Jump to content




Photo

Construction of Roanoke Amtrak Platform


  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

#1 Dixie

Dixie

    Train Attendant

  • Training
  • Pip
  • 33 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Johnson City TN

Posted 14 February 2017 - 01:04 AM

Good news -- 

 

http://wsls.com/2017/02/13/construction-of-roanoke-amtrak-platform-to-begin-monday/?cid=WSLS_10 

 

"The work is expected to take 300 days to complete." 

... and on to Bristol, we hope ... 

 


#2 Dixie

Dixie

    Train Attendant

  • Training
  • Pip
  • 33 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Johnson City TN

Posted 14 February 2017 - 01:06 AM

More details: http://www.roanoke.com/business/news/roanoke/work-begins-on-downtown-roanoke-amtrak-platform/article_e66c4a5e-3175-5991-869d-4a1778dfcdb1.html 



#3 jphjaxfl

jphjaxfl

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,231 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Jacksonville, FL
  • Interests:Rail passenger advocate for modern, reliable passenger trains that will allow for business or leasure travel. I have been riding trains for over 60 years, but I am not advocating going back to what we once had, rather an updated system similar to Europe, Japan, China, India and other nations with great passenger train systems.

Posted 14 February 2017 - 06:33 AM

Great to see passenger trains returning to Roanoke.  I changed trains in Roanoke from the Pocahantas to a Washington bound train and traveled westbound on the Pocahantas through Roanoke's beautiful N&W station.  Later I traveled on Amtrak's Hilltoper from Roanoke to Washington via Richmond after taking a Trailways bus from Johnson City, TN.  I made several business trips to Roanoke in the late 1990s by car because there were no trains.  I hope the new train is well used!



#4 LookingGlassTie

LookingGlassTie

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 128 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portsmouth, VA

Posted 14 February 2017 - 08:15 AM

Which train would serve that station, the Crescent or the Cardinal?



#5 MikefromCrete

MikefromCrete

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,123 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Crete, IL

Posted 14 February 2017 - 08:17 AM

Neither. The Lynchburg train will be extended to Roanoke. 



#6 A Voice

A Voice

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 685 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 February 2017 - 10:26 AM

 

 

... and on to Bristol, we hope ... 

 

 

 

Hey, on to Bristol....and then on to Knoxville......



#7 MikefromCrete

MikefromCrete

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,123 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Crete, IL

Posted 14 February 2017 - 10:56 AM

 

 

 

... and on to Bristol, we hope ... 

 

 

 

Hey, on to Bristol....and then on to Knoxville......

 

 

You can only stretch this train so far, The schedule calls for a 6 a.m. departure from Roanoke, so any down-line additions will be in the wee hours. If you have a 6 a.m. departure from Knoxville, the train will arrive too late to be good for anybody wanting to go to Washington for the day. Not to mention the need for an additional consists and crews. 



#8 A Voice

A Voice

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 685 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 February 2017 - 11:11 AM

 

 

 

 

... and on to Bristol, we hope ... 

 

 

 

Hey, on to Bristol....and then on to Knoxville......

 

 

You can only stretch this train so far, The schedule calls for a 6 a.m. departure from Roanoke, so any down-line additions will be in the wee hours. If you have a 6 a.m. departure from Knoxville, the train will arrive too late to be good for anybody wanting to go to Washington for the day. Not to mention the need for an additional consists and crews. 

 

 

Well, agreed, but it was more of a thinking-out-loud wish than an actual proposal anyway.  

 

Regardless, further extension, even to Bristol, will involve consideration of crews, train sets, and schedule; Perhaps even a different train, on a differing schedule, altogether.  It is certainly, however, a safe assumption that all of those issues are easier to solve than getting Tennessee to contribute money to bring rail passenger service to east Tennessee (and a train already at Bristol would add only relatively marginal costs to reach further into the state).  


Edited by A Voice, 14 February 2017 - 11:11 AM.


#9 nferr

nferr

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 254 posts

Posted 14 February 2017 - 12:06 PM

Will there be any kind of station? Or just a platform?



#10 LookingGlassTie

LookingGlassTie

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 128 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portsmouth, VA

Posted 14 February 2017 - 12:42 PM

Ohhh ok.   The Lynchburg train is an extension of the Northeast Regional, correct?



#11 Triley

Triley

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 918 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southern New Hampshire

Posted 14 February 2017 - 03:33 PM

Ohhh ok.   The Lynchburg train is an extension of the Northeast Regional, correct?


That's what was said, yes. Weekdays 171/176 will be extended.

Not looking forward to that layover.

My posts are my own opinions and do not represent the views of my employer in any way, shape, or form. ~ Now back to your regularly scheduled program.


#12 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,874 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 14 February 2017 - 04:49 PM

Well, agreed, but it was more of a thinking-out-loud wish than an actual proposal anyway.  
 
Regardless, further extension, even to Bristol, will involve consideration of crews, train sets, and schedule; Perhaps even a different train, on a differing schedule, altogether.  It is certainly, however, a safe assumption that all of those issues are easier to solve than getting Tennessee to contribute money to bring rail passenger service to east Tennessee (and a train already at Bristol would add only relatively marginal costs to reach further into the state).

I regard any extension to Bristol as something that won't happen for some years, a decade or longer, at the earliest. If ever. The tracks are slow and there are not exactly a lot of larger population centers in SW Virginia pass Blacksburg (and Virginia Tech). The economics and costs of extending a state supported train to Bristol don't provide a strong argument. The annual revenue stream that Virginia has for passenger rail would be better spent over the next decade on modest track improvements between Alexandria and Lynchburg / Roanoke (maybe another double track project) and primarily on the DC to Richmond to NFK/NPN corridors. 

 

The second Regional to Lynchburg is in the near term plans. Likely to see a second NE Regional extended to Roanoke before service is extended southwest of Roanoke. But a second Regional extended to Roanoke might have to also lay overnight as Roanoke to NYP is likely too many hours for a round-trip day train originating in NYP. 

 

Several weeks ago, the Roanoke Times reported that the storage track and service yard in Roanoke had been completed: Amtrak train has new parking place in Roanoke.  The pictures of the new storage track area sure look to me to have a space reserved for adding a second storage track if VA someday wants to add it for a second layover train.


Edited by afigg, 14 February 2017 - 05:57 PM.


#13 Triley

Triley

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 918 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southern New Hampshire

Posted 14 February 2017 - 05:50 PM

Not even NYP to RVR are same day turns with the equipment. The only equipment that does a same day turn is 67/66, with a different LSA.

Remember we need to leave time for not only the train to be wyed, but also to be serviced and cleaned, so you need to leave a minimum of 3-4 hours.

My posts are my own opinions and do not represent the views of my employer in any way, shape, or form. ~ Now back to your regularly scheduled program.


#14 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,207 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 14 February 2017 - 05:51 PM

Bristol is in the plans, but in general there are two issues:
(1) Bristol itself is not big enough to support a train.  Knoxville might be, but time becomes a serious issue.  Feeder buses are another question, too.

(2) As mentioned, you can only extend a train but so far before the times become an issue.  An extension to Bristol would either have to be the "reverse-peak" train (the second one being extended to LYH) or would functionally be running overnight.  I've already started poking at VA on the potential sleeping car front...running an all-coach overnight train does not seem like a recipe for success, though a sleeper, cafe, and a few coaches seems like a workable possibility.  This goes double for Knoxville (at which point there's the question of whether you're going to Washington or all the way to New York...IIRC you're looking at about 10-12 hours Bristol-Washington and thus 14-16 Bristol-New York; Knoxville would probably be about another 3-4 on top of that, so 13-16 Knoxville-Washington or 17-20 Knoxville-New York).


Edited by Anderson, 14 February 2017 - 05:54 PM.

Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#15 west point

west point

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,083 posts

Posted 14 February 2017 - 06:47 PM

Noted above Bristol has several problems. In the 1950s there were not a lot of thru coach passengers on trains with sometimes only 2 coaches on each train ( 3 LD RTs ). Sleepers were often 4 - 5 cars. The riders <> Roanoke increased with each stop. Really hard to justify any service. Bristol can be somewhat of an anchor as the Tennessee 25 MSA of the Bristol station includes both Johnson City and Kingsport ( which never has had any LD trains other than a Clinchfield Dinky. Several other smaller towns are also in that MSA or just out of it.

Bristol - Knoxville SOU RR now NS much was built before the Civil war and built on the cheap. For the ~ 120 miles Bristol Knoxville SOU RR schedules were 3:45 - 4:15. That did include very heavy head end traffic but only 2 freights and an occasional local operated on the route. Now NS runs 10 -15 freights either way on now CTC track. Double track from Bulls Gap - Knoxville has been changed to single track and later CTC. Have no idea IM transit time but unconfirmed it takes 6:))+.

#16 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,207 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 14 February 2017 - 09:34 PM

Honestly, if the train were run from Atlanta/Chattanooga or Nashville/Memphis up to New York, having a "sandbagged" overnight schedule from Knoxville to Roanoke (timed for a morning departure from Roanoke a la the Lynchburger's putative schedule) isn't the end of the world.  Five hours from Knoxville to Bristol and four from Bristol to Roanoke is nine hours.  Depart Knoxville at 2000-2200 and arrive Roanoke 0500-0700, in line with what we're expecting for the Lynchburger from there onwards?  That's a decent timetable that really only sucks for Bristol.

 

Operationally, something like that would probably be similar to the Silver Star: A respectable amount of business on each end (probably about 4-7 coaches, especially north of Roanoke) with a bit of a "gap" in the middle where the train would be a bit light on traffic.  Honestly, though, you'd probably also get a fairly modest-but-steady flow of traffic in the sleepers over the reasonably long hauls from western VA into New York, given the length of the run (8-9 hours is long enough to justify an added expense on my end).


Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#17 A Voice

A Voice

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 685 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 February 2017 - 10:13 PM

Honestly, if the train were run from Atlanta/Chattanooga or Nashville/Memphis up to New York, having a "sandbagged" overnight schedule from Knoxville to Roanoke (timed for a morning departure from Roanoke a la the Lynchburger's putative schedule) isn't the end of the world.  Five hours from Knoxville to Bristol and four from Bristol to Roanoke is nine hours.  Depart Knoxville at 2000-2200 and arrive Roanoke 0500-0700, in line with what we're expecting for the Lynchburger from there onwards?  That's a decent timetable that really only sucks for Bristol.

 

 

A 9:00 to 6:00 Knoxville to Roanoke schedule is really only practical if we're talking essentially a long-distance train service (off the top of my head, New York to Knoxville is very close to the arbitrary 750 mile distinction).  That would be great, but we're already way, way, way premature with any discussion of a "thinking out loud" daydream of pushing on past Bristol (which, as noted, is not really a larger market, though in fairness, neither is Carbondale, Illinois).  



#18 dlagrua

dlagrua

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,658 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hillsborough, NJ
  • Interests:Car collecting, Train Travel, Model RR, Visiting Historical sights, Cooking, Antiques, but above all love for friends and family.

Posted 15 February 2017 - 11:30 AM

From what I read only an 800' platform is being built. This is good news but some questions remain. Amtrak served Roanoke back in the 1970.s  The signaling was fine, the tracks were fine,there was a beautiful N&W station (now a tourist info center and museum on the lower level) , a Virginian Station (restored an now also a museum)  covered platforms and everything necessary to support  passenger trains. Then everything gets torn up and  has to be rebuilt from scratch. It doesn't make sense. Instead of preservation for later use there was destruction and demolition. A rail fan told me that was the work of the N&W to insure that passenger service never returned to Roanoke.



#19 Texan Eagle

Texan Eagle

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,691 posts

Posted 15 February 2017 - 01:47 PM

Are they really looking at a 6am Roanoke departure? That makes the train almost impossible to use for Virginia Tech students, who would otherwise make a large chunk of train-taking crowd. To reach Roanoke by 5.30-5.45am, one has to leave Blacksburg by 5am and there is no bus service that early in the morning. Maybe Amtrak should offer Thruway Connection to Blacksburg?


Edited by Texan Eagle, 15 February 2017 - 01:47 PM.


#20 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,874 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 15 February 2017 - 05:27 PM

Are they really looking at a 6am Roanoke departure? That makes the train almost impossible to use for Virginia Tech students, who would otherwise make a large chunk of train-taking crowd. To reach Roanoke by 5.30-5.45am, one has to leave Blacksburg by 5am and there is no bus service that early in the morning. Maybe Amtrak should offer Thruway Connection to Blacksburg?

The projected departure time from Roanoke on weekdays IIIC is approximately 6:20 AM if they stick with the current #176 schedule. Which departs LYH at 7:38 AM. On weekends, #156 departs LYH at 9:59 AM, so Saturday and Sundays might be a circa 8:30 AM departure from Roanoke. Depends on what Amtrak and NS agree on as the best trip time from Roanoke to LYH with a TBD boarding time at LYH.

 

Virginia is already paying for a Roanoke to LYH bus which also starts from Blacksburg on Fridays. Current bus weekday departure from Roanoke is 5:50 AM with Blacksburg Friday departures at 4:32 AM. If the Regional departs Roanoke at 6:20 AM or later, that is a better time than the bus provides. 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users