EMUs proposed for Providence Boston 45 min service

Discussion in 'Commuter Rail and Rail Transit Discussion' started by jis, Mar 1, 2018.

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

  1. Mar 1, 2018 #1

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    23,967
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    Transit group: Changes to MBTA Providence Line would shorten trip to Boston
     
  2. Mar 1, 2018 #2

    Metra Electric Rider

    M

    Metra Electric Rider

    OBS Chief

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2016
    Messages:
    701
    When I read the subject I was picturing Springfield MA instead of Providence and thought - WOW! Who is proposing electrifying that line?

    But this is a great idea and goes a long way towards creating a commutable New England Mega Region (with resultant sprawl however...).
     
  3. Mar 1, 2018 #3

    Palmetto

    Palmetto

    Palmetto

    Conductor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    Messages:
    1,742
    Location:
    Southmost Texas
    Acela Express currently takes about 35 minutes, give or take; Northeast Regional, 40. There is no way--EMUs not withstanding--that there will be a 45-minute run between Boston and Providence unless most of the commuter stops were cut out.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 1, 2018
  4. Mar 1, 2018 #4

    Eric S

    E

    Eric S

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,430
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    You can find the report here: http://transitmatters.org/regional-rail/

    High-performance EMUs (which would have better acceleration than locomotive-hauled Amtrak trains), combined with high-level platforms at all stations, is expected to drastically reduce travel times. I believe Stadler FLIRTs were used to model travel times. As for the 45-minute travel time (actually 46 minutes BOS-PVD), the schedules proposed are predicated upon the completion of the NSRL, which would remove (or bypass by tunnel) the slow terminal tracks at South Station. So add a few(?) minutes if we're stuck using the existing South Station.
     
  5. Mar 1, 2018 #5

    Dutchrailnut

    D

    Dutchrailnut

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,052
    Location:
    Brookfield, Connecticut, USA
    Besides MBTA and Amtrak do not have to give this fantasy trackage rights , its a pipedream no matter what.
     
  6. Mar 1, 2018 #6

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    23,967
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    Since it is MBTA that will run it if anyone does, I guess there will be a huge fist fight between MBTA and MBTA to get trackage rights on their own track [​IMG]
     
  7. Mar 1, 2018 #7

    Eric S

    E

    Eric S

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,430
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    What does this have to do with trackage rights? It's a report calling for MBTA to switch to EMUs.
     
  8. Mar 1, 2018 #8

    MikefromCrete

    M

    MikefromCrete

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,468
    Location:
    Crete, IL
    Putting EMU's on the run isn't a bad idea, but making the whole thing dependent on an expensive North Station/South Station tunnel puts it out of the realm of realism.
     
  9. Mar 2, 2018 #9

    Eric S

    E

    Eric S

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,430
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    It's not dependent upon the NSRL. The report mentions that the NSRL ought to be pursued as the ultimate goal, but that electrification and high-level platforms systemwide are worthwhile with or without NSRL. It's just that the specific schdules in the report, for the Providence/Stoughton Line and the Fairmount Line, assume the NSRL is built. Without NSRL speeding the approach to South Station, the schedules would presumably be a few minutes longer.

    The beauty of the report, in fact, is that the project can be broken down into smaller, more easily achievable pieces, raising platforms and electrifying tracks line by line.
     
  10. Mar 2, 2018 #10

    Palmetto

    Palmetto

    Palmetto

    Conductor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    Messages:
    1,742
    Location:
    Southmost Texas
    There is one negative to switching to EMUs on the Providence Line: lack of the ability to use it anywhere else on the system.
     
  11. Mar 2, 2018 #11

    fairviewroad

    fairviewroad

    fairviewroad

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2011
    Messages:
    3,306
    "Every 15 minutes" seems a bit much, I think 30-minute headways would be sufficient, but nobody asked me. [​IMG]
     
  12. Mar 3, 2018 #12

    Eric S

    E

    Eric S

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,430
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Pretty sure it suggested 15-minute peak headways, 30-minute off-peak headways.
     
  13. Mar 5, 2018 #13

    Dutchrailnut

    D

    Dutchrailnut

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,052
    Location:
    Brookfield, Connecticut, USA
    MBTA has openly said no electric service , due to high cost charged by Amtrak and it would need to many facilities build to service such electrics.
     
  14. Mar 5, 2018 #14

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    23,967
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    That can change. Afterall MBTA is as much a creature of politics as anything. The whole point is to get the political winds to blow differently. We already know that left to themselves the railroads will do nothing other than slowly go out of business moaning victimhood [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 6, 2018
    Eric S likes this.
  15. Mar 6, 2018 #15

    amamba

    amamba

    amamba

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Messages:
    4,083
    Location:
    Providence
    This would be great for PVD!

    Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum
     

Share This Page



arrow_white