Jump to content




Photo

Expanding the Amtrak Route Map


  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#1 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,308 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 27 November 2016 - 05:28 PM

Many of us have proposed increased service. Some of these include increased service on existing routes while others include new routes. I want to keep this thread to new routes (either including at least one new city or new route between two existing cities) as opposed to increased service on existing routes (although a reroute of an existing route can be included).

 

Some I remember being discussed by people other than myself...

 

Gulf Coast, New Orleans to Jacksonville (since currently not being used, it counts)

 

Toledo to Detroit/Dearborn

 

Dallas/Ft. Worth to Meridian/Atlanta

 

Reroute of Southwest Chief to include Pueblo

 

Oklahoma City to Newton, KS

 

Feel free to suggest others, especially anything that includes the largest major markets that don't presently have Amtrak train service.

 

 

 

 

 


Trains Traveled:
 
Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA) 
Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI)
Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS)
Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI)
Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL)
Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX)
California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY)
City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)

 

All I want for Amtrak is a direct train from Philly to Chicago in less than 24 hours 
 
 


#2 CCC1007

CCC1007

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,369 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 November 2016 - 05:33 PM

the North Coast Limited would add the population centers of Montana and North Dakota.



#3 brianpmcdonnell17

brianpmcdonnell17

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 316 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 November 2016 - 05:41 PM

A Chicago-Florida train could add Nashville and Louisville while connecting Florida, Atlanta, and Indianapolis/Chicago. Other routes are also possible, but I feel that this route would be the most successful. Given the current condition of the tracks, it would take a lot of investment. However, I think it would become one of the most popular LD routes. It could be one of the few LD routes that could support corridor service over the entire route.
Trains travelled: Capitol Limited WAS-CHI, Carolinian CLT-RGH, Coast Starlight SJC-LAX, Crescent BAL-ATL, Empire Builder MSP-CHI, Empire Service NYP-NFL, Lake Shore Limited BOS-ALB, Maple Leaf ALB-NYP, Northeast Regional FBG-RVR+WAS-BOS, Pacific Surfliner LAX-ANA, Silver Meteor ORL-NYP, Silver Star FTL-WAS, 2016 Autumn Express NYP-HAR-NYP<p>

Non Amtrak: Atlanta Streetcar, Caltrain, CTA, DC Streetcar, Long Island Railroad, MARC, MARTA, MBTA, Metra, Metrolink, METRO Transit Light Rail, Miami Metrorail, Muni Metro, New Jersey Transit, North Star, NYC Subway, PATH, SEPTA Subway, South Shore Line, Sunrail, TECO Streetcar, Tri-Rail, Washington Metro

#4 Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SAS
  • Interests:Mechanized Travel

Posted 27 November 2016 - 07:03 PM

the North Coast Limited would add the population centers of Montana and North Dakota.

 

I'm confused.  The Sunset Limited already passes by and through multiple cities and metros that each have populations larger than all the residents of Montana and North Dakota combined.  If we can't reasonably entertain a daily SL schedule then what legitimate hope do these expanded routes have?  Or is this is just another random wish list thread that's not based on any reasonable criteria for practicality and suitability beyond having connecting trackage of one sort or another?


Edited by Devil's Advocate, 27 November 2016 - 07:05 PM.

I'd rather be a glass half empty than a glass half fool.


#5 brianpmcdonnell17

brianpmcdonnell17

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 316 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 November 2016 - 07:24 PM

the North Coast Limited would add the population centers of Montana and North Dakota.

 
I'm confused.  The Sunset Limited already passes by and through multiple cities and metros that each have populations larger than all the residents of Montana and North Dakota combined.  If we can't reasonably entertain a daily SL schedule then what legitimate hope do these expanded routes have?  Or is this is just another random wish list thread that's not based on any reasonable criteria for practicality and suitability beyond having connecting trackage of one sort or another?

I agree that there are other routes with far more potential than a second parallel route through Montana and North Dakota. Unless Montana and North Dakota pay for it or Amtrak suddenly gets as much money as the highways, I do not think that the North Coast Limited would be a good investment.
Trains travelled: Capitol Limited WAS-CHI, Carolinian CLT-RGH, Coast Starlight SJC-LAX, Crescent BAL-ATL, Empire Builder MSP-CHI, Empire Service NYP-NFL, Lake Shore Limited BOS-ALB, Maple Leaf ALB-NYP, Northeast Regional FBG-RVR+WAS-BOS, Pacific Surfliner LAX-ANA, Silver Meteor ORL-NYP, Silver Star FTL-WAS, 2016 Autumn Express NYP-HAR-NYP<p>

Non Amtrak: Atlanta Streetcar, Caltrain, CTA, DC Streetcar, Long Island Railroad, MARC, MARTA, MBTA, Metra, Metrolink, METRO Transit Light Rail, Miami Metrorail, Muni Metro, New Jersey Transit, North Star, NYC Subway, PATH, SEPTA Subway, South Shore Line, Sunrail, TECO Streetcar, Tri-Rail, Washington Metro

#6 railiner

railiner

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,647 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY
  • Interests:All public transportation....land, sea, and air

Posted 27 November 2016 - 08:45 PM

The "3-C", Cleveland-Columbus-Cincinnati, should be on top of that list, IMHO....

Perhaps with a later extension to Louisville and beyond...
metroblue?

okay on the blue!

#7 west point

west point

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 858 posts

Posted 27 November 2016 - 09:29 PM

It would seem that taking the most populous locations and adding routes has the highest potential for making Amtrak a significant factor in transportation. Combining present destinations with different routes definitely a plus. So with that in mind these are our picks. Stations listed more than once will be considered another route. ATL has the highest number of passengers at its airport ~ 45 - 60 % connecting.

1. NYP / WASH - PHL - Pittsburgh - Columbus OH, Indianapolis, St. Louis, Kansas city connecting to SWC
2.( split Cincinnati - Louisville - STL )
3. Chicago - Fort Wayne, Columbus, PGH.
4. Cincinnati - Nashville - BHM - Montgomery - NOL.
5. Nashville - Chattanooga - ATL - Macon - JAX
6. ATL - Columbus, Ga. - Tallahassee - Tampa - MIA.
7. ATL - Montgomery
8. ATL - Augusta - Savannah.
9. ATL - Athens, Ga. - Florence, SC
10. ATL - CLT - Raleigh - Petersburg - Richmond - WASH.
11. ATL - BHM - Memphis - Kansas City
12. WASH - LYH - Roanoke - Bristol - Knoxville - Chattanooga - MEM.
13. DEN - FTW - DAL - HOU - Galveston
14. DEN - ABQ.
15 DET - TOL - Columbus - Cincinnati.
16. Norfolk - Roanoke - Huntington - Columbus

Edited by west point, 27 November 2016 - 09:31 PM.


#8 cirdan

cirdan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,837 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 November 2016 - 06:20 AM

 

the North Coast Limited would add the population centers of Montana and North Dakota.

 

I'm confused.  The Sunset Limited already passes by and through multiple cities and metros that each have populations larger than all the residents of Montana and North Dakota combined.  If we can't reasonably entertain a daily SL schedule then what legitimate hope do these expanded routes have?  Or is this is just another random wish list thread that's not based on any reasonable criteria for practicality and suitability beyond having connecting trackage of one sort or another?

 

 

My understanding was that the reason the Daily Sunset wasn't happening has nothing to do with populations or ridership forecasts but is largely down to negotiations between Amtrak and UPRR not having been succesful.



#9 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,241 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 28 November 2016 - 01:18 PM

 

 

the North Coast Limited would add the population centers of Montana and North Dakota.

The Sunset Limited already passes by and through multiple cities and metros that each have populations larger than all the residents of Montana and North Dakota combined.  If we can't reasonably entertain a daily SL schedule, then what legitimate hope do these expanded routes have?

My understanding . . . the Daily Sunset wasn't happening . . . largely down to negotiations between Amtrak and UP RR not having been successful.

A later round of negotiations got 9 hours squeezed out of the schedule, freeing up one trainset (that went to beef up the Capitol Limited), and allowing a sweet overnight run L.A.-Tucson & vice versa, including a connection to the Coast Starlight that was forecast to add $10 or $20 million revenues to that train.

 

Nothing more happened for a couple of good reasons. One was Amtrak's critical and chronic lack of equipment; the other, a similarly critical and chronic lack of funds.

 

The PRIIA route study forecast ridership roughly doubling with daily service, over 100,000 added pax. Therefore the daily 7x a week trains would have much lower costs per passenger/per mile/per every measure, than the current 3x a week schedule. But on a gross level, the daily train would in total lose a little more money than the current schedule.

 

(Say we're losing $1 every day the train runs. That's $3 a week for both the Sunset and Cardinal. Go to daily and we can cut costs by half! Now we're losing only 50¢ a day! . . . Uh, oh. We're now losing $3.50 a week on each train. We don't have the budget to do that.)

 

Nonetheless, I'm sure we'll see a daily Sunset when the new bi-levels are delivered to the Midwest and that cascades 70 or 90 or so Horizon cars to other routes.


Edited by WoodyinNYC, 29 November 2016 - 05:28 PM.


#10 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,853 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 28 November 2016 - 01:25 PM

How are 70 or 90 Horizon cars going to affect equipment availability for the Superliner Sunset?



#11 PVD

PVD

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,302 posts

Posted 28 November 2016 - 01:32 PM

The only way the Horizon availability (reasonably) influences SL supply is if an existing SL train such as the CL or CONO were converted to single level. That is also predicated on the arrival of additional VL sleepers. It may not be the ideal move, but it does partially answer the question. One would hope the Horizons used would be refurbished and set up for LD use if this were ever to happen.



#12 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,241 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 28 November 2016 - 01:35 PM

How are 70 or 90 Horizon cars going to affect equipment availability for the Superliner Sunset?

Replace bi-levels on the koming Sunset Shuttle New Orleans-San Antonio service. Replace bi-levels on the Heartland Flyer. Replace bi-levels on the City of New Orleans.

 

Amtrak will find other ways and places. They are pretty good at stretching equipment usage.



#13 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,853 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 28 November 2016 - 01:45 PM

The problem will be shortage of Sleepers when it comes to replacing bi-levels in the City of New Orleans. None of the Viewliners that become available after delivery is completed of the VL IIs are slated for use anywhere other than on current trains plus a few service expansions like on the 65/66/67, and the through New York Chicago cars on the Pennsy and the Cap.I agree that bi-levels can be replaced on day trains across the board as single levels become more available due to the deployment of the bi-level short distance cars.

 

I expect the Viewliners to be deployed in routes that will earn them the most revenue, and CONO is not one of those routes by a long shot. So I would not expect CONO to be converted to single level anytime soon.



#14 DesertDude

DesertDude

    Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 66 posts

Posted 29 November 2016 - 12:50 AM

 

the North Coast Limited would add the population centers of Montana and North Dakota.

 

I'm confused.  The Sunset Limited already passes by and through multiple cities and metros that each have populations larger than all the residents of Montana and North Dakota combined.  If we can't reasonably entertain a daily SL schedule then what legitimate hope do these expanded routes have?  Or is this is just another random wish list thread that's not based on any reasonable criteria for practicality and suitability beyond having connecting trackage of one sort or another?

 

 

Yes, this. As I noted in a previous thread, the Sunset Limited from LAX-NOL could easily be one of Amtrak's top-performing LD routes. Yes, there are new routes I'd like to see as well, but improving the SL should be seen as low-hanging fruit for boosting ridership.



#15 Seaboard92

Seaboard92

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,244 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Carolina
  • Interests:-Amtrak
    -New York Central
    -Seaboard Airline
    -Scriptwriting

Posted 29 November 2016 - 04:09 PM

My number one route to be added is Chicago-Indianapolis-Cincinnati- Louisville-Nashville-Atlanta-Jacksonville-Orlando-(Miami).
I think routing via CIN would be faster then taking the Louisville and Indianapolis Shortline railroad at shortline speeds. If it's going to take the same time might as well reroute to a major city. As far as time wise I would schedule it out of Chicago just before midnight putting it into Indy around 5 am ish making Cincy around seven am. Then the last decent hour station is potentially Atlanta or Macon. And it's at least an eight hour run from Atlanta to Jacksonville so ideally a great place to put nighttime running. This train could then run in the Silver Star's slot south and we could shift the Silver Star to a six pm departure from NYP making it a daylight run from Columbia south to Miami. Which would give Jacksonville a early morning, mid morning, and afternoon train south to Miami. I would speed the Star up by cutting the Tampa detour from its route and shifting the new Chicago train or Silver Meteor into Tampa.

View my pictures at http://trainboy1.rrpicturearchives.net

Amtrak Routes I've riden: Silver Star(NYP-ORL), Silver Meteor(KIS-NYP),Carolinian(CLT-NWK), Palmetto (FLO-NYP), Acela(WAS-NYP), NE Regional(WBG-RVR), Pacific Surfliner(SAN-OSD), Piedmont(CLT-SAL), Crescent(NYP-CLT), Cardinal (WAS-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Cascade (PDX-SEA)

Steam Engines I've worked behind

Norfolk & Western No. 611

Nickel Plate Road No. 765

Southern Pacific No. 4449

 


#16 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,241 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 29 November 2016 - 05:19 PM

The problem will be shortage of Sleepers when it comes to replacing bi-levels in the City of New Orleans.

 

The Viewliners [should] be deployed in routes that will earn the most revenue, and CONO is not one of those routes by a long shot. So I would not expect CONO to be converted to single level anytime soon.

I'm hoping that an avowed "pro-infrastructure" President might be fine with another $200-$300 million Viewliners. The options have presumably expired. Don't know if that would require the various "Requests For" to delay things. But I'd sure like to see CAF roll another 50 to 100 Viewliner IIs out the door before they forget all they have learned the hard way. LOL.

 

Where to deploy any additional V IIs is not a simple answer. Assume we get a fat single-level car order but no bi-level order. Then replacing the Superliner consists on the City of New Orleans and the Capitol Ltd would allow those bi-level cars to be redistributed to other routes. Would an extra Superliner sleeper bring in more revenue if added to a Coast Starlight than it was getting on the CONO? Would another coach or two added to every Empire Builder and California Zephyr show a better return than it was making on the Capitol Ltd? Would a daily Sunset perform so much better than the CONO as to make a switch worth doing? Until we see some hard numbers, my hunch is to flip the Capitol Ltd and the CONO to new single-level consists and send the old bi-level equipment out West where trains often sell out.


Edited by WoodyinNYC, 29 November 2016 - 05:23 PM.


#17 west point

west point

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 858 posts

Posted 29 November 2016 - 08:13 PM

The equipment plans from the FY 2016 budget can give us some information. Look at page 22

https://www.amtrak.c...ancial-Plan.pdf

Amtrak is looking for 100 single levels a year starting in 2019 - 2025. Bi-levels of 100 count starting in 2021 -2025. The bi-level situation is complicated by the NS order to be delivered if the testing in January passes so construction can start. Then "Maybe" either there will be more NS cars ordered by the states or Amtrak might tack onto the end of the present order ?

Another factor is how well the present fleets fare. The Amfleet-2s and Superliner-1s mileages are going up very quickly.

How the order for single levels will be allocated to the 5 different type of cars may depend on how the new V-2 sleepers attract riders. The question of options at CAF may be an open question. Unless someone can produce a copy of the option clause in the contract we are left in the dark. There may be a certain date or more likely CAF has to produce so many operating cars before the option expires. Then again there may be a blended option date. WHO knows ?

#18 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,241 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 29 November 2016 - 08:18 PM

Fellas, C-mon. We can make a much bigger list than this!

 

Baton Rouge-New Orleans

Beaumont-Houston

San Antonio-Houston

a second daily train San Antonio-Houston-Lafayette-New Orleans (complementing the Sunset Shuttle route coming when the Sunset Ltd goes daily and combines with the Texas Eagle CHI-SAS-L.A., so one morning and one evening run each way)

New Orleans-Baton Rouge-Alexandria-Shreveport-Dallas-Ft Worth

 

CHI-St Paul-Duluth

CHI-St Paul-St Cloud-Fargo-Grand Forks-Winnepeg

CHI-St Paul-Sioux Falls-Sioux City-Lincoln-Omaha-Kansas City ///-StL-CHI

CHI-St Paul-Des Moines-Quad Cities-CHI

(and as mentioned above, the restored renamed Sakajawea {a.k.a. North Coast Hiawatha} route CHI-St Paul-St Cloud-Fargo-Bismark-Dickenson-Billings-Bozeman-Helena-Missoula-Spokane-Pasco-Yakima-Ellensburg-Stampede Pass-Seattle)

 

Billings-Livingston (Yellowstone gateway)-Bozeman-Helena-Missoula "Montana Corridor" state-supported train

 

Another Cascades route, an east-west corridor Spokane-Pasco-Yakima-Ellensburg-Seattle

 

More to come.


Edited by WoodyinNYC, 29 November 2016 - 08:27 PM.


#19 railiner

railiner

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,647 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY
  • Interests:All public transportation....land, sea, and air

Posted 29 November 2016 - 11:43 PM

You say we can make a bigger list?

 

Might as well throw in the "Butte Special" (Salt Lake City-Ogden- Pocatello-Idaho Falls-Butte)

And let's not forget the "Wabash Cannonball" (St. Louis-Decatur-Danville-Lafayette-Logansport-Fort Wayne-Montpelier-Detroit)

Then there's the "Twin Star Rocket" (Minneapolis-St. Paul-Des Moines-Kansas City-Wichita-Fort Worth-Dallas-Houston)

Not to mention the "Kansas City-Florida Special" (Kansas City-Springfield-Memphis-Birmingham-Atlanta-Macon-Jesup-Jacksonville)

I could go on.... :P


metroblue?

okay on the blue!

#20 WoodyinNYC

WoodyinNYC

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,241 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 30 November 2016 - 01:42 PM

You say we can make a bigger list?

 

. . . to mention the "Kansas City-Florida Special" (Kansas City-Springfield-Memphis-Birmingham-Atlanta-Macon-Jesup-Jacksonville)

I could go on.... :P

Please do go on.  :)

 

Wondering if there are usable tracks today Kansas City-Springfield-Memphis? And if so, who runs the trains?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users