B
budget traveler
Guest
If they do, are they more likely at closer to travel date?
Because they don't have enough cars, and working locomotives, to go around. These capital expenses require major funding from Congress, which for the past 46 years has been making a practice of feeding Amtrak just enough to keep it alive, but not enough to let it grow. This dithering has decimated the industry which used to supply passenger rail equipment in this country...when an equipment order actually is authorized, it takes the successful bidder several years to figure out exactly what to do (witness CAF and Viewliner 2), if in fact they ever figure it out at all (Nippon-Sharyo). Then, if an order is actually completed and delivered, there is no follow-up order in a reasonable time so the workforce which has finally begun to learn the business is laid off and dispersed...and the whole depressing process has to start all over again. Locomotives are not so bad as there is an ongoing market for freight locomotives, but they are more expensive to construct and my understanding is that after Amtrak's last major Diesel locomotive order was completed (the P42s sixteen years ago), General Electric (who happens to be the largest locomotive builder in this hemisphere) opined that they were not interested in bidding on Amtrak business ever again.Why doesn't Amtrak add more cars (coach/sleepers) during the peak seasons? Sell more tickets and make more money - not sell fewer and make more. Also, this would show the right that American passenger rail is alive and well. There are lots of things stacked against Amtrak.
Make train travel great again!
Enter your email address to join: