CAHSR Alignment to San Francisco

Discussion in 'High Speed and Other Non-Amtrak Intercity Rail' started by jis, Aug 14, 2019.

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

  1. Aug 14, 2019 #1

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    25,070
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  2. Aug 18, 2019 #2

    MARC Rider

    M

    MARC Rider

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,382
    Location:
    Baltimore. MD
    It sounds like they're doing the right thing with the blended tracks to get the trains into the city. But some people can't be satisfied, I guess:

    "Nevertheless, it seemed like several people visiting the meeting were disappointed by the politics and compromises. “I want a better future,” said TR, who lives in San Francisco. “I want to be able to go between San Francisco and Los Angeles and have a smaller environmental impact.”

    So he won't be able to go between SF and LA if the train takes a couple of minutes longer? As for environmental impact, the faster the train runs, the greater the GHG emissions. Power requirements increase as a cube of the velocity. So maybe you don't really need a train that goes 200 mph. They don't need instantaneous travel between the two cities, they just have to be competitive with other modes of transport. And given our lack of political will to pay the big bucks needed for these kinds of infrastructure projects, maybe a slower, cheaper train is a better idea.

    Sometimes I wish they would teach basic engineering principles in K-12 educations, stuff about how all designs are compromises and to suck it up and learn to live with it.
     
  3. Aug 18, 2019 #3

    jis

    jis

    jis

    Conductor AU Lifetime Supporter Gathering Team Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    25,070
    Location:
    Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
    I think those few should really hold out for the Teleporter ROTFL :D
     
  4. Aug 19, 2019 #4

    cirdan

    cirdan

    cirdan

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,342
    The acceleration burns way much more energy than cruising at any speed. So pulling a train over into a passing track, only to accelerate it back to full speed is much more harmful for the environment than just having the same train plod along. ​
     
  5. Aug 20, 2019 #5

    leemell

    leemell

    leemell

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,523
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    CHSR is completely renewable electricity (solar, wind, stored) so GHGs will not be increased by higher speeds.
     
    Devil's Advocate likes this.
  6. Aug 30, 2019 #6

    Anderson

    A

    Anderson

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    9,373
    Location:
    Virginia
    Depends on how the power is generated...
     
  7. Aug 30, 2019 #7

    leemell

    leemell

    leemell

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,523
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Solar arrays, wind turbine farms, hydroelectric (dams in the Sierra Nevadas)
     
  8. Aug 31, 2019 #8

    Anderson

    A

    Anderson

    Conductor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    9,373
    Location:
    Virginia
    Which I agree with, though IIRC there have been issues with overall power generation figures. I was more drawing a line under the fact that HSR powered by, say, coal or gas at least has less of an edge on that front.
     

Share This Page



arrow_white