Jump to content




Photo

Chicago - St Louis high speed rail


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 RickIronton

RickIronton

    Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 10 December 2013 - 12:26 PM

Since Amtrak inaugurated high speed between Joliet and Dwight IL, I have observed through Amtrak's train tracking the highest speed of 99 mph.

Does this corridor ever live up to "Illinois High-Speed Rail" advertisements of higher speed considering the fact that 110 mph was obtainable?



#2 kbmiflyer

kbmiflyer

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 111 posts

Posted 10 December 2013 - 02:11 PM

Note the "high speed" portion is between Dwight and Pontiac, not Dwight and Joliet.  I have taken this train several times, and we usually hit 110 between Pontiac and Dwight (albeit for only a few minutes).

 

Note that the Texas Eagle does not go up to 110, only the Linoln Service (not sure why).

 

That being said, advertising high speed rail is a bit of a joke for now until we get high speed along most of the route, and figure out the slow sections between Joliet and CUS (they are working on that), and between Alton and St Louis (they really aren't working on that).



#3 Guest_Andrew_*

Guest_Andrew_*
  • Guests

Posted 10 December 2013 - 02:33 PM

When the Lincoln Service travels that quickly, how are the noise levels within the passenger cars? 



#4 MARC Rider

MARC Rider

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 787 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 December 2013 - 02:59 PM

When the Lincoln Service travels that quickly, how are the noise levels within the passenger cars? 

The Lincoln service uses the same kind of Amfleet coaches they use for the Northeast Regional, and those go 125 mph, and it's perfectly quiet inside.  We rode on them at the Gathering, it was indistinguishable from a Northeast Regional trip (though we weremn't going 100 mph between Chicago and Joliet.)

 

Now, if you want noisy trains, you have to ride the Chicago L.:)  And I remember one ride in 1972 from NYP to PHL, on the Southern Crescent.  Amtrak stuck a few of their own cars in the consist for the Northeast Corridor riders, and the one I was stuck in was an old PRR P70, still painted in Penn Central peas-soup green.  Running through Jersey we must have been above 100 mph (they had already done the track improvements for the original Metroliners),  and that was one noisy rock-and-roll of a ride.



#5 Guest_grover5995_*

Guest_grover5995_*
  • Guests

Posted 27 January 2014 - 11:55 AM

Note the "high speed" portion is between Dwight and Pontiac, not Dwight and Joliet.  I have taken this train several times, and we usually hit 110 between Pontiac and Dwight (albeit for only a few minutes).

 

Note that the Texas Eagle does not go up to 110, only the Linoln Service (not sure why).

 

That being said, advertising high speed rail is a bit of a joke for now until we get high speed along most of the route, and figure out the slow sections between Joliet and CUS (they are working on that), and between Alton and St Louis (they really aren't working on that).

I believe the plan is for nearly all of the Joliet-Alton segment to be upgraded to 110mph in a couple years.  The route from Chicago-Joliet is supposed to switch to the METRA/Rock Island line in a few years due to freight interference on the Heritage Corridor.  The Texas Eagle is a longer train and uses heavier double-deck Superliners so it cannot go quite as fast.



#6 George Harris

George Harris

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,070 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:now in California
  • Interests:Track, construction, schedules

Posted 30 January 2014 - 05:11 PM

I believe the plan is for nearly all of the Joliet-Alton segment to be upgraded to 110mph in a couple years.  The route from Chicago-Joliet is supposed to switch to the METRA/Rock Island line in a few years due to freight interference on the Heritage Corridor.  The Texas Eagle is a longer train and uses heavier double-deck Superliners so it cannot go quite as fast.

However, teh Superliners do run many miles at 90 mph on the Southwest Chief route. 

 

I feel like the Chicago - St. Louis "High Speed" has become a sinkhole for money with very little to show for ti.  A lot of that is Illinois politics.  The reality is that in GM&O days regardless of speed limits of 79 mph or whatever, the schedule was likely faster than the best now and little slower than that after the 110 mph is in place.  As a matter of pride the GM&O boys did their best to keep schedule even if it meant running 90 plus regardless of speed limits.  Then at that time there were three railroads operating Chicago - St. Louis passenger service. 



#7 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,176 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 30 January 2014 - 10:15 PM

IIRC, the Superliners are rated up to 100 MPH.  They can't take full advantage of the upgrades, but they can take advantage of most of their potential.


Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#8 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,360 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 31 January 2014 - 09:33 AM

The agreement in place with the host railroad does not allow the Texas Eagle to operate at higher speed. Only a few specific trains are allowed to do so, and the Texas Eagle is not one of them. So no, Superliner or not, the Texas Eagle cannot take advantage of the higher speeds possible.



#9 George Harris

George Harris

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,070 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:now in California
  • Interests:Track, construction, schedules

Posted 31 January 2014 - 12:49 PM

The agreement in place with the host railroad does not allow the Texas Eagle to operate at higher speed. Only a few specific trains are allowed to do so, and the Texas Eagle is not one of them. So no, Superliner or not, the Texas Eagle cannot take advantage of the higher speeds possible.

The idiocy points in this agreement are multiple and goofy beyond all imagining.  Did someone have a gun to the heads of the people on the state's and fed's side of this side of this concept?



#10 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,360 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 31 January 2014 - 01:37 PM

IMHO the general level of idiocy or at least willful neglect of intelligent decision making on all sides involved in the Chicago - St. Louis HSR Project is of epic proportions. It is hard to fathom why this sort of thing is tolerated for many years with no one screaming blue murder.



#11 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,874 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 01 February 2014 - 11:10 AM

I feel like the Chicago - St. Louis "High Speed" has become a sinkhole for money with very little to show for ti.  A lot of that is Illinois politics.  The reality is that in GM&O days regardless of speed limits of 79 mph or whatever, the schedule was likely faster than the best now and little slower than that after the 110 mph is in place.  As a matter of pride the GM&O boys did their best to keep schedule even if it meant running 90 plus regardless of speed limits.  Then at that time there were three railroads operating Chicago - St. Louis passenger service.

I think the reason you have seen little to show for the CHI-STL corridor is that they still have a long way to go on the improvement projects. Checking the status of the big $1.142 billion grant on recovery.gov (diving down to state and projects), IL has filed their quarterly report through December 31, 2013 which shows that $370 million of the total grant has been spent so far (link which may not work). The $1.142B grant includes rolling stock purchases for the corridor service, so those won't be paid in full until the bi-level and locomotives are delivered.  Still, as a crude metric, IL has spent 32% so far of the major grant for the corridor upgrades for the bills that were paid as of December, 2013.

 

There is a separate $186 million grant for double tracking and upgrades from Dwight to Joliet, which I believe has yet to start any track work. It is a FY10 project grant, so it is not covered on the recovery.gov tracking site. While the CHI-STL corridor will need another billion or two to reach the final project goals, the improvements from the funding that has been provided are still in the pipeline. Have to give it until at least 2016 before the funds are going into a sinkhole or not. Yes, this is taking a long time after the funds were awarded, but unless you are DOD, it usually takes time to spend some $1.4 billion in federal money.



#12 CHamilton

CHamilton

    Engineer

  • Gathering Committee Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,096 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle

Posted 26 February 2014 - 11:34 PM

St. Clair County leaders are considering committing $500,000 to lure a high speed rail station to East St. Louis as part of the state's project connecting St. Louis and Chicago with a 284-mile rail track capable of allowing trains reach 110 mph.

The St. Clair County Board will consider using the money to aid the state's Department of Transportation with the design and planning of the station, which would be adjacent to the MetroLink on River Park Drive. Board members will likely vote on the proposal during a meeting on Monday night....

"We are the only county with MetroLink so that will allow ... all the communities in St. Clair County to be attached to high speed rail," Kern said. "If a station isn't built in East St. Louis, you'll have to travel to Alton or St. Louis to get on a high speed train. Alton is probably a half hour, 45 minutes (to reach by car). If you have to travel to St. Louis, you will be leaving your home to cross the bridge to get on a train that will then backtrack just where you were. Then when you are coming back, the train will pass your home on its way to St. Louis."

The project is funded through $1.2 billion in federal funds and $400 million in state funds. The St. Clair County Transit District would provide the proposed local funding....

The project is expected to be completed in 2017, though, significant reductions in travel time to Chicago will begin in 2015. The cost of the proposed station in East St. Louis is not yet known.

 

 


Amtrak can be better! Tell your local, state and national elected officials to support a more robust rail system. Join NARP and your local rail advocacy organization.
Where you'll find my posts: // All Aboard Washington (websiteFacebook) // Amtrak Unlimited Forum Group (Facebook) // Grow Trains (websiteFacebook, Twitter) // Restore the Pioneer Train (website, Facebook, Twitter) // Save the Seattle Waterfront Streetcar (Again) (websiteFacebook, Twitter) // Transit Riders of Puget Sound (Facebook) // Trains on FB (Facebook) // My Random Twitter Musings @HamiltonChas

#13 siberianmo

siberianmo

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 131 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. Louis, Missouri metro area
  • Interests:Passenger rail - model railroading - walking with my dog - reading (historical fiction - political points of view - wartime accounts - and of course, train books!)

Posted 27 February 2014 - 01:39 PM

A long time ago in another life (not really) I became involved with a group(civic & political people) pushing for a high speed rail connection between St. Louis and Chicago. Over more than a decade it appears that a "hybrid" of high speed rail is about to make that connection. I say "hybrid" only because 110 mph surely is not high speed; higher speed but not high. Anyway . . .

I travel between St. Louis and Chicago in order to make connections for Amtrak's long distance trains out of Union Station. The trip aboard the Lincoln Service trains takes roughly 6 hours. It is fair to say that I have never been later than 20 minutes arriving into Chicago. That ain't bad. Anyway . . .

When reading the post revealing "plans" for an East St. Louis stop for high speed rail, I had to cringe. What makes high(er) speed less likely is the insertion of more stops between end points.

Get my point?

Edited by Juneaudog, 27 February 2014 - 01:40 PM.

Tom - siberianmo

 

Alaska RR: Denali Star

Amtrak: Acela Express - Ann Rutledge - California Zephyr - Capitol Limited - Cardinal - Cascades - City of New Orleans - Coast Starlight - Crescent - Empire Builder (Portland & Seattle) - Lake Shore Limited (Boston & NY City) - Lincoln Service - Metroliner - Missouri Mule - Missouri River Runner - Pacific Surfliner - Silver Meteor - Silver Star - Sunset Limited - Texas Eagle 

BC Rail: Cariboo Prospector

VIA Rail: Atlantic - Bras d'Or - Canadian - Chaleur - Corridor (Brantford/Montreal/Ottawa/Toronto) - Ocean 

 

 


#14 Bob Dylan

Bob Dylan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,610 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:Passenger Trains/Travel/Sports(except Soccer)/Government-Politics/Reading/Old Buildings
    Movies/Music/Unicorns and Ancient Aliens!

Posted 27 February 2014 - 03:50 PM

Isn't East St. Louis sort of the Detroit of Missouri/Illinois? :ph34r: When I used to travel there often on Business the Locals would tell us Don't  Cross the River to East St. Louis! I wouldn't think too many HSR Passengers would catch the Train there when the Commuter Trains run to the New  St; Louis Intermodel  Station where you can catch Amtrak! I agree there's really no need for this Station, it would just Slow Up the Corridor Trains!


Edited by jimhudson, 27 February 2014 - 05:04 PM.

 
"There's Something About a Train! It's Magic!"-- 1970s Amtrak Ad
 
".. I ride on a Mail Train Baby, can't buy a thrill.."--I said that!
 
"..My heart is warm with the friends I make,and better friends I'll not be knowing,
Yet there isn't a train I wouldn't take,No matter where its going!.." -Edna St. Vincent Millay

#15 XHRTSP

XHRTSP

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 283 posts

Posted 15 March 2014 - 09:10 PM

Isn't East St. Louis sort of the Detroit of Missouri/Illinois? :ph34r: When I used to travel there often on Business the Locals would tell us Don't  Cross the River to East St. Louis! I wouldn't think too many HSR Passengers would catch the Train there when the Commuter Trains run to the New  St; Louis Intermodel  Station where you can catch Amtrak! I agree there's really no need for this Station, it would just Slow Up the Corridor Trains!


Parts of East St Louis literally resemble a war zone. I've been there, I've saw it with me own two eyes.

Oh, and the Metrolink ride across the river into Civic isn't that bad. East St Louis has a lot of problems, that ain't one of them. 500k can be much better spent.

#16 cirdan

cirdan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,889 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 March 2014 - 04:07 AM

The agreement in place with the host railroad does not allow the Texas Eagle to operate at higher speed. Only a few specific trains are allowed to do so, and the Texas Eagle is not one of them. So no, Superliner or not, the Texas Eagle cannot take advantage of the higher speeds possible.


Wasn't there talk at some point that additional Lincoln Services would be added in the future?

Basically this agreement would seem to preclude that possibility.

#17 CHamilton

CHamilton

    Engineer

  • Gathering Committee Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,096 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle

Posted 01 June 2014 - 07:57 PM

Final downstate construction begins for 110-mph trains

Amtrak passenger trains should be running at speeds up to 110 mph between Carlinville and Joliet in 2015, based on the latest update of high-speed rail construction from the Illinois Department of Transportation.
  This year's construction season, the fifth since the $1.5 billion federal-state high-speed rail program began, includes approximately $100 million worth of rail, bridge, siding, crossing and station improvements between St. Louis and Chicago.
  “We are on schedule to bring most of the Joliet-Carlinville segment to 110 by the end of 2015,” IDOT spokeswoman Paris Ervin said. 
 The upgrades, according to IDOT, will allow for 110-mph service between Carlinville and Joliet that was first begun in 2012 on the section between Pontiac and Dwight. The goal is 110-mph service on the entire St. Louis-Chicago corridor in 2017.“We are on schedule to bring most of the Joliet-Carlinville segment to 110 by the end of 2015,” IDOT spokeswoman Paris Ervin said.This year's construction season, the fifth since the $1.5 billion federal-state high-speed rail program began, includes approximately $100 million worth of rail, bridge, siding, crossing and station improvements between St. Louis and Chicago.
    Work in the Springfield area includes siding upgrades at Auburn, Carlinville, Elkhart, Girard, Lincoln and just north of Springfield.

 


Amtrak can be better! Tell your local, state and national elected officials to support a more robust rail system. Join NARP and your local rail advocacy organization.
Where you'll find my posts: // All Aboard Washington (websiteFacebook) // Amtrak Unlimited Forum Group (Facebook) // Grow Trains (websiteFacebook, Twitter) // Restore the Pioneer Train (website, Facebook, Twitter) // Save the Seattle Waterfront Streetcar (Again) (websiteFacebook, Twitter) // Transit Riders of Puget Sound (Facebook) // Trains on FB (Facebook) // My Random Twitter Musings @HamiltonChas

#18 Bob Dylan

Bob Dylan

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,610 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin Texas
  • Interests:Passenger Trains/Travel/Sports(except Soccer)/Government-Politics/Reading/Old Buildings
    Movies/Music/Unicorns and Ancient Aliens!

Posted 01 June 2014 - 08:34 PM

Looks like the Eagles will be heading for Amish Country on re-routes and the Lincoln Service Trains will be Bustitutions on Selected Days!
 
"There's Something About a Train! It's Magic!"-- 1970s Amtrak Ad
 
".. I ride on a Mail Train Baby, can't buy a thrill.."--I said that!
 
"..My heart is warm with the friends I make,and better friends I'll not be knowing,
Yet there isn't a train I wouldn't take,No matter where its going!.." -Edna St. Vincent Millay

#19 Eric S

Eric S

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,261 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 01 June 2014 - 09:10 PM

The article mentions the overpass being constructed at Normal to allow trains to serve both tracks, meaning the old platform will be put back into service. That had been mentioned at the time the new Normal station opened, but until this article I had never seen any sort of timeline for that construction.



#20 Steve4031

Steve4031

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,059 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Riding Trains Often!!

Posted 01 June 2014 - 09:22 PM

This link mentions work south of Alton. [url="/details.aspx"]http://www.idothsr.o...st/details.aspx

Between Madison and Alton.

Edited by Steve4031, 01 June 2014 - 09:24 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users