Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

DC to Baltimore MagLev one step closer to approval?


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 Ziv

Ziv

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 385 posts

Posted 09 April 2017 - 07:48 AM

I thought this was way down on the "maybe someday" list, but WTOP seems to think that the funding is mostly in place and that this 15 minute from DC to Baltimore MagLev train is actually going to happen. It accelerates to 300+ mph in just 3 minutes and may make just one stop at BWI. It is approximately a 40 mile trip with BWI about 13 miles south of Baltimore, so if the train stops at BWI on every trip it won't get up to full speed for very long on the northern leg.

They also mention that the group that is working on it wants to extend the line all the way to New York, but that wouldn't start until 2030 or 2035.

Japan International Bank is mentioned as being on board to provide 50% of the construction cost.

Construction to start in 2019, according to the article. 

 

http://wtop.com/dc-t...timore/slide/3/



#2 Eric S

Eric S

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,333 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 09 April 2017 - 10:53 AM

Maybe I'll be proven wrong at some point, but I just can't see this actually happening. Washington-Baltimore makes almost no sense for a standalone maglev line and a Washington-New York line is exceedingly impractical when the legacy/standard rail lines are not running at capacity (except for the Hudson River tunnels for a relatively short period of time on weekdays). Either this project faces the same extreme cost bloat that affects far too many US rail/transit projects (we can't seem to build for normal First World costs) or if not, then this group should be hired for their expertise in normal-cost building to improve the existing rail network.

 

I'd much rather that the public funds used for maglev studies had been redirected into improving a few rail stations instead. The US struggles to get standard intercity/regional/commuter rail right. Until we manage to figure that out, let other countries worry about studying maglev lines.



#3 Ziv

Ziv

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 385 posts

Posted 09 April 2017 - 10:58 AM

I agree, Eric, this just doesn't seem like a good candidate for the expense of a MagLev train. A city pair that is 100-300 miles apart would seem to work so much better. Maybe the Japanese bank figures that this is a way to get the camels nose under the tent, and then they can build on this start to build demand for other projects in the US? Because ponying up $5Bn to $6Bn is not chump change, but a longer distance between the city pairs would increase the price pretty quickly.

It would be cool to see it happen, but I am not holding my breath. But it sounds like Governor Hogan is taking it seriously.


Edited by Ziv, 09 April 2017 - 10:59 AM.


#4 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,624 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 09 April 2017 - 12:23 PM

Maybe I'll be proven wrong at some point, but I just can't see this actually happening. Washington-Baltimore makes almost no sense for a standalone maglev line and a Washington-New York line is exceedingly impractical when the legacy/standard rail lines are not running at capacity (except for the Hudson River tunnels for a relatively short period of time on weekdays). Either this project faces the same extreme cost bloat that affects far too many US rail/transit projects (we can't seem to build for normal First World costs) or if not, then this group should be hired for their expertise in normal-cost building to improve the existing rail network.

 

 

(Hand raised) I got a good compromise between WAS-BAL and WAS-NYP. WAS-PHL anyone?  :)


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Shore Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/


#5 Eric S

Eric S

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,333 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 09 April 2017 - 12:42 PM

Still no.

 

Stay away from this gadgetbahn foolishness. Let's focus on upgrading and improving the existing rail services, adding bypasses of slow or congested segments, try to get closer to global best practices (both in terms of construction and operations).



#6 Hal

Hal

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 443 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 April 2017 - 02:47 PM

Still no.
 
Stay away from this gadgetbahn foolishness. Let's focus on upgrading and improving the existing rail services, adding bypasses of slow or congested segments, try to get closer to global best practices (both in terms of construction and operations).


Yes, a Maglev between Washington and Baltimore is foolishness. Someone is making money promoting it. Not going to happen.

#7 bretton88

bretton88

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 663 posts

Posted 09 April 2017 - 03:11 PM

Still no.
 
Stay away from this gadgetbahn foolishness. Let's focus on upgrading and improving the existing rail services, adding bypasses of slow or congested segments, try to get closer to global best practices (both in terms of construction and operations).

Yes, a Maglev between Washington and Baltimore is foolishness. Someone is making money promoting it. Not going to happen.
It's foolish, but Japan is willing to stake very real money into it. They're gambling that once we begin with the technology, we'll want to buy more of it (and thus they'll make money).

If I won the lottery, I'd probably build a passenger from nowhere to nowhere.


#8 Hal

Hal

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 443 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 April 2017 - 03:44 PM

Still no.
 
Stay away from this gadgetbahn foolishness. Let's focus on upgrading and improving the existing rail services, adding bypasses of slow or congested segments, try to get closer to global best practices (both in terms of construction and operations).

Yes, a Maglev between Washington and Baltimore is foolishness. Someone is making money promoting it. Not going to happen.
It's foolish, but Japan is willing to stake very real money into it. They're gambling that once we begin with the technology, we'll want to buy more of it (and thus they'll make money).
Japan would have to fund 100% of the construction costs. No way they will get billions from Maryland. Or the federal government. Then there is that building anything in Maryland, they would have to do environmental studies. There would be Nimby opposition. Can't even get the Purple Line built. Years of lawsuits. The trains would have to be built in America. So they would need a factory and skilled labor. If it were built who would operate it? Who will pay the operating and maintenance costs. Who would ride it only to BWI and Baltimore? WTOP, who listens to them anymore anyway. Most have been a slow news day. They bought some cheap PR. Foolishness.

Edited by Hal, 09 April 2017 - 03:45 PM.


#9 Thirdrail7

Thirdrail7

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,231 posts

Posted 09 April 2017 - 04:37 PM

 

WTOP, who listens to them anymore anyway.

 

46gDD.gif

 

Traffic and weather on the 8's! It's always good to know what driver is upside down or in the bushes while traveling! ^_^


Edited by Thirdrail7, 09 April 2017 - 04:38 PM.

They say laughter is the best medicine. Obviously they never posted on AU.


#10 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,236 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 09 April 2017 - 04:53 PM

My read is that this is a mix of two things:
(1) A loss-leader (the Japanese trying to use the WAS-BAL line to sell the US on a WAS-NYP line); and

(2) A case of corporate welfare from Japan gone wild (a lot of the backing seems to be from the Japanese government rather than the Japanese private sector).

 

The underlying issue is that the Japanese are looking at their domestic maglev plans as being a massive boondoggle and are trying to get some other lines sold so they can defray some of the long-term costs (and sunk R&D costs) on scale.


Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#11 bretton88

bretton88

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 663 posts

Posted 10 April 2017 - 07:05 PM

My read is that this is a mix of two things:
(1) A loss-leader (the Japanese trying to use the WAS-BAL line to sell the US on a WAS-NYP line); and
(2) A case of corporate welfare from Japan gone wild (a lot of the backing seems to be from the Japanese government rather than the Japanese private sector).
 
The underlying issue is that the Japanese are looking at their domestic maglev plans as being a massive boondoggle and are trying to get some other lines sold so they can defray some of the long-term costs (and sunk R&D costs) on scale.

Bingo. I might find the links later, but that's exactly what's happening. While I think the whole thing is a boondoggle, it's got the financial backing, so I give it a chance of happening instead of dismissing it. Baltimore and DC will get the world's fastest commuter train, lol.

If I won the lottery, I'd probably build a passenger from nowhere to nowhere.


#12 districtRich

districtRich

    Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington, DC

Posted 10 April 2017 - 07:58 PM

Apparently they had a community meeting but I can't find any maps online. Where do they plan to have the station in DC? What route do they plan to take into the city? Amtrak sure isn't going to let them use any right of way as competition. National Park Service won't let them get near the BW Parkway.

Acela (8)  California Zephyr (1)  Capitol Limited (7)  Cardinal (1)  Coast Starlight (1)  Crescent (1) • Empire Builder (1) • Northeast Regional (tons)  Pacific Surfliner (2) • Silver Meteor (2) Sunset Limited (1) Texas Eagle (2)  Wolverine (2)

 


#13 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,236 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 10 April 2017 - 11:40 PM

Apparently they had a community meeting but I can't find any maps online. Where do they plan to have the station in DC? What route do they plan to take into the city? Amtrak sure isn't going to let them use any right of way as competition. National Park Service won't let them get near the BW Parkway.

(1) I believe they're looking at using the ex-Washington, Baltimore, and Annapolis line (https://ggwash.org/v...napolis-by-rail).

(2) I don't know about station locations.
(3) If the project actually gets rolling, I kind of wonder if Congress would give Amtrak the choice to be obstructionist on this one.  Yes, Amtrak can demand "fair compensation" for being dragged into sharing WAS with another tenant but I think it's possible for Congress to declare "You are recieving your compensation as part of the following grant(s) for insert-project-here" (e.g. the WAS overhaul).


Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#14 Green Maned Lion

Green Maned Lion

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,755 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ
  • Interests:Sleeping

Posted 11 April 2017 - 08:42 AM

If a foreign company manages to acquire a ROW, upgrades it to HSR standard, and wants to run, entirely on their dime, a foreign built trainset, I'm not sure what legal impediment there would be.

It's only when the government contributes funding that Buy America kicks in.
Travelled: Broadway Limited (1), Lake Shore Limited (6), Capitol Limited (7), Empire Builder (1), Southwest Chief (2), Sunset Limited (1), California Zephyr (3), Coast Starlight (2), Silver Meteor (5), Silver Star (5), Silver Palm (2), Crescent (1), Cardinal (4), Auto Train (4), Pennsylvanian (2), Palmetto (1), Acela Express (1), Empire Service (1), Northeast Regional (11), Keystone Service (1) --- Total Miles: 50,144 --- Total Trains: 61
Most important: Keep it Simple, Stupid!
Posted Image
Dream of love, dream of me, for you are my love. I love you.
Avatar and sig were done by my fiance, Corvidophile.

#15 CHamilton

CHamilton

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,186 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle

Posted 11 April 2017 - 08:57 AM

Cities want to believe in the hyperloop because US infrastructure is so bad


Amtrak can be better! Tell your local, state and national elected officials to support a more robust rail system. Join NARP and your local rail advocacy organization.
Where you'll find my posts: // All Aboard Washington (websiteFacebook) // Amtrak Unlimited Forum Group (Facebook) // Grow Trains (websiteFacebook, Twitter) // Restore the Pioneer Train (website, Facebook, Twitter) // Save the Seattle Waterfront Streetcar (Again) (websiteFacebook, Twitter) // Transit Riders of Puget Sound (Facebook) // Trains on FB (Facebook) // My Random Twitter Musings @HamiltonChas

#16 A Voice

A Voice

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 759 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 April 2017 - 10:46 AM

Should any of the various Hyperloop or maglev boondoggles ever actually be built, just imagine what the billions expended on such wasted efforts could have accomplished if equivalent appropriations were spent instead on incremental improvements to existing or expanded conventional passenger rail.  Sure, private investors can build whatever they want and those funds would not otherwise be available for wiser projects, but it still represents real money down the toilet while not addressing the actual transportation needs and requirements in any of the markets proposed.  

 

Of course, you'll never see real private investment in conventional passenger rail services as they are are money losing propositions; However, some investors, always after the next big thing and potential high rates of return, just might be deluded into putting money into these high-tech mistakes.  



#17 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,453 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 11 April 2017 - 05:09 PM

About eight years ago Munich and the state of Bavaria threw in the towel after cost estimates for a maglev train line from the city center to the airport nearly doubled in less than a year to Euro  3.3 billion.

 

Construction never started on the Munich maglev line, but well over Euro 50 million of taxpayer money was spent on endlessly studying the project without even one shovel of dirt having been dug for the now-cancelled prestige project. 

From a National Corridors Initiative article about Munich now building a conventional rail East-West tunnel under the city, its second such, for Euros 3.2 to 3.8 Billion.

 

http://www.nationalc...ml#Construction

 

Munich can't afford Maglev to the airport, but Baltimore is supposed to come up with many Billions for it?


Edited by WoodyinNYC, 13 April 2017 - 04:18 PM.


#18 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,236 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 12 April 2017 - 02:40 AM

 

About eight years ago Munich and the state of Bavaria threw in the towel after cost estimates for a maglev train line from the city center to the airport nearly doubled in less than a year to Euro  3.3 billion.

 

Construction never started on the Munich maglev line, but well over Euro 50 million of taxpayer money was spent on endlessly studying the project without even one shovel of dirt having been dug for the now-cancelled prestige project. 

From a National Corridors Initiative article about Munich now building a conventional rail East-West tunnel under the city, it's second such, for Euros 3.2 to 3.8 Billion.

 

http://www.nationalc...ml#Construction

 

Munich can't afford Maglev to the airport, but Baltimore is supposed to come up with many Billions for it?

 

Again, it's not a Baltimore (or Washington) project, it's a (probably functionally third-sector) Japanese-funded project.


Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#19 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,453 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 12 April 2017 - 08:31 AM

 

 

... Munich and the state of Bavaria threw in the towel after cost estimates for a maglev train line from the city center to the airport nearly doubled ...

From a National Corridors Initiative article about Munich now building a conventional rail tunnel under the city ...

 

http://www.nationalc...ml#Construction

 

Munich can't afford Maglev to the airport, but Baltimore is supposed to come up with many Billions for it?

Again, it's not a Baltimore (or Washington) project, it's a (probably functionally third-sector) Japanese-funded project.

Joe Fox, a traffic reporter and transit activist, wrote on the Greater Greater Washington blog

https://ggwash.org/v...-down-the-track

Japan is willing to pay for half the project in hopes it catches on, but who would fund the other half?

 

The $10 billion dollar question for the entire project is the funding source. The Japan Bank of International Cooperation (JBIC) has offered to pay half the cost of the DC to Baltimore line. The remainder of the initial funding would come from a yet-to-be-identified mix of (American) federal, state, and private sources.

...

There would also need to be dedicated funding via either fares or government support to repay JBIC for its initial investment.

 

It's a project half-funded by a loan from Japan's export-import bank. Like most loans, it would need to be repaid. The other half the money needed to build it would come from government (or private ha ha) sources. So it looks like whether the project uses Maryland's money, or funds from the City of Baltimore, or both, that taxpayers in Baltimore would have to pay for Maglev.


Edited by WoodyinNYC, 12 April 2017 - 08:39 AM.


#20 cirdan

cirdan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,957 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 April 2017 - 03:39 AM

Amtrak sure isn't going to let them use any right of way as competition.


Why not?

If things reach the point that this will be built anyway, Amtrak would be affected no matter what. So it would make sense for Amtrak to have part of the cake.

If they're smart they won't settle for a one off payment but seek to get a share of the ongoing profits. That way they've hedged their liabilities and win whether the project is a success or not.

Edited by cirdan, 13 April 2017 - 03:39 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users