Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

Is a coast to coast train feasible?


  • Please log in to reply
112 replies to this topic

#1 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 18 August 2015 - 08:40 PM

When writing about former routes, I encountered a proposal of the Capitol Limited and Southwest Chief being linked in Chicago. This would've given service from Los Angeles all the way to Washington on one train. I don't know if that ever was implemented or it was like the Skyline Connection of 2000?

 

The only coast to coast train was the Sunset Limited from LA to Orlando but that was lost since Katrina.

 

I know that delays are certainly common in LD trains and the longer the train the worse the delays will get. But could any coast to coast train be feasible? Would you rather LA to the Northeast (NYP or WAS) or to Florida (or both)?

 

The SC/CL would be the fastest way to get from the West to the East but the connection time between the SC and CL east would not be practical (3:15 to 6:40pm). A SC/LSL might be more feasible (3:15 to 9 :30pm) and would give LAX/NYP and LAX/BOS instead of LAX/WAS. I might be interested in SC/LSL and CZ/CL (or SC/CL and CZ/LSL). One baby step might be combining either the LSL or CL with the Texas Eagle and giving direct service from the East Coast to Dallas and San Antonio (and St. Louis). 

 

The debate of longer LD trains and longer delays vs. having to connect (and possibly miss connections) will probably continue the rest of our lives. But after my experience with missing my connection, I would almost always trend to fewer connections required.


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/

#2 AmtrakBlue

AmtrakBlue

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,494 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Delaware

Posted 18 August 2015 - 08:57 PM

I think I prefer doing connections/layovers to break up the trip.  



#3 Thirdrail7

Thirdrail7

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,161 posts

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:08 PM

When writing about former routes, I encountered a proposal of the Capitol Limited and Southwest Chief being linked in Chicago. This would've given service from Los Angeles all the way to Washington on one train. I don't know if that ever was implemented or it was like the Skyline Connection of 2000?

 

The only coast to coast train was the Sunset Limited from LA to Orlando but that was lost since Katrina.

 

I know that delays are certainly common in LD trains and the longer the train the worse the delays will get. But could any coast to coast train be feasible? Would you rather LA to the Northeast (NYP or WAS) or to Florida (or both)?

 

The SC/CL would be the fastest way to get from the West to the East but the connection time between the SC and CL east would not be practical (3:15 to 6:40pm). A SC/LSL might be more feasible (3:15 to 9 :30pm) and would give LAX/NYP and LAX/BOS instead of LAX/WAS. I might be interested in SC/LSL and CZ/CL (or SC/CL and CZ/LSL). One baby step might be combining either the LSL or CL with the Texas Eagle and giving direct service from the East Coast to Dallas and San Antonio (and St. Louis). 

 

The debate of longer LD trains and longer delays vs. having to connect (and possibly miss connections) will probably continue the rest of our lives. But after my experience with missing my connection, I would almost always trend to fewer connections required.

 

 

What you read was utilized as run through equipment. In other words, the inbound Chief's equipment was utilized as the outbound Capitol Limited on the same day. This practice ended due to reliability issues. Passengers detrained at CHI while the equipment was serviced so it wasn't true coast to coast service.

 

 

As for using the eastern long distance fleet to run anywhere west, you'd need a lot more equipment to make this feasible. Remember, the Superliner fleet can't realistically operate on most sections of the NEC, so shipping the equipment that can across the country is not a good idea.


Edited by Thirdrail7, 18 August 2015 - 09:10 PM.

They say laughter is the best medicine. Obviously they never posted on AU.


#4 Eric S

Eric S

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,330 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:09 PM

The potential for incredible delays enroute is so great (see pre-Katrina Sunset Limited) that I don't think it's worth it. Better to make the connection experience in Chicago (or New Orleans, etc.) better and more pleasant than to combine a western and eastern long distance train.

 

(Don't forget that all long distance trains in the west use Superliner equipment and most long distance trains in the east do not.)



#5 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:10 PM

I think I prefer doing connections/layovers to break up the trip.  

 

I would assume any California to North East train would have a significant layover (4-5 hours) in Chicago to change crews, clean the train, restock food, etc. so you'd still be able to get off the train if you wish.

 

Can Superliners be used on the LSL? If not, you would have to change the corresponding western train to Viewliner. Hopefully the new Viewliners can change all differences in LD trains.


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/

#6 Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,160 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Америка
  • Interests:Travel by Planes, Trains, and Automobiles

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:18 PM

I think I prefer doing connections/layovers to break up the trip.


I prefer connections as well. As much as I enjoy traveling I can only take so much continuous travel at any one time. Being stuck on the train for days on end saps my interest and energy. I schedule connections for long trips on aircraft as well. After ten hours or so I've had my fill and need to get off and explore something larger and more stationary than a train or plane. I suppose I might feel differently on a massive cruise ship but I've never been curious enough to book such a thing and so far as I am aware there is no coast-to-coast option in this context.

 

The potential for incredible delays enroute is so great (see pre-Katrina Sunset Limited) that I don't think it's worth it. Better to make the connection experience in Chicago (or New Orleans, etc.) better and more pleasant than to combine a western and eastern long distance train.

 
Agreed. And on that note CHI has a long way to go before it's anything I'd call pleasant. Hopefully the new lounges and other renovations will go a long way toward reaching that goal.

 

Hopefully the new Viewliners can change all differences in LD trains.


How do you figure?

Edited by Devil's Advocate, 18 August 2015 - 09:25 PM.

We've got provisions and lots of beer. The key word is survival on the new frontier. 


#7 AmtrakBlue

AmtrakBlue

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,494 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Delaware

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:22 PM

I think I prefer doing connections/layovers to break up the trip.  

 
I would assume any California to North East train would have a significant layover (4-5 hours) in Chicago to change crews, clean the train, restock food, etc. so you'd still be able to get off the train if you wish.
 
How is this different than what is done now with connections?

#8 AmtrakBlue

AmtrakBlue

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,494 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Delaware

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:25 PM

I prefer connections as well. As much as I enjoy traveling I can only take so much continuous travel at any one time. Being stuck on the train continuously for days on end saps my energy. I schedule connections for long trips on aircraft as well. After ten hours or so I've had my fill and need to get off and explore something larger and more stationary than a train or plane. I suppose I might feel differently on a massive cruise ship but I've never been curious enough to book such a thing.

Though my longest trip on planes was recent (coast to coast) I already knew that I would not like being in the plane more than 4 hours and even that is pushing it. Which is why I went PHL to SJC via MSP & SLC. Plus I love take offs and landings.

#9 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:29 PM

 

 

I think I prefer doing connections/layovers to break up the trip.  

 
I would assume any California to North East train would have a significant layover (4-5 hours) in Chicago to change crews, clean the train, restock food, etc. so you'd still be able to get off the train if you wish.
 
How is this different than what is done now with connections?

 

 

You would be guaranteed to not miss your connection.

 

If Train A and Train B are connected, then you would never miss the connection between A and B but if A is delayed by more than the built in layover, B is delayed.

 

If Train A and Train B are not connected, you would not have the delays on Train B because of Train A but if you miss the connection you're really screwed.

 

I missed a connection but luckily there's tons of trains along the NEC. In most cases you're not as lucky. I remember the Empire Builder was not en route to get into Chicago until 10:00pm last Sunday so any of them having to go East were really screwed.

 

Six of one and half dozen of the other.


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/

#10 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:33 PM

 

I prefer connections as well. As much as I enjoy traveling I can only take so much continuous travel at any one time. Being stuck on the train continuously for days on end saps my energy. I schedule connections for long trips on aircraft as well. After ten hours or so I've had my fill and need to get off and explore something larger and more stationary than a train or plane. I suppose I might feel differently on a massive cruise ship but I've never been curious enough to book such a thing.

Though my longest trip on planes was recent (coast to coast) I already knew that I would not like being in the plane more than 4 hours and even that is pushing it. Which is why I went PHL to SJC via MSP & SLC. Plus I love take offs and landings.

 

 

I am totally scared of landings. The plane plummets to the ground at top speed, it's like going down on a roller coaster. Isn't that when most accidents happen? It's one thing to change trains but changing planes is a whole different matter.

 

I can see one connection but two?


Edited by Philly Amtrak Fan, 18 August 2015 - 09:34 PM.

Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/

#11 Eric S

Eric S

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,330 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:36 PM

 

Can Superliners be used on the LSL? If not, you would have to change the corresponding western train to Viewliner. Hopefully the new Viewliners can change all differences in LD trains.

 

 

Superliner cannot be used on the LSL, at least not east/south of ALB. And cannot serve high level platforms at SYR and ALB (and coming at ROC). So really not the best idea east of BUF.

 

What do you mean about Viewliners changing differences?



#12 SarahZ

SarahZ

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,060 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading, writing, baking, local history, urban exploration, music, dancing, and looking for new adventures

Posted 18 August 2015 - 09:53 PM

I am totally scared of landings. The plane plummets to the ground at top speed, it's like going down on a roller coaster. Isn't that when most accidents happen? 

 

That's not quite how it works. :)

 

The plane decreases speed as it descends (when you "circle" the airport, that's what it's doing). You can actually feel the plane slow down quite a bit shortly before it starts final approach. To me, it always feels like we're stopping in mid-air because I can hear the engines change pitch. They make this low, growling noise. That's usually a good signal that you're about to land.

 

Then, the plane comes in fast, yes, but it's not nearly as fast as it's going while in the air. A 747's speed is about 150 mph when it comes in for a landing. When it's at cruising altitude, it's usually traveling between 480 - 560 mph. It feels like it's going "top speed" to you because your visual cues are messing with you. When you're high up in the air, the distance to the ground makes it look like you're barely moving, so when you start getting closer and closer to the ground, it appears that you're going faster.

 

Have you ever watched a bird land on a wire? They slow down, flap their wings a bit, and touch down. A plane does pretty much the same thing, only the flaps on the wings act as the flappy bit instead of the pilot actually flapping the wings. ;) Plus, the plane has brakes.

 

Yes, according to things I've read, most crashes occur during takeoff and landing, but many more people survive those crashes than you'd think. The survival rate, as of 2013, was 95.7%.

 

I'm sure saxman, other pilots, and others with more flight experience will weigh in with some corrections and clarifications, but that's how I've always experienced landings. I read a lot and watch a lot of videos because I love flying so much. :) I actually LOVE takeoffs and landings and think the part in the air is kind of boring, so I really don't mind connections. More fun stuff and less boring stuff. ;)


Edited by SarahZ, 18 August 2015 - 09:54 PM.

Amtrak Miles: 39,318

 

Amtrak Routes: Blue Water, California Zephyr, Capitol Limited, Carl Sandburg, City of New Orleans, Coast Starlight, Crescent, Empire Builder, Hiawatha, Illinois Zephyr, Lincoln Service, Southwest Chief, Texas Eagle, Wolverine

 

Metropolitan Rail: Chicago Metra, Chicago L, Dallas TRE, Detroit People Mover, New Orleans RTA, San Francisco MUNI, Seattle Monorail, South Shore Line (NICTD), Toronto Subway & RT, Washington DC Metro


#13 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 09 October 2015 - 09:01 PM

 

When writing about former routes, I encountered a proposal of the Capitol Limited and Southwest Chief being linked in Chicago. This would've given service from Los Angeles all the way to Washington on one train. I don't know if that ever was implemented or it was like the Skyline Connection of 2000?

 

The only coast to coast train was the Sunset Limited from LA to Orlando but that was lost since Katrina.

 

I know that delays are certainly common in LD trains and the longer the train the worse the delays will get. But could any coast to coast train be feasible? Would you rather LA to the Northeast (NYP or WAS) or to Florida (or both)?

 

The SC/CL would be the fastest way to get from the West to the East but the connection time between the SC and CL east would not be practical (3:15 to 6:40pm). A SC/LSL might be more feasible (3:15 to 9 :30pm) and would give LAX/NYP and LAX/BOS instead of LAX/WAS. I might be interested in SC/LSL and CZ/CL (or SC/CL and CZ/LSL). One baby step might be combining either the LSL or CL with the Texas Eagle and giving direct service from the East Coast to Dallas and San Antonio (and St. Louis). 

 

The debate of longer LD trains and longer delays vs. having to connect (and possibly miss connections) will probably continue the rest of our lives. But after my experience with missing my connection, I would almost always trend to fewer connections required.

 

 

What you read was utilized as run through equipment. In other words, the inbound Chief's equipment was utilized as the outbound Capitol Limited on the same day. This practice ended due to reliability issues. Passengers detrained at CHI while the equipment was serviced so it wasn't true coast to coast service.

 

 

As for using the eastern long distance fleet to run anywhere west, you'd need a lot more equipment to make this feasible. Remember, the Superliner fleet can't realistically operate on most sections of the NEC, so shipping the equipment that can across the country is not a good idea.

 

 

I found this recently.

 

http://www.trainweb....s/route_15.html


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/

#14 jphjaxfl

jphjaxfl

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,246 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Jacksonville, FL
  • Interests:Rail passenger advocate for modern, reliable passenger trains that will allow for business or leasure travel. I have been riding trains for over 60 years, but I am not advocating going back to what we once had, rather an updated system similar to Europe, Japan, China, India and other nations with great passenger train systems.

Posted 10 October 2015 - 12:07 AM

In the 1950s and early 1960s, the private railroads had numerous coast to coast Sleeping Cars that ran via New York Central, Pennsylvania and B&O from the east to Chicago and Santa Fe, C&NW-CMSP&P-UP and CRI&P-SP from Chicago to west coast points.  In some cases the Sleeping Cars were switched from one station to another in Chicago.  Fortunately, the timekeeping was much better than with Amtrak so the through service kept it schedule.  There were many other through Sleeping cars from east coast points such as New York and Washington to Texas points such as Dallas, El Paso, Houston, San Antonio and even Mexico City that switched railroads at St. Louis Union Station.  The Crescent - Sunset Limited also provided through Sleeping Car Service via the New Orleans gateway from New York to Los Angeles (without an overnight stay in New Orleans).  But that was when passenger trains were operated for the convenience of the passenger and not the convenience of the railroad.



#15 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 10 October 2015 - 09:08 AM

 But that was when passenger trains were operated for the convenience of the passenger and not the convenience of the railroad.

 

UGH!


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/

#16 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,966 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 10 October 2015 - 09:56 AM

That was also the time when railroads even by sleeper were the most affordable way to travel cross country. That is not the case anymore. I doubt that such a service could be sustained other than as a vanity service today.

#17 neroden

neroden

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,150 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Ithaca, NY
  • Interests:Please feel free to moderate my posts

Posted 16 October 2015 - 12:58 AM


There's no point in running very long single routes; too few people will take them, and the people who do take them are travelling in a leisurely enough fashion that they'll probably appreciate the layover.

A single-overnight which drops you off in Chicago's West Loop or midtown Manhattan can be close enough in "daytime used" to flying; a double-overnight cannot.

I've actually suggested splitting the California Zephyr at Denver for this reason -- anyone going through would probably appreciate the layover -- but it doesn't make sense unless Denver becomes enough of a "hub" for trains running in all directions that Amtrak can justify a maintenance base.
--Nathanael--

Please feel free to moderate my posts.

#18 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 16 October 2015 - 06:34 AM

There's no point in running very long single routes; too few people will take them, and the people who do take them are travelling in a leisurely enough fashion that they'll probably appreciate the layover.

I've actually suggested splitting the California Zephyr at Denver for this reason -- anyone going through would probably appreciate the layover -- but it doesn't make sense unless Denver becomes enough of a "hub" for trains running in all directions that Amtrak can justify a maintenance base.

 

They won't appreciate the layover if they miss their connection like I did in WAS and have to go to a ticket counter in a crowded station and have to change plans. And that was with trains going north around every hour. Imagine getting stuck in CHI going east or west. 

 

Maybe the CZ can build a 3 hour layover in DEN each way. This will give them around a two hour buffer each way for trains running late and if you are boarding at DEN you have that much less chance to wait for your train. I can see a similar situation in MSP for the EB (it's not halfway but halfway would be somewhere in the middle of nowhere and MSP seems to be one of the busiest intermediate points) or in KCY for the SWC.

 

I'm not as sure about the CZ but it's clear from the Crescent report that passengers travel much more between ATL and NYP than NOL and ATL. That would make sense for a split for that reason except that you have nowhere to store the trains in ATL and according to the Crescent PRIAA the train station in ATL is lousy and I would feel sorry for passengers having to transfer there.

 

So if they do get the SL back and running between NOL and ORL (or JAX), would you split it somewhere or let it run coast to coast like the old days? If you do split it, I actually think SAS is a more logical split than NOL because then you can minimize the TE delays. Unless you drastically change the SL schedule, the connection in NOL is overnight to the Crescent.

Edited by Philly Amtrak Fan, 16 October 2015 - 07:32 AM.

Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/

#19 jebr

jebr

    Engineer

  • Forum Manager
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,710 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:MSP

Posted 16 October 2015 - 10:38 AM

Three hours can sometimes not even be enough to make up the lost time en route. There has to be a balance between having one seat rides (convenience and no worry of making a connection) and ability to keep reliability (if, for example, the Capitol Limited and Empire Builder are linked, a long delay in Montana destroys timekeeping all the way to WAS.)

Chicago is not a bad place to have transfers. Even those going through Chicago have different enough destinations that linking trains would only benefit a small percentage of passengers at the cost of even more unreliable timekeeping.

#20 Philly Amtrak Fan

Philly Amtrak Fan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia Area

Posted 16 October 2015 - 04:22 PM

I am assuming this New York to Los Angeles never even left the planning stage, does anyone have any more details? New York to Los Angeles in 60 hours?

 

http://www.washingto...022800-idx.html


Trains Traveled: Broadway Limited (CHI-Harrisburg, PA), Three Rivers (Harrisburg, PA-CHI, Altoona, PA-CHI, PHL-CHI), Capitol Limited (CHI-WAS), Lake Short Limited (NYP-CHI), , Silver Meteor (PHL-ORL), Southwest Chief (CHI-LAX), California Zephyr (CHI-SLC, SLC-EMY), City of New Orleans and/or Illini (CHI-Champaign, IL)
Bring back the Broadway Limited (or Three Rivers or any Chicago-Pittsburgh-Philly train)!
 
https://www.facebook...roadwayLimited/




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users