- Joined
- Feb 18, 2003
- Messages
- 8,507
Oops. Watching NFL, half saw "WSDOT," and brain spit out Wisconsin. Game over, brain fully engaged - now Washington.
Last edited by a moderator:
Amtrak Siemens Charger locomotive (SC44, ALC42, ALC42E) (2015 - 1Q 2024)
- Thread starter randomguy65
- Start date
Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:
- Status
WSDOT is Washington State DOT, not Wisconsin. So, IL and CA opted to start from xxx1 while WA opted to started from xxx0. Oh, a start from Zero versus One indexing issue!
Those computer geeks in Washington prefer 0-based algorithms, right Charlie?WSDOT is Washington State DOT, not Wisconsin. So, IL and CA opted to start from xxx1 while WA opted to started from xxx0. Oh, a start from Zero versus One indexing issue!
CSXfoamer1997
OBS Chief
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2015
- Messages
- 575
I think the NCDOT should purchase SC-44's to replace the old F59's. Those might not last for long. Besides, the SC-44's would run faster and be more environmental friendly than those older ones.
The F59PHI is capable of 110 mph. Just where does North Carolina have track where the trains can even come close to that, let alone faster? There's no need for a 125 mph locomotive.
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
And money really does not grow on trees
One presumes the SEHSR corridor eventually and the F59s are due for replacement in the next few years.
Thirdrail7
Engineer
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 4,542
Is there a series for the MARC units?
Dutchrailnut
Conductor
the MARC units won't be build till 2017.
keelhauled
OBS Chief
By the time SEHSR comes to fruition whatever replaces the F59s will probably be hitting retirement age themselves...in any case NCDOT seems to be happy buying the occasional used locomotive, I tend to doubt that will change.
neroden
Engineer
Fascinating. First, it looks like Illinois gets all its locos first. It looks like Illinois has decided to do all the burn-in testing at Pueblo so I guess they'll all go to Pueblo first. 4601 and 4602 are presumably receiving mods (being the earliest two)? We know 4603 is going to Washington for what appears to be systems integration testing, which 4604 already did on the NEC. I assume that California will do its integration testing on IDTX units as well. Once that's all done, it looks like Illinois is going to get a bulk delivery of more than 10 locomotives at once. I wonder which route they'll put them on first? (Why I am asking? It'll be Chicago-St. Louis, won't it?)
CraigDK
Service Attendant
Just remember that the Illinois units are not exclusive to IL only, they are just as likely to show up on another Midwest line first. If ten or a dozen units show up at once, they will probably spread out rapidly.
Hopefully they go into service soon. Got two trips to Stl lined up.
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
AFAIK, the answer is no.
Last edited by a moderator:
Remember, IDOT is only acting as the coordinating agency for the Midwest 3 state consortium which collectively will own the SC-44s (and the N-S bi-levels). So Michigan and Missouri have a voice in who gets the new shiny locomotives first. I expect the states have agreed to a deployment schedule by now. With two high profile 110 mph corridors, my guess is that the SC-44s will be deployed to the Lincoln and Wolverine services first with a lot of publicity. As to which would go first, yes, probably CHI-STL followed shortly by a revenue service run on a Wolverine train.
west point
Engineer
There might be one reason for NC DOT to get the Chargers. Once the "S" line is rebuilt from Petersburg - Raleigh that route may be 125 MPH capable. NC will probably provide some of the loco power for the route. It is planned to be rebuilt with no grade crossings Norlina - Petersburg.
Last edited by a moderator:
I am hoping that the CHI-STL route gets them first.
On a side note, I rode BNL - CHI and back this week. For both trips, we only went just over 100 mph on the Pontiac to Dwight section. Has the speed limit slowed down? We did not get close to 110. I also noted that the trains were running locomotives on each end, but they seem to be only running one locomotive now.
Of course, after going 100 mph from Dwight to Pontiac, we were sent to the Pontiac siding to wait for a late northbound train that was just leaving Bloomington. Not sure why the Lexington siding wasn't available, but we ended up going from 5 minutes late leaving Pontiac to 25 minutes late into Bloomington after sitting on a siding for 20 minutes. I am still curious how high speed rail along with increase freight traffic is going to to work on a line that is primarily single track from Joliet to Alton.
On a side note, I rode BNL - CHI and back this week. For both trips, we only went just over 100 mph on the Pontiac to Dwight section. Has the speed limit slowed down? We did not get close to 110. I also noted that the trains were running locomotives on each end, but they seem to be only running one locomotive now.
Of course, after going 100 mph from Dwight to Pontiac, we were sent to the Pontiac siding to wait for a late northbound train that was just leaving Bloomington. Not sure why the Lexington siding wasn't available, but we ended up going from 5 minutes late leaving Pontiac to 25 minutes late into Bloomington after sitting on a siding for 20 minutes. I am still curious how high speed rail along with increase freight traffic is going to to work on a line that is primarily single track from Joliet to Alton.
Northwest Railfan
Train Attendant
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 36
Surprised no one posted about it, but IDOT 4611 is almost to Seattle on #14 now. I'm hoping to catch a test train when they start running.
Fan Railer
OBS Chief
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 887
So did the unit number for the WSDOT test loco change from 03 to 11? Or are they sending both units up to WSDOT?
Northwest Railfan
Train Attendant
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 36
I believe they are only sending 4611.
Northwest Railfan
Train Attendant
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 36
I believe they are only sending 4611. I was surprised as well.
Thirdrail7
Engineer
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 4,542
The 4610 is preparing to ship to Pueblo.
Fan Railer
OBS Chief
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 887
Nice. Anyone know the testing schedule for 4611?
- Status
