Sumitomo/Siemens Contract for 137 Cars (former bi-levels)

Discussion in 'Amtrak Rail Discussion' started by afigg, Sep 27, 2012.

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

  1. Jun 10, 2019 #1251

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    24,586
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    I think there would have been a strong case for continuing with the original Amtrak designed cars, if there was any sign that Amtrak was going to grow by leaps and bounds. Absent that it is hard to justify maintaining a design group beyond one that is needed to put together RFIs and RFPs and carry out monitoring and governance of them from vendor selection, through order placement, delivery and deployment.

    Incidentally, the biggest main line passenger car purchaser in the US today is NY MTA (LIRR + MNRR) AFAICT. Their order sizes, which are much larger than Amtrak's has ever been, almost justify doing their own design, but they tend to work with vendors using vendor shell design to furnish cars the way they need.

    But as Walter correctly points out, the situation back when Amtrak was ordering Amfleets and Superliners was very different. There were no vendors that were not about to go under around to work seriously with, so a lot had to be done in house. Also FRA's revision of standards allowing CEM in cars was many decades away.
     
  2. Jun 10, 2019 #1252

    jamess

    j

    jamess

    Train Attendant

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2017
    Messages:
    38
    This is not good.

    People traveling 10 hours between LA and Bay Area are with Amtrak for 10 hours.

    How can they think that vending machines will cut it?
     
  3. Jun 10, 2019 #1253

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    24,586
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    The only train that runs from LA to Bay area is the Coast Starlight which is not an Amtrak California train and carries a full Diner and Lounge/Cafe.

    I suspect that the Amtrak California Lounges will have some form of Cafe service, though probably more like what they have in Amtrak California Business Class type of setup than a full fledged Cafe. But we will have to wait and see.
     
    NSC1109 likes this.
  4. Jun 10, 2019 #1254

    PVD

    P

    PVD

    Conductor AU Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2015
    Messages:
    4,123
    Location:
    NYC/Queens
    People often are unaware that the states that pay for corridor trains really call the shots on many of the service levels.
     
  5. Jun 10, 2019 #1255

    jamess

    j

    jamess

    Train Attendant

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2017
    Messages:
    38
    I didnt say train, I said "with Amtrak". The San Joaquin + San Joaquin bus is packed with folks making trips across the state. Thats where they would be cutting the cafe car.

    Theres no need to wait and see.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Jun 10, 2019 #1256

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    24,586
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    It is Caltrans that will be doing that. Not Amtrak. Amtrak is just a contract operator for Caltrans. Amtrak does not decide what service to provide on Amtrak California trains.
     
  7. Jun 11, 2019 #1257

    jamess

    j

    jamess

    Train Attendant

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2017
    Messages:
    38
    I dont understand how being pedantic about this helps.

    This is what I said:


    Let's say I change my phrasing to:

    People traveling 10 hours between LA and Bay Area on an Amtrak® branded train funded by California taxpayers under the direction of Caltrans and managed by the San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority with bus connection service operated by a 3rd party contractor deserve more than a vending machine.

    That doesn't change what I am saying.

    Buying these trains without a cafe car of any kind is a mistake.
     
  8. Jun 11, 2019 #1258

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    24,586
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    Hey I love being pedantic. If that bothers you just ignore my postings. Nobody is forcing you to read them and try to convince me not to post. Trust me it is a fools errand.

    So to carry on being pedantic, my favorite activity mind you it is California DOT’s mistake, not Amtrak’s.

    So wanna go another round having a pedantic discussion?
     
  9. Jun 11, 2019 #1259

    edgy

    e

    edgy

    AU Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2018
    Messages:
    3
     
  10. Jun 11, 2019 #1260

    edgy

    e

    edgy

    AU Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2018
    Messages:
    3
     
  11. Jun 11, 2019 #1261

    CSXfoamer1997

    C

    CSXfoamer1997

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2015
    Messages:
    538
    In the coupler configuration box, what do "S" and "H" stand for?
     
  12. Jun 11, 2019 #1262

    MisterUptempo

    MisterUptempo

    MisterUptempo

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Messages:
    173
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    The "H" refers to an AAR Type "H" coupler, which is the standard coupler used by Amtrak. The "S" refers to a semi-permanent coupler. Caltrans intends to run their new Siemens cars as unified trainsets, which helps explain why all the mid coaches have "S" couplers on both ends, and the end coach has an "S" on one end to connect to the mid coaches and an "H" to connect to the locomotive.

    Some of the IDOT cars will run as semi-permanently connected matched pairs, but not as a trainset.
     
    CSXfoamer1997 likes this.
  13. Jun 11, 2019 #1263

    MARC Rider

    M

    MARC Rider

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,239
    Location:
    Baltimore. MD
    Looking at the RPA ridership stats, the average trip length for California State Supported Services in in the neighborhood of 120 miles, and that's because the San Joaquins have a longer average trip length than the othe 2 services. Both the Capitol Corridor and Pacific Surfliner average trip lengths are less than 100 miles. Infact, on the Capitol corridor over 90% of the trips are less than 100 miles, on the Oacific Surfliner 90% of the trips are under 200 miles and even on the San Joaquins, 75% of the trips are less than 200 miles.

    Whether or not there's a cafe or lounge probably doesn't matter to the vast majority of California Amtrak patrons.

    By the way, when I travel to California, I usually fly Southwest, as I fly out of BWI. They seem to do quite fine business on a 5-6 hour nonstop flight offering inly a dinky drink and a little bag of pretzels. People travel to get to places, not to eat while they're traveling. Yeah, once the travel times start exceeling a certain point, you might want to make food available to keep the cattle from stampeding, but those sort of travel times aren't what Amtrak California offers.
     
    jis likes this.
  14. Jun 11, 2019 #1264

    NSC1109

    N

    NSC1109

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2016
    Messages:
    236
    Location:
    MI
    You’re still missing the part that there is no direct service between LA and the Bay Area that would have this equipment...and the Coast Starlight still has its diner.
     
    jis likes this.
  15. Jun 11, 2019 #1265

    CAMISSY55

    C

    CAMISSY55

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2017
    Messages:
    155
    I disagree. Having traveled quite a lot on the Pacific Surfliner, I can attest that the café is very popular. Within minutes after most stops, a line quickly forms for the upscale sandwiches, craft beers, bottled waters, and other snacks. In the late afternoon or on get-away weekends the café facilitates an enjoyable happy hour experience. In the morning nice juices, coffee drinks, teas, and a few nice breakfast items enable travelers to have some semblance of a meal on their way to work.
    Many of the station stops do not have places nearby to purchase anything but low quality processed, fast food and beverages. I think your minimalist tastes and preferences are great for you. But my experience on the Surfliner (no experience on the Joaquins or Capital Corridors) tells me folks would definitely object to the elimination of the café.

    Even for a trip of less than a hour and a half, I am thrilled that the café exists.
     
    seat38a, Ziv and Bob Dylan like this.
  16. Jun 12, 2019 #1266

    neroden

    n

    neroden

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2014
    Messages:
    7,309
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY
    The cafe is insanely successful on the Surfliner. Dunno about the San Joaquins, but trip times on the San Joaquins are *long*.
     
    Bob Dylan and Ziv like this.
  17. Jun 12, 2019 #1267

    CAMISSY55

    C

    CAMISSY55

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2017
    Messages:
    155
    And IMHO, all the more reason a café car is essential.
     
    Bob Dylan likes this.
  18. Jun 12, 2019 #1268

    rickycourtney

    rickycourtney

    rickycourtney

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,614
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Perhaps Caltrans intends to use these new trainsets exclusively on the Capitol Corridor? That route has comparatively short trip times and the full café isn’t as necessary. In fact the café is closed on some runs.

    It is however worth noting that the Surfliner cars have a café, but no real “lounge” area. If I recall correctly, the reason why the California Cars have a lounge was they used to offer full, sit down dining service on the long routes like the San Joaquin.
     
  19. Jun 12, 2019 #1269

    seat38a

    s

    seat38a

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,902
    Location:
    Orange County California
    I've been on multipe Surfliner trains where the Cafe Car was completely sold out and had to restock during the crew change at LAUS. Beer and liquor are very popular on the Surfliner, with complete sellouts down to the last mini bottle of liquor quite common. There's quite a bit of subtle encouragement to drink on the Surfliner and its not a hard sell with craft beer and wine. A year or so ago they even came out with a nice color cocktail menu just for the train.
     
  20. Jun 12, 2019 #1270

    jamess

    j

    jamess

    Train Attendant

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2017
    Messages:
    38
    Sure, many people are riding from Hanford to Fresno and don't need a cafe car.

    But from personal experience going LA-Fresno (5 hours), many people who got on the bus with me in LA were still on the train when I got off in Fresno. I spoke with one lady who had gotten off a cruise in Long Beach that day and was taking Amtrak home to Modesto.

    And while both LA and Fresno do have food options (a 7-11 at least), many of the smaller stations have nothing at all.

    We are talking about the new cars on order for Amtrak California which will run on the San Joaquin. The San Joaquin connects riders from LA to the Bay Area via Amtrak branded thruway bus service. The buses have never offered food service, the trains have. For a long journey like that, food service is essential.
     
  21. Jun 15, 2019 #1271

    cocojacoby

    c

    cocojacoby

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    May 13, 2014
    Messages:
    207
    Great info Walter although I can't agree that Sumitomo/Nippon Sharyo is an inexperienced builder.

    I think most of the problems would be eliminated if Amtrak could buy off-the-shelf equipment and get exempted from the buy-America provision. I understand that the new Acela coaches are made in Italy and are exempt so we just might be heading in the right direction.
     
  22. Jun 15, 2019 #1272

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    24,586
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    The exemption is only for the prototype sets. There is no exemption for the rest of the order. They will be built in the US. Even most of the assembly of the prototypes is in the US. So really not much has changed, as things stand.

    Interestingly, All Aboard Florida/Brightline/VT USA insisted on buy-America for their Siemens order, even though there is no law that requires such for their order, and made use of it in their marketing blurbs extensively. Of course the design and engineering is entirely based on the Viaggio Comfort cars, but they are manufactured completely in the US.
     
    Ziv likes this.
  23. Jun 15, 2019 #1273

    cocojacoby

    c

    cocojacoby

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    May 13, 2014
    Messages:
    207
    Are you sure about that? This is from the Trains Magazine article:

    — Aluminum passenger car shells manufactured in Italy. Alstom received a waiver from FRA “buy America” requirements to go outside the U.S. for these because, according to Cuadrado, no U.S. facility is available to manufacture aluminum shells of the required length.
     
  24. Jun 15, 2019 #1274

    Acela150

    Acela150

    Acela150

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,443
    Location:
    In a Sea of Foam
    Jis is spot on. He usually is.
     
  25. Jun 15, 2019 #1275

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    24,586
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    The original waiver is for the initial batch of shells. Alstom is supposed to be setting up the facility for manufacturing those shells in the US for line production. Of course in these things nothing is certain until the proverbial fat lady sings. So we will see. I have not heard of any general waiver yet, and Trains is not a source that I particularly trust on these things. They are better than Railpace, but only by a smidgen.

    Sometimes bizarre things do happen. For example Rotem got permission to fabricate shells in Korea for the Silverliner Vs but they were required to ship the Stainless Steel sheets from the US to Korea for fabrication in Korea! Their excuse was they could not find enough skilled labor in the US to handle Stainless Steel. So go figure! Given CAF's alleged experience there may be some truth to it, at least for the price they were willing to pay. Now with all these tariffs on metal flying around there would be an even greater incentive to do things within the US one would think.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2019

Share This Page

arrow_white