Majority would use HSR

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

CHamilton

Engineer
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Messages
5,301
Location
Seattle
Hmmm. While there are a lot of people who ride the existing high speed rail service in the NEC, more and more people I know are riding the Bolt Bus or similar services because of the cost. My wife and I decided to take a day trip to Philly for the 4th of July. RT fare for the two of us on the Regional (forget the Acela) was over $200! We need up driving. Even with downtown parking rates it was a bargain in comparison. For a jaunt to NY the usual bucket is $80 to $100 one way so its a $300-$400 trip. We usually only go if I Have a companion coupon.
 
Hmmm. While there are a lot of people who ride the existing high speed rail service in the NEC, more and more people I know are riding the Bolt Bus or similar services because of the cost. My wife and I decided to take a day trip to Philly for the 4th of July. RT fare for the two of us on the Regional (forget the Acela) was over $200! We need up driving. Even with downtown parking rates it was a bargain in comparison. For a jaunt to NY the usual bucket is $80 to $100 one way so its a $300-$400 trip. We usually only go if I Have a companion coupon.
Which shows that there is considerable demand if people are still packing the trains at those prices.
 
Here in Central Illinois, people are getting fed up with the cancellations of the Lincoln Service trains while the HSR rail is being constructed. Right now we have a 12 minute, or maybe it's 12 miles, section finished and it has taken years.

I'm not convinced that the HSR from Chicago to Springfield, along with the increased price, is going to result in increased revenue. Most of the politicians do their work in Chicago and go to Springfield only when absolutely necessary.
 
HSR under construction? To my knowledge there is only one HSR project under construction in the US right now and it is not in Illinois but in California. What is happening there? I couldn't find anything in the IDOT site or other searches.
 
I imagine the reference is to the CHI-STL HrSR project. Not sure whether "increased price" refers to the project's costs, or speculation that fares will rise, though.
 
I found it. The acccepted basic definition of HSR is trains the go faster then 125 MPH. This project is designed to increase passenger rail speed between Chicago and St Louis to 110 MPH. Siginificalntly faster than current speeds, but not High Speed Rail. A little project sales spin here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
An all-too-common sales spin, I'd say. Many (most?) of the upgraded rail projects and proposals around the country have been portrayed as HSR, even though max speeds have typically not been higher than 110mph. CHI-STL is hardly unique in this regard.

This is why I prefer "HrSR" rather than "HSR" to refer to these projects.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But why "cheapen the brand" (so to speak) just because we are horrible with passenger rail (and transit) in this country?
 
Back
Top