Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

Speeding up the TE


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

#21 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,584 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 28 June 2017 - 12:51 PM

I personally would prefer that 1960 schedule as that would allow a same day 19-1 or 59-1 transfer at NOL and the westbound train would serve SAS and LAX at way better hours (although I doubt arriving into LAX at 5:05pm is ever going to happen) although eastbound the train got into SAS at 4:30am and for any train to be able to connect in NOL with the current 20 it would have to arrive in NOL before 7am.

 

I also like the idea of a through branch going from DAL/FTW-ELP and travel between DAL/FTW-LAX would be way way better than it is today. Plus the route between DAL and ELP back then was 645.3 miles, 13:35 hrs where today via SAS is 919 miles, about 20.5 hours, not counting the layover in SAS. They must have had some shortcut. I had proposed breaking the SL and TE and run through cars from DAL-SAS connecting with the SL. If you can have through cars DAL-ELP to the SL that would be even better for DAL to get to LAX.

 

Of course the #1 reason this schedule was better.... PHOENIX!

 

I personally don't care much for the SL-CS connection, I'd rather have the Crescent-SL connection (although of course I'm biased). (Dream Sequence): This SL westbound schedule with the Dallas branch and a resurrected Spirit of California. That way you can still go from Texas/Arizona to the Bay Area with a same day transfer and you'd have the overnight SF Area/LA Area train again. 


Trains Traveled:
 
Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA) 
Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI)
Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS)
Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI)
Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL)
Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX)
California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY)
City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)

 

Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 

https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/

 


#22 Eric S

Eric S

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,324 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 28 June 2017 - 01:30 PM

I also like the idea of a through branch going from DAL/FTW-ELP and travel between DAL/FTW-LAX would be way way better than it is today. Plus the route between DAL and ELP back then was 645.3 miles, 13:35 hrs where today via SAS is 919 miles, about 20.5 hours, not counting the layover in SAS. They must have had some shortcut. I had proposed breaking the SL and TE and run through cars from DAL-SAS connecting with the SL. If you can have through cars DAL-ELP to the SL that would be even better for DAL to get to LAX.

 

Yes, there's a UP line (former T&P) that essentially follows I-20 heading west from Fort Worth through Abilene, Midland, and Odessa.



#23 Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,044 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Америка
  • Interests:Travel by Planes, Trains, and Automobiles

Posted 28 June 2017 - 05:14 PM

Unfortunately, Illinois is such a mess right now that the state government is unlikely to renegotiate anything.  Although eliminating this "paper barrier" would be a really good idea.

 
What you call a "paper barrier" is what Union Pacific would call an invoice. The fact that taxpayers paid to bring the tracks up to code doesn't change the fact that UP remains in firm control of operating speeds and dispatching. Either pay up or slow down.  The power imbalance between Amtrak and Union Pacific is so great that Amtrak needs to tread very carefully.  Nearly all of the practical and political leverage is on UP's side.

 

The reason for the long layover between the TE and SL is the pathetic (at least westbound) SL schedule. I don't know what's less attractive, getting to SAS at 2:45am to board the train or spending six hours in SAS if traveling from DAL/FTW to LAX. And in either case, you arrive in LAX during the graveyard shift. With a better schedule, you'd have way more business between DAL/SAS-:LAX. Based on the markets served, the SL (including passengers from DAL/FTW and south heading to LAX via SAS) should be blowing the Cardinal out of the water in terms of ridership/revenue. IMO the schedule is the biggest reason it's not.

 

Who cares about worsening calling times for the 2nd and 7th largest cities in the country when you can improve calling times for much more important markets like Maricopa, AZ and Beaumont, TX?

Attached File  Screen Shot 2017-06-28 at 5.05.35 PM.png   42.53KB   14 downloads


Edited by Devil's Advocate, 28 June 2017 - 05:35 PM.

We've got provisions and lots of beer. The key word is survival on the new frontier. 


#24 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,401 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 28 June 2017 - 07:07 PM

 

Unfortunately, Illinois is such a mess right now ...

 ... The fact that taxpayers paid to bring the tracks up to code doesn't change the fact that UP remains in firm control of operating speeds and dispatching. Either pay up or slow down. The power imbalance between Amtrak and Union Pacific is so great that Amtrak needs to tread very carefully. Nearly all of the practical and political leverage is on UP's side.

To be fair to Illinois and UP, things beyond their control haven't gone as had been hoped for.

 

The Stimulus committed a Billion or so to upgrading from near Chicago (Aurora) to near St Louis (more or less Alton). Everyone understood that was enuff to chew on for Phase One, and anyway they weren't ready with plans and permits for the Phase Two stuff right then.

 

Then after the mid-term election of 2010, Congress in its wisdom aborted the plans to further invest in passenger rail, because after all, Obama was for it and that meant the Crazies were agin it.

 

When or if funding ever materializes for the now phantom Phase Two, the CHI-Aurora segment will get the full 110-mph upgrade treatment: double tracking, new bridges, grade crossings fixed, fencing, etc.; and the Aurora-St Louis segment will get complete double tracking etc. That way Phase Two, costing about another Billion, will cut another 30 or 40 or 50 minutes out of the run time. At that point more frequencies will be added, and the Texas Eagle presumably will be allowed to move at 110-mph speeds. By the time Phase Two is finishing up, we might even see the Horizons replaced by new cars of one level or another. (A Phase Three could include a new bridge over the Mississippi among other projects to shave more minutes from the schedules.)

 

Anyway, no problem that can't be fixed by time and money and clear thinking in Congress. So don't count on any progress for the foreseeable future.



#25 ehbowen

ehbowen

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,101 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, Texas

Posted 28 June 2017 - 07:18 PM

 

I also like the idea of a through branch going from DAL/FTW-ELP and travel between DAL/FTW-LAX would be way way better than it is today. Plus the route between DAL and ELP back then was 645.3 miles, 13:35 hrs where today via SAS is 919 miles, about 20.5 hours, not counting the layover in SAS. They must have had some shortcut. I had proposed breaking the SL and TE and run through cars from DAL-SAS connecting with the SL. If you can have through cars DAL-ELP to the SL that would be even better for DAL to get to LAX.

 

Yes, there's a UP line (former T&P) that essentially follows I-20 heading west from Fort Worth through Abilene, Midland, and Odessa.

 

 

Umm, from a standpoint of temporal coordinates I think it would be more correct to say that Interstate 20 follows the UP's former T&P route....


broadside-1.jpg 16 inch Armor Piercing...When you care enough to send the very, VERY best!
Visit Streamliner Schedules - Historic timetables from the Streamliner era.


#26 ehbowen

ehbowen

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,101 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, Texas

Posted 28 June 2017 - 07:20 PM

I also like the idea of a through branch going from DAL/FTW-ELP and travel between DAL/FTW-LAX would be way way better than it is today. Plus the route between DAL and ELP back then was 645.3 miles, 13:35 hrs where today via SAS is 919 miles, about 20.5 hours, not counting the layover in SAS. They must have had some shortcut. I had proposed breaking the SL and TE and run through cars from DAL-SAS connecting with the SL. If you can have through cars DAL-ELP to the SL that would be even better for DAL to get to LAX.

 

For more information on the service from El Paso to Dallas and east, check the schedule for the former Texas Eagles under MoPac....


broadside-1.jpg 16 inch Armor Piercing...When you care enough to send the very, VERY best!
Visit Streamliner Schedules - Historic timetables from the Streamliner era.


#27 Eric S

Eric S

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,324 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 28 June 2017 - 08:41 PM

 

 

I also like the idea of a through branch going from DAL/FTW-ELP and travel between DAL/FTW-LAX would be way way better than it is today. Plus the route between DAL and ELP back then was 645.3 miles, 13:35 hrs where today via SAS is 919 miles, about 20.5 hours, not counting the layover in SAS. They must have had some shortcut. I had proposed breaking the SL and TE and run through cars from DAL-SAS connecting with the SL. If you can have through cars DAL-ELP to the SL that would be even better for DAL to get to LAX.

 

Yes, there's a UP line (former T&P) that essentially follows I-20 heading west from Fort Worth through Abilene, Midland, and Odessa.

 

 

Umm, from a standpoint of temporal coordinates I think it would be more correct to say that Interstate 20 follows the UP's former T&P route....

 

 

Umm, OK. But that distinction doesn't really aid one in finding the approximate route of the rail line in question.



#28 neroden

neroden

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,096 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Ithaca, NY
  • Interests:Please feel free to moderate my posts

Posted 28 June 2017 - 09:16 PM

Unfortunately, Illinois is such a mess right now that the state government is unlikely to renegotiate anything.  Although eliminating this "paper barrier" would be a really good idea.

 
What you call a "paper barrier" is what Union Pacific would call an invoice.

Paper barrier is a historic technical term in railroading referring to a contract which prevents something which is technically straightforward -- such as direct service from a point on one railroad to a point on another which is physically connected. That was the most common usage.
 

The fact that taxpayers paid to bring the tracks up to code doesn't change the fact that UP remains in firm control of operating speeds and dispatching.

Yeah, well, you know my view of the long term solution: buy the tracks, and if they don't want to sell take them by eminent domain. It's been done before.

But in the short term, the most I can say is... Illinois made a bad deal. And they're so disorganized that they're not likely to renegotiate it any time soon.

A much better deal was made by Massachusetts, which has slowly been purchasing every line from CSX and seems to have sufficient bargaining power to force CSX to lower unreasonable prices. Talk in the Statehouse is now about Springfield-Worcester.

Massachusetts has quite a lot of backlog of management cleanup, budget issues, and upgrades of existing lines to do first, but don't be surprised if in a few years there's a state buyout of Springfield-Worcester with an "offer you can't refuse" made to CSX. The Class Is pretend they're exempt from state eminent domain, but a unified Governor, Legislature, and Congressional delegation can have powerful effects.

Which is exactly what Illinois doesn't have.

Edited by neroden, 28 June 2017 - 09:23 PM.

--Nathanael--

Please feel free to moderate my posts.

#29 MisterUptempo

MisterUptempo

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 108 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, IL

Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:52 PM

Well can Illinois pay UP for the extra speed, I can't imagine it would cost more than a few million dollars a year.

 

Yeahhhhh.......No.

 

There are folks in Rockford and the Quad Cities who have been patiently waiting for their state-supported routes. I wouldn't imagine that the state throwing millions at UP so that you can look at motorists' reactions with your binoculars is going to sit too well with them.

 

I suggest you get that bake sale started.



#30 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,768 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 29 June 2017 - 10:26 AM

The Stimulus committed a Billion or so to upgrading from near Chicago (Aurora) to near St Louis (more or less Alton). Everyone understood that was enuff to chew on for Phase One, and anyway they weren't ready with plans and permits for the Phase Two stuff right then.
 
Then after the mid-term election of 2010, Congress in its wisdom aborted the plans to further invest in passenger rail, because after all, Obama was for it and that meant the Crazies were agin it.
 
When or if funding ever materializes for the now phantom Phase Two, the CHI-Aurora segment will get the full 110-mph upgrade treatment: double tracking, new bridges, grade crossings fixed, fencing, etc.; and the Aurora-St Louis segment will get complete double tracking etc. That way Phase Two, costing about another Billion, will cut another 30 or 40 or 50 minutes out of the run time. At that point more frequencies will be added, and the Texas Eagle presumably will be allowed to move at 110-mph speeds. By the time Phase Two is finishing up, we might even see the Horizons replaced by new cars of one level or another. (A Phase Three could include a new bridge over the Mississippi among other projects to shave more minutes from the schedules.)
 
Anyway, no problem that can't be fixed by time and money and clear thinking in Congress. So don't count on any progress for the foreseeable future.


I am trying to figure out which Aurora you refer to in the context of the Chicago - St. Louis route. Did you perhaps mean Joliet, which is actually on the route? The only Aurora I can find is on BNSF route to Galesburg and then on to Kansas City and Omaha.



#31 norfolkwesternhenry

norfolkwesternhenry

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis, MN
  • Interests:Trains, Boating, Trains, Mountain Biking, Trains, Having Fun, Trains, working on my bikes, Trains, planning my next trip, PV, trains, planning trips for family

Posted 01 July 2017 - 09:35 AM

If i had some extra time from reducing the layover in DAL and FTW, I'd (at least on the westbound side) push the westbound departure out of CHI back (currently 1:45pm, the earliest of the four western trains). I don't think it is as big of an issue with passengers missing transfers from the CL/LSL but pushing the 21 departure back would make it even less of an issue.
 
The reason for the long layover between the TE and SL is the pathetic (at least westbound) SL schedule. I don't know what's less attractive, getting to SAS at 2:45am to board the train or spending six hours in SAS if traveling from DAL/FTW to LAX. And in either case, you arrive in LAX during the graveyard shift. With a better schedule, you'd have way more business between DAL/SAS-:LAX. Based on the markets served, the SL (including passengers from DAL/FTW and south heading to LAX via SAS) should be blowing the Cardinal out of the water in terms of ridership/revenue. IMO the schedule is the biggest reason it's not.


Well can Illinois pay UP for the extra speed, I can't imagine it would cost more than a few million dollars a year.

 
Yeahhhhh.......No.
 
There are folks in Rockford and the Quad Cities who have been patiently waiting for their state-supported routes. I wouldn't imagine that the state throwing millions at UP so that you can look at motorists' reactions with your binoculars is going to sit too well with them.
 
I suggest you get that bake sale started.
the binoculars are just another way to pass time, I'm hoping for a TE that shaves off more time, so I can connect to the EB, although that woukd be a lot of time shaving, but a minute here, a minute there...

Empire Builder MSP-CHI (2) CHI-MSP (2) MSP-PDX (1) MSP-CBS (5.5 H late) (1) MKE-MSP (1) MSP-SEA (1) Coast Starlate PDX-EMY (1.5H late) (1) California Zephyr DEN-SLC (1H late) (1) Hiawatha CHI-MKE (1) NE Regional WAS-BAL (1) WAS-NYP (1) Acela Express BAL-WAS (1) BOS-WAS (1) Late Shore (Limited service) CHI-BOS (On Time) (1) Capitol Limited WAS-CHI (1) Texas Eagle SAS-CHI (1.5 HR late, 1 HR late) (2) CHI-SAS (1) (55 min early) Wolverine DET-DER-ARB-CHI (35 Min late) (1) Cascades SEA-VAC (1)
Non-Amtrak: VIA: Corridor Service Q.C.-Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto-Windsor (1) Canadian: VAC-Winnipeg 4.5 H late (1) D. C. metro, Montreal Metro, Toronto subway, Portland streetcars, BART, Metra, NYC subway, Boston subway, Twin cities Blue/Green line
train cars travelled in: Superliner: Coach, Sleeper, Diner, CCC, SSL. Amfleet: LD Café, Café/Business, coach. Viewliner: Sleeper, Diner. Acela: Café, Business, quiet car. Horizon: Coach. Talgo: coach, diner, café; non Amtrak: ex CP Via Canadian Manor cars, Park car, diner,sleeper, Skyline lounge. LRC trainset: coach (tilt de-activated)

No trees were killed to make this, but a number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

My apologies if I offend you, or seem stubborn, it's simply my nature. I am 14 after all, and my English isn't exactly perfect.


#32 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,401 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 01 July 2017 - 12:25 PM

 

... a through branch going from DAL/FTW-ELP and travel between DAL/FTW-LAX would be way way better than it is today.

For more information on the service from El Paso to Dallas and east, check the schedule for the former Texas Eagles under MoPac....

Philly, what you are calling a thru branch Dallas-El Paso, Union Pacific calls their main line in the Southwest. (San Antonio-El Paso was the main line of the Southern Pacific, but since the merger not so much).

 

Others have posted that the UP will fight to the last against passenger trains on this route. Maybe that's why Amtrak doesn't run here, and hasn't for decades, if ever.

 

Meanwhile, the UP seems reconciled to the idea of a daily Sunset Ltd. on the San Antonio-El Paso segment, and indeed, on the whole Sunset route, now that they've double tracked west of El Paso.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++

 

ehbowen, That schedule if full of info nuggets. Lots of fun.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

The Stimulus committed a Billion or so to upgrading from near Chicago [Joliet] (Aurora) to near St Louis (more or less Alton). Everyone understood that was enuff to chew on for Phase One, and anyway they weren't ready with plans and permits for the Phase Two stuff right then.
 
Then after the mid-term election of 2010, Congress in its wisdom aborted the plans to further invest in passenger rail, because after all, Obama was for it and that meant the Crazies were agin it.
 
When or if funding ever materializes for the now phantom Phase Two, the CHI-[Joliet] Aurora segment will get the full 110-mph upgrade treatment: double tracking, new bridges, grade crossings fixed, fencing, etc.; and the [Joliet] Aurora -St Louis segment will get complete double tracking etc. That way Phase Two, costing about another Billion, will cut another 30 or 40 or 50 minutes out of the run time. At that point more frequencies will be added, and the Texas Eagle presumably will be allowed to move at 110-mph speeds. By the time Phase Two is finishing up, we might even see the Horizons replaced by new cars of one level or another. (A Phase Three could include a new bridge over the Mississippi among other projects to shave more minutes from the schedules.)
 
Anyway, no problem that can't be fixed by time and money and clear thinking in Congress. So don't count on any progress for the foreseeable future.


I am trying to figure out which Aurora you refer to in the context of the Chicago - St. Louis route. Did you perhaps mean Joliet, which is actually on the route? The only Aurora I can find is on BNSF route to Galesburg and then on to Kansas City and Omaha.

I can no longer plead early-onset Alzhies. It's done onset already.

 

Joliet, of course. Thanks. The as yet untouched portion of the Lincoln Service route is CHI-Joliet.


Edited by WoodyinNYC, 01 July 2017 - 03:27 PM.


#33 printman2000

printman2000

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,695 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amarillo, Texas

Posted 03 July 2017 - 11:17 PM

The TE still has the DAL/FTW buffer in the schedule from before the switch to the current track. FYI - the current Eagle only runs with one P42, no protection anywhere along the route, which is a nightmare waiting to happen.


Can confirm there is still a protect unit stored at Fort Worth. Saw it today.

#34 norfolkwesternhenry

norfolkwesternhenry

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis, MN
  • Interests:Trains, Boating, Trains, Mountain Biking, Trains, Having Fun, Trains, working on my bikes, Trains, planning my next trip, PV, trains, planning trips for family

Posted 10 July 2017 - 10:48 AM

The TE still has the DAL/FTW buffer in the schedule from before the switch to the current track. FYI - the current Eagle only runs with one P42, no protection anywhere along the route, which is a nightmare waiting to happen.

Can confirm there is still a protect unit stored at Fort Worth. Saw it today.
according to the VP of operations at Amtrak, there is also a protection engine at Marshal, TX

Empire Builder MSP-CHI (2) CHI-MSP (2) MSP-PDX (1) MSP-CBS (5.5 H late) (1) MKE-MSP (1) MSP-SEA (1) Coast Starlate PDX-EMY (1.5H late) (1) California Zephyr DEN-SLC (1H late) (1) Hiawatha CHI-MKE (1) NE Regional WAS-BAL (1) WAS-NYP (1) Acela Express BAL-WAS (1) BOS-WAS (1) Late Shore (Limited service) CHI-BOS (On Time) (1) Capitol Limited WAS-CHI (1) Texas Eagle SAS-CHI (1.5 HR late, 1 HR late) (2) CHI-SAS (1) (55 min early) Wolverine DET-DER-ARB-CHI (35 Min late) (1) Cascades SEA-VAC (1)
Non-Amtrak: VIA: Corridor Service Q.C.-Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto-Windsor (1) Canadian: VAC-Winnipeg 4.5 H late (1) D. C. metro, Montreal Metro, Toronto subway, Portland streetcars, BART, Metra, NYC subway, Boston subway, Twin cities Blue/Green line
train cars travelled in: Superliner: Coach, Sleeper, Diner, CCC, SSL. Amfleet: LD Café, Café/Business, coach. Viewliner: Sleeper, Diner. Acela: Café, Business, quiet car. Horizon: Coach. Talgo: coach, diner, café; non Amtrak: ex CP Via Canadian Manor cars, Park car, diner,sleeper, Skyline lounge. LRC trainset: coach (tilt de-activated)

No trees were killed to make this, but a number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

My apologies if I offend you, or seem stubborn, it's simply my nature. I am 14 after all, and my English isn't exactly perfect.


#35 CCC1007

CCC1007

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,548 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 July 2017 - 10:50 AM

The TE still has the DAL/FTW buffer in the schedule from before the switch to the current track. FYI - the current Eagle only runs with one P42, no protection anywhere along the route, which is a nightmare waiting to happen.

Can confirm there is still a protect unit stored at Fort Worth. Saw it today.
according to the VP of operations at Amtrak, there is also a protection engine at Marshal, TX
Marshal, TX? Why would they have a protection locomotive there? Did he mean a freight locomotive could be borrowed from there?

#36 Bob Dylan

Bob Dylan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,020 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:Passenger Trains/Travel/Sports(except Soccer)/Government-Politics/Reading/Old Buildings
    Movies/Music/Unicorns and Ancient Aliens!

Posted 10 July 2017 - 10:59 AM

Not sure if a P-42 protect engine is actually there, I've never seen one or heard of it on my many trips on this route, but Marshall is a Crew Change point for Trains that operate through there since its a junction point.

The nicely restored Station, now a Museum, is off the Main that the Eagles use, so a backing move and two spots are required for the Crew Change and Station work.

Passengers are not allowed to get off the train for a smoke/freah air stop during the stop.

As for protect engines on the Eagle route, the only non-Freight rescue engine I've experienced while aboard the Eagle, on my many trips requiring such, came out of Ft. Worth as has been discussed.

Edited by Bob Dylan, 10 July 2017 - 11:12 AM.

"There's Something About a Train! It's Magic!"-- 1970s Amtrak Ad
 
".. I ride on a Mail Train Baby, can't buy a thrill.."--I said that!
 
"..My heart is warm with the friends I make,and better friends I'll not be knowing,
Yet there isn't a train I wouldn't take,No matter where its going!.." -Edna St. Vincent Millay

#37 norfolkwesternhenry

norfolkwesternhenry

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis, MN
  • Interests:Trains, Boating, Trains, Mountain Biking, Trains, Having Fun, Trains, working on my bikes, Trains, planning my next trip, PV, trains, planning trips for family

Posted 14 July 2017 - 10:01 PM

The TE still has the DAL/FTW buffer in the schedule from before the switch to the current track. FYI - the current Eagle only runs with one P42, no protection anywhere along the route, which is a nightmare waiting to happen.

Can confirm there is still a protect unit stored at Fort Worth. Saw it today.
according to the VP of operations at Amtrak, there is also a protection engine at Marshal, TX
Marshal, TX? Why would they have a protection locomotive there? Did he mean a freight locomotive could be borrowed from there?
thats what he said, in person, to me in the CNOC building.

Empire Builder MSP-CHI (2) CHI-MSP (2) MSP-PDX (1) MSP-CBS (5.5 H late) (1) MKE-MSP (1) MSP-SEA (1) Coast Starlate PDX-EMY (1.5H late) (1) California Zephyr DEN-SLC (1H late) (1) Hiawatha CHI-MKE (1) NE Regional WAS-BAL (1) WAS-NYP (1) Acela Express BAL-WAS (1) BOS-WAS (1) Late Shore (Limited service) CHI-BOS (On Time) (1) Capitol Limited WAS-CHI (1) Texas Eagle SAS-CHI (1.5 HR late, 1 HR late) (2) CHI-SAS (1) (55 min early) Wolverine DET-DER-ARB-CHI (35 Min late) (1) Cascades SEA-VAC (1)
Non-Amtrak: VIA: Corridor Service Q.C.-Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto-Windsor (1) Canadian: VAC-Winnipeg 4.5 H late (1) D. C. metro, Montreal Metro, Toronto subway, Portland streetcars, BART, Metra, NYC subway, Boston subway, Twin cities Blue/Green line
train cars travelled in: Superliner: Coach, Sleeper, Diner, CCC, SSL. Amfleet: LD Café, Café/Business, coach. Viewliner: Sleeper, Diner. Acela: Café, Business, quiet car. Horizon: Coach. Talgo: coach, diner, café; non Amtrak: ex CP Via Canadian Manor cars, Park car, diner,sleeper, Skyline lounge. LRC trainset: coach (tilt de-activated)

No trees were killed to make this, but a number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

My apologies if I offend you, or seem stubborn, it's simply my nature. I am 14 after all, and my English isn't exactly perfect.


#38 norfolkwesternhenry

norfolkwesternhenry

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis, MN
  • Interests:Trains, Boating, Trains, Mountain Biking, Trains, Having Fun, Trains, working on my bikes, Trains, planning my next trip, PV, trains, planning trips for family

Posted 14 July 2017 - 10:02 PM

Could he be wrong, sure, but he is the VP of operations

Empire Builder MSP-CHI (2) CHI-MSP (2) MSP-PDX (1) MSP-CBS (5.5 H late) (1) MKE-MSP (1) MSP-SEA (1) Coast Starlate PDX-EMY (1.5H late) (1) California Zephyr DEN-SLC (1H late) (1) Hiawatha CHI-MKE (1) NE Regional WAS-BAL (1) WAS-NYP (1) Acela Express BAL-WAS (1) BOS-WAS (1) Late Shore (Limited service) CHI-BOS (On Time) (1) Capitol Limited WAS-CHI (1) Texas Eagle SAS-CHI (1.5 HR late, 1 HR late) (2) CHI-SAS (1) (55 min early) Wolverine DET-DER-ARB-CHI (35 Min late) (1) Cascades SEA-VAC (1)
Non-Amtrak: VIA: Corridor Service Q.C.-Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto-Windsor (1) Canadian: VAC-Winnipeg 4.5 H late (1) D. C. metro, Montreal Metro, Toronto subway, Portland streetcars, BART, Metra, NYC subway, Boston subway, Twin cities Blue/Green line
train cars travelled in: Superliner: Coach, Sleeper, Diner, CCC, SSL. Amfleet: LD Café, Café/Business, coach. Viewliner: Sleeper, Diner. Acela: Café, Business, quiet car. Horizon: Coach. Talgo: coach, diner, café; non Amtrak: ex CP Via Canadian Manor cars, Park car, diner,sleeper, Skyline lounge. LRC trainset: coach (tilt de-activated)

No trees were killed to make this, but a number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

My apologies if I offend you, or seem stubborn, it's simply my nature. I am 14 after all, and my English isn't exactly perfect.


#39 printman2000

printman2000

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,695 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amarillo, Texas

Posted 14 July 2017 - 10:58 PM

I was on 21 today and looked around when we pulled into Marshall. I did not see an Amtrak unit anywhere. Plenty of places it could have been that I could not see from the train though.

#40 ehbowen

ehbowen

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,101 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, Texas

Posted 15 July 2017 - 04:51 AM

Two possibilities I can think of:

  • FTW protection unit was temporarily moved to Marshall during the reroute but is back home now.
  • Brain fart

 


broadside-1.jpg 16 inch Armor Piercing...When you care enough to send the very, VERY best!
Visit Streamliner Schedules - Historic timetables from the Streamliner era.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users