Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

Best passenger rail route from Berkshires to NYC might be through ALB


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#1 Thirdrail7

Thirdrail7

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,051 posts

Posted 02 December 2017 - 03:39 PM

I guess this is a start. This route does seem better than dropping down the old NECR towards NLC. However, it seems like it would still be lightly used. The good news is Pittsfield seems to be on board. This could lead to new activity on the old B&A route.

 

Please allow a brief fair use quote from Group: Best passenger rail route from Berkshires to NYC might be through Albany, to start

 


 

The Berkshire Flyer Working Group, led by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, had to get some possible routes nailed down so it could ask Amtrak to price it all out, something t

hat takes about six to eight weeks.

"Amtrak is not in the habit of giving ballpark figures," said Astrid Glynn, MassDOT's rail and transit director. "We need to sharpen what the request is."

After forming last summer under an economic development initiative sponsored by Sen. Adam Hinds, D-Pittsfield, the group has moved swiftly to analyze what Hinds says is a hungry seasonal travel market for work and leisure-related service.

The group is collecting data, too, and will get more figures on how many Manhattan and New York metro area residents have second homes in Berkshire County, for instance. MassDOT did it for Pittsfield already: that's 212 people right there.

And Clete Kus, transportation program manager at the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, said he would have a similar analysis of Airbnb use in the Berkshires by New York City residents, and would also look into data from vacation rental sites like Homeaway.com.

With a March 1 deadline to present its research and a possible plan to the Legislature, the group is getting into the nitty-gritty, like timing for Sunday evening service back to New York.

"There's a 4 p.m. departure at Albany," said Jay Green of the Berkshire Scenic Railway. "You could depart from Pittsfield at 3 p.m. for a 6:30 to 7 p.m. arrival at Penn [Station]."

"Later is better," Hinds said.

 

 

 

Perhaps this could a be a Friday-Sunday operation.


Edited by Thirdrail7, 02 December 2017 - 04:10 PM.

They say laughter is the best medicine. Obviously they never posted on AU.


#2 Ryan

Ryan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,306 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:OTN
  • Interests:a fact checker combined with a ferret

Posted 02 December 2017 - 03:57 PM

I go to PSF for work, and would love this. The drive from Albany sucks.
Posted Image

Disclaimer: Any images or links you see in my post may in fact be invasive advertising or even fraudulent phishing attacks silently injected into my post by our spam based hosting service. If anything looks suspicious or inappropriate or you have any doubt whatsoever then do not click any links (particularly those appearing in green and/or with a double underline) or interact with the spam in any way. You may also want to consider using ad-blocking plugins such as Adblock Plus and/or Ghostery)to help reduce the number and severity of advertising scams directed at you.

#3 Palmetto

Palmetto

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,657 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southmost Texas

Posted 02 December 2017 - 05:26 PM

Oh. Oh.  The dreaded reverse move maneuver, unless the proposal is to simply run a shuttle between Pittsfield and Albany, with a change there.

 

That could be avoided by skipping Albany and taking the connection between the CSX Berkshire Division down onto the Hudson Division, although the article cites the need for "a new connection" which I believe means a new east leg of the wye currently in place. 

 

Before the Post Road Branch was put back, the Boston section of the Lake Shore used to do this, and it involved backing down on the connection so that the train was properly pointed to continue up to Albany to join the New York section.

 

The Berkshire Flyer would be a separate train in that case, and would need a slot on Metro North's Hudson Line.  They would probably do well to stop at Chatham, too.

 

The article also mentions the route via the new connection would be faster by 20 minutes.  I would say it would save a lot more than that, especially if a change of trains at Albany is envisioned.  Somebody better get busy finding funding for the new connection!


Edited by Palmetto, 02 December 2017 - 05:36 PM.


#4 Green Maned Lion

Green Maned Lion

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,143 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ
  • Interests:Sleeping

Posted 02 December 2017 - 09:44 PM

I think a route from New York to Berks County PA would be a better use of resources.
Travelled: Broadway Limited (1), Lake Shore Limited (6), Capitol Limited (7), Empire Builder (1), Southwest Chief (2), Sunset Limited (1), California Zephyr (3), Coast Starlight (2), Silver Meteor (5), Silver Star (5), Silver Palm (2), Crescent (1), Cardinal (4), Auto Train (4), Pennsylvanian (2), Palmetto (1), Acela Express (1), Empire Service (1), Northeast Regional (11), Keystone Service (1) --- Total Miles: 50,144 --- Total Trains: 61
Most important: Keep it Simple, Stupid!
Posted Image
Dream of love, dream of me, for you are my love. I love you.
Avatar and sig were done by my fiance, Corvidophile.

#5 neroden

neroden

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,645 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Ithaca, NY
  • Interests:Please feel free to moderate my posts

Posted 04 December 2017 - 10:04 PM

The only interesting question is: what's CSX's attitude?  Open hostility?  Positivity?  Ransom requests, and if so how large?

 

I'm sure this could be operated reasonably as a standalone shuttle (change trains at Albany) or a push-pull extension of one of the Albany terminating trains (probably along with a shuttle, for equipment positioning) but it's all moot if track access can't be straightened out.


--Nathanael--

Please feel free to moderate my posts.

#6 Palmetto

Palmetto

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,657 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southmost Texas

Posted 05 December 2017 - 06:23 AM

These days, CSX is losing traffic and trains are becoming fewer.  The former B&A seems to be no exception.  If CSX puts up a stink about another passenger train on its Berkshire Subdivision, it could probably be considered obstructionism, pure and simple.



#7 Thirdrail7

Thirdrail7

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,051 posts

Posted 18 February 2018 - 08:16 PM

A little progress has been made and with CSX looking to sell off routes, the time to strike is now.

 

http://www.berkshire...ger-rail,532174

 

 

 

By Heather Bellow, The Berkshire Eagle
LENOX — It has been hailed as a $1 billion-a-year solution for a limping rural economy in the Berkshires' postindustrial age.

And it has been criticized as a naive dream.

But seasonal weekend passenger train service from New York City to Pittsfield might yet materialize, and within the next five years.

Some nuts and bolts are now on the table — a working group exploring such a service since September has mapped out its plan in a report for lawmaker review. The deadline is March 1.

The Berkshire Flyer Working Group was born out of a legislative initiative sponsored by state Sen. Adam Hinds, D-Pittsfield, to explore such service as an economic development push to get more people and money into the Berkshires.

The group's members have mostly settled on a Friday Amtrak train that leaves New York's Penn Station at 2:20 p.m. and arrives in Pittsfield at 6:10 p.m.

All that's missing is the cost.

The nearly completed report is waiting on operating and capital costs from Amtrak, which would provide the service from July 4 through Labor Day weekend, and possibly extend that to fall weekends through Columbus Day weekend.

Amtrak is expected to deliver those numbers this week. But transportation officials at Tuesday's Flyer meeting hinted that the busy rail company might not make its deadline.Hinds said this was OK — the March 1 deadline could be loosened a bit.

In the meantime, the group is sharpening its sales pitch to lawmakers. Apart from the report, which says this rail plan is likely to work, Hinds pointed to its role in a nationwide movement of rail resurgence with enormous environmental and economic benefits.

"We're participating in something significant," Hinds said.

  • lonewolfette9847 likes this

They say laughter is the best medicine. Obviously they never posted on AU.


#8 Palmetto

Palmetto

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,657 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southmost Texas

Posted 19 February 2018 - 06:35 AM

Wow, "in the next five years."  What would require waiting up to five years?  They don't mention what the return schedule to New York would be.  They'd probably have to combine this train to Sunday only 296 in Renssalaer.


Edited by Palmetto, 19 February 2018 - 03:16 PM.


#9 brianpmcdonnell17

brianpmcdonnell17

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,019 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Largo, Florida

Posted 19 February 2018 - 10:17 AM

Amtrak already has a train over the entire route so they should at least make a connection available in ALB so this is at least somewhat of an option at present. As of now, if one searched for Pittsfield-New York the routing is LSL 449 to ALB and the Maple Leaf from there to New York, which takes just over 5 hours. However, going north the only routing listed by Amtrak is via New Haven and Springfield, which has two transfers rather than one and takes over eight hours. There is an Empire Service train arriving ALB just over an hour before 448 leaves, so if this routing was listed on the Amtrak website it could at least make the New York to Pittsfield route more reasonable in the interim and on the days when the direct train will not operate.
Routes Travelled: CL WAS-CHI, Card. CHI-WAS, Caro. CLT-RGH, CS SEA-LAX, CZ CHI-RIC, Cre. BAL-ATL, EB SEA-CHI, ES NYG/NYP-NFL, LSL BOS/NYP-CHI, ML ALB-NYP, NER FBG-RVR+WAS-BOS, PS LAX-ANA, Pen. NYP-PGH, Pie. RGH-CLT, SM ORL-NYP, SS MIA-NYP

#10 Palmetto

Palmetto

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,657 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southmost Texas

Posted 19 February 2018 - 03:17 PM

I didn't see a mention of a stop in Chatham.  And if they were to, they would have to build a platform at the old B&A station.  Formerly, this was two tracks mainline, but the track closer to the station was ripped up many years ago.



#11 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,596 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 21 February 2018 - 04:12 AM

PSF seems like a rather...odd place to terminate the train (not to mention having to deal with the resulting crewing issues and so on), so I have to wonder...are they planning to have the equipment sit there?  Go on to Springfield?  Or deadhead it back to Albany?


Amtrak mileage to date: Somewhere between 120,000 and 150,000 miles...I /really/ need to run all of my trips through a calculator sometime.

...and no, I am not /that/ Anderson...;-)


#12 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,926 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 02 April 2018 - 10:00 AM

A followup from the Berkshire Flyer:

 

http://www.berkshire...re-flyer,535974

 

Extension of a regular Empire Corridor Albany service it is....

 

I suspect it will be an immediate turn around and head back at least to Albany, since I doubt they can afford to strand an entire consist in PSF except perhaps in a a train late in the day in and very early in the day out the following day, provided there is somewhere to store the train in PSF.

 

It seems to me that even Berkshire County by itself may be able to dig out the $235K estimated net cost.

 

Now about the virtues of a stop at Chatham, which will cost real money....


  • lonewolfette9847 likes this

#13 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,897 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 02 April 2018 - 04:00 PM

The feasibility study for the proposed Pittsfield service is available on a MassDOT webpage: Berkshire Flyer Study.

 

The study describes 3 options, 2 through Albany and one using the Schodack Subdivision Route with a new connector track.  Reviewing the study, the new connector track would be a significant project and thus expensive. 

 

What are the odds that Massachusetts would actually pay for or contribute to a train through Albany, even with a limited Friday, Sunday only schedule? 



#14 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,926 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 02 April 2018 - 04:07 PM

The $235K per year number puts it within reach of more local funding than MassDOT though.


Edited by jis, 03 April 2018 - 12:36 PM.


#15 Palmetto

Palmetto

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,657 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southmost Texas

Posted 02 April 2018 - 08:00 PM

I saw a youtube video of the recent meeting.  It was stated that they chose the option that they did because it requires no capital cost.  All the infrastructure is there.  As for Chatham,  I suppose that if Chatham want service badly enough, they'd cough up the money to build a short platform out to the track.



#16 fairviewroad

fairviewroad

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,208 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 April 2018 - 12:09 PM

They must be fairly certain of the economic benefits of this service if they're going to pour that kind of money into a train with such limited service. I'm generally for more passenger rail service, but when it exists only to shuttle wealthy people to their weekend getaways, I'm a bit skeptical of putting public funds into it.



#17 Metra Electric Rider

Metra Electric Rider

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 619 posts

Posted 03 April 2018 - 12:32 PM

I have to say I'm pretty impressed with the ability of someone to get this organized so quickly. The letter JIS posted (Adam Hinds was the author I think) was pretty passionate about population loss and the desire for it to be a daily, year-round service to help stem population loss and economic stagnation in the region, which I think is putting it's hopes in tourism.


SJ - Norra Stambanan, Nordvästra stambanan, Södra stambanan, Dalabanan

NSB- Bergensbanen, Kongsvingerbanen, Rørosbanen, Dovrebanen, Flåmsbana, Roa–Hønefossbanen

Amtrak - Floridian, San Francisco Zephyr, Southwest Limited, Illini, State House


#18 Palmetto

Palmetto

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,657 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southmost Texas

Posted 03 April 2018 - 04:03 PM

Here's another concern of the committee:  how do people get to their final destination after alighting the train?



#19 Eric S

Eric S

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,410 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 03 April 2018 - 05:45 PM

The CapeFlyer, which is a similar summer-weekend-only service offered between Boston and Cape Cod (Hyannis), has some sort of coordinated local bus (Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority) service (as well as nearby ferry service). Presumably a BerkshireFlyer would involve similar coordinated bus service from Pittsfield to wherever, whether via the Berkshire Regional Transit Authority or some other service provider.


  • Palmetto likes this

#20 railgeekteen

railgeekteen

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 136 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston area
  • Interests:Trains, roads, planes, nintendo

Posted 06 April 2018 - 10:29 PM

What about Pittsfield to NYC via Great Barrington and Danbury?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users