Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

Amtrak route with least amount of support?


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 139 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 06 April 2018 - 03:55 PM

Which Amtrak train's disappearance would cause the least amount of unhappy people? This would be route that has very little support from, well, anyone. I propose the Sunset Limited. Do any of the states along the route actually care about it?



#2 JoeBas

JoeBas

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,005 posts

Posted 06 April 2018 - 03:57 PM

My vote is either the NEC north or Boston leg of the LSL.  Maybe the Downeaster.  



#3 Steve4031

Steve4031

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,519 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Riding Trains Often!!

Posted 06 April 2018 - 03:58 PM

The city of New Orleans doesn't get much support.


Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum

#4 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 139 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 06 April 2018 - 04:10 PM

My vote is either the NEC north or Boston leg of the LSL.  Maybe the Downeaster.  

But Maine cares enough to support the Downeaster. Sure, NH does not give a crap about the route.



#5 Bob Dylan

Bob Dylan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:Passenger Trains/Travel/Sports/Gov't/ Politics/History/Reading/
    Movies/Music/Space-Ancient Aliens

Posted 06 April 2018 - 04:14 PM

Gotta agree that the Sunset Ltd. Is #1 on the No Love list!

That's why a Daily Texas Eagle CHI-LAX with the proposed SAS-NOL stub train ( timed to connect with the Crescent and CONO) makes the most sense.

Edited by Bob Dylan, 06 April 2018 - 04:15 PM.

"There's Something About a Train! It's Magic!"-- 1970s Amtrak Ad
 "..My heart is warm with the friends I make,and better friends I'll not be knowing,
Yet there isn't a train I wouldn't take,No matter where its going!.." -Edna St. Vincent Millay

#6 MikefromCrete

MikefromCrete

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,462 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Crete, IL

Posted 06 April 2018 - 04:23 PM

This is kind of a silly endeavor. What do you mean by "least support?" Ridership? Political backing in the form of state subsidies? Groups that support the train? Railfans? I don't get the concept. 


  • Thirdrail7 likes this

#7 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 139 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 06 April 2018 - 04:27 PM

This is kind of a silly endeavor. What do you mean by "least support?" Ridership? Political backing in the form of state subsidies? Groups that support the train? Railfans? I don't get the concept. 

Do people along the route care about the train? Do local politicians come out in support of the train? 



#8 Just-Thinking-51

Just-Thinking-51

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,510 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:USA

Posted 06 April 2018 - 07:39 PM

Hard to care about a non daily train. However the other day I was talking to a random fuel desk clerk, and she knew were the train station was and the days & time the train visit. Yet never has been on the train. Seem to be a common issue. I have taken to bring up Amtrak during regular discussion, and find it surprising how many people are aware of the trains but yet to ride themselves.

Dont know what the point of this thread is. Ever community has a interest in there train. But limited funds and local politics will limited any measure of support. Any mayor who does know there a train station in town, probably should not be in office. At the very least the train travel across a community is a Emergency Manager Issue. Got to prepare for derailment and a extra 300 people in your community needed help at 2am.
  • Thirdrail7, daybeers and cpotisch like this

#9 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cooking, Politics

Posted 06 April 2018 - 07:39 PM

My vote is either the NEC north or Boston leg of the LSL.  Maybe the Downeaster.  

You really don't like New England, do you?


Edited by cpotisch, 06 April 2018 - 07:40 PM.

  • Thirdrail7 likes this

Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service, Downeaster w/ Great Dome
 
Wish List: Auto Train, Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome


#10 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cooking, Politics

Posted 07 April 2018 - 04:07 PM

Gotta agree that the Sunset Ltd. Is #1 on the No Love list!

That's why a Daily Texas Eagle CHI-LAX with the proposed SAS-NOL stub train ( timed to connect with the Crescent and CONO) makes the most sense.

 

I'm trying to remember: Would the stub train have through-cars onto the Eagle, or would passengers have to change trains?


Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service, Downeaster w/ Great Dome
 
Wish List: Auto Train, Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome


#11 west point

west point

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,600 posts

Posted 07 April 2018 - 07:59 PM

 

 

 

I'm trying to remember: Would the stub train have through-cars onto the Eagle, or would passengers have to change trains?

 

 

Nothing set in stone.  Once it became apparent that Nippon (NS ) delivery of bi-levels was not going to happen plans became uncertain.  Originally a Daily Eagle to LAX with Super liners. A daily connecting train of single levels at SAS to NOL.  Now Amtrak has absolutely no idea what long range plans to make.  Once delivery and acceptances of Siemens cars is assured the plans not only for this service but who know what else national plans ?  Politics are also   the 800 pound bear as well.

 

If congress keeps the present level of funding for LD trains ( FY 2018 ) then all bets are off ?


Edited by west point, 07 April 2018 - 08:01 PM.

  • cpotisch likes this

#12 Lonestar648

Lonestar648

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,631 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 April 2018 - 01:10 PM

UP would not cooperate with a daily TE to LAX by demanding a massive amount of money up front.


  • cpotisch likes this

#13 dogbert617

dogbert617

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 261 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, IL

Posted 17 August 2018 - 11:57 PM

This is kind of a silly endeavor. What do you mean by "least support?" Ridership? Political backing in the form of state subsidies? Groups that support the train? Railfans? I don't get the concept. 

I'm thinking the original poster meant the least ridership affected, were an Amtrak long distance train to go away. That said, I don't think the Sunset is THAT bad for ridership, and still gets some due to the fact it serves Phoenix(via Maricopa), Tucson, El Paso, and Alpine(for those going there, Marfa, or Big Bend National Park). It has both the issue of the fact it only runs 3 days a week, and the fact it was rerouted outside of downtown Phoenix, that hurts its ridership. The main issue with bringing Sunset service back to Phoenix, is that the Union Pacific tracks west of Phoenix would need to be restored

 

You honestly could make cases for other trains having lower ridership as well too, for various reasons. For example Silver Star being less since it goes through Columbia, SC late at night, and since sadly its dining car service was removed. Or the stretch between Grand Junction and Reno on CZ, due to the fact the Ca. Zephyr goes through that area late at night. And for Salt Lake City hurting ridership there, the arrival times aren't great(IIRC 11:10-30pm going west, and something like 3:30am going east). Let me make it extremely clear though, I am VERY OPPOSED to any Amtrak trains being eliminated because of low ridership!



#14 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cooking, Politics

Posted 18 August 2018 - 09:49 AM

 

This is kind of a silly endeavor. What do you mean by "least support?" Ridership? Political backing in the form of state subsidies? Groups that support the train? Railfans? I don't get the concept. 

I'm thinking the original poster meant the least ridership affected, were an Amtrak long distance train to go away. 

I agree with Mike. I think the OP was asking which train has the least political support and the fewest people that rely on it, along its route. I don't think he was asking which train has the fewest total people along the route, regardless of whether or not they rely on it and use it.


Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service, Downeaster w/ Great Dome
 
Wish List: Auto Train, Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome


#15 bretton88

bretton88

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 884 posts

Posted 18 August 2018 - 11:51 AM

If Amtrak had to start doing train offs tomorrow, I suspect the Sunset would be gone (Tri weekly, in a bunch of states that don't really care), followed by the Heartland Flyer. Oklahoma has always been on the fence about it and ridership is not very good. I think it beats the Cardinal only because West Virginia has historically been very protective of it's train, even tri weekly. So WV might try to save it again.

If I won the lottery, I'd probably build a passenger from nowhere to nowhere.


#16 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cooking, Politics

Posted 18 August 2018 - 05:21 PM

You're probably right. It's sad, because its New Orleans' only train west, with great crew and some great views, but being thrice-weekly, it never really had any chance.


Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service, Downeaster w/ Great Dome
 
Wish List: Auto Train, Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome


#17 neroden

neroden

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,729 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Ithaca, NY
  • Interests:Please feel free to moderate my posts

Posted 21 August 2018 - 05:28 AM

Politically, the Sunset Limited has by *far* the least support.  Heartland Flyer is probably second-least.  Southern half of the City of New Orleans (south of Carbondale, or maybe south of Memphis) is probably third.

 

Anderson's attacks on the Southwest Chief show that he's a fool who doesn't understand politics, since the Southwest Chief has fanatical political support, almost as much as the Empire Builder.


--Nathanael--

Please feel free to moderate my posts.

#18 bretton88

bretton88

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 884 posts

Posted 21 August 2018 - 07:54 AM

Politically, the Sunset Limited has by *far* the least support.  Heartland Flyer is probably second-least.  Southern half of the City of New Orleans (south of Carbondale, or maybe south of Memphis) is probably third.
 
Anderson's attacks on the Southwest Chief show that he's a fool who doesn't understand politics, since the Southwest Chief has fanatical political support, almost as much as the Empire Builder.

Not really, the SW Chief proposal wasn't an attempt to get rid of it, but an attempt to remake it. On the SW Chief, you have a daily train with a single (NMRX really doesn't count) cooperative host RR who would have been agreeable to most changes Amtrak wanted to make (on the current route). The non starter was always the bus bridge. Meanwhile with the SL, you have a tri weekly train, so it won't be a good corridor service regardless and a hostile host RR. So your only options with the SL are discontinuing or status quo. That's why Amtrak went after the Chief first.

If I won the lottery, I'd probably build a passenger from nowhere to nowhere.


#19 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cooking, Politics

Posted 21 August 2018 - 08:59 AM

 

Politically, the Sunset Limited has by *far* the least support.  Heartland Flyer is probably second-least.  Southern half of the City of New Orleans (south of Carbondale, or maybe south of Memphis) is probably third.
 
Anderson's attacks on the Southwest Chief show that he's a fool who doesn't understand politics, since the Southwest Chief has fanatical political support, almost as much as the Empire Builder.

Not really, the SW Chief proposal wasn't an attempt to get rid of it, but an attempt to remake it. On the SW Chief, you have a daily train with a single (NMRX really doesn't count) cooperative host RR who would have been agreeable to most changes Amtrak wanted to make (on the current route). The non starter was always the bus bridge. Meanwhile with the SL, you have a tri weekly train, so it won't be a good corridor service regardless and a hostile host RR. So your only options with the SL are discontinuing or status quo. That's why Amtrak went after the Chief first.

Chopping up a two night train into short train segments and a very long bus segment would have 100% destroyed the Chief. Virtually no one would have been willing to transfer to/from a bus two times for a trip that long. They weaponized the PTC mandate to justify what would have effectively been a train-off, without having to worry about the 180 day rule or anything like that.


Edited by cpotisch, 05 September 2018 - 02:39 PM.

  • Devil's Advocate, ParanoidAndroid and daybeers like this

Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service, Downeaster w/ Great Dome
 
Wish List: Auto Train, Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome


#20 MARC Rider

MARC Rider

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 979 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Baltimore. MD

Posted 24 August 2018 - 01:03 PM

My vote is either the NEC north or Boston leg of the LSL.  Maybe the Downeaster.  

 

Considering that the NEC north carries over 50% of the combined rail/air passengers on this route, this making it one of the few places in the US where passenger rail is actually an important part of the transportation mix, I think not.


  • jebr, daybeers and cpotisch like this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users