Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

If you had to cut an Amtrak route, which one would you cut?


  • Please log in to reply
60 replies to this topic

#1 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 19 March 2018 - 09:38 PM

I would cut one of the duplicate Illinois routes.



#2 brianpmcdonnell17

brianpmcdonnell17

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 890 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Largo, Florida

Posted 19 March 2018 - 10:25 PM

How are you defining a route? For example, would a route such as the Palmetto count even though it's entire route is covered by the Silver Meteor? If you were to cut the Carl Sandburg/Illinois Zephyr would both trains be lost or just one? Also, is this from a purely selfish perspective or should we consider Amtrak's point of view as well?

Edited by brianpmcdonnell17, 19 March 2018 - 10:26 PM.

<p>Routes Travelled: CL WAS-CHI, Card. CHI-WAS, Caro. CLT-RGH, CS SEA-LAX, CZ CHI-RIC, Cre. BAL-ATL, EB SEA-CHI, ES NYG/NYP-NFL, LSL BOS/NYP-CHI, ML ALB-NYP, NER FBG-RVR+WAS-BOS, PS LAX-ANA, Pen. NYP-PGH, Pie. RGH-CLT, SM ORL-NYP, SS FTL-NYP

#3 railiner

railiner

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,595 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY
  • Interests:All public transportation....land, sea, and air

Posted 19 March 2018 - 11:28 PM

A strange question to ask, but in light of the funding situation, it unfortunately may become a relevant one....

The obvious answer is which route cut would yield the best return to Amtrak's 'bottom line'....both now, in and the future.

However, the societal effect would also have to be taken into consideration.


metroblue?

okay on the blue!

#4 Lonestar648

Lonestar648

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,281 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 March 2018 - 12:20 AM

Personally, I would not cut a single train.  The shorter trains have state funding so would not be likely to be cut unless state funding were lost.  The long distance routes in both the East and the West have their own support groups so would be difficult to single one out.  Many people say the Sunset Ltd., but in reality, many think the daily TE extended to LA would be well traveled compared to the Sunset Limited.  Bottom Line, I can not target one LD train as needing to be cut.  To me the Amtrak map needs to be grown in both route miles and passengers.  The more paying passengers, the more profit potential there is.


  • Ryan, pennyk, CCC1007 and 5 others like this

#5 Ryan

Ryan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,037 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:OTN
  • Interests:a fact checker combined with a ferret

Posted 20 March 2018 - 05:08 AM

^^^ what he said
Posted Image

Disclaimer: Any images or links you see in my post may in fact be invasive advertising or even fraudulent phishing attacks silently injected into my post by our spam based hosting service. If anything looks suspicious or inappropriate or you have any doubt whatsoever then do not click any links (particularly those appearing in green and/or with a double underline) or interact with the spam in any way. You may also want to consider using ad-blocking plugins such as Adblock Plus and/or Ghostery)to help reduce the number and severity of advertising scams directed at you.

#6 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 20 March 2018 - 07:23 AM

^^^ what he said

I agree, but my post did say if you had to cut one.



#7 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 20 March 2018 - 08:40 AM

How are you defining a route? For example, would a route such as the Palmetto count even though it's entire route is covered by the Silver Meteor? If you were to cut the Carl Sandburg/Illinois Zephyr would both trains be lost or just one? Also, is this from a purely selfish perspective or should we consider Amtrak's point of view as well?

Named route. Car Sandburg and Illinois Zephyr count as separate routes. 



#8 cirdan

cirdan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,055 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 March 2018 - 10:21 AM

I would say cut all Amtrak service to Hawai. And then as a next step to Alaska.

 

Cutting those wouldn't hurt Amtrak at all.


  • AmtrakBlue, DoB, daybeers and 1 other like this

#9 Metra Electric Rider

Metra Electric Rider

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 589 posts

Posted 20 March 2018 - 11:00 AM

I would say cut all Amtrak service to Hawai. And then as a next step to Alaska.

 

Cutting those wouldn't hurt Amtrak at all.

 

Don't forget about Amtrak de Puerto Rico too!


  • cirdan likes this

SJ - Norra Stambanan, Nordvästra stambanan, Södra stambanan, Dalabanan

NSB- Bergensbanen, Kongsvingerbanen, Rørosbanen, Dovrebanen, Flåmsbana, Roa–Hønefossbanen

Amtrak - Floridian, San Francisco Zephyr, Southwest Limited, Illini, State House


#10 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,212 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 20 March 2018 - 12:41 PM

There is Guam to consider too :D And then there is Wyoming and South Dakota too, coming back to continental locations. ;)


  • cirdan likes this

#11 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,808 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 20 March 2018 - 01:27 PM

I don't know what the intentions of the OP (who BTW wasn't me) but certainly you'd rather cut a frequency than the one route of a given train.

 

Most of the state supported routes come out of state budgets so if you only consider LD routes the one "extra" one would be the Palmetto. To me, that's a Florida route without Florida. That's like if you took the LSL and terminated it in Albany or the California Zephyr and terminated it in Reno. You may point out the financials of the train but most of that is NEC traffic, when the train did not allow passengers between NYP-WAS it was a totally different story. Replace that train with another NER and you'd get half the R&R and less than half the cost. 

 

Other than that, obviously the Cardinal (Byrd Crap). I'd love to be able to keep Cincinnati if I could but they have the lowest ridership of the major cities I would potentially be losing if I had to cut any other route. If you cut the Sunset Limited, you lose Houston and they are much bigger. My hope always is retain CHI-CIN and cut the rest (well CVS-NYP would obviously still be covered anyway). Maybe if you cut the SL you could extend the Crescent to San Antonio to make up for Houston. If you extend Hiawatha Service to Minneapolis, you can get rid of the rest of the Empire Builder (maybe Washington state can pick up Seattle to Spokane). Maybe the 750 mile rule can be dropped. Tell the federal government would you rather pay for 400 miles between CHI-MSP or 2000 miles between CHI-SEA when the CHI-MSP has probably 1/3 of the ridership and revenue of the entire route and 1/5 of the cost? You shouldn't have to run a train 2000 miles just to serve Minneapolis.


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Shore Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL), Texas Eagle (CHI-DAL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/


#12 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 20 March 2018 - 01:43 PM

I don't know what the intentions of the OP (who BTW wasn't me) but certainly you'd rather cut a frequency than the one route of a given train.

 

Most of the state supported routes come out of state budgets so if you only consider LD routes the one "extra" one would be the Palmetto. To me, that's a Florida route without Florida. That's like if you took the LSL and terminated it in Albany or the California Zephyr and terminated it in Reno. You may point out the financials of the train but most of that is NEC traffic, when the train did not allow passengers between NYP-WAS it was a totally different story. Replace that train with another NER and you'd get half the R&R and less than half the cost. 

 

Other than that, obviously the Cardinal (Byrd Crap). I'd love to be able to keep Cincinnati if I could but they have the lowest ridership of the major cities I would potentially be losing if I had to cut any other route. If you cut the Sunset Limited, you lose Houston and they are much bigger. My hope always is retain CHI-CIN and cut the rest (well CVS-NYP would obviously still be covered anyway). Maybe if you cut the SL you could extend the Crescent to San Antonio to make up for Houston. If you extend Hiawatha Service to Minneapolis, you can get rid of the rest of the Empire Builder (maybe Washington state can pick up Seattle to Spokane). Maybe the 750 mile rule can be dropped. Tell the federal government would you rather pay for 400 miles between CHI-MSP or 2000 miles between CHI-SEA when the CHI-MSP has probably 1/3 of the ridership and revenue of the entire route and 1/5 of the cost? You shouldn't have to run a train 2000 miles just to serve Minneapolis.

Get rid of most of the Empire Builder? Whitefish, Montana has more riders than Indianapolis. 


  • CCC1007 likes this

#13 Bob Dylan

Bob Dylan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,833 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:Passenger Trains/Travel/Sports/Gov't/ Politics/History/Reading/
    Movies/Music/Space-Ancient Aliens

Posted 20 March 2018 - 02:10 PM

"..There you go again..!"

Let's just eliminate all the stops @ 30th St Station and go back to stopping @ the Magnificent North Philly Station!

It'll save tons of money for Amtrak!🤔
"There's Something About a Train! It's Magic!"-- 1970s Amtrak Ad
 "..My heart is warm with the friends I make,and better friends I'll not be knowing,
Yet there isn't a train I wouldn't take,No matter where its going!.." -Edna St. Vincent Millay

#14 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 907 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cars, Politics

Posted 20 March 2018 - 03:43 PM

I don't know what the intentions of the OP (who BTW wasn't me) but certainly you'd rather cut a frequency than the one route of a given train.

 

Most of the state supported routes come out of state budgets so if you only consider LD routes the one "extra" one would be the Palmetto. To me, that's a Florida route without Florida. That's like if you took the LSL and terminated it in Albany or the California Zephyr and terminated it in Reno. You may point out the financials of the train but most of that is NEC traffic, when the train did not allow passengers between NYP-WAS it was a totally different story. Replace that train with another NER and you'd get half the R&R and less than half the cost. 

 

Other than that, obviously the Cardinal (Byrd Crap). I'd love to be able to keep Cincinnati if I could but they have the lowest ridership of the major cities I would potentially be losing if I had to cut any other route. If you cut the Sunset Limited, you lose Houston and they are much bigger. My hope always is retain CHI-CIN and cut the rest (well CVS-NYP would obviously still be covered anyway). Maybe if you cut the SL you could extend the Crescent to San Antonio to make up for Houston. If you extend Hiawatha Service to Minneapolis, you can get rid of the rest of the Empire Builder (maybe Washington state can pick up Seattle to Spokane). Maybe the 750 mile rule can be dropped. Tell the federal government would you rather pay for 400 miles between CHI-MSP or 2000 miles between CHI-SEA when the CHI-MSP has probably 1/3 of the ridership and revenue of the entire route and 1/5 of the cost? You shouldn't have to run a train 2000 miles just to serve Minneapolis.

I'm trying to understand why the Cardinal should get the axe, considering it has low operating costs (one locomotive, diner-lite manned by one person, runs three days a week, etc.) and is the only train providing any service to 15 STATIONS. Last year a total of more than 71,000 passengers went through those stations, meaning ditching the Card would deny train service to 71,000 people (yes, I know some people rode more than once).

 

And the Builder has zero redundancy and is very profitable, as well as offering spectacular scenery. Chopping it to MSP would deny train service to hundreds of thousands of people. The EB does not exist for corridor service. It is to offer LD service between Seattle/Portland and Chicago, via that specific route. With it cut to Minneapolis, Seattle passengers now have to take the CS down to Sacramento, and then take the Zephyr across. That's a total travel time of 75 hours 5 minutes, and requires you a five hour early morning layover. Does that sound like something you'd want to do. And then you have the the majority of the other stations, which have no service at all.


Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service

 

Wish List: Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome, Downeaster

 


#15 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,808 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 20 March 2018 - 03:54 PM

cpotisch, if you HAD to cut something and if it had to be an LD route, no matter what you choose someone is going to be screwed and you can make an argument for every LD route. When past LD routes were cut there was hardship too and other people had to make adjustments or simply lost service as well. Is there any other route that you think would cause less damage?


Edited by Philly Amtrak Fan, 20 March 2018 - 03:55 PM.

Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Shore Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL), Texas Eagle (CHI-DAL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/


#16 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 20 March 2018 - 03:55 PM

 

I don't know what the intentions of the OP (who BTW wasn't me) but certainly you'd rather cut a frequency than the one route of a given train.

 

Most of the state supported routes come out of state budgets so if you only consider LD routes the one "extra" one would be the Palmetto. To me, that's a Florida route without Florida. That's like if you took the LSL and terminated it in Albany or the California Zephyr and terminated it in Reno. You may point out the financials of the train but most of that is NEC traffic, when the train did not allow passengers between NYP-WAS it was a totally different story. Replace that train with another NER and you'd get half the R&R and less than half the cost. 

 

Other than that, obviously the Cardinal (Byrd Crap). I'd love to be able to keep Cincinnati if I could but they have the lowest ridership of the major cities I would potentially be losing if I had to cut any other route. If you cut the Sunset Limited, you lose Houston and they are much bigger. My hope always is retain CHI-CIN and cut the rest (well CVS-NYP would obviously still be covered anyway). Maybe if you cut the SL you could extend the Crescent to San Antonio to make up for Houston. If you extend Hiawatha Service to Minneapolis, you can get rid of the rest of the Empire Builder (maybe Washington state can pick up Seattle to Spokane). Maybe the 750 mile rule can be dropped. Tell the federal government would you rather pay for 400 miles between CHI-MSP or 2000 miles between CHI-SEA when the CHI-MSP has probably 1/3 of the ridership and revenue of the entire route and 1/5 of the cost? You shouldn't have to run a train 2000 miles just to serve Minneapolis.

I'm trying to understand why the Cardinal should get the axe, considering it has low operating costs (one locomotive, diner-lite manned by one person, runs three days a week, etc.) and is the only train providing any service to 15 STATIONS. Last year a total of more than 71,000 passengers went through those stations, meaning ditching the Card would deny train service to 71,000 people (yes, I know some people rode more than once).

 

And the Builder has zero redundancy and is very profitable, as well as offering spectacular scenery. Chopping it to MSP would deny train service to hundreds of thousands of people. The EB does not exist for corridor service. It is to offer LD service between Seattle/Portland and Chicago, via that specific route. With it cut to Minneapolis, Seattle passengers now have to take the CS down to Sacramento, and then take the Zephyr across. That's a total travel time of 75 hours 5 minutes, and requires you a five hour early morning layover. Does that sound like something you'd want to do. And then you have the the majority of the other stations, which have no service at all.

 

Philly has been told 1000000 times that the Empire Builder is very profitable and still does not get it. Would he care to explain?


  • cpotisch likes this

#17 JayPea

JayPea

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,618 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colfax, WA (CFX)
  • Interests:Trains, photography, reading. And any combination thereof. :)

Posted 20 March 2018 - 05:07 PM

Here's some facts about the Empire Builder Philly might be interested in:Attached File  Screenshot_20180320-145718.png   662.46KB   12 downloads

Note that 6 of the top 9 city pairs on the EB in terms of ridership involve cities west of St. Paul and 8 of the top 9, including the top two, in revenue include cities west of St. Paul. So, yeah, let's cut all that dead weight west of St. Paul. See how well that works for ya.
  • cpotisch likes this

Amtrak Miles Traveled: 85410--City of New Orleans, State House/Lincoln Service, California Zephyr, Southwest Chief, Empire Builder, Cascades, Crescent, Capital Limited, Coast Starlight, Texas Eagle/Sunset Limited, Silver Meteor, Lake Shore Limited,  Pacific Surfliner, Cardinal, Vermonter, Northeast Regional, Downeaster.

 

Pre-Amtrak Miles Traveled:8478-- North Coast Limited, Panama Limited, Empire Builder, Abraham Lincoln, City of Hinkle


#18 zephyr17

zephyr17

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,473 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington State

Posted 20 March 2018 - 05:13 PM

Since it is under 750 miles, devolve the NEC costs (including capital and overhead) onto the states served.

 

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.  My state taxes are required to support the Cascades, and my federal taxes go to support the Builder and the Starlight.  Why should NY, PA, etc be any different?


Edited by zephyr17, 20 March 2018 - 05:15 PM.

Pre Amtrak: SP Coast Daylight, AT&SF San Diegan, AT&SF Super Chief, D&RGW Rio Grande Zephyr

Amtrak: Southwest Limited/Chief, San Diegan/Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, Cascades, California/San Francisco Zephyr, Coast Starlight, Empire Builder, Sunset Limited (LA-Orlando), Desert Wind, Pioneer, City of New Orleans, Silver Star, Silver Meteor, Lake Shore Limited (NY Section), Cardinal, Hoosier State (Amtrak),  Hoosier State (Iowa Pacific), Ann Rutledge, Adirondack, Maple Leaf, NE Regional, Capitol Limited

Via Rail Canada: Via Canadian (CP route), Via Super Continental, Via Atlantic Limited, Via Hudson Bay, Via Skeena, Via Canadian (CN route), Via "Corridor" (Toronto-Montreal)

Other: BC Rail Cariboo Dayliner, Alaska Railroad, Eurostar, Thalys, DB, Netherlands Rail, Austrian Railways, BR, Korail (conventional), Korail KTX


#19 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 907 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cars, Politics

Posted 20 March 2018 - 07:17 PM

Since it is under 750 miles, devolve the NEC costs (including capital and overhead) onto the states served.

 

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.  My state taxes are required to support the Cascades, and my federal taxes go to support the Builder and the Starlight.  Why should NY, PA, etc be any different?

New York contributes a tremendous amount to rail infrastructure and a lot to Empire Corridor and NEC equipment. PA, that's another story...


Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service

 

Wish List: Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome, Downeaster

 


#20 Metra Electric Rider

Metra Electric Rider

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 589 posts

Posted 21 March 2018 - 10:43 AM

Thanks for the EB fact sheet, for some reason or other I found it very interesting. I was surprised how low Milwaukee ridership was, but of course, it's part of corridor service so there are plenty of options between Chicago and Milwaukee. But it definitely looks like both ends of the route are crying out for another train or two, and probably corridor service.


SJ - Norra Stambanan, Nordvästra stambanan, Södra stambanan, Dalabanan

NSB- Bergensbanen, Kongsvingerbanen, Rørosbanen, Dovrebanen, Flåmsbana, Roa–Hønefossbanen

Amtrak - Floridian, San Francisco Zephyr, Southwest Limited, Illini, State House





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users