Gold Line East L.A. Extension Clearance Test Video
#1
Posted 25 February 2009 - 03:08 PM
Performed under tow; with audio, and includes press release. (requires Adobe flash player, link provided)
#3
Posted 25 February 2009 - 07:41 PM
AnsaldoBreda (Italy) P2550s. Same outfit that built the Red/Purple Line subway rolling stock.
Metro Gold Line (Wikipedia, somewhat dated)
AnsaldoBreda
The Gold Line Eastside extension is slated to open this summer, ahead of schedule and under budget.
This post has been edited by WhoozOn1st: 25 February 2009 - 07:43 PM
#5
Posted 26 February 2009 - 07:05 PM
#7
Posted 02 March 2009 - 02:02 PM
sechs, on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 09:35 PM, said:
Good question, sechs, and I just now e-mailed L.A. Metro in search of an answer. If by Wednesday (3-4-09) I've not received a response I'll try to ask at Metro's weekly live chat.
EDIT: In the meantime, here is a dated (says of the Eastside Extension, "Construction is expected to begin soon." !!), but otherwise informative, look at the Gold Line in general, including 363 pics:
LAMTA Gold Line
EDIT 2: A Metro e-mail response informed me that my inquiry has been forwarded (from Customer Relations) for a response. Pretty quick reply!
This post has been edited by WhoozOn1st: 02 March 2009 - 07:00 PM
#8
Posted 02 March 2009 - 02:25 PM
WhoozOn1st, on Wed, Feb 25, 2009, 04:08 PM, said:
Performed under tow; with audio, and includes press release. (requires Adobe flash player, link provided)
WOW, that's pretty cool.
Silver Meteor #97 & #98 (2), Silver Star #91 (2), Capitol Limited #29 & #30(2), Empire Builder #7,#8,#27  Coast Starlight #11 & #14, California Zephyr #6, Cascades #506, City of New Orleans #58, South West Chief #3, San Joaquin #714, Pacific Surfliner #774, Texas Eagle #422, Cardinal #50, Crescent #19. Approx. 22,820 miles & 38 states!
#9
Posted 03 March 2009 - 06:18 PM
WhoozOn1st, on Mon, Mar 2, 2009, 12:02 PM, said:
sechs, on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 09:35 PM, said:
Good question, sechs, and I just now e-mailed L.A. Metro in search of an answer. If by Wednesday (3-4-09) I've not received a response I'll try to ask at Metro's weekly live chat.
EDIT: In the meantime, here is a dated (says of the Eastside Extension, "Construction is expected to begin soon." !!), but otherwise informative, look at the Gold Line in general, including 363 pics:
LAMTA Gold Line
EDIT 2: A Metro e-mail response informed me that my inquiry has been forwarded (from Customer Relations) for a response. Pretty quick reply!
Okay, folks, here's L.A. Metro's response to my inquiry regarding sechs' question (worded differently, as you can see). It is what it is.
_____________
We forwarded your request to Rail Operations staff on the Gold Line. The following is their response:
METRO CUSTOMER RELATIONS
AnsaldoBreda provided the most technologically advanced light rail vehicle to enhance Metro’s ability to better manage its rail fleet. The 2550 rail vehicle has the capacity to operate on all Metro light rail lines. The 76-passenger, 54-ton, 90-foot long vehicles contain the latest in rail car technology, from advanced propulsion system and diagnostic equipment to greater accessibility for Metro patrons. They have a life span of at least 30 years.
The new state of the art vehicle provides many improvements that will directly benefit Metro riders. Automated announcements on an interior and exterior public address system will announce approaching stops. Seats are cantilevered, which opens up floor space for faster boarding and alighting.
Some of the 2550 car’s other new features include:
Stainless steel structure and composite body components that increase the vehicle’s lifespan while reducing maintenance costs.
Camera security system that films interior and exterior views.
Global Positioning System.
Event Recorder (Black Box) that captures and records events and conditions of the vehicle in the case of incidents.
On-board hardware and software that improves fleet management capabilities.
Improved control and interior communication for train operators.
An improved regenerative braking system that feeds electrical power back into the overhead cantenary system.
Rail Operations
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Rail Operations is committed to operate and maintain
a safe, clean and efficient transit system with professionalism,
courtesy and integrity throughout the Los Angeles region.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [my e-mail address]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 10:57 AM
To: Customer Relations
Subject: I have questions, comments or concerns about Metro. [automatic subject upon clicking "Contact Us."]
Hello,
I am a member of, and contributor to, an online rail discussion group:
Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum [link]
In addition to Amtrak issues we also have a topic area for Commuter rail/light rail/subway discussions. I recently posted a thread about Gold Line Eastside Extension testing. Among the responses was a question to which I did not know the answer, so I'm writing in hopes of finding help with it.
It applies to the Gold Line as a whole: How and why was the decision reached to purchase new rolling stock from AnsaldoBreda instead of procuring additional Siemens equipment?
Perhaps an unusual inquiry, but at the forum we're quite interested in such things, and I hope you'll be able to enlighten us, or direct me to someone for a reply.
Thank you for your consideration,
Patrick Galligan
Ventura
This post has been edited by WhoozOn1st: 03 March 2009 - 06:20 PM
#11
Posted 04 March 2009 - 12:02 AM
WhoozOn1st, on Tue, Mar 3, 2009, 03:18 PM, said:
Translation: Breda offered all of the bells and whistles that we wanted at a lower price.
Well, they're definitely better looking than the Siemens model.
#12
#13
#14
Posted 23 March 2009 - 05:13 PM
sechs, on Tue, Mar 3, 2009, 10:02 PM, said:
WhoozOn1st, on Tue, Mar 3, 2009, 03:18 PM, said:
Translation: Breda offered all of the bells and whistles that we wanted at a lower price.
Well, they're definitely better looking than the Siemens model.
Here's a take on the AnsaldoBreda cars that's VERY different from the LACMTA party line that was essentially the response to my inquiry (posted above):
Mayor seeks a new chance for rail car maker
"After MTA decided not to exercise its options, the Italian company began intense lobbying."
Some interesting phrases used in the article to describe the new cars: ...significant design flaws...three years behind schedule...cars are too heavy...6,000 pounds heavier than specified in the contract, meaning they consume more energy...incompatible with those already in the Metro fleet [meaning the Siemens and Sumitomo cars]...concerned about the narrowness of the seats in the cars, the vehicles' reliability and their weight...
Sheesh!
#16
Posted 26 March 2009 - 12:23 PM
Is an Italian rail company taking L.A. for a ride?
#17
Posted 27 March 2009 - 08:38 AM
"Italy's AnsaldoBreda is granted a two-month reprieve in a deal to build 100 light-rail cars for the MTA."
#18
Posted 21 May 2009 - 08:34 AM
Today's vote by L.A.'s Community Redevlopment Agency board could set the stage for AnsaldoBreda to construct a factory for building 100 light rail cars.
#19
Posted 22 May 2009 - 01:46 PM
Talks with Italian rail firm approved
"The tentative agreement approved by the CRA [Community Redevelopment Agency] board Thursday set the terms for the rail company to lease a prized parcel of city land -- a deal that would be executed only if the MTA board agrees, as early as next Thursday, to let AnsaldoBreda build the 100 cars."
#20
Posted 22 May 2009 - 02:12 PM
WhoozOn1st, on Thu, May 21, 2009, 07:34 AM, said:
Today's vote by L.A.'s Community Redevlopment Agency board could set the stage for AnsaldoBreda to construct a factory for building 100 light rail cars.
Reading the details about the LA property between LA gov't and Italian AnsaldoBreda, I don't think it'll be a good deal since it's a 50 year lease. If you failed, the fines are hefty. Any opinions?

Sign In
Register
Help
Start a new topic
Add Reply

MultiQuote
