AlanB, on Thu, Jan 14, 2010, 12:26 AM, said:
Heading North, on Wed, Jan 13, 2010, 10:16 PM, said:
I can understand the logic in perhaps not meeting the ambulance at EWR and waiting for the easier access at North Eliz; even though that flies in the face of similar logic applied by a crew on Boston's T commuter service, which saw severe repercussions from their not making the first available stop.
However, I cannot understand the logic of discharging the entire train at EWR. That makes no sense. In fact, that would simply delay getting needed attention to the victim, as emptying a train takes time. I could see skipping the stop, even though that could cause some people to perhaps miss a flight. But throwing out potentially 100 to 200 or more passengers takes substantial time, critical time for someone having a heart attack.
Yeah, stopping the train to discharge several hundred passengrs would just seem to delay help for the heart attack victim. The paramedics could work on the victim witih other passengers on board. The other passengers would be delayed, but not for that long, since the paramedics would try to remove the patient from train and transport him to a hospital as soon as possible.

Sign In
Register
Help