Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

Trump Proposes 50% Cut to Amtrak Funding (2018-02-12)


  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

#21 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,877 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 12 February 2018 - 05:59 PM

I got an idea, let's cut infrastructure to pay for infrastructure. You could see where some routes could maybe be shifted to states over time and maybe down the road that's worth exploring, but this would take a multi-year process and you wouldn't be able to halve the federal subsidies in one year. Florida as a big beneficiary of LD trains I could see playing ball and subsidizing its LD trains, and California would probably move to save the Coast Starlight. I don't see how you transition the hugely long east-west routes to the states though since you'd undoubtedly have some states that would act and others that wouldn't so the interested ones would have to foot the bill for the whole route. Already have some of that now with some of the existing state service. New Hampshire gets service from the Vermonter and Downeaster and doesn't participate in either, but we're also not talking anywhere near the subsidies with that example.

 

Florida is a big tourism state so I'd imagine a lot of ORL, MIA, and TPA passengers are passengers originate out of state. I'd want the Silver Star/Meteor being a PA resident as much as the Florida residents. Same with the SWC/CZ as I wouldn't be able to get to California without them. So those trains aren't just for Florida/California. You can tell which states aren't tourism states and which trains really are just trains that benefit specific states only and those are the ones that should be funded more by the states that benefit more from those trains.


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Shore Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL), Texas Eagle (CHI-DAL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/


#22 Lonestar648

Lonestar648

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,631 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 February 2018 - 10:57 PM

There are many states on the verge of bankruptcy, so how can they find more money when like Illinois they can't pay the LOTTO winners for several years back.  Other states are cutting services to the bone.  I just do not see every state coughing up the expected funds to do the infrastructure improvements the WH is expecting. 



#23 Carolina Special

Carolina Special

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 12 February 2018 - 10:59 PM

I find the proposed sale of Dulles and National airports to be interesting. Privatizing these seems to be a no-brainer.

Too bad all the frequency licenses are pretty much spoken for, I believe. I worked with someone who turned a low six figure investment into the low seven figures in the 1980s before the feds wised up and started auctioning instead of just collecting capital gains. Sadly, I was about six months late to the party.

Of course we could start using offshore oil auctions to fund infrastructure. Have my doubts some board members would like that idea, however.

Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum

Edited by Carolina Special, 12 February 2018 - 11:05 PM.


#24 KnightRail

KnightRail

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 378 posts

Posted 12 February 2018 - 11:26 PM

 

Typical politics, but Congress rarely ever considers the budget proposed by the WH. So what the various committees in the House and Senate do is what will be critical.

Exactly. A White House budget is dead on arrival no matter whats in it. Accomplishes nothing more than causing the ill advised to panic and scream the sky is falling. We go through this same thing year after year.
Presidential budget proposals give us some insight into the executive branch's interest and support levels for passenger rail in general and Amtrak in particular. It also gives us a catalyst and a starting point for discussing the issue with our senators and representatives. Nothing more and nothing less. If you have an example of someone screaming or panicking then by all means please quote them here so we can set the record straight. If you do not have any such examples then please put this false narrative to rest.
Shared from Facebook, someone posted QUOTE:
[Book that Long Distance train trip NOW!
The system will see dramatic cuts after this summer]

That is absolutely an example of someone spreading what at this point is a false narrative.

Edited by KnightRail, 12 February 2018 - 11:27 PM.


#25 Woodcut60

Woodcut60

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 179 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Stockholm, Sweden
  • Interests:Passenger Trains; Amtrak; American Railroad History

Posted 13 February 2018 - 01:06 AM

Quote from Trump's Budget:

"Reforms Amtrak Long Distance Services. While Amtrak has in recent years improved its ridership and revenue on the Northeast Corridor and State Supported Routes, Amtrak continues to rely exclusively on Federal subsidies to operate long distance train routes, which have large operating losses and serve a small number of passengers. The Budget proposes reforms to Amtrak to improve efficiencies in long distance services and reduce reliance of the Federal Government. In particular, the Budget proposes that States begin to share the operating subsidy costs of Long Distance routes with the Federal Government. This would make States more equal partners with the Federal Government, and would strengthen the responsiveness of Amtrak to the communities they serve. State contributions to long distance routes is only one tool in the menu of options for reform the Administration will be exploring to improve the current system and reduce Federal subsidies in the Long Distance network."


Amtrak Routes Traveled: Lake Shore Limited, California Zephyr, San Joaquin, Pacific Surfliner, Coast Starlight, Empire Builder, Cardinal, Crescent, Sunset Limited, Southwest Chief, Hiawatha, City of New Orleans, Texas Eagle, Heartland Flyer, Missouri River Runner, Lincoln, Wolverine, Northeast Regional, Acela Express, Downeaster, Vermonter, Silver Star, Silver Meteor, Capitol Limited, Pennsylvanian, Amtrak Cascades, Maple Leaf, Adirondack, Ethan Allen Express, Keystone, Carolinian, Piedmont.
Other Routes in North America: Denali Star (Anchorage-Fairbanks, Alaska Railroad), The Ocean (Halifax-Montréal), Corridor (Montréal-Toronto), The Canadian (Toronto-Vancouver).
Amtrak: approx. 29,000 miles and 47 states; VIA Rail Canada: approx. 4,300 miles and eight provinces.

#26 neroden

neroden

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,665 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Ithaca, NY
  • Interests:Please feel free to moderate my posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 02:33 AM

 

Poor Ohio.  Just enough "I don't need any functioning government" rural voters to cripple the state.

 

OFF TOPIC: There are also just enough "we don't need a functioning government" states to cripple our entire country at this point.  The most exasperating aspect of this whole experiment is how distant and unlikely a practical and equitable solution seems at this point.  When half the country has been so completely demonized that the other half is willing to ignore signs of foreign meddling on their behalf you know the gig is almost up.

 

 

I agree.  Frankly, the country is crippled already.  However, it's apparent that California is quite capable of operating on its own, and the Northeastern bloc of states should be able to operate independently as a functioning economic unit once gerrymandering is eliminated in Pennsylvania, which is probably going to happen this week. The situation is much worse for people in states whose state governments have also been wrecked.


--Nathanael--

Please feel free to moderate my posts.

#27 Rover

Rover

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 261 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:N. Texas

Posted 13 February 2018 - 04:30 AM

 

Typical politics, but Congress rarely ever considers the budget proposed by the WH.  So what the various committees in the House and Senate do is what will be critical.


Exactly. A White House budget is dead on arrival no matter whats in it. Accomplishes nothing more than causing the ill advised to panic and scream the sky is falling. We go through this same thing year after year.

 

It never gets old...  :rolleyes: 

 

When does Washington ever use simple Math?  Everyone there creates their own form of Math to get the results they desire.

New Math :cool:


I've ridden: ~ The Empire Builder 1981 ~ The Coast Starlight 1981 ~ The Texas Eagle ~ The Sunset Limited ~
Books: ~ Time-Life - The Old West ~ The Railroaders * Rail Ventures - 4th Edition

 

I think it is absolute mythology that there's any national system that is profitable. And I think the naysayers just have to get over it. ~ Amtrak President Alex Kummant ~ June 2008

 


#28 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,620 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 13 February 2018 - 04:49 AM

On the one hand, I want to see the federal government take less "leadership" in developing transportation policy (since that "leadership" has often meant a mix of "You will go through all of these hoops because if you do not then we won't cover 80% of the project" and "You will build what we want you to build where we want you to build it or we'll make sure you can't afford to do it"), but I'd much rather see funding levels held steady or increased while being converted to block grants.  Yes, there should be a "basic national system" of highways, of passenger (and freight) rail, and of airports.  But outside of those networks?  The federal government should give the states a check, perhaps try to promote cooperation on some level (e.g. transit agency ticket interlining), and then generally sod off rather than forcing states to sift through a bunch of disparate "silos" to sort out funding for transit improvements and the like.  Probably the best example I can think of off the top of my head?  I like the various grant programs, but the fact that states have to go around and get money from all of these different grants to fund projects based on tangled criteria?  That's a problem.

 

So you want to know why I'm so annoyed with this situation?  I feel like you've got one party that has identified a real problem but then completely made a hash of solving it, and another which doesn't think there is a problem.


Amtrak mileage to date: Somewhere between 120,000 and 150,000 miles...I /really/ need to run all of my trips through a calculator sometime.

...and no, I am not /that/ Anderson...;-)


#29 lordsigma

lordsigma

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 127 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 08:22 AM

 

I got an idea, let's cut infrastructure to pay for infrastructure. You could see where some routes could maybe be shifted to states over time and maybe down the road that's worth exploring, but this would take a multi-year process and you wouldn't be able to halve the federal subsidies in one year. Florida as a big beneficiary of LD trains I could see playing ball and subsidizing its LD trains, and California would probably move to save the Coast Starlight. I don't see how you transition the hugely long east-west routes to the states though since you'd undoubtedly have some states that would act and others that wouldn't so the interested ones would have to foot the bill for the whole route. Already have some of that now with some of the existing state service. New Hampshire gets service from the Vermonter and Downeaster and doesn't participate in either, but we're also not talking anywhere near the subsidies with that example.

 

Florida is a big tourism state so I'd imagine a lot of ORL, MIA, and TPA passengers are passengers originate out of state. I'd want the Silver Star/Meteor being a PA resident as much as the Florida residents. Same with the SWC/CZ as I wouldn't be able to get to California without them. So those trains aren't just for Florida/California. You can tell which states aren't tourism states and which trains really are just trains that benefit specific states only and those are the ones that should be funded more by the states that benefit more from those trains.

 

That's really what I meant. Florida is a big beneficiary of the Auto Train and Silver Meteor/Star bringing tourists into the state, so I would think Florida would act to preserve those routes possibly even without interest from other state governments along the route.



#30 keelhauled

keelhauled

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 683 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Camorr

Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:23 AM

Amtrak is a drop in a bucket in delivering people to Florida. Delta alone flies 16 757s a day ATL-MCO. That's about 3,000 seats on one route by one airline. Amtrak doesn't even have a thousand seats daily going into the state. The tourism industry wouldn't blink if the Silvers and Auto train went away.

We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works.


#31 Bob Dylan

Bob Dylan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,272 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:Passenger Trains/Travel/Sports/Gov't/ Politics/History/Reading/
    Movies/Music/Space-Ancient Aliens

Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:26 AM

In a related matter, Disney announced Big Increases in Ticket Pricing,Parking and Hotel Rates @ its,Resorts and Cruises today!😣

Will this hurt tourism on the Orlando/Tampa to Miami Corridor???

Edited by Bob Dylan, 13 February 2018 - 10:26 AM.

"There's Something About a Train! It's Magic!"-- 1970s Amtrak Ad
 "..My heart is warm with the friends I make,and better friends I'll not be knowing,
Yet there isn't a train I wouldn't take,No matter where its going!.." -Edna St. Vincent Millay

#32 bretton88

bretton88

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 838 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 10:47 AM

In a related matter, Disney announced Big Increases in Ticket Pricing,Parking and Hotel Rates @ its,Resorts and Cruises today!

Will this hurt tourism on the Orlando/Tampa to Miami Corridor???

Nope. Because people will keep paying. Which at this point is actually a problem for Disney. There's massive overcrowding at their parks.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

If I won the lottery, I'd probably build a passenger from nowhere to nowhere.


#33 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,120 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:06 AM

Amtrak is a drop in a bucket in delivering people to Florida. Delta alone flies 16 757s a day ATL-MCO. That's about 3,000 seats on one route by one airline. Amtrak doesn't even have a thousand seats daily going into the state. The tourism industry wouldn't blink if the Silvers and Auto train went away.

Northeast to Florida is the largest airline corridor market in the US. If Amtrak disappears from there hardly anyone will notice in Florida, unfortunately. There is close to zero chance that Florida will step up to fund LD trains to Florida at this point. With a different government in Florida things may be different.

 

What the government in Florida does support with some reluctance are local and regional corridor service around a few crowded cities. There is an outside chance that they may get around to fund the intra-Florida part of the service. An unlikely but within the realm of possibilities. Funding for LD service from outside Florida is not within the realm of possibilities at this time.

 

Note that while individual cities and towns have stepped up to support the New Orleans to Orlando service, Florida DOT is conspicuously absent from the whole effort.

 

 

In a related matter, Disney announced Big Increases in Ticket Pricing,Parking and Hotel Rates @ its,Resorts and Cruises today!

Will this hurt tourism on the Orlando/Tampa to Miami Corridor???

Nope. Because people will keep paying. Which at this point is actually a problem for Disney. There's massive overcrowding at their parks.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

Exactly. Also Disney is big but not the only thing in Orlando to make it a tourist destination either.


Edited by jis, 13 February 2018 - 12:16 PM.


#34 keelhauled

keelhauled

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 683 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Camorr

Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:41 AM


Amtrak is a drop in a bucket in delivering people to Florida. Delta alone flies 16 757s a day ATL-MCO. That's about 3,000 seats on one route by one airline. Amtrak doesn't even have a thousand seats daily going into the state. The tourism industry wouldn't blink if the Silvers and Auto train went away.

Northeast to Florida is the largest airline corridor market in the US. If Amtrak disappears from there hardly anyone will notice in Florida, unfortunately. There is close to zero chance that Florida will step up to fund LD trains to Florida at this point. With a different government in Florida things may be different.
Exactly. Amtrak is functionally irrelevent in long distance transportation. The value of long distance trains is in the ability to serve people traveling overlapping segments of the route between midpoints or from mid to end points, which is not a market airliners can compete in, and if demand is sufficient can be done more efficiently than busses.

Which is why most advocacy efforts re the national network make me bang my head against the wall in frustration, because they tend to emphasize end to end travel, which is both a small fraction of overall ridership and the most politically vulnerable part of the whole kit and caboodle. Amtrak perennially fails at self advocacy and NARP rarely displays any initiative to veer from the Amtrak line despite being supposedly independent.

We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works.


#35 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,120 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 13 February 2018 - 12:42 PM

Here is an interesting general article about the budget and the budgeting process....

 

https://www.theatlan...tm_source=atlfb



#36 Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,875 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 February 2018 - 01:22 PM

 

 

 

Typical politics, but Congress rarely ever considers the budget proposed by the WH. So what the various committees in the House and Senate do is what will be critical.

Exactly. A White House budget is dead on arrival no matter whats in it. Accomplishes nothing more than causing the ill advised to panic and scream the sky is falling. We go through this same thing year after year.
Presidential budget proposals give us some insight into the executive branch's interest and support levels for passenger rail in general and Amtrak in particular. It also gives us a catalyst and a starting point for discussing the issue with our senators and representatives. Nothing more and nothing less. If you have an example of someone screaming or panicking then by all means please quote them here so we can set the record straight. If you do not have any such examples then please put this false narrative to rest.
Shared from Facebook, someone posted QUOTE: [Book that Long Distance train trip NOW! The system will see dramatic cuts after this summer] That is absolutely an example of someone spreading what at this point is a false narrative.

I'm not sure what this is or what you expect me to do with it. Someone you cannot name said something you cannot properly quote in a location you cannot link?  If you were in my shoes would this mean anything to you?

 

Amtrak is functionally irrelevent in long distance transportation. The value of long distance trains is in the ability to serve people traveling overlapping segments of the route between midpoints or from mid to end points, which is not a market airliners can compete in, and if demand is sufficient can be done more efficiently than busses.


End-to-end travel is indeed dominated by airlines but mid-route travel is dominated by private vehicles. Neither example makes a strong case for Amtrak on its own. In most industrialized democracies the passenger rail sales pitch revolves around improved safety and faster speeds compared to driving with improved logistics and lower environmental impact than flying. Unfortunately at the moment Amtrak's long distance network would have a heck of a time promoting their questionable safety record or their slower-than-everything speeds or their outdated particulate spewing locomotives or their poor schedule keeping or their once-a-day arrivals into barely used stations featuring few if any traveler related services or last mile connections. I'm not intending to say this is all Amtrak's fault but it's a hard sell nonetheless.

 

Amtrak perennially fails at self advocacy and NARP rarely displays any initiative to veer from the Amtrak line despite being supposedly independent.


On the one hand I agree that Amtrak does a terrible job at self-advocating. On the other hand they're legally restricted from overtly promoting policy awareness or requesting political support from passengers and citizens. Which to me is the strongest evidence that Amtrak was probably never intended to survive this long in the first place.


Edited by Devil's Advocate, 15 February 2018 - 12:08 AM.

.


#37 keelhauled

keelhauled

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 683 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Camorr

Posted 13 February 2018 - 04:33 PM

 

Amtrak is functionally irrelevent in long distance transportation. The value of long distance trains is in the ability to serve people traveling overlapping segments of the route between midpoints or from mid to end points, which is not a market airliners can compete in, and if demand is sufficient can be done more efficiently than busses.


End-to-end travel is indeed dominated by airlines but mid-route travel is dominated by private vehicles. Neither example makes a strong case for Amtrak on its own. In most industrialized democracies the passenger rail sales pitch revolves around improved safety and faster speeds compared to driving with improved logistics and lower environmental impact than flying. Unfortunately at the moment Amtrak's long distance network would have a hell of a time promoting their questionable safety record or their slower-than-everything speeds or their outdated particulate spewing locomotives or their flaky schedule keeping or their once-a-day arrivals into barely used stations and shacks featuring few if any traveler related services or last mile connections.

 

Yes, I should have qualified that it is a market they *can* be competitive in if there is adequate investment. At the moment it is stagnant.
 

 

Amtrak perennially fails at self advocacy and NARP rarely displays any initiative to veer from the Amtrak line despite being supposedly independent.


On the one hand I agree that Amtrak does a terrible job at self-advocating. On the other hand they're legally restricted from overtly promoting policy awareness or requesting political support from passengers and citizens.

 

In a perfect world policy promotion and advocacy organization would be NARP's role. Unfortunately they seem to see themselves as joined at the hip with Amtrak as opposed to the traveling public. They should have been holding Amtrak's feet to the fire with regards to the PIPs for example, instead of allowing them to vanish into the ether. On the other hand, Amtrak doesn't seem to have any idea what it's supposed to be doing with the long distance trains, other than running them because that's what they've always done. As far as I can tell, their advertising is somewhere between limited and nonexistent, and they have not made a case at Congress to obtain anything in the way of investment. Their annual requests are always similar to the previous year, perhaps a little larger but not enough to be meaningful.  I have read fleet plans for years that lay out equipment replacement objectives for whenever funding is available, but never a reference to actually trying to locate funding.  How hard can it be to add a line requesting such and such amount for Superliner replacement or Amfleet II replacement?  At least try to initiate the discussion, there is nothing to lose.

For FY 2017, Amtrak requested $1.8 billion, $1.21 billion for the national network. For FY 2018, they requested $1.6 billion, $1.24 billion for the national network; they also requested appropriations for the next three years, increasing to $1.7 billion and $1.8 billion for FY 19 and 20.  For god's sake, have some ambition.  It is baffling that they can identify the problem of an aging fleet but completely ignore it.


We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works.


#38 dlagrua

dlagrua

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,943 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hillsborough, NJ
  • Interests:Car collecting, Train Travel, Model RR, Visiting Historical sights, Cooking, Antiques, but above all love for friends and family.

Posted 13 February 2018 - 09:51 PM

 

 

Poor Ohio.  Just enough "I don't need any functioning government" rural voters to cripple the state.

 

OFF TOPIC: There are also just enough "we don't need a functioning government" states to cripple our entire country at this point.  The most exasperating aspect of this whole experiment is how distant and unlikely a practical and equitable solution seems at this point.  When half the country has been so completely demonized that the other half is willing to ignore signs of foreign meddling on their behalf you know the gig is almost up.

 

 

I agree.  Frankly, the country is crippled already.  However, it's apparent that California is quite capable of operating on its own, and the Northeastern bloc of states should be able to operate independently as a functioning economic unit once gerrymandering is eliminated in Pennsylvania, which is probably going to happen this week. The situation is much worse for people in states whose state governments have also been wrecked.

 

The states of NY and NJ are operating at such large deficits that they might as well be bankrupt. These are blue states and residents pay exorbitant tax rates. It doesn't matter how high the taxes go here, there will still not be any money to fund the Gateway project. 



#39 Rover

Rover

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 261 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:N. Texas

Posted 14 February 2018 - 02:03 AM

Retire to Europe if you want to ride the rails in your senior years. America is much more concerned about having airports in remote locations for the elite to fly their jets into. The airport "fees" they pay hardly support the building and operation of these Govt. parking lots for them. And this isn't going to change. THIS is America.


I've ridden: ~ The Empire Builder 1981 ~ The Coast Starlight 1981 ~ The Texas Eagle ~ The Sunset Limited ~
Books: ~ Time-Life - The Old West ~ The Railroaders * Rail Ventures - 4th Edition

 

I think it is absolute mythology that there's any national system that is profitable. And I think the naysayers just have to get over it. ~ Amtrak President Alex Kummant ~ June 2008

 


#40 Lonestar648

Lonestar648

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,631 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:06 AM

Amtrak is nearing or at a critical point with its fleet where routes will not be able to continue due to the aging inventory. By kicking the can down the road it appears that Congress is hoping that the Amtrak thorn will just gradually disappear thus no one has blood on their hands.  To me, keeping fund at the level is the same as wanting Amtrak Passenger Rail to be shut down so more cars are used, more gas consumed, etc.  Congress is just a bunch of self centered egos who could care less about their constituency as long as they still get elected, get lots of free trips, and lots of media coverage to stroke their inflated egos.  Amtrak needs so much capital to make the system operate long term, no one wants to address the elephant in the room..






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users