Jump to content




Photo

Feasibility of Florida-Chicago Train via Atlanta, Nashville, Louisvill


  • Please log in to reply
62 replies to this topic

#61 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,383 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 14 April 2017 - 12:41 PM

 

 

Why would they run the cafe to Chicago?  Doesn't the Capitol already have a cafe?  You wouldn't need two between Pittsburgh and Chicago...

To provide food service to the single level portion without the need to climb stairs. Since it needs just one additional cafe, of which there is quite an abundance, it is a non-issue really. If enough Club-Cafes can be found, it also opens up the possibility of BC service.

 

 

How often have you seen Amtrak place two cafe or lounge cars within the same consist?  More likely, the intention would be to run the Capitol Limited with only a dining car - no Sightseer Lounge - and the single-level cafe/lounge sufficing for lounge space.  Other trains which split en route generally operate with the diner in one section and the lounge to the alternate destination (Empire Builder, Lake Shore Limited).  Climbing stairs isn't really an issue (aside from mobility impairments, for which provision is made) and Amtrak has operated split-level trains before (Heritage sleepers and Superliner coaches).  

 

I actually happened to have traveled with the guy who wrote the PIP on one of my WAS - CHI trips on the Cap and discussed this matter as we happened to be seated at the same table for dinner. (I had a roomette two doors down from his in the Trans-Dorm too) He has since been let go by Amtrak. I was just reporting on his take. Of course others can come up with other reasons.



#62 A Voice

A Voice

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 641 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 April 2017 - 12:54 PM


 

I actually happened to have traveled with the guy who wrote the PIP on one of my WAS - CHI trips on the Cap and discussed this matter as we happened to be seated at the same table for dinner. (I had a roomette two doors down from his in the Trans-Dorm too) He has since been let go by Amtrak. I was just reporting on his take. Of course others can come up with other reasons.

 

 

I don't doubt what you were told, of course (and thanks for sharing), but I do wonder how that line of thinking came about.  It's not like passengers on the lower level of Superliner sleepers and coaches don't already climb stairs - twice - to reach the serving area in the lounge car.  



#63 railiner

railiner

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,903 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY
  • Interests:All public transportation....land, sea, and air

Posted 15 April 2017 - 01:24 PM

Good points...but having 2 LSA's aboard seems expensive...AFAIK, Amtrak gave up that practice years ago on the Sightseer cars, not even sure if they staff the upper bars (if they even still exist), at peak times...


metroblue?

okay on the blue!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users