Amtrak Asks Two People Who Use Wheelchairs To Pay $25,000 For A Ride (NPR 1/17/20)

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The headline seems pretty accurate to me. 5 guests in wheelchairs is not an extreme number, the standard city busses that run on Disney property accommodate 2 each.

From what I am reading, it isn't wheelchairs, but instead larger power scooters. These people can be easily accommodated in regular seats, but don't want their power scooters put in with luggage or baggage because they claim the power chairs can be (will be?) damaged.
 
To put this into perspective, what could $25k get me in the private car world?

On that route I believe you could get quite a lot. I don’t have the milage figures ahead of me because I have no internet on the Heartland Flyer. But if the milage is what I remember it’s 2,000 ish a car round trip. So you could do five cars if each was 2,000 per day and had no deadhead. Now that doesn’t include food/drink. If you originate the trip in STL and not in Chicago and stay on the same consist there is no switching charge in STL.
 
Amtrak has reversed course — at least partly — on its plan to charge two wheelchair users $25,000 for a short train ride, after hearing criticism, including from a U.S. senator.

NPR has a update that contains the above quote. Seem there a lot of people using the train to get there.
 
NPR has a update that contains the above quote. Seem there a lot of people using the train to get there.

Good news!

I agree with her, if Amtrak has the ability to reconfigure a railcar to allow for the passengers, they should have to do so when requested.

“Duckworth, who is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Transportation and Safety, went on to say she planned to request a meeting with Amtrak President and CEO Richard Anderson "to discuss eliminating Amtrak's nationwide policy of refusing to absorb any costs associated with reconfiguring a railcar to accommodate a group of wheelchair users."
 
Last edited:
The sad thing is that sometimes an unintended consequence of such things turns out to be service discontinuance. I am hoping it won’t come to that and Ms. Duckworth will make sure that Congress appropriates adequate funds for Amtrak to serve ADA customers at the level that everyone appears to desire.
 
The sad thing is that sometimes an unintended consequence of such things turns out to be service discontinuance. I am hoping it won’t come to that and Ms. Duckworth will make sure that Congress appropriates adequate funds for Amtrak to serve ADA customers at the level that everyone appears to desire.

Yes. It will clearly be the ADA customers fault for wanting to use a public transit service....
 
The sad thing is that sometimes an unintended consequence of such things turns out to be service discontinuance. I am hoping it won’t come to that and Ms. Duckworth will make sure that Congress appropriates adequate funds for Amtrak to serve ADA customers at the level that everyone appears to desire.
This is the kind of reaction Amtrak risked with their clumsy execution and sloppy response. It's not inconceivable that Amtrak could have started charging a substantial mitigation fee or imposed a long lead time for performing this service, but raising the price from trivial to $25,000 in a single leap requires a compelling justification. My guess is that Anderson is going to struggle with supplying a plausible good faith explanation.
 
Last edited:
Yes. It will clearly be the ADA customers fault for wanting to use a public transit service....

Who said anything about anyones fault? Services have to be paid for and adequate budgets help provide desired service. It makes sense to adequately fund things with clear instructions on what is funded and what is not so that a good audit can be carried out to determine whether appropriated money was spent properly for its intended purpose.
 
On that route I believe you could get quite a lot. I don’t have the milage figures ahead of me because I have no internet on the Heartland Flyer. But if the milage is what I remember it’s 2,000 ish a car round trip. So you could do five cars if each was 2,000 per day and had no deadhead. Now that doesn’t include food/drink. If you originate the trip in STL and not in Chicago and stay on the same consist there is no switching charge in STL.


How many PV's are handicapped accessible?
 
How many PV's are handicapped accessible?

This is really a place for the private car industry to come to the rescue again...

While PVs are not ADA compliant and are exempt from the regulation they are more willing to compromise than Amtrak and make arrangements. I know there are several ex Marc Pvs around that have an ADA door on the vestibule of the car. And I’m sure the owners would gladly take a row or two out. It would be more expensive than what the group is used to but way cheaper than $25,000
 
Perhaps, since they were booking 5 seats at the same time, it would have been better to say that Amtrak was charging 5 wheelchair passengers $5,000+ per seat "COACH"

But then, that would not be as eye-catching or sensational as saying they were charging two people $25,000

Perhaps, but I think $5,000 per person to go from Chicago to Bloomington would be pretty eye-popping as it is.

Amtrak clearly dropped the ball with its outrageous quote, the kind of quote that's designed to make the "problem" go away. Clearly a violation of the ADA, if not the letter of the law than the spirit of it. People with mobility issues are not a "problem."

One thing that hasn't been mentioned on this thread is that one of the causes of this situation is the relatively infrequent service on this corridor. I mean, it's pretty decent by Amtrak (non-NEC) standards, but if you had hourly trains then I suspect the group would have been far more amenable to splitting up.
 
I know of a few former Marc cars that probably could accommodate. If not a PV that is a party car out of a former baggage car could definitely. If they want to ride in their chairs it would make perfect sense. Use the baggage doors for loading.
 
The typical equipment used on the route is several Horizon and/or Amfleets which are wheel chair accessible. It think the group could have been accommodated without changing around seating by having them sit in two separate cars. The group would be split in half but without modifying cars. My $.02
 
Local transit agencies run paratransit services at a great cost in order to meet ADA requirements.

Amtrak should have chartered a bus, at their own cost, for the group, if they could not accommodate the passengers on board.

It is not the fault of the customers that Amtrak has not designed their vehicles to allow for quick modification needed to serve wheelchair passengers. ADA passed in 1990. Amtrak has had 30 years to update their procedures.
 
The typical equipment used on the route is several Horizon and/or Amfleets which are wheel chair accessible. It think the group could have been accommodated without changing around seating by having them sit in two separate cars. The group would be split in half but without modifying cars. My $.02
Three of them did sit in 3 separate cars. What surprises me is that there was only 1 space per car for a person in a wheelchair. I'm pretty sure, although not totally sure, that I have seen 2 wheelchairs with people in them in the same car when I got on a superliner in ABQ.
 
Three of them did sit in 3 separate cars. What surprises me is that there was only 1 space per car for a person in a wheelchair. I'm pretty sure, although not totally sure, that I have seen 2 wheelchairs with people in them in the same car when I got on a superliner in ABQ.
The Amfleet and Horizon equipment used on Midwest corridors has typically had seats (semi-permanently) removed for a wheelchair location. There might be space to fit two traditional/standard wheelchairs there, but likely only room for one larger motorized device.
 
Ski Train is running on weekends in Denver.

To be fair, the Ski Train has its costs reimbursed.

The TrainJam folks are rolling again this spring

To be fair, the Train Jam is operating with less equipment since they decided they didn't want to pay the new fees:

Unfortunately, due to pricing changes, we were unable to rent a second observation car as we had done in years past. We’ll still have the standard one observation car that comes on the California Zephyr, but it will definitely be a bit more cramped than years past. This means that our train will consist of three coach class cars, three sleeper cars, one restaurant car, and one observation car! Wow!

My response was:
That stinks. They really couldn't find a way to throw them a bone in the middle of the winter? After last year, I'd give them anything they want.

The school crossing guard are visiting DC.

With a much earlier commitment. At the end of the day, you are correct in saying it boils down to

What change is Richard Anderson.

Indeed. Go for the profit. I suspect that he may spin it to Senator Duckworth this way...that he is following the law and must operate to obtain a profit and eating costs aren't profitable. After all, this is the same group that didn't want to help out with the Toys For Tots train and now its probably gone for good.
 

The American Disabilities Act combined with the fact that Amtrak is subsidized by the government shows this policy to be unjust. If Amtrak could not have made real accommodations to do this, they should not have even mentioned a 25,000 cost but just said it couldn’t be done.

Amtrak should have disability friendly trains. Amtrak and state and local transit agencies should be ADA compliant as much as possible.

The government does have a right to cater to transportation for these people.

My own method would be to privatize Amtrak and state and local transit BUT require ADA compliance spending to be added to the private sector as disabled people are one group which deserve transportation that has subsidies. But the problem is the subsidized transit for fully able bodied individuals where it just costs too much and cutbacks are needed as private sector can handle better transportation methods for a lower cost.

This isn’t a partisan issue however and Amtrak was in violation of the American Disabilities act signed into law in 1990.
 
Last edited:
Amtrak should have disability friendly trains. Now if it was a private company without taxpayer funds, I would say that each company can have their own policies but Amtrak and state and local transit agencies should be ADA compliant as much as possible.
ADA is the law. Private companies have to comply with it too. So no, the private companies cannot just have their own policies that violate ADA.
 
What I mean by private companies is lets say you have an issue with one vendor who can’t cater to ADA needs because they don’t have expertise in it or it is cost prohibitive but there are other firms who can do it, there is no need to force everyone to comply as you can choose appropriate vendors which are competitive. But there should be vendors who are ADA complaint and there should also be profit in it as well.

With Amtrak, the agency is subsidized by taxpayers. Not every private transportation firm has to deal with handicap accessible passengers in the private sector but some do offer options.
 
Back
Top