Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum: A way Amtrak can become profitable over night. - Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2

A way Amtrak can become profitable over night.

#1 Guest_Guest_gp35_*_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 04 May 2007 - 09:49 PM

Ofcourse I can't imagine this ever happening, but just for conversation sake.

2 Coaches added to an Amtrak train filled with slot machines and the bj table, keno board, crap table, etc...

Would it work?

#2 User is offline   battalion51 

  • Engineer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,133
  • Joined: 23-August 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 04 May 2007 - 09:57 PM

Well you'd run into a lot of issues with state and local laws. The alcohol rules on Sundays were hard enough to overcome throughout the years, much less tangoing with gambling rules. The other issue you run into is security for that amount of cash on a train. Right now a train carries maybe a couple of thousand dollars in cash from Diner and Lounge sales. It'd take a pretty significant security upgrade to even try slots.
The Chief-FSU Alumnus
ZBT - ZA Colony
In Memory of Steven Lorenz 1987-2006
Rail Miles Travelled: 66,107
Amtrak Florida
The Chief on Youtube New Video 03/27

#3 Guest_Guest_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 04 May 2007 - 10:15 PM

Maine was considering this.

The key is to use all credit cards, with no cash.

#4 Guest_Guest_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 04 May 2007 - 11:33 PM

View PostGuest, on Fri, May 4, 2007, 07:15 PM, said:

The key is to use all credit cards, with no cash.



Of course, this is against the rules of every gaming jurisdiction and regulators in the United States. Even if this weren't the case, every gaming jurisdiction (either state regulations or tribal regulations) that the train passes through would have to allow it. Would be quite a hassle to close up the 'casino car' every time you passed through an area that didn't allow gambling, like the state of Utah.

#5 Guest_Guest_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 05 May 2007 - 01:52 AM

View PostGuest, on Fri, May 4, 2007, 07:15 PM, said:

Maine was considering this.

The key is to use all credit cards, with no cash.


Most credit card companies decline all gambling transactions.

#6 Guest_Guest_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 05 May 2007 - 08:25 AM

View PostGuest_gp35_*, on Fri, May 4, 2007, 06:49 PM, said:

Ofcourse I can't imagine this ever happening, but just for conversation sake.

2 Coaches added to an Amtrak train filled with slot machines and the bj table, keno board, crap table, etc...

Would it work?

This has been examined at Amtrak, based on several casinos wanting to conduct gambling lessons on the train, on the way to the casino locations. It is logistically almost impossible to control and the various state and local laws would be an absolute nightmare to deal with.

#7 Guest_Guest_GP35_*_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 05 May 2007 - 10:09 AM

Like the lotto, the state can clear it through the entire state.

#8 User is offline   stlouielady 

  • Lead Service Attendant
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 201
  • Joined: 03-January 06
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:St Louis, MO

Posted 05 May 2007 - 11:22 AM

View PostGuest_GP35_*, on Sat, May 5, 2007, 10:09 AM, said:

Like the lotto, the state can clear it through the entire state.


It's not quite that easy. Gambling regulations vary from state to state, and in tribal lands, vary within each of these. Each of the tribes agree to a compact with the state, and have to follow the rules of this compact. Of course, these can vary from tribe to tribe, just like the regulations vary state by state. For example, in Iowa, gambling is only allowed on Native American lands, or on a barge-like vessel on a lake or river, or in a horse or greyhound track facility; and in the latter two, it is only allowed if a referendum in the county where it is located has been voted on and passed. In Mississippi, it is only allowed on barges. In Missouri, again, it is only allowed on riverboats, and there is a loss limit imposed there for players. North Dakota and Minnesota only allow gambling on tribal lands, Wisconsin only allows it on tribal lands, no gambling at all in the state of Utah, in California it is only allowed on tribal lands. I could continue, but, as you can see, it is extremely complex. Then there is also the question about which types of gambling are allowed per state. Some jurisdications limit table games and games of chance. There are different classes of slot machines, class 1, 2, and 3, and depending on what state you are in will determine what class of slot machines are allowed to be used. If a train stayed solely within the jurisdiction of one gaming regulatory agency, then they could conceivably legally allow this. But, probably not feasible. I work in the gaming industry, so, knowing what is allowed and what is not allowed per state is important for us to know, and obviously it is required for us to follow each and every rule for each and every jurisdiction we do business with. Amtrak, or any other gambling entity, would obviously have to follow the same rules.
Michele

#9 User is offline   Everydaymatters 

  • Engineer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,557
  • Joined: 15-May 06
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Northern Illinois - 60 Miles NW of CUS
  • Interests:Travel, antiques, reading

Posted 05 May 2007 - 01:40 PM

I believe there's a way around all these gambling laws. At least, I've seen it practiced here in Northern Illinois. Instead of money being won, or chips that can be cashed in for money, the winner gets chips that can be redeemed for prizes.

The idea is that the winner doesn't win money. The winner wins a chip or token that can be redeemed for say, a diamond ring, an Ipod, a pair of sunglasses.

Why can't that work?
50,000 mile mark hit on the LSL returning from the 3rd Annual AU Gathering.
50,598 Amtrak miles and counting.

#10 User is offline   AmtrakWPK 

  • Engineer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 1,825
  • Joined: 18-June 04

Posted 05 May 2007 - 02:20 PM

The player is gambling for something of value. That makes it gambling.

#11 Guest_Guest_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 05 May 2007 - 02:43 PM

View PostEverydaymatters, on Sat, May 5, 2007, 10:40 AM, said:

I believe there's a way around all these gambling laws. At least, I've seen it practiced here in Northern Illinois. Instead of money being won, or chips that can be cashed in for money, the winner gets chips that can be redeemed for prizes.

The idea is that the winner doesn't win money. The winner wins a chip or token that can be redeemed for say, a diamond ring, an Ipod, a pair of sunglasses.

Why can't that work?

Let's face it. Amtrak needs to get the whole on-board experience fixed before they even think about something like this. If you want another reason, go to one of the smaller casinos and take the time to talk with one of their security people and ask them what kind of problems they have. They will convince you that this is the last thing Amtrak needs.

#12 User is offline   Chatter163 

  • OBS Chief
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 467
  • Joined: 26-August 02

Posted 05 May 2007 - 03:56 PM

Quote

I believe there's a way around all these gambling laws. At least, I've seen it practiced here in Northern Illinois. Instead of money being won, or chips that can be cashed in for money, the winner gets chips that can be redeemed for prizes.

The idea is that the winner doesn't win money. The winner wins a chip or token that can be redeemed for say, a diamond ring, an Ipod, a pair of sunglasses.
Why can't that work?
Assuming this to be true, the fact that the laws of the State of Illinois may permit this in no way means that the gaming statues of other states and municipalities would, to say nothing of the regulation required.

#13 Guest_Guest_gp35_*_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 05 May 2007 - 05:00 PM

Ofcourse there are ways around. The federal government can say Amtrak will be given free onboard gambling in any state at anytime. End of story.

The question is would congress pass such a bill. Depends on how serious members are about making Amtrak profitable.

BTW, Katrina and Rita made a good example of those stupid barge only gambling. Mississippi learned thec lesson, Louisiana still insist on using barges.

#14 User is offline   AmtrakWPK 

  • Engineer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 1,825
  • Joined: 18-June 04

Posted 05 May 2007 - 05:14 PM

Quote

Depends on how serious members are about making Amtrak profitable.

Or how serious members are about committing political suicide.
I would expect this sometime shortly after a serious gun control bill is delivered to the president by a squadron of flying pigs.

#15 User is offline   rmgreenesq 

  • OBS Chief
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 433
  • Joined: 05-August 06
  • Location:Worcester, MA (WOR)

Posted 05 May 2007 - 06:47 PM

View Poststlouielady, on Sat, May 5, 2007, 12:22 PM, said:

Amtrak, or any other gambling entity, would obviously have to follow the same rules.


Actually, as an organ of interstate commerce, Amtrak could thumb its nose at all the local laws. All it would need is Congress to permit/sanction gaming on the rails.

Still I'm not sure it would work. It would move Amtrak away from transportation and that much closer to "land cruise"

Rick
The railway approach to New York is not one to lift the spirits. We disembark in subterranean gloom and trudge along the platform sustained only by an act of faith that New York really is up there above us, and that we haven't all died.

-Michael Palin

#16 User is offline   battalion51 

  • Engineer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,133
  • Joined: 23-August 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 05 May 2007 - 09:13 PM

And if it moves towards being a land cruise, it would play very well into the hands of Congressmen like Mica who want to cut off the funding for Amtrak since they view as already being a land cruise in its current state.
The Chief-FSU Alumnus
ZBT - ZA Colony
In Memory of Steven Lorenz 1987-2006
Rail Miles Travelled: 66,107
Amtrak Florida
The Chief on Youtube New Video 03/27

#17 Guest_Guest_GP35_*_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 05 May 2007 - 10:12 PM

It could work and yield a profit. Expect longer trains. And hope a greedy CEO dont replace the coach and sleepers with slot coaches.

#18 Guest_Guest_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 06 May 2007 - 09:36 PM

I think they should add a car with arcade games for the younger riders!

I have seen them on other trains and they made thousands of dollars per trip!!!!!

#19 User is offline   JAChooChoo 

  • Lead Service Attendant
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 206
  • Joined: 28-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Stone Mountain GA
  • Interests:Passenger, B&O

Posted 06 May 2007 - 10:24 PM

Why not keep it simple and rail oriented - a pool on when the train will reach its Endpoint? :D
Alan

#20 Guest_Guest_gp35_*_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 07 May 2007 - 08:24 AM

View PostGuest, on Sun, May 6, 2007, 06:36 PM, said:

I think they should add a car with arcade games for the younger riders!

I have seen them on other trains and they made thousands of dollars per trip!!!!!

Agreed, an Idea that should have been done in the 80's and would still work today.

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



This Web site is not operated by or affiliated with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak®).