Commuter Rail from Las Cruces to El Paso

shop deals on amazon
Advertise with us
Shop deals on ebay
Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
DesertDude

DesertDude

Train Attendant
Joined
Sep 18, 2014
Messages
86
Conversations on commuter rail service to El Paso begin

I definitely think Las Cruces is a good candidate for rail service (see my other thread here). In a perfect world, a daily Sunset Limited could take NMSU students to Los Angeles and Houston and the major cities in between. I'm not sure LC-EP is a good corridor for frequent commuter service, but I'm impressed that locals are expressing support for the idea.
 
Nice idea, but you're involving Texas in this plan, and unfortunately, Texas is pretty much an anti-passenger rail state. And I agree with you: I have doubts that the corridor would be a viable one. If Santa Fe to Alburquerque is struggling, it's pretty much a given that this one will struggle even more.
 
Palmetto said:
Nice idea, but you're involving Texas in this plan, and unfortunately, Texas is pretty much an anti-passenger rail state. And I agree with you: I have doubts that the corridor would be a viable one. If Santa Fe to Alburquerque is struggling, it's pretty much a given that this one will struggle even more.
Click to expand...
DART is not too shabby and they are supposed to build Cotton Belt line soon.

Although I don't know if they got the green light for that.
 
This is a good idea! According to friends that live in Las Cruces lots of Students and Locals go to El Paso for Shopping, Partying ( Juarez used to be Great till the Cartel War turned it into Murder Central) and to catch Planes and the Sunset Ltd.

The Long Dog runs between El Paso and Albuquerque thru Las Cruses but the connection times with the Sunset suck!

I've always wondered why the Sunset is routed along the border instead of through Las Cruses? UP runs it's Freights that way, perhaps they could be flip-flopped and the Sunset would benefit by running through a Growing College town instead of the Ghost towns it serves in the desert!???
 
Palmetto said:
Nice idea, but you're involving Texas in this plan, and unfortunately, Texas is pretty much an anti-passenger rail state. And I agree with you: I have doubts that the corridor would be a viable one. If Santa Fe to Alburquerque is struggling, it's pretty much a given that this one will struggle even more.
Click to expand...
Go to Dallas and tell me that again.

With the TRE, a HUGE Dart system, The A Train, the Heartland Flyer, the Texas Eagle, and Sunset Limited, I would hardly call Texas "Anti Passenger Rail".

What Texas IS against is spending MILLIONS of dollars on an infrastructure that no one will use.

TEXAS probably could care less about a train between Las Cruces and El Paso. But if El Paso and Las Cruces want it, they can make it happen.

Texas just isn't as stupid as Bill Richardson who crammed a poorly conceived and even worse executed rail plan, putting the state into even more debt, possibly totally screwing up the Southwest Chief, and leaving all the mess in the hands of his successors while he galavants in North Korea saving idiots who shouldn't have gone there in the first place.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll concede things are moving along in the big Texas cities, and it's about time don't you think? Let's consider outside the Metroplex and Houston, though. There's a certain MPO in Southmost Texas that isn't even aware of the State's rail plan, which includes extending passenger rail services into its territory.

There is intercity rail service in the country's fourth largest city only three times a week. There is ONE train that runs north to OKC daily. That does not make a corridor. Three plus trains per day does, though.

Texas has a long way to go vis-a-vis rail transit, and Dallas is the oasis in the transit desert.

I would really like to find a source that cites the actual annual figure that Texas contributes towards its current passenger rail. I'll work on that.
 
Isn't the Heartland Flyer in serious risk of getting canned due to shortage of funding in the coming year?

Yeah, a good commuter network is not the same as good intercity service. Texas does not have much of the latter, and has only one and a half of the former.
 
Jis is correct about about the Heartland Flyer being in danger of disappearing and the lack of most Texas politicians interest, or outright opposition, to anything rail in Texas.

We miss Kay Bailey Hutchison in the Senate, our current Senators are the Grey Ghost Cornyn and Terrible Ted Cruz, and the Congress Critters are focused on preventing Anything from passing that might make Obama look good.

As was said, the Political leaders in the Metro-Plex ( Hi Tony!) are a pleasant exception. The so called Progressive leaders here in the Traffic Choked People's Republic of Austin are sadly MIA when it comes to Rail matters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
VentureForth said:
Palmetto said:
Nice idea, but you're involving Texas in this plan, and unfortunately, Texas is pretty much an anti-passenger rail state. And I agree with you: I have doubts that the corridor would be a viable one. If Santa Fe to Alburquerque is struggling, it's pretty much a given that this one will struggle even more.
Click to expand...
Go to Dallas and tell me that again.
Click to expand...
Go to San Antonio, where passenger rail is uniquely restricted from receiving public funding or even the use of public land, and tell me what Dallas has to do with the rest of the state.

VentureForth said:
What Texas IS against is spending MILLIONS of dollars on an infrastructure that no one will use.
Click to expand...
Are you really talking about the same state that is in the process of bailing out poorly conceived, illogically constructed, and extremely expensive private toll roads with public taxpayer debt relief?

VentureForth said:
Texas just isn't as stupid as Bill Richardson...
Click to expand...
Please tell me more about the incredible genius of Rick Perry, Greg Abbot, Ted Cruz, and Ken Paxton.

VentureForth said:
With the TRE, a HUGE Dart system, The A Train, the Heartland Flyer, the Texas Eagle, and Sunset Limited, I would hardly call Texas "Anti Passenger Rail".
Click to expand...
Maybe that's because you casually deflect honest questions with irrational nonsense and intentionally twist the facts to fit an inherently dishonest position.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Devil's Advocate said:
VentureForth said:
Palmetto said:
Nice idea, but you're involving Texas in this plan, and unfortunately, Texas is pretty much an anti-passenger rail state. And I agree with you: I have doubts that the corridor would be a viable one. If Santa Fe to Alburquerque is struggling, it's pretty much a given that this one will struggle even more.
Click to expand...
Go to Dallas and tell me that again.
Click to expand...
Go to San Antonio, where passenger rail is uniquely restricted from receiving public funding or even the use of public land, and tell me what Dallas has to do with the rest of the state.

VentureForth said:
What Texas IS against is spending MILLIONS of dollars on an infrastructure that no one will use.
Click to expand...
Are you really talking about the same state that is in the process of bailing out poorly conceived, illogically constructed, and extremely expensive private toll roads with public taxpayer debt relief?

VentureForth said:
Texas just isn't as stupid as Bill Richardson...
Click to expand...
Please tell me more about the incredible genius of Rick Perry, Greg Abbot, Ted Cruz, and Ken Paxton.

VentureForth said:
With the TRE, a HUGE Dart system, The A Train, the Heartland Flyer, the Texas Eagle, and Sunset Limited, I would hardly call Texas "Anti Passenger Rail".
Click to expand...
Maybe that's because you casually deflect honest questions with irrational nonsense and intentionally twist the facts to fit an inherently dishonest position.
Click to expand...
His home state isn't much better, either, by the way. They've been talking about commuter rail out of Atlanta for who knows how long.
 
Yep, gotta agree that Georgia isn't exactly New York or California when it comes to Rail!

But with the exception of Senator Kay Bailey Hutichison, who is greatly missed, and the DFW Metroplex Politicians (including an AU Member!), Texas is hopeless when it comes to any kind of Rail.

This includes Austin and San Antonio, supposedly two Progressive cities in a State that vies with Alabama, Georgia and Ohio as those that have the most anti-Rail Politicians!
 
As someone who lived in one of those small communities south of Cruces for 12 years and who still has friends there, I say it is a waste to spend the money on studies as it will never happen. Not in the 21st century.
 
Devil's Advocate said:
Go to San Antonio, where passenger rail is uniquely restricted from receiving public funding or even the use of public land, and tell me what Dallas has to do with the rest of the state.
Click to expand...
If that's what the people want.

Devil's Advocate said:
Are you really talking about the same state that is in the process of bailing out poorly conceived, illogically constructed, and extremely expensive private toll roads with public taxpayer debt relief?
Click to expand...
If you're talking about SH 130:

“The filing will have no financial impact on the state of Texas,” Orol said. “It’s business as usual for our customers, employees, vendors, and surrounding communities during these proceedings.”
Click to expand...
No one can predict usership.
How 'bout them states up in the Northeast who have huge tax burdens and STILL have to pay tolls just about everywhere they go? I mean Boston, the Bastion of Liberalism did GREAT with the Big Dig, didn't they?

Devil's Advocate said:
Please tell me more about the incredible genius of Rick Perry, Greg Abbot, Ted Cruz, and Ken Paxton.
Click to expand...
I dunno... But since Ann Richardson, residents seem to be pretty happy re-electing conservatives over and over and over and over and...

Devil's Advocate said:
Maybe that's because you casually deflect honest questions with irrational nonsense and intentionally twist the facts to fit an inherently dishonest position.
Click to expand...
Actually, I was being quite relevant to the OP's position on commuter rail, not deflecting, making comparative notes as to why Texas shouldn't be in the business of failing commuter rail lines.
If the New Mexico Railrunner (of which I'm a huge fan, despite only having seen phase one implemented in person) could have been more successful, my thinking could be skewed. But we're not talking about connecting huge population centers here. El Paso is huge, but not LC.

I think it's a shame that there isn't better rail connectivity between Dallas - Austin - San Antonio - Houston. You can blame Southwest Airlines. A lot of good that'll do ya. But if and when the Florida Briteline becomes successful, you will see a renewed interest in intrastate rail (but that's not what started this conversation).

Texas isn't Anti-Rail - they are against taxing heavily and spending foolishly. They aren't perfect at it, but show me who is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Texas isn't Anti-Rail - they are against taxing heavily and spending foolishly. They aren't perfect at it, but show me who is.
Click to expand...
If Texas isn't anti-rail but only excessive public spending (though entirely coincidentally :rolleyes: highway projects are never excessive, only rail and transit), explain the opposition to the privately-funded Texas HSR proposal.
 
VentureForth said:
Devil's Advocate said:
Go to San Antonio, where passenger rail is uniquely restricted from receiving public funding or even the use of public land, and tell me what Dallas has to do with the rest of the state.
Click to expand...
If that's what the people want.
Click to expand...
It's really more that the rural folks and politicians don't want passenger rail but unfortunately that's all it takes.

VentureForth said:
Devil's Advocate said:
Are you really talking about the same state that is in the process of bailing out poorly conceived, illogically constructed, and extremely expensive private toll roads with public taxpayer debt relief?
Click to expand...
If you're talking about SH 130:

The filing will have no financial impact on the state of Texas, Orol said. Its business as usual for our customers, employees, vendors, and surrounding communities during these proceedings.
Click to expand...
Texas requested and eventually secured $400 million of American taxpayer money for use in building into SH130 that is now at risk of repayment, which by definition includes Texan taxpayers as well.

VentureForth said:
No one can predict usership.
Click to expand...
In reality it was widely panned and predicted to fail from the start. I live in the target area for this project and everyone I knew in South and Central Texas took one look at the distant routing and said it made no sense for folks traveling between major cities where most of the traffic originates. Lo and behold the project failed to gain anywhere near enough traction to be economically viable.

VentureForth said:
How 'bout them states up in the Northeast who have huge tax burdens and STILL have to pay tolls just about everywhere they go? I mean Boston, the Bastion of Liberalism did GREAT with the Big Dig, didn't they?
Click to expand...
What on earth does any of that have to do with passenger rail in Texas?

VentureForth said:
Devil's Advocate said:
Please tell me more about the incredible genius of Rick Perry, Greg Abbot, Ted Cruz, and Ken Paxton.
Click to expand...
I dunno... But since Ann Richardson, residents seem to be pretty happy re-electing conservatives over and over and over and over and...
Click to expand...
Yeah, Texans are happy to elect some of the least intelligent and most unreasonable politicians in the country. Maybe in your view intelligence is determined by political ideology rather than mental prowess, but that's not how I see it.

VentureForth said:
Devil's Advocate said:
Maybe that's because you casually deflect honest questions with irrational nonsense and intentionally twist the facts to fit an inherently dishonest position.
Click to expand...
Actually, I was being quite relevant to the OP's position on commuter rail, not deflecting, making comparative notes as to why Texas shouldn't be in the business of failing commuter rail lines.
Click to expand...
In reality your response is nothing but another course in dishonest deflection from someone who either has no idea what they're talking about or thinks their audience is too ignorant to see the fundamental flaws in their logic. Keep talking nonsense and I'll keep poking holes in your erroneous pseudologic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Devil's Advocate said:
In reality your response is nothing but another course in dishonest deflection from someone who either has no idea what they're talking about or thinks their audience is too ignorant to see the fundamental flaws in their logic. Keep talking nonsense and I'll keep poking holes in your erroneous pseudologic.
Click to expand...
I'm thrilled to know you are the most smartest person in the whole wide world and sorry to hear that everyone who disagrees with you are amongst the least intelligent and unreasonable. If mental prowess is defined by your acceptance, then I'm happy to be ignorant.

The point of this thread is primarily that there is discussion about a possible rail link between Las Cruces and El Paso.

Whereas the citizens of New Mexico are gung ho about the idea, Texan's are not.

Texans were declared to be anti-passenger rail.

I submitted that they aren't. Texans are against wasteful spending without benefit.

If you can show some economic sense why a rail link between a town of 100,000 and another city of 600,000 would benefit a group of people large enough to make it viable, I'm all ears.

Meanwhile, as much as I enjoy Amtrak, the Heartland Flyer is a FAILURE. I'm quite surprised it's lasted this long.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
VentureForth said:
Devil's Advocate said:
In reality your response is nothing but another course in dishonest deflection from someone who either has no idea what they're talking about or thinks their audience is too ignorant to see the fundamental flaws in their logic. Keep talking nonsense and I'll keep poking holes in your erroneous pseudologic.
Click to expand...
I'm thrilled to know you are the most smartest person in the whole wide world and sorry to hear that everyone who disagrees with you are amongst the least intelligent and unreasonable. If mental prowess is defined by your acceptance, then I'm happy to be ignorant. The point of this thread is primarily that there is discussion about a possible rail link between Las Cruces and El Paso. Whereas the citizens of New Mexico are gung ho about the idea, Texan's are not. Texans were declared to be anti-passenger rail. I submitted that they aren't. Texans are against wasteful spending without benefit. If you can show some economic sense why a rail link between a town of 100,000 and another city of 600,000 would benefit a group of people large enough to make it viable, I'm all ears. Meanwhile, as much as I enjoy Amtrak, the Heartland Flyer is a FAILURE. I'm quite surprised it's lasted this long.
Click to expand...
I'm by no means the smartest person in the world but I will say that I have lived in Texas for many years and I do not suffer foolishness lightly. If you're going to tell me how my own state works you better know what you're talking about. Echo chamber soundbites, sliding goalposts, and revisionist history will draw my ire every single time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pretty familiar with Texas, too. Lived in Longview for 4 years and Greenville for 8, not to mention Irving was my stateside address the whole time I grew up in Japan. Met Kay Bailey and John Cornyn (who spent a year or so at my high school in Japan). Both understood the importance of mass transit, with Cornyn a bit more weary of how to make it viable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
John Cornyn is actually very supportive of the Crescent Star proposal and pushing a bit for it. This is the proposal to run a section of the Crescent from meridian to Fort Worth. But he is exceedingly hampered by the party that is in complete disarray and a state of confusion about everything at present. If Trump truly becomes the leader of the party it might start looking much more like the Democratic party when it comes to infrastructure investment, or it might simply disintegrate. We'll have to wait and see how it evolves.
 
jis said:
John Cornyn is actually very supportive of the Crescent Star proposal and pushing a bit for it. This is the proposal to run a section of the Crescent from meridian to Fort Worth. But he is exceedingly hampered by the party that is in complete disarray and a state of confusion about everything at present. If Trump truly becomes the leader of the party it might start looking much more like the Democratic party when it comes to infrastructure investment, or it might simply disintegrate. We'll have to wait and see how it evolves.
Click to expand...
The faction of ideologues who consider passenger rail and transit automatically a boondoggle will not change their minds merely because Trump may think otherwise.
 
John Bredin said:
jis said:
John Cornyn is actually very supportive of the Crescent Star proposal and pushing a bit for it. This is the proposal to run a section of the Crescent from meridian to Fort Worth. But he is exceedingly hampered by the party that is in complete disarray and a state of confusion about everything at present. If Trump truly becomes the leader of the party it might start looking much more like the Democratic party when it comes to infrastructure investment, or it might simply disintegrate. We'll have to wait and see how it evolves.
Click to expand...
The faction of ideologues who consider passenger rail and transit automatically a boondoggle will not change their minds merely because Trump may think otherwise.
Click to expand...
The point is that may or may not matter depending on how much coherence of position is maintained by the rag tag circus known as the Republican Party today. It is well known that it is only a relatively small group of ideologues that have been holding everyone hostage. Will they be able to wield the same kind of power after the elections? There is no way to know, because everything is getting turned topsy turvy.
 
Bob Dylan said:
I've always wondered why the Sunset is routed along the border instead of through Las Cruses? UP runs it's Freights that way, perhaps they could be flip-flopped and the Sunset would benefit by running through a Growing College town instead of the Ghost towns it serves in the desert!???
Click to expand...
It's the geographical location. It has really steep mountains starting just north of El Paso, all the way north, somewhere south of Santa Fe. It's the Great Rift Valley where Rio Grande flows. So building track through Las Cruces is nearly impossible.
 
But there *is* track from El Paso to Las Cruces; it's a BNSF corridor. If it wasn't for the lack of seamless dispatching (two other host railroads own track from Las Cruces to Deming) and the possible poor track conditions of the shortline, then rerouting the SL via Las Cruces would be a no-brainer.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top