Jump to content




Photo

AMTK Locomotive 66 Hit semi and damaged


  • Please log in to reply
149 replies to this topic

#1 TylerP42

TylerP42

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,061 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toledo, OH

Posted 19 February 2016 - 06:21 PM

Link to FB, Joliet Fire Dept. Extensive damage to side, leaking fluids, front, broken windshields and ditch lights. 3rd wreck 66 has been involved in.

https://m.facebook.c...209932415685150

Just a 19 year old with a love for the railroad. 
Trains Taken:
Capitol Limited, Empire Builder, Wolverine, Lake Shore Limited, Hiawatha, Lincoln Service,(Birthday Trip Next), Southwest Chief, Coast Starlight, California Zephyr (5,640 Miles) END OF TRIP, Acela Express, Northeast Regional, Silver Star, Carolinian, Ethan Allen Express , Adirondack, Texas Eagle, VIA Rail Corridor Service (Toronto-Hamilton/Aldershot)

20,221 Miles By Rail...
 
 


#2 Acela150

Acela150

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,837 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NS Harrisburg Division

Posted 19 February 2016 - 06:26 PM

https://www.facebook...?type=3

 

Non mobile link. Hopefully it loads for everyone. 


These posts are my views and opinions.

Donate your spare time! Be a Volunteer Firefighter!
 
"Mainline 66W Recrew On Board at Abrams ready to head east when you can handle us, Ok 66W, ok on signal indication at Norris, take it to the Falls to wait for the window"

#3 AmtrakBlue

AmtrakBlue

    Engineer

  • Gathering Committee Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,112 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Delaware

Posted 19 February 2016 - 06:28 PM

If 66 is having such bad luck, no wonder they don't want a 666 ACS-64.  ;)


2011: Jun: WIL=>WAS=>WIL (NER) // Nov: WIL=>WAS=>CHI=>PRO (NER=>CL=>CZ)
2012: Apr: WIL=>WAS=>WIL (NER) // May(NTD): WIL=>PHL=>WIL (NER) / PHL=>PAO=>PHL (Keystone) // Aug: WIL=>WAS (NER) / BWI=>WIL (NER) // Oct(Gathering): PHL=>WIL (NER) / PHL=>HAR=>PHL (Keystone) / SEPTA, NJT, PATCO, River Line, Princeton Dinky
2013: May(NTD): WIL=>WAS=>WIL (NER)  // Oct (Gathering): WIL=>CHI (Card) / CHI=>MKE=>GLN=>CHI() / CHI=>JOL=>CHI () / CHI=>WIL(CL=>NER) / CTA, Metra. SEPTA (WIL=>NRK) // Nov:  PHL=>PHL (Autumn Express) 
2014: May(NTD):  WIL=>PHL=>WIL(NER) // May:  WIL=>BOS=>WIL(NER) day trip

2014: Oct(Gathering): WIL=>NYP=>TOL(pd-NER=>LSL) / TOL=>CHI=>LAX=>EMY(pts-LSL=>SWC=>CS) / EMY=>CHI=>TOL (pts-CZ-CL) / TOL=>WAS=>WIL(pd-CL=>NER)
2015: May: CHI=>CIN(pd-Card) / CIN=>WIL(pts Card)
2015;  Oct(Gathering):  WIL=>WAS(Acela) / ALX=>WAS(NER) / WAS=>BAL(Acela) / WAS=>WIL(NER)

2016: Mar: WIL=>WAS=>WIL (NER)  // Oct:  WIL=>NYP=>NYP=>WIL (Autumn Express) 


#4 CCC1007

CCC1007

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,477 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 February 2016 - 06:38 PM

Looks like a container on chaise, with one of the containers that is partially owned by UP!!!

#5 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,874 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 19 February 2016 - 06:51 PM

Chicago Tribune: Cops: Truck carrying ATVs struck by train after going around gates in Joliet.
 

A southbound Amtrak train struck a semi truck carrying all-terrain vehicles in Joliet Friday after the truck's driver drove around downed warning gates, Joliet police said.

 

Four semi trucks had gone around the downed gates before the train struck the fifth truck, police said.

No injuries were reported.

 

"The (gates) according to witnesses had been down for an extended period of time," said Joliet Police Deputy Chief Edgar Gregory. "Don't know what that amount of time exactly was."

 

Cedric Randel, 37, of Chicago, received three traffic citations including improper lane usage, stop arm violation and no proof of insurance, Gregory said. The trucks were headed west on Laraway Road, west of Illinois Hwy. 53 when they entered into the eastbound lane in order to go around the crossing arm, he said.

Five trucks drove around the lowered gates?? And the 5th one got hit. Yikes.



#6 MikefromCrete

MikefromCrete

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,111 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Crete, IL

Posted 19 February 2016 - 06:51 PM

Has 66 been in any other notable accidents? Other than the Heritage paint scheme, it's no different than any other Amtrak locomotive. (Although this accident did take place near the old U.S. 66, so that's something.) The stretch of track south of Joliet is located near two giant container yards, one used by BNSF, the other by UP. Accidents involving trucks and container-haulers are very frequent in the area and the residents of Elwood, the town where the yards are located, have been freaking out about the problem, demanding new access to the yards from nearby I-55. In an unrelated incident, a truck made a u-turn and ran over several graves in nearby national veterans cemetery. Needless to say, the residents are very unhappy about the situation, despite the fact the town is reaping a lot of money from taxes on the container yards.

Edited by MikefromCrete, 19 February 2016 - 06:58 PM.


#7 TylerP42

TylerP42

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,061 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toledo, OH

Posted 19 February 2016 - 06:52 PM

2 Passengers injured.

Just a 19 year old with a love for the railroad. 
Trains Taken:
Capitol Limited, Empire Builder, Wolverine, Lake Shore Limited, Hiawatha, Lincoln Service,(Birthday Trip Next), Southwest Chief, Coast Starlight, California Zephyr (5,640 Miles) END OF TRIP, Acela Express, Northeast Regional, Silver Star, Carolinian, Ethan Allen Express , Adirondack, Texas Eagle, VIA Rail Corridor Service (Toronto-Hamilton/Aldershot)

20,221 Miles By Rail...
 
 


#8 keelhauled

keelhauled

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 480 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:VT

Posted 19 February 2016 - 09:07 PM

Chicago Tribune: Cops: Truck carrying ATVs struck by train after going around gates in Joliet.
 

 

 

Cedric Randel, 37, of Chicago, received three traffic citations including improper lane usage, stop arm violation and no proof of insurance, Gregory said.

Five trucks drove around the lowered gates?? And the 5th one got hit. Yikes.

That is a special kind of stupid.


Go on, raise the flag, I got stars in my eyes...I'm in love with her and I won't apologize.


#9 CCC1007

CCC1007

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,477 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 February 2016 - 09:22 PM

Has 66 been in any other notable accidents? Other than the Heritage paint scheme, it's no different than any other Amtrak locomotive. (Although this accident did take place near the old U.S. 66, so that's something.) The stretch of track south of Joliet is located near two giant container yards, one used by BNSF, the other by UP. Accidents involving trucks and container-haulers are very frequent in the area and the residents of Elwood, the town where the yards are located, have been freaking out about the problem, demanding new access to the yards from nearby I-55. In an unrelated incident, a truck made a u-turn and ran over several graves in nearby national veterans cemetery. Needless to say, the residents are very unhappy about the situation, despite the fact the town is reaping a lot of money from taxes on the container yards.

This is the third accident with it since it received the paint job. It's the heritage unit that has had the worst luck.

#10 Acela150

Acela150

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,837 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NS Harrisburg Division

Posted 19 February 2016 - 10:05 PM

Has 66 been in any other notable accidents? Other than the Heritage paint scheme, it's no different than any other Amtrak locomotive. (Although this accident did take place near the old U.S. 66, so that's something.) The stretch of track south of Joliet is located near two giant container yards, one used by BNSF, the other by UP. Accidents involving trucks and container-haulers are very frequent in the area and the residents of Elwood, the town where the yards are located, have been freaking out about the problem, demanding new access to the yards from nearby I-55. In an unrelated incident, a truck made a u-turn and ran over several graves in nearby national veterans cemetery. Needless to say, the residents are very unhappy about the situation, despite the fact the town is reaping a lot of money from taxes on the container yards.

 

I think it's been in 3 or 4 in the Phase II paint alone! 


These posts are my views and opinions.

Donate your spare time! Be a Volunteer Firefighter!
 
"Mainline 66W Recrew On Board at Abrams ready to head east when you can handle us, Ok 66W, ok on signal indication at Norris, take it to the Falls to wait for the window"

#11 Ryan

Ryan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,287 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:OTN
  • Interests:a fact checker combined with a ferret

Posted 19 February 2016 - 10:11 PM

Chicago Tribune: Cops: Truck carrying ATVs struck by train after going around gates in Joliet.
 

Cedric Randel, 37, of Chicago, received three traffic citations including improper lane usage, stop arm violation and no proof of insurance, Gregory said.

Five trucks drove around the lowered gates?? And the 5th one got hit. Yikes.

That is a special kind of stupid.


One of the Facebook comments on the article pointed out that you can't fix stupid, but you can push it a mile down the tracks while you get the train stopped. (or something to that effect)
Posted Image

Disclaimer: Any images or links you see in my post may in fact be invasive advertising or even fraudulent phishing attacks silently injected into my post by our spam based hosting service. If anything looks suspicious or inappropriate or you have any doubt whatsoever then do not click any links (particularly those appearing in green and/or with a double underline) or interact with the spam in any way. You may also want to consider using ad-blocking plugins such as Adblock Plus and/or Ghostery)to help reduce the number and severity of advertising scams directed at you.

#12 chakk

chakk

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,005 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 February 2016 - 11:09 PM

And another bites, and another one bites, another one bites the dust.

#13 Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,809 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Paper Street
  • Interests:Travel by Planes, Trains, and Automobiles

Posted 19 February 2016 - 11:20 PM

Chicago Tribune: Cops: Truck carrying ATVs struck by train after going around gates in Joliet.
 

Cedric Randel, 37, of Chicago, received three traffic citations including improper lane usage, stop arm violation and no proof of insurance, Gregory said.

Five trucks drove around the lowered gates?? And the 5th one got hit. Yikes.

 
That is a special kind of stupid.


It's easy to continue down the path of gawk and awe but maybe if we stopped viewing these kinds of routine events as being any kind of special we could finally start doing something about them. The trucking companies have made it clear that they don't see railroad crossing safety as an issue worthy of their time or consideration. Maybe we need to make it clear that this sort of attitude is a severe financial mistake with tougher regulations and more proactive enforcement?

Edited by Devil's Advocate, 19 February 2016 - 11:21 PM.

If I had a tumor I'd name it Marla.


#14 Thirdrail7

Thirdrail7

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,945 posts

Posted 20 February 2016 - 12:30 AM

It is time to start equipping the grade crossings with four quadrant gates. I think it would help.


They say laughter is the best medicine. Obviously they never posted on AU.


#15 keelhauled

keelhauled

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 480 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:VT

Posted 20 February 2016 - 08:02 AM

Chicago Tribune: Cops: Truck carrying ATVs struck by train after going around gates in Joliet.
 

Cedric Randel, 37, of Chicago, received three traffic citations including improper lane usage, stop arm violation and no proof of insurance, Gregory said.

Five trucks drove around the lowered gates?? And the 5th one got hit. Yikes.
 
That is a special kind of stupid.
It's easy to continue down the path of gawk and awe but maybe if we stopped viewing these kinds of routine events as being any kind of special we could finally start doing something about them. The trucking companies have made it clear that they don't see railroad crossing safety as an issue worthy of their time or consideration. Maybe we need to make it clear that this sort of attitude is a severe financial mistake with tougher regulations and more proactive enforcement?
I was referring specifically to the driver not having insurance paperwork. But I don't disagree with anything you said.

Go on, raise the flag, I got stars in my eyes...I'm in love with her and I won't apologize.


#16 Just-Thinking-51

Just-Thinking-51

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,242 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:USA

Posted 20 February 2016 - 08:16 AM

It is time to start equipping the grade crossings with four quadrant gates. I think it would help.


Or maybe the railroad should maintain there gates so they only go down when there a train coming. Add some railroad training and paint the crosstie so the crews know where the grade crossing sensor are so they don't fowl the crossing.

Four quadrants gates can fail, when they do two of arms fail down, two of the arms fail up. So five trucks still could get around them in a failure mode.

One thinks with modern technology a failed gate, or a fowled gate could report itself to the dispatcher.

#17 Just-Thinking-51

Just-Thinking-51

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,242 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:USA

Posted 20 February 2016 - 08:21 AM

I was referring specifically to the driver not having insurance paperwork. But I don't disagree with anything you said.


Failure to have a updated copy of insurance, or a failure to have any insurance. One is a bad thing, the other is a oops.

#18 GaSteve

GaSteve

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 376 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Atlanta, GA
  • Interests:More trains !

Posted 20 February 2016 - 09:14 AM

It is time to start equipping the grade crossings with four quadrant gates. I think it would help.

The basic problem is cost, which starts at around $250K.  Who is going to pony up?



#19 Karl1459

Karl1459

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 403 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oregon
  • Interests:Trains, Antique Cars and Hot Rods, Firefighting, Bridge (the card game)

Posted 20 February 2016 - 10:25 AM

 

 

Chicago Tribune: Cops: Truck carrying ATVs struck by train after going around gates in Joliet.
 

Cedric Randel, 37, of Chicago, received three traffic citations including improper lane usage, stop arm violation and no proof of insurance, Gregory said.

Five trucks drove around the lowered gates?? And the 5th one got hit. Yikes.

 

 
That is a special kind of stupid.

 


It's easy to continue down the path of gawk and awe but maybe if we stopped viewing these kinds of routine events as being any kind of special we could finally start doing something about them. The trucking companies have made it clear that they don't see railroad crossing safety as an issue worthy of their time or consideration. Maybe we need to make it clear that this sort of attitude is a severe financial mistake with tougher regulations and more proactive enforcement?

 

 

If I recall correctly DOT rules only require liability insurance to state minimums (150K to 300K? for most trucks, 1M for Hazardous materials, and 5M for Hazardous waste). Clearly not enough if a gyppo wrecks a locomotive, even another truck, or puts someone in a trauma center and rehab for a year of so. The truckers that don't care (many do... but they stay out of the news) would care a little bit more if their insurance costs became higher for the shady operators... and there was a little enforcement at the pumps with no insurance? = no fuel purchase!

 

Note that this bozo may have had insurance... just not carrying the proof.

 

It is time to start equipping the grade crossings with four quadrant gates. I think it would help.

 

While full quadrant gates are better than lane gates separated crossings (over/underpasses) are even better.

 

There are a lot if intersections where it is physically not feasible to install four quadrant gates, usually where an intersection to a road paralleling the railroad is too close to the tracks. The incident at the VA/NC border and IL several weeks ago were that type of intersections (and both had a truck trailer fouling the track while waiting to turn onto the parallel highway).

 

I don't think there are very many good and inexpensive solutions out there... whats left is either not that good or very expensive.



#20 Thirdrail7

Thirdrail7

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,945 posts

Posted 20 February 2016 - 10:34 AM

 

It is time to start equipping the grade crossings with four quadrant gates. I think it would help.

The basic problem is cost, which starts at around $250K.  Who is going to pony up?

 

 

 


 

While full quadrant gates are better than lane gates separated crossings (over/underpasses) are even better.

 

There are a lot if intersections where it is physically not feasible to install four quadrant gates, usually where an intersection to a road paralleling the railroad is too close to the tracks. The incident at the VA/NC border and IL several weeks ago were that type of intersections (and both had a truck trailer fouling the track while waiting to turn onto the parallel highway).

 

I don't think there are very many good and inexpensive solutions out there... whats left is either not that good or very expensive.

 

 

 

My thought process is a grade crossing incident usually ends up costing millions in loss of life, lawsuits and damages. Where it is feasible, equipping the crossings with four quadrant gates is probably cheaper than grade crossing separation. The states can use a portion of motor vehicle fines with contribution from the railroads to pay for it.

 

After all, you can pay for it 250k at a time or have a few million dollar, lump sum payments.


They say laughter is the best medicine. Obviously they never posted on AU.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users