Draft Appropriations bill

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
And so begins the tug-o-war for funds. Should be interesting to watch, if nothing more than for the heartburn.
 
Amtrak Joe and the Senate will do Better by Amtrak and the Reps from Rail Friendly States and Districts will make sure its Improved when the Conference Committes hash out the Real Budget! ;) (This has been going on since Amtrak's Birth when the Nixon Gang set it up to Disappear :angry: !)
 
I just saw on the web that the House released it's draft appropriations bill that cits Amtrak subsidy by 30%. That's a pretty hefty cut!
It actually increases the total funding for Amtrak to $1.8 billion, so the news is not that bad. I guess it is the operating subsidy that is taking the hit, which should not be a surprise. The text states that it 'rescinds funding for high-speed rail service" - is this a direct attack on the CA HSR project?
The House Appropriations committee statement on rail:

Rail The Federal Railroad Administration is funded at $2 billion, which is $384 million above last years level and $716 million below the Presidents request. Of this amount, $1.8 billion is targeted to Amtrak, primarily for capital improvements to the nations rail lines. Within the funds for Amtrak, the bill includes $500 million in grant funding to build and maintain rail bridges and tunnels in local communities, and rescinds funding for high-speed rail service.
The bill also includes policy reforms for Amtrak that have been enacted in previous years, such as requiring overtime limits on Amtrak employees to reduce unnecessary costs, and prohibiting federal funding for routes where Amtrak offers a discount of 50% or more off normal, peak fares.
FTA Transit funding takes a direct hit with $181 million less than FY2012, which is really bad if that includes sequestration.

Of course, this is the House bill which may get revised before full passage by the House by a narrow margin on a party line vote (the Republican majority is a narrow one after all). The Senate bill will look pretty different and I doubt that Senator Mikulski will agree to the House cuts in transportation funding, especially to transit and passenger rail.
 
I know Amtrak put in for a drop in the operating grant, so this doesn't seem to be the end of the world. I don't know if the 30% cut measures from pre-sequestration or post-sequestration levels...but Amtrak's request on the operating side was $373m. Pre-sequestration, from what I can tell, Amtrak got $466m; post-sequestration, $442m. The former times 70% would be $326.2m, the latter $309.4m.

On the bright side, the request included $1.33bn in added capital funding, so it looks like even the House version of the bill contains a substantial increase on that front.
 
That was my thinking. This sort of baseline offers a very real possibility of Amtrak getting most or all of what it was looking for. If CAHSR becomes a sticking point, it seems plausible that Amtrak might come out ahead in such a compromise. But it certainly seems that, aside from CAHSR, it's not a bad starting position at all.

One other quick point: Please remember that Amtrak's operating subsidy need is likely to drop by about $50-100m next year (depending on year over year expense and revenue trends) due to PRIIA revenue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Someone should dig into the House Appropriations draft bill to see what exactly in there for Amtrak. According to Boardman, Amtrak is getting $600 million total for capital grants which after debt service and equipment maintenance would leave only $200 million for everything else. Boardman appears to be hoping mad, quoting from the Trains Magazine newswire:

Reacting angrily, Boardman promptly called a news conference to denounce the proposed cuts and said he would, if necessary, institute “slow speed service” on the Northeast Corridor, “if we don’t get the repairs we need. I will not compromise safety, but that would put all of our ticket revenue from Acela and Northeast Regional services at risk.”
The Trains Magazine Newswire story: Boardman: House appropriators put entire Amtrak network at risk. However, unless you are a registered subscriber, it is likely to be blocked. But I expect other transportation and rail news sources will write about it.

Going to be a major battle in Congress this year over Amtrak, passenger rail, and transit funding (among many others). The House has been spending its time in the past 3-4 months passing bills on party line votes that they know the Senate will ignore. The leverage of the hardcore slash and burn House Republicans in the end may be limited, however, as the annual budget deficit is falling rather quickly which is now expected to postpone the need to raise the debt limit until November or December.
 
Someone should dig into the House Appropriations draft bill to see what exactly in there for Amtrak. According to Boardman, Amtrak is getting $600 million total for capital grants which after debt service and equipment maintenance would leave only $200 million for everything else.
From the NARP press release:

The draft bill, which the subcommittee will consider tomorrow, slashes Amtrak’s budget by a third, threatening Amtrak's very existence. The bill also fails to include funding for the High Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Program. Not only does the bill include no new funding for the highly over-subscribed TIGER grants—a competitive, multi-modal program—it rescinds $237 million in previously appropriated FY 2013 TIGER funding that is not yet obligated....

The House committee’s bill has just $950 million for Amtrak, a 29% cut from the final 2013 number [$1,344 million]. This includes a $350 million operating grant (21% below the FY 2013 level), and $600 million in capital (33.5% below FY 2013).
 
Getting hopping mad about the organization's potential Congressional authorization is part of any director's job description, regardless of who is in charge of congress and how much money is involved.
 
Ok, someone (preferably not NARP) needs to sort out what is really going on. These numbers simply don't add up.
 
Here is a link to The US House's Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines and Hazardous Materials first hearing on Rail Reauthorization for 2013.

And here is Chairman Denhan's opening statement:

The starting point for this reauthorization is Amtrak and the Administration’s respective budget requests. This is our starting point because the primary policy questions answered in this, or any other reauthorization, are how much federal funding do we allocate and what should that funding be used for?

Chairman Shuster and I are committed to Rail Reauthorization this year and hopefully this hearing will continue this bipartisan effort.

Today, we will hear from both Amtrak and the Administration regarding Amtrak’s fiscal needs. As you may know, the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) authorized funding levels for Amtrak over five years for operating grants and capital grants.

On the operating side, PRIIA authorized, Amtrak requested, and Congress has appropriated amounts higher than Amtrak’s actual needs. In fact, since PRIIA was enacted, Amtrak received $2.6 billion in operating appropriations, but actually only had $2.1 billion in losses. While Amtrak did use this money on important projects like purchasing a new set of long distance train sets, imagine if Amtrak could have leveraged this half billion dollars for its infrastructure needs on the Northeast Corridor. I look forward to exploring this matter with our witnesses.

With regard to capital grants, the PRIIA authorization levels were higher than what has been consistently appropriated. In FY 2014, Amtrak is requesting $2.27 billion for its capital program, about $1.4 billion more than the FY 2013 amount ($904 million). This additional funding includes the procurement of new rolling stock ($356 million), initiation projects related to the new Hudson River tunnels in New York ($167 million), and continued station compliance with the Americans with Disability Act.

In addition to hearing about Amtrak’s fiscal needs, both entities will also address the reorganization of Amtrak into business lines. Amtrak’s decision to split out Northeast Corridor, State-Supported Routes, and Long-Distance Routes will create more transparency and show stakeholders where federal funding is needed.

There is growing agreement between Amtrak, the Administration, and others like the Brookings Institute that reorganization is a big first step toward running Amtrak more like a business, which should allow proper infrastructure development. The current operating structure does not allow proper infrastructure development because the profits of the Northeast Corridor go to subsidize losses on other routes, especially the Long Distance Routes.

We must find a better way to do this and we are open to any ideas.
And here is an excerpt from the hearing's press release:

The hearing will examine Amtrak’s Fiscal Year 2014 grant request: $373 million for operations and $2.27 billion for its capital program. The Subcommittee will also explore how Amtrak’s budget request relates to the rail service’s on-going reorganization and the upcoming reauthorization of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) – one the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure’s legislative priorities this year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The ruckus being raised in the House over Amtrak's appropriation is coming from the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation and HUD, according to DC.STREETS.org's article “The Twilight of the Appropriations Process”: House GOP Gets Its Knives Out"

From the article:

the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation and HUD passed a $44 billion spending bill for 2014 – 15 percent lower than 2013 enacted levels. The bill contains $15.3 billion in discretionary appropriations for the Department of Transportation, also 15 percent below enacted 2013 levels and amounting to about two-thirds of the president’s request. It passed the subcommitee this morning [Wed., 6/19/13] on a voice vote.

The budget would eliminate both TIGER and high-speed rail funding (as have all House-passed budgets in recent memory), cut Amtrak’s subsidy by a third, and bring HUD’s Community Development Block Grants back to Ford administration levels. While the cuts are steep, as in past years they are unlikely to be enacted, given Democratic control of the Senate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looking at the situation, it sounds like Ryan put Shuster in an impossible position. With that said...I'm still seeing multiple versions of the numbers on the ground.
 
There is an AP story on the Senate proposed budget that has info on what the Senate numbers currently are for Amtrak and TIGER grants. Still nowhere what Amtrak needs, but at least it would be more than the House. The outcome of the appropriations process this year is anyone's guess in the wake of the defeat of the farm bill in the House last week. With the annual federal budget deficit falling faster than predicted, we are in strange times in Washington with the parties locked into discretionary budget numbers from 2 years ago and the sequestration.

Excerpt:

Working with the additional money, Democrats were able Tuesday to actually propose boosting Amtrak's $1.4 billion budget to almost $1.5 billion instead of cutting it to $950 million as proposed by the House. Murray's $500 million pot for bridge construction wasn't even requested by President Barack Obama but follows major bridge collapses in Minnesota and Kentucky as well as the I-5 collapse in Skagit County last month.
Murray also boosted a so-called TIGER grant program for transportation projects first established under Obama's 2009 economic stimulus bill, proposing $550 million, a 10 percent increase. Her House GOP counterpart, Tom Latham of Iowa, not only would eliminate next year's funding but would pull back $237 million already approved.
 
As has been the case for decades, but ever increasingly so: the best government money can buy - got $100B for farm subsidies, countless hundreds of billions for the MIC; but something that actually serves the people: Amtrak... sorry, no money. :(
 
I just emailed my congress-thingy protesting said cuts... now if others would just do likewise...
 
Amtrak posted a news release yesterday with Boardman's statement on the proposed Senate FY2014 appropriations. I'm sure Boardman would rather have $2 billion or more to fund Gateway studies, a piece of the Portal Bridge replacement, rolling stock acquisitions, but he will take what he can get and hope for more favorable conditions either next year or after the 2014 mid-terms.

WASHINGTON – Amtrak President and CEO Joe Boardman made the following statement on today’s action by the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development regarding proposed federal funding for Amtrak in FY 2014:
“The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee proposed FY 2014 funding level for Amtrak of $1.45 billion is a realistic and workable number. It recognizes the need for federal investment to operate and maintain the Amtrak national network, and to keep the Northeast Corridor the safe and reliable economic engine that it is today.“Even at this funding level, however, there is a significant amount of critical backlog infrastructure work that will not get done. In order for the nation’s intercity passenger rail system to reach its full potential, Amtrak will need higher and sustained levels of federal capital funding.”
 
Given the "stop everything" approach being taking by the Republicans in Congress lately, I would be unsurprised if we were running on continuing appropriations straight through all of 2014.
 
Make that 2016, given the massive structural advantage that they have in the apportionment of districts. The 114th Congress isn't going to be any better than this current bunch of do-nothings.
 
Count me horrified at Denham's notion that Amtrak ought to move away from the cross-subsidization model.

Deregulation (which achieved the same ends) in intercity bus service and in air service (although air service receives huge Federal grants to keep rural service in place, which has slowed the 'rationalization' of service) has resulted in shrinking transportation networks. Sure, there are lower prices between popular destinations, but the promised profits never seem to materialize and the customer is stuck with lowered safety (Fung Wah, anyone?) or compromised service (US Airways).

It seems like the end game is to spend billions of public money on infrastructure upgrades or fixes on the NEC and then farm out operation to a private operator so they can make a private profit at the public's expense. Rather than reaping the infrastructure dividend to provide enhanced service to the network, rural and network backbone service will be cut for being too "costly". Those who cannot fly will be stuck taking the 'Hound on vastly cut back schedules between state-supported stub corridor services.

Note: if a Greyhound trip is overbooked, you may be out of luck that day. Thanks, Congress!
 
The House Transportation Committee is holding hearings on the Amtrak reauthorization and funding and the House Republicans are making quite clear that they are out to slash the Amtrak network. The concept for the $950 million in appropriations is that Amtrak can make up the difference by selling off or leasing its NEC assets to private investors. This would be a replay of the glide path to profitability era.

Anyway, came across this July 9 Streetsblog post Amtrak Foe Mica Meets His Match in John Robert Smith. Mica really has it in for the Amtrak LD trains and food service.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top