Recent content by Anderson

I mean, those "spiraling" exchange rates should help. A dollar buys almost 50% more JPY than it used to, so an American operation would be getting a big discount on the equipment...

I mean, presuming they can get the money together for the line (a big presumption), at least we're at a point that they could just order another batch of either Acela IIs or...whatever it is Brightline is going to use out in CA/NV.

If the Cap-Star runs with three sleepers, that would be 15 needed (vs 8 now). If the Meteor goes to three sleepers, that'd be 12 needed (vs 8 now). Even assigning 3/1 to the LSL (12 needed) and 2 to the Crescent and Cardinal each (8 and 4 needed), that's "only" 51 of 74. That *should* be...

So, if VIA is going to do this, they really need some sort of bus/taxi connection into town. Admittedly there are only about 20 pax/train per those numbers (2x/week in each direction equals 208 departures per year), but that just tells me that they could cover demand for that with a large van...

It's a good question whether that's an Amtrak-induced thing or if MNRR insists on it.

At the time, DCA-LGA on AA (IIRC) still ran close to hourly. I recall it being a big deal when they cut one midday frequency. [I'm also not sure if that 75% included onward connections on either side, but connecting traffic only needs 3-5x/day, not hourly service. It's where the market is...

From what I recall from plans 10-15 years ago, there *are* some cheaper time savings to be had (don't forget that the Acelas were running like 10 minutes faster back in '18 or '19, and I legitimately speculated that a nonstop time of 2:30 WAS-NYP was in sight w/improvements and new trains, and...

Yeah. It seems to have been a random idea Tampa came up with. It isn't even clear what the money is /for/, either. Edit: It sorta calls into question FL getting picked for Corridor ID...but as you said, DeSantis is about to term out.

So, I'm sticking by my phrasing, but only because I don't think it is unreasonable to wag a finger at them about impossible-to-meet-due-to-lack-of-equipment ridership projections. The issue is that, particularly once they get to some point, either they're not buying their projections or they're...

I'd say half an hour of wait time per call.

Mine are different insofar as they got "stuck" building a commuter market down there for a few years, building up a non-trivial passholder base. To be fair, I think they mismanaged the equipment order timing (as I've said repeatedly, even the close-in portions of their ridership projections...

So, about 9 sets are needed. You absolutely need 8 for the current schedule (3:25-3:30 for travel plus an apparent 30-ish minute allowance for turning), but this promptly effectively goes to 9 if there are any slow orders whatsoever (I think they effectively needed 9 to run the full schedule...

They're fine at four cars (now). I think the trolley might get a bit overwhelmed once you're around 7 cars (that might require a second attendant, and the cart only has but so much space). This feels like a case where a reasonable call could be made either way.

Or, in the case of Auto-Train, they pushed into an unwise expansion and then had those derailments. [I strongly suspect that if Auto-Train had stuck to LOR-SFA alone, they might still be operating.]

Eh, helping a friend/family member to the train strikes me as a valid reason to be on the platform. Not on the train, but at least the platform, especially if the red caps aren't being particularly useful.