Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

SF direct to NYC


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1 denmarks

denmarks

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 467 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chico, CA
  • Interests:Computers and Travel

Posted 11 December 2017 - 03:06 PM

Is it possible for a Superliner car to travel from Chicago to New York City? If so why is there no direct train from SF to NYC?


Dennis M. Marks
32,992 miles on Amtrak

 


#2 the_traveler

the_traveler

    Engineer

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,049 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Whatever siding I'm sitting on!
  • Interests:Looking at GPS to find out where I am at!

Posted 11 December 2017 - 03:13 PM

No. Superliners do not run in the east (except on the CL and AT and occasionally the Cardinal) because they are too tall for the tunnels in Baltimore and the entrances to NYP and (when used) NYG.
Take it easy .......

Take the train instead and enjoy the ride!

The view is much better at 3 feet than it is at 30,000 feet!

#3 brianpmcdonnell17

brianpmcdonnell17

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,020 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Largo, Florida

Posted 11 December 2017 - 03:33 PM

In addition to the height issues, Superliners are not accessible from high-level platforms. This limits them from using most Northeast Corridor stations as well as some stations on the Keystone and Empire Corridors.

Sent from my SM-J327P using Amtrak Forum mobile app
Routes Travelled: CL WAS-CHI, Card. CHI-WAS, Caro. CLT-RGH, CS SEA-LAX, CZ CHI-RIC, Cre. BAL-ATL, EB SEA-CHI, ES NYG/NYP-NFL, LSL BOS/NYP-CHI, ML ALB-NYP, NER FBG-RVR+WAS-BOS, PS LAX-ANA, Pen. NYP-PGH, Pie. RGH-CLT, SM ORL-NYP, SS MIA-NYP

#4 Green Maned Lion

Green Maned Lion

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,143 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ
  • Interests:Sleeping

Posted 11 December 2017 - 04:15 PM

Beyond that, a one seat ride to San Francisco is kind of pointless. The advantage to a one seat ride reduces greatly as trip length increases.


Travelled: Broadway Limited (1), Lake Shore Limited (6), Capitol Limited (7), Empire Builder (1), Southwest Chief (2), Sunset Limited (1), California Zephyr (3), Coast Starlight (2), Silver Meteor (5), Silver Star (5), Silver Palm (2), Crescent (1), Cardinal (4), Auto Train (4), Pennsylvanian (2), Palmetto (1), Acela Express (1), Empire Service (1), Northeast Regional (11), Keystone Service (1) --- Total Miles: 50,144 --- Total Trains: 61
Most important: Keep it Simple, Stupid!
Posted Image
Dream of love, dream of me, for you are my love. I love you.
Avatar and sig were done by my fiance, Corvidophile.

#5 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,926 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 11 December 2017 - 04:27 PM

And it adds enormously to schedule risk in the face of unpredictable events along a longer route.



#6 Hotblack Desiato

Hotblack Desiato

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 189 posts

Posted 11 December 2017 - 05:12 PM

Not to mention issues of equipment maintenance and servicing.

 

That said, Amtrak did experiment with through-routing the Capitol Limited with one of the western trains (I think it was the SW Chief), but that didn't last very long.  The negatives outweighed the positives of that arrangement.



#7 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,875 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 11 December 2017 - 09:58 PM

Not to mention issues of equipment maintenance and servicing.

 

That said, Amtrak did experiment with through-routing the Capitol Limited with one of the western trains (I think it was the SW Chief), but that didn't last very long.  The negatives outweighed the positives of that arrangement.

 

Yes, the CL-SWC (http://timetables.or...0511n&item=0042). Only the CL would work since the CL is SL while the LSL and TR (still existed) is/was Viewliner.

 

There was also CL-SS/SM back in the early 90's (http://timetables.or...1027n&item=0012).

 

Finally there was the transcontinental  LAX-MIA SL (http://timetables.or...1030n&item=0030)

 

The full SL back then was 3066 miles. The current TE from CHI-LAX is now 2728 miles. LSL+SWC or LSL+CZ  would be quite a bit over 3000 miles but if 2728 miles is reasonable now why isn't 3300 miles?  Or do you not consider 2728 miles reasonable? Is there a magic number you consider reasonable?

 

I think by distance a 2000 mile one seat ride is reasonable since the SWC and CZ are that distance so NEC-Texas without a change of trains in Chicago is reasonable and hopefully Crescent Star will become a reality. Also, you should be able to do a one seat ride between Florida and Texas (or even a same day transfer in New Orleans). How about being able to travel between anywhere in Florida and Dallas (or New Orleans and Dallas or Houston and Dallas) without taking a bus or staying overnight in San Antonio? 


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Shore Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL), Texas Eagle (CHI-DAL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/


#8 railbuck

railbuck

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 181 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 December 2017 - 10:37 PM

I wouldn't consider a one seat ride over 2000 miles (or two nights) to be reasonable.  Now a one roomette ride, sure.



#9 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,748 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cooking, Politics

Posted 14 March 2018 - 10:51 AM

There are tons of reasons why there isn't a direct San Francisco to NY train, here are some of the main ones:

 

Delays

Delays compound and increase exponentially as a trip gets longer. Scheduling would be very difficult (making connections, arriving at the big cities at a good time of day, etc.)

 

Demand

There's very minimal demand for a one seat ride from San Francisco to NY. It would be at least 75 hours, and as has been mentioned, the longer the trip, the lower the demand. Traveling that kind of distance, most people are find with a transfer.

 

Equipment

This is the main problem. Superliners can not fit into most tunnels on the east coast, and can not access high-level platforms. They definitely can't modify the tunnels, so no operation through Baltimore or NY Penn. And new low platforms would have to be constructed at a lot of stations. So this SF-NY train has to use single-level equipment. There are no single-level Sightseer cars or proper Lounges, so these would have to be either designed and constructed (which is unlikely), or wouldn't operate with proper lounges at all. This means that on a 75+ hour train ride, people wouldn't have a good place to relax or really see the scenery. And since single-level cars have much less capacity than Superliners, the consists would have to be extended to fit more people. So this train probably doesn't fit at most stations, and would require a ton of equipment. There already are virtually no single-level cars to spare, and this train would probably require 6 or more extra-long consists. That's probably around 70 cars for one train. Do the math and it's probably $200 million to cover just the equipment for this train.

 

Put all this together and you realize that a direct SF-NYC train is pretty unlikely.


Edited by cpotisch, 14 March 2018 - 10:52 AM.

  • Thirdrail7 likes this
Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service
 
Wish List: Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome, Downeaster

#10 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,875 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 14 March 2018 - 11:03 AM

Superliner no but why not Viewliner?


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Shore Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL), Texas Eagle (CHI-DAL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/


#11 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,748 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cooking, Politics

Posted 14 March 2018 - 12:55 PM

Superliner no but why not Viewliner?

 

All these reasons:

Equipment

This is the main problem. Superliners can not fit into most tunnels on the east coast, and can not access high-level platforms. They definitely can't modify the tunnels, so no operation through Baltimore or NY Penn. And new low platforms would have to be constructed at a lot of stations. So this SF-NY train has to use single-level equipment. There are no single-level Sightseer cars or proper Lounges, so these would have to be either designed and constructed (which is unlikely), or wouldn't operate with proper lounges at all. This means that on a 75+ hour train ride, people wouldn't have a good place to relax or really see the scenery. And since single-level cars have much less capacity than Superliners, the consists would have to be extended to fit more people. So this train probably doesn't fit at most stations, and would require a ton of equipment. There already are virtually no single-level cars to spare, and this train would probably require 6 or more extra-long consists. That's probably around 70 cars for one train. Do the math and it's probably $200 million to cover just the equipment for this train.


  • Ryan and Thirdrail7 like this
Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service
 
Wish List: Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome, Downeaster

#12 Trogdor

Trogdor

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,204 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here

Posted 14 March 2018 - 01:27 PM

The Zephyr already requires six trainsets, so a hypothetical SF-NY route would require 9 or 10 sets.


Posted Image

#13 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,926 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 14 March 2018 - 01:35 PM

The ultimate question remains "why?". The only conceivable reason seems to be the fulfillment of fantasies of a limited number of fringe railfans, at a rather huge cost. That does not deserve much serious consideration IMHO in this day and age, unless the basis for trying to do that is on a completely different infrastructure perhaps, capable fo 250 to 300mph sustained speeds over very long stretches.


  • Thirdrail7 likes this

#14 railiner

railiner

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,154 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY
  • Interests:All public transportation....land, sea, and air

Posted 15 March 2018 - 12:13 PM

Perhaps instead of thinking of this as "transportation"....there might be a reasonable market for this as an occasional (once or twice a summer, say), "cruise train"....where everyone aboard books for the entire journey.  Such a train could be routed and scheduled to optimize for sightseeing, and have added recreation/feature cars in the consist....

Of course, the problem remains, where to obtain spare cars for such a service during a busy season...perhaps utilizing various privately owned cars?   But then, it would probably be a private operation, not an Amtrak one, other than Amtrak providing power, crews, and other logistical support....

There have been some attempts at this type of market in the past, but alas, none succeeded for very long.....


metroblue?

okay on the blue!

#15 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,748 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cooking, Politics

Posted 15 March 2018 - 05:09 PM

Perhaps instead of thinking of this as "transportation"....there might be a reasonable market for this as an occasional (once or twice a summer, say), "cruise train"....where everyone aboard books for the entire journey.  Such a train could be routed and scheduled to optimize for sightseeing, and have added recreation/feature cars in the consist....

Of course, the problem remains, where to obtain spare cars for such a service during a busy season...perhaps utilizing various privately owned cars?   But then, it would probably be a private operation, not an Amtrak one, other than Amtrak providing power, crews, and other logistical support....

There have been some attempts at this type of market in the past, but alas, none succeeded for very long.....

While I very much support the prospect of a "cruise train", Amtrak's current operations are currently so far from that kind of service, that that just doesn't seem feasible as an Amtrak service in any way.


Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service
 
Wish List: Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome, Downeaster

#16 cpotisch

cpotisch

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,748 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cooking, Politics

Posted 15 March 2018 - 05:10 PM

The Zephyr already requires six trainsets, so a hypothetical SF-NY route would require 9 or 10 sets.

So maybe $400 million in equipment. Even better.


Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service
 
Wish List: Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome, Downeaster

#17 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 136 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 16 March 2018 - 12:39 PM

In my fantasy Amtrak plan, the revived National limited also goes west from Kansas City to Denver, Salt Lake City, and ends in the bay area. 



#18 dlagrua

dlagrua

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,939 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hillsborough, NJ
  • Interests:Car collecting, Train Travel, Model RR, Visiting Historical sights, Cooking, Antiques, but above all love for friends and family.

Posted 17 March 2018 - 09:13 AM

Even during the Golden Age of passenger rail, cross country trains never made it to NYC. Connections were always made by the railroads in Chicago.  In some cases you had to arrive in Chicago and take transportation to another station as Dearborn  (to depart on the Santa Fe) . In other cases through cars were transferred to trains West giving somewhat of a one train option but I believe that these served sleeper passengers only. The PRR may have offered this. The single seat one train option was not viable back then so it certainly isn't now. Actually we enjoy the 4 hr layover as we can walk to the French Market or Greektown for lunch and/or see the city. You can't do that with air travel and its one of the things that passenger rail offers. 



#19 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,875 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 17 March 2018 - 10:14 AM

I wouldn't consider a one seat ride over 2000 miles (or two nights) to be reasonable.  Now a one roomette ride, sure.

 

The TE between CHI and LAX is close to three days long. I personally would never travel between the two cities on the TE when the SWC exists although I know people at AU have said they have and insist that the TE should exist for that purpose. Now would anyone here would ride the whole way in a coach seat I don't know. But the idea that a three day train is a deal breaker is a crock when the CHI-LAX TE exists. You can say equipment isn't available for a NYC-SF train but don't tell me no one would ride a train for three days in a row without getting off.  


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Shore Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL), Texas Eagle (CHI-DAL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/


#20 JRR

JRR

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 370 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 March 2018 - 10:24 AM

I enjoyed the four day trip from Jasper to Toronto on the VIS Canadian last year and would ride a NYP to SF train if it existed but never will.


Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users