Sigh.... Yet another study, to be followed by more studies and NEPA and what not. Other countries spend less money building the entire friggin' system than we spend on studies of studies about whether to build a system :(
     
  18. Jan 8, 2014 #18

    me_little_me

    m

    me_little_me

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,678
    And I love the "soon to become a reality". Even after the studies, there is funding then delays by opponents in congress and state legislatures, then environmental studies, then contracts to be let, then lawsuits by environmentalists, people whose land is taken, financial opponents and naysayers, then construction, then more lawsuits over the ballooning cost caused by all the delays, then completion of the first ten miles between Hooterville and Nowheresville as a "demonstration" then testing then complaints that nobody is taking the 10 mile train, then more lawsuits. Then, "soon" is 2040. Then the line is abandoned as technology has made it obsolete.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 8, 2014
  19. Jan 8, 2014 #19

    afigg

    a

    afigg

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,896
    Location:
    Virginia
    Have any of the studies been beyond a feasibility study or proposal? The initial studies and reports don't cost that much, so the total spent over the years on Texas T-Bone or other proposals probably have not been that much, when compared to the cost of a full up NEPA and PE and then construction. But, yes, this is the US where for transit and highway systems (and many DOD systems as well) we commission studies, then more studies, white papers, proposals until the sum total of the sheer mass of the studies is enough to break through the Wall of Resistance and the project may get funding and advance.

    On a more serious note, though, I think that building a HSR line between Dallas and Houston will eventually get traction and be built. The most significant change from 10 or 15 years ago is that Dallas and Houston are building rail transit system with Houston opening a new light rail extension just a few weeks ago. Having respectable local rail transit systems in both cities for the HSR trains to connect to helps to build local political support for a HSR service.
     
  20. Jan 8, 2014 #20

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Conductor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    17,836
    Location:
    Austin Texas
    All of the previous Proposals/Schemes for HSR in Texas have included Austin and San Antonio on the Red Hot I-35 Corridor!

    I Question if there Would Be that Much Ridership Between Dallas and Houston if There Wasn''t a Triangle Route that Included the I-35 Corridor ?? :help:

    This is Would Be an Immensely Expensive Project IF it is Ever Built and Would Require the Feds and State to Kick in Billions of Dollars and All Kinds of Tax Incentives to the Private Sector Partners! Talk Radio is Blowing Up About this Topic with All the NIMBYS (Right and Left Wing) Blowing a Gasket! I Even Heard a Caller in Austin say: "No-one Rides Trains Anymore and Were' Already Spending Billions on Toll Roads and the Airport!" Imagine That! :rolleyes:
     
  21. Jan 8, 2014 #21

    CHamilton

    CHamilton

    CHamilton

    Conductor AU Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,275
    Location:
    Seattle
    Houston-Dallas High-Speed Rail + Tearing Down I-345 = A Big Win

     
  22. Jan 11, 2014 #22

    FriskyFL

    FriskyFL

    FriskyFL

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    782
    HSR in Texas...hahahahahahaha! Bubba don't ride no commie trains.
     
  23. Jan 11, 2014 #23

    Anderson

    A

    Anderson

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    9,012
    Location:
    Virginia
    I'll avoid a rant on NEPA, but I will say that Bubba also don't live in the big city.
     
  24. Jan 11, 2014 #24

    George Harris

    G

    George Harris

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    Messages:
    5,027
    Location:
    now in California
    Yeah, "Nobody" was going to ride DART or the Houston light rail, either. Look at the statistics. Nuff said.
     
  25. Jan 11, 2014 #25

    Anderson

    A

    Anderson

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    9,012
    Location:
    Virginia
    Honestly, as long as the government doesn't foul this up, I could see it being a mostly private sector operation. JR Central is awash in cash and wants to invest somewhere (IIRC, their free cash flow is floating somewhere around $1 billion and they're hard-pressed to invest domestically). Europe's already pretty built out, China has a lot of political issues for them, Brazil is snarled in domestic issues, and a lot of other places just don't have what's needed to support a line.
     

Share This Page



arrow_white