Chicago - St Louis high speed rail

Discussion in 'High Speed and Other Non-Amtrak Intercity Rail' started by RickIronton, Dec 10, 2013.

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

  1. Dec 10, 2013 #1

    RickIronton

    R

    RickIronton

    Train Attendant

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Messages:
    76
    Since Amtrak inaugurated high speed between Joliet and Dwight IL, I have observed through Amtrak's train tracking the highest speed of 99 mph.

    Does this corridor ever live up to "Illinois High-Speed Rail" advertisements of higher speed considering the fact that 110 mph was obtainable?
     
  2. Dec 10, 2013 #2

    kbmiflyer

    k

    kbmiflyer

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2013
    Messages:
    132
    Note the "high speed" portion is between Dwight and Pontiac, not Dwight and Joliet. I have taken this train several times, and we usually hit 110 between Pontiac and Dwight (albeit for only a few minutes).

    Note that the Texas Eagle does not go up to 110, only the Linoln Service (not sure why).

    That being said, advertising high speed rail is a bit of a joke for now until we get high speed along most of the route, and figure out the slow sections between Joliet and CUS (they are working on that), and between Alton and St Louis (they really aren't working on that).
     
  3. Dec 10, 2013 #3

    Andrew

    A

    Andrew

    Guest

    When the Lincoln Service travels that quickly, how are the noise levels within the passenger cars?
     
  4. Dec 10, 2013 #4

    MARC Rider

    M

    MARC Rider

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,063
    Location:
    Baltimore. MD
    The Lincoln service uses the same kind of Amfleet coaches they use for the Northeast Regional, and those go 125 mph, and it's perfectly quiet inside. We rode on them at the Gathering, it was indistinguishable from a Northeast Regional trip (though we weremn't going 100 mph between Chicago and Joliet.)

    Now, if you want noisy trains, you have to ride the Chicago L. :) And I remember one ride in 1972 from NYP to PHL, on the Southern Crescent. Amtrak stuck a few of their own cars in the consist for the Northeast Corridor riders, and the one I was stuck in was an old PRR P70, still painted in Penn Central peas-soup green. Running through Jersey we must have been above 100 mph (they had already done the track improvements for the original Metroliners), and that was one noisy rock-and-roll of a ride.
     
  5. Jan 27, 2014 #5
    I believe the plan is for nearly all of the Joliet-Alton segment to be upgraded to 110mph in a couple years. The route from Chicago-Joliet is supposed to switch to the METRA/Rock Island line in a few years due to freight interference on the Heritage Corridor. The Texas Eagle is a longer train and uses heavier double-deck Superliners so it cannot go quite as fast.
     
  6. Jan 30, 2014 #6

    George Harris

    G

    George Harris

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    Messages:
    5,027
    Location:
    now in California
    However, teh Superliners do run many miles at 90 mph on the Southwest Chief route.

    I feel like the Chicago - St. Louis "High Speed" has become a sinkhole for money with very little to show for ti. A lot of that is Illinois politics. The reality is that in GM&O days regardless of speed limits of 79 mph or whatever, the schedule was likely faster than the best now and little slower than that after the 110 mph is in place. As a matter of pride the GM&O boys did their best to keep schedule even if it meant running 90 plus regardless of speed limits. Then at that time there were three railroads operating Chicago - St. Louis passenger service.
     
  7. Jan 31, 2014 #7

    Anderson

    A

    Anderson

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    8,935
    Location:
    Virginia
    IIRC, the Superliners are rated up to 100 MPH. They can't take full advantage of the upgrades, but they can take advantage of most of their potential.
     
  8. Jan 31, 2014 #8

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    23,666
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    The agreement in place with the host railroad does not allow the Texas Eagle to operate at higher speed. Only a few specific trains are allowed to do so, and the Texas Eagle is not one of them. So no, Superliner or not, the Texas Eagle cannot take advantage of the higher speeds possible.
     
  9. Jan 31, 2014 #9

    George Harris

    G

    George Harris

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    Messages:
    5,027
    Location:
    now in California
    The idiocy points in this agreement are multiple and goofy beyond all imagining. Did someone have a gun to the heads of the people on the state's and fed's side of this side of this concept?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 31, 2014
  10. Jan 31, 2014 #10

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    23,666
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    IMHO the general level of idiocy or at least willful neglect of intelligent decision making on all sides involved in the Chicago - St. Louis HSR Project is of epic proportions. It is hard to fathom why this sort of thing is tolerated for many years with no one screaming blue murder.
     
    mlanoue likes this.
  11. Feb 1, 2014 #11

    afigg

    a

    afigg

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,896
    Location:
    Virginia
    I think the reason you have seen little to show for the CHI-STL corridor is that they still have a long way to go on the improvement projects. Checking the status of the big $1.142 billion grant on recovery.gov (diving down to state and projects), IL has filed their quarterly report through December 31, 2013 which shows that $370 million of the total grant has been spent so far (link which may not work). The $1.142B grant includes rolling stock purchases for the corridor service, so those won't be paid in full until the bi-level and locomotives are delivered. Still, as a crude metric, IL has spent 32% so far of the major grant for the corridor upgrades for the bills that were paid as of December, 2013.

    There is a separate $186 million grant for double tracking and upgrades from Dwight to Joliet, which I believe has yet to start any track work. It is a FY10 project grant, so it is not covered on the recovery.gov tracking site. While the CHI-STL corridor will need another billion or two to reach the final project goals, the improvements from the funding that has been provided are still in the pipeline. Have to give it until at least 2016 before the funds are going into a sinkhole or not. Yes, this is taking a long time after the funds were awarded, but unless you are DOD, it usually takes time to spend some $1.4 billion in federal money.
     
  12. Feb 27, 2014 #12

    CHamilton

    CHamilton

    CHamilton

    Conductor AU Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,272
    Location:
    Seattle
    St. Clair County may chip in $500K for high speed rail station in East St. Louis
     
  13. Feb 27, 2014 #13

    siberianmo

    siberianmo

    siberianmo

    Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    132
    Location:
    St. Louis, Missouri metro area
    A long time ago in another life (not really) I became involved with a group(civic & political people) pushing for a high speed rail connection between St. Louis and Chicago. Over more than a decade it appears that a "hybrid" of high speed rail is about to make that connection. I say "hybrid" only because 110 mph surely is not high speed; higher speed but not high. Anyway . . .

    I travel between St. Louis and Chicago in order to make connections for Amtrak's long distance trains out of Union Station. The trip aboard the Lincoln Service trains takes roughly 6 hours. It is fair to say that I have never been later than 20 minutes arriving into Chicago. That ain't bad. Anyway . . .

    When reading the post revealing "plans" for an East St. Louis stop for high speed rail, I had to cringe. What makes high(er) speed less likely is the insertion of more stops between end points.

    Get my point?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 27, 2014
  14. Feb 27, 2014 #14

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Conductor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    17,753
    Location:
    Austin Texas
    Isn't East St. Louis sort of the Detroit of Missouri/Illinois? :ph34r: When I used to travel there often on Business the Locals would tell us Don't Cross the River to East St. Louis! I wouldn't think too many HSR Passengers would catch the Train there when the Commuter Trains run to the New St; Louis Intermodel Station where you can catch Amtrak! I agree there's really no need for this Station, it would just Slow Up the Corridor Trains!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 27, 2014
  15. Mar 16, 2014 #15

    XHRTSP

    XHRTSP

    XHRTSP

    Lead Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2014
    Messages:
    326
    Parts of East St Louis literally resemble a war zone. I've been there, I've saw it with me own two eyes.

    Oh, and the Metrolink ride across the river into Civic isn't that bad. East St Louis has a lot of problems, that ain't one of them. 500k can be much better spent.
     
  16. Mar 18, 2014 #16

    cirdan

    cirdan

    cirdan

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,256
    Wasn't there talk at some point that additional Lincoln Services would be added in the future?

    Basically this agreement would seem to preclude that possibility.
     
  17. Jun 2, 2014 #17

    CHamilton

    CHamilton

    CHamilton

    Conductor AU Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,272
    Location:
    Seattle
    Final downstate construction begins for 110-mph trains

     
  18. Jun 2, 2014 #18

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Bob Dylan

    Conductor

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    17,753
    Location:
    Austin Texas
    Looks like the Eagles will be heading for Amish Country on re-routes and the Lincoln Service Trains will be Bustitutions on Selected Days!
     
  19. Jun 2, 2014 #19

    Eric S

    E

    Eric S

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,421
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    The article mentions the overpass being constructed at Normal to allow trains to serve both tracks, meaning the old platform will be put back into service. That had been mentioned at the time the new Normal station opened, but until this article I had never seen any sort of timeline for that construction.
     
  20. Jun 2, 2014 #20

    Steve4031

    S

    Steve4031

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    5,361
    Location:
    Chicago
    This link mentions work south of Alton. http://www.idothsr.o...st/details.aspx

     

    Between Madison and Alton.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 2, 2014
  21. Nov 22, 2015 #21

    afigg

    a

    afigg

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,896
    Location:
    Virginia
    Saw this article on the CHI-STL corridor status at Progressive Railroading and this thread appears to be the most on-topic for it.

    Progressive Railroading November magazine article: The Chicago-to-St. Louis higher-speed rail project nears finish line. (well, depending on how one defines "nearing" the finish line. The funded track work will continue to 2018).

    Excerpts which help to explain why the upgrades have been taking so long (think EIS and going through the local approval process to upgrade almost 300 grade crossings).

    BTW, calling the CHI-STL "high speed rail" project has always been a stretch. I agree with one of the comments to the article that the project and maybe even the title of this thread should be Chicago - St. Louis higher speed rail.
     
  22. Jun 8, 2016 #22

    norfolkwesternhenry

    norfolkwesternhenry

    norfolkwesternhenry

    Lead Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2016
    Messages:
    474
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    The Texas Eagle has Superliner cars, which can only handle 100 MPH, but the problem is most likely the engine does not have the remote signaling needed for speeds above 79 MPH, according to US law
     
  23. Jun 8, 2016 #23

    norfolkwesternhenry

    norfolkwesternhenry

    norfolkwesternhenry

    Lead Service Attendant

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2016
    Messages:
    474
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    not quite, one P42 can pull the Texas Eagle at 100 MPH, because they roll very well, it does not have the signaling needed for speeds 79+ MPH, according to US law
     
  24. Jun 8, 2016 #24

    Eric S

    E

    Eric S

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,421
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Are you responding to a particular question or comment?

    It's been over 6 months since there was a comment in this thread, until yours.
     
  25. Jun 9, 2016 #25

    Steve4031

    S

    Steve4031

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    5,361
    Location:
    Chicago
    At least it addresses the topic to some degree. It's about trains operating on the Lincoln service route. This is unlike most of the posts on AU.
     

Share This Page



arrow_white