Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

When it comes to growing Amtrak, what service expansion(s) do you view


  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

#61 west point

west point

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,356 posts

Posted 20 January 2018 - 12:49 PM

Just to amplify the equipment problems highlighted by the 501 derailment now we have LAX.  There is not enough spare equipment to cover the Santa Barber mudslide demands on the Surf liners.



#62 AmtrakWPK

AmtrakWPK

    Engineer

  • Honored Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,836 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 January 2018 - 04:47 PM

One reason for the horrible OTP was the three-times-per-week schedule. The freight roads never really bother setting things up for it, I don't think. That would also have to be changed to daily to have a real hope for OTP change.  We're still shackled to the freight, though. And just-barely-kept-running maintenance funding. I'm WELL AWARE of the OTP. We got back to WPK on Sunset at 2am-4am (or later) several times instead of early evening the previous day (IIRC the schedule correctly).  Even really late, it was still a great ride WPK-NOL-WPK (sigh...).



#63 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,517 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 27 January 2018 - 10:47 AM

We got back to WPK on Sunset at 2am-4am (or later) several times instead of early evening the previous day (IIRC the schedule correctly).  Even really late, it was still a great ride WPK-NOL-WPK (sigh...).

WPK is the code for Winter Park, Florida. This info for those of us who memorized the 500+ Amtrak codes when young, but have forgot them in our dotage. ;)


Edited by WoodyinNYC, 27 January 2018 - 10:48 AM.


#64 WICT106

WICT106

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 819 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 27 January 2018 - 08:54 PM

Time to resurrect the recommendation to bring Amtrak through Madison, WI. 


"Be bold and courageous. When you look back on your life, you'll regret the things you didn't do more than the ones you did." - Unknown

#65 Anthony V

Anthony V

    Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 99 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:38 PM

Time to resurrect the recommendation to bring Amtrak through Madison, WI. 

For Madison service, I recommend two routes, this first would be restoring the Varsity route via Janesville, WI, which would be better for travel between Chicago and Madison. The second would be a separate Milwaukee to Madison run independent from the Hiawatha Service. However, before any of this will even start to take shape, you'll need to kick Walker out at the upcoming gubernatorial elections.



#66 dlagrua

dlagrua

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hillsborough, NJ
  • Interests:Car collecting, Train Travel, Model RR, Visiting Historical sights, Cooking, Antiques, but above all love for friends and family.

Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:25 PM

IF Amtrak had the equipment, new routes could be created on the many short lines across the country as on the Louisville and Indiana that connects Indianapolis to Louisville. Such lines run far less freight than the major carriers so there should be plenty of space available for Amtrak.  Short lines such as the L & I would probably be eager to have extra revenue for leasing route mileage to Amtrak. I believe that this line was formerly a portion of the route that the Chicago to Miami  Amtrak Floridian and Midwest Autotrain used.



#67 Anthony V

Anthony V

    Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 99 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 January 2018 - 12:35 PM

IF Amtrak had the equipment, new routes could be created on the many short lines across the country as on the Louisville and Indiana that connects Indianapolis to Louisville. Such lines run far less freight than the major carriers so there should be plenty of space available for Amtrak.  Short lines such as the L & I would probably be eager to have extra revenue for leasing route mileage to Amtrak. I believe that this line was formerly a portion of the route that the Chicago to Miami  Amtrak Floridian and Midwest Autotrain used.

The Floridian used that route until 1974. The Midwest Auto-Train terminated in Louisville. Finally, from 1999-2003, the Kentucky Cardinal used the L&I.



#68 GrandRiver

GrandRiver

    Train Attendant

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 05 February 2018 - 05:07 PM

What about increased frequency of Pere Marquette? Has anyone mentioned that. The other Michigan services have multiple options but Pere Marquette is once daily each way. Especially since it stops in so many popular summer vacation towns for Chicago tourists.

 

Also The Cincinnatian (Detroit to Cincinnati version) maybe? Although Cincinnati to Chicago is a current route that has terrible timing in Cincinnati...maybe fix that first. 



#69 Pere Flyer

Pere Flyer

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 129 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Grand Rapids, Mich.; Norman, Okla.
  • Interests:Writing, dancing, traveling

Posted 05 February 2018 - 06:10 PM

What about increased frequency of Pere Marquette? Has anyone mentioned that. The other Michigan services have multiple options but Pere Marquette is once daily each way. Especially since it stops in so many popular summer vacation towns for Chicago tourists.

YES for increased frequencies of the Pere Marquette! I don’t know the double tracking situation, but a simple reflection of the current timetable, adding 0600 CHI and 1830 GRR departures, would make the train attractive to Chicago-based travelers, perhaps for vacationing spots.

On the note of single frequency state supported routes, the same thing could be done with the Heartland Flyer. Add an 0800 (or so) FTW - 1227 OKC and 1725 OKC - 2047 FTW. Would make day trips to OKC feasible from Norman, Ardmore, etc., including the moneyed Metroplex. I’d rather have that than a single frequency HF extension to Kansas or Tulsa.


Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum

Edited by Pere Flyer, 05 February 2018 - 06:11 PM.

Pere Marquette: 370 (CHI, HOM, GRR); 371 (GRR, HOM, CHI) | Heartland Flyer: 821 (OKC, NOR, FTW); 822 (FTW, NOR, OKC) | Texas Eagle: 22 (FTW, CHI)

 

S Shore Line | TRE | DART | MTA | NJT | DC Metro | MBTA | CTA | Denver RTD | MARTA | ATL Streetcar | QLine | Paris Métropolitain | Barcelona Metro | Greyhound Lines | Jefferson Lines


#70 GrandRiver

GrandRiver

    Train Attendant

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 05 February 2018 - 07:46 PM

 

What about increased frequency of Pere Marquette? Has anyone mentioned that. The other Michigan services have multiple options but Pere Marquette is once daily each way. Especially since it stops in so many popular summer vacation towns for Chicago tourists.

YES for increased frequencies of the Pere Marquette! I don’t know the double tracking situation, but a simple reflection of the current timetable, adding 0600 CHI and 1830 GRR departures, would make the train attractive to Chicago-based travelers, perhaps for vacationing spots.

On the note of single frequency state supported routes, the same thing could be done with the Heartland Flyer. Add an 0800 (or so) FTW - 1227 OKC and 1725 OKC - 2047 FTW. Would make day trips to OKC feasible from Norman, Ardmore, etc., including the moneyed Metroplex. I’d rather have that than a single frequency HF extension to Kansas or Tulsa.


Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum

 

My friends actually travel from Chicago quite a bit on the Pere Marquette, particularly for Founders new releases because then they can do a brewery "cruise" along the way. If you stop in St Joe you can get to Greenbush, Transient and Cultivate to name a few. Then in Holland you can go to New Holland or Saugatuck. And obviously Founders, Brewery Vivant and Perrin among others in GR. 



#71 Eric S

Eric S

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,354 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 06 February 2018 - 09:02 AM

What about increased frequency of Pere Marquette? Has anyone mentioned that. The other Michigan services have multiple options but Pere Marquette is once daily each way. Especially since it stops in so many popular summer vacation towns for Chicago tourists.

 

Also The Cincinnatian (Detroit to Cincinnati version) maybe? Although Cincinnati to Chicago is a current route that has terrible timing in Cincinnati...maybe fix that first. 

 

Of the two other Michigan services, one (Wolverine) is three-a-day, but the other (Blue Water) is also just once daily.



#72 keelhauled

keelhauled

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 546 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:VT

Posted 06 February 2018 - 09:25 AM

At one point there was the idea of running 370/371 2x daily with the second frequency only to Holland due to not being able to get all the way to Grand Rapids and back twice using a single trainset. That was why the schedule was changed several years ago to earlier westbound and later eastbound, but obviously the step of filling in with the second trip has not happened, with the exception of the Thanksgiving schedule.

Go on, raise the flag, I got stars in my eyes...I'm in love with her and I won't apologize.


#73 cpotisch

cpotisch

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 255 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Interests:Planes, Trains, Cars, Politics

Posted 17 February 2018 - 02:00 PM

What about through-cars going from the Cardinal or Capitol Limited to a Silver train down to Florida. This would result in direct service from Chicago to South Florida. This plus an extended CONO or Sunset Ltd would make south Florida vastly more accessible by train.


Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum

Routes Traveled: Silver Meteor, Silver Star, CrescentLake Shore LimitedCalifornia Zephyr, Sunset Limited, Texas EagleEthan Allen Express, Empire Service, Maple Leaf, AdirondackAcela Express, Northeast RegionalKeystone Service

 

Wish List: Cardinal, CONO, Empire Builder, Southwest Chief, Crescent (overnight), Adirondack w/ Great Dome, Downeaster

 


#74 Palmetto

Palmetto

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,483 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southmost Texas

Posted 17 February 2018 - 02:45 PM

The Cardinal connection would require passengers to ride south-- the opposite way they arrived.  Some people don't mind riding backwards, but if I had a choice, I'd rather ride facing forward.  No matter, we've been told Amtrak hates switching cars en route.  Don't know if that's actually true or not, but a 29/97 connection should be doable at Washington.  There's Amtrak yard jobs there that could perform the drop and add.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users