Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

HSR for MSP to Duluth progressing


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 CHamilton

CHamilton

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,216 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle

Posted 07 April 2013 - 02:55 PM

Plans Progress for High-Speed Rail from Mpls to Duluth
 
The Northern Lights Express, a proposed high-speed rail line connecting the Twin Cities and Duluth, is now picking up speed, transportation leaders believe, after getting an environmental green light and gathering public comment Thursday night in what the person spearheading the project described as "a big milestone."

"We are going to move forward," Julie Carr, the NLX project manager, said in an interview.

Carr led an environmental assessment open house Thursday at the Armed Forces Community Center in Cambridge, where a court reporter transcribed public comments and large posterboards showcased the project, which MnDOT estimates will cost between $800-$950 million.
...
The 155-mile route would speed passengers at up to 110 miles per hour between Minneapolis and Duluth, a trip that would take between two to two and a half hours, since speeds would be slower in the cities and time would be factored in for stops at stations along the way.

Cambridge is one of four proposed stops, along with Coon Rapids; Hinckley; and Superior, Wisconsin. Click here for a route map.

The state is using $8 million in initial funding to move into a preliminary engineering stage later this year, which could last for two or three years.
Final funding to actually build the project has not been secured.

Edited by CHamilton, 07 April 2013 - 02:59 PM.

Amtrak can be better! Tell your local, state and national elected officials to support a more robust rail system. Join NARP and your local rail advocacy organization.
Where you'll find my posts: // All Aboard Washington (websiteFacebook) // Amtrak Unlimited Forum Group (Facebook) // Grow Trains (websiteFacebook, Twitter) // Restore the Pioneer Train (website, Facebook, Twitter) // Save the Seattle Waterfront Streetcar (Again) (websiteFacebook, Twitter) // Transit Riders of Puget Sound (Facebook) // Trains on FB (Facebook) // My Random Twitter Musings @HamiltonChas

#2 Train Rider

Train Rider

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 April 2013 - 02:15 PM

Native Minnesotan here.

 

Not the best use of resources.  If new line is to be built then run it to Rochester, which has much more going on than does Duluth.

 

I can think of lots of political reasons why Duluth, I can think of lots of Indian gaming reasons why Duluth via Hinckley, but I can't think of a single reason why a billion bucks for a line to Duluth is a good use of that money when there are other projects in the state that can serve more passengers.


Empire Builder (7), Texas Eagle (3), Lake Shore Limited (1), Southwest Chief (1), Hiawatha (multiple), Lincoln Service (2)


#3 jis

jis

    Engineer

  • Gathering Team Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,509 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
  • Interests:Trains, Planes and Travel

Posted 08 April 2013 - 02:24 PM

Yeah I have been scratching my head a bit about the Duluth thing myself. but then again, I know next to nothing about travel patterns in Minnesota, so I had chalked it up as my own unfamiliarity until I read the message above.

#4 fairviewroad

fairviewroad

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,192 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 April 2013 - 02:41 PM

Don't forget that Duluth is across the stateline from Superior, WI.  According to the census bureau the Duluth metro area

is population 279,000 while the Rochester metro area is population 209,000. 

 

So Duluth has Rochester beat in terms of overall population. That in and of itself proves nothing. But it's a relevant

data point nonetheless.



#5 Train Rider

Train Rider

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 April 2013 - 02:49 PM

Don't forget that Duluth is across the stateline from Superior, WI.  According to the census bureau the Duluth metro area

is population 279,000 while the Rochester metro area is population 209,000. 

 

So Duluth has Rochester beat in terms of overall population. That in and of itself proves nothing. But it's a relevant

data point nonetheless.

Rochester is a growing, affluent city with the Mayo Clinic and related high-end businesses, Duluth is a struggling blue-collar port city that has lost more than 20 percent of its population in the past few decades.  It is the gateway to the scenic North Shore of Lake Superior but a train will never take you past Two Harbors.

 

I love Duluth, but would never take a train there.


Empire Builder (7), Texas Eagle (3), Lake Shore Limited (1), Southwest Chief (1), Hiawatha (multiple), Lincoln Service (2)


#6 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,524 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 08 April 2013 - 04:46 PM

Remind me: Is Hinkley the casino stop they were looking at?


Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#7 fairviewroad

fairviewroad

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,192 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 April 2013 - 05:41 PM

Don't forget that Duluth is across the stateline from Superior, WI.  According to the census bureau the Duluth metro area

is population 279,000 while the Rochester metro area is population 209,000. 

 

So Duluth has Rochester beat in terms of overall population. That in and of itself proves nothing. But it's a relevant

data point nonetheless.

Rochester is a growing, affluent city with the Mayo Clinic and related high-end businesses, Duluth is a struggling blue-collar port city that has lost more than 20 percent of its population in the past few decades.  It is the gateway to the scenic North Shore of Lake Superior but a train will never take you past Two Harbors.

 

I love Duluth, but would never take a train there.

 

I expect the train is for people living in Duluth to travel to the Twin Cities, not vice versa. And if inbound traffic is the goal, then a  higher population

in the outlying city is a plus. Point taken about the trajectories of the two metro areas, however.



#8 The Davy Crockett

The Davy Crockett

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,332 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ALX
  • Interests:The Rails, US History, The Great Outdoors, Good Food

Posted 08 April 2013 - 06:37 PM

  
I love Duluth, but would never take a train there.
 


I would !!!


I wish I was a headlight on a northbound of the border train.

#9 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,897 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 08 April 2013 - 11:16 PM

 
Rochester is a growing, affluent city with the Mayo Clinic and related high-end businesses, Duluth is struggling blue-collar port city that has lost more than 20 percent of its population in the past few decades.  It is the gateway to the scenic North Shore of Lake Superior but a train will never take you past Two Harbors.
 
I love Duluth, but would never take a train there.
Checking the stats on Duluth, the city bottomed out in population decline in the 1990 census and has had been around 86K since then. The metropolitan area has a population of 280K.

While the city may be struggling, the question is how to help boost the economy and improve transportation options to and from the city. Reasonably fast intercity train service to the Twin Cities is one way to do that. Now whether train service to Rochester MN should be given priority over service to Duluth, that is up to the politicians who control the levers of power and the planning staffs to determine/ As it stands, this is a PE and EIS study. They are a long way from an official decision, getting the funds, and starting construction. 

#10 jphjaxfl

jphjaxfl

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,250 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Jacksonville, FL
  • Interests:Rail passenger advocate for modern, reliable passenger trains that will allow for business or leasure travel. I have been riding trains for over 60 years, but I am not advocating going back to what we once had, rather an updated system similar to Europe, Japan, China, India and other nations with great passenger train systems.

Posted 09 April 2013 - 02:45 PM

The prior Amtrak train between the Twin Cities and Duluth was fairly well patronized. I remember riding it in 1970s when most seats were occupied. It was not very fast at 3 1/2 to 4 hours. Originally it left the Twin Cities about 8AM and arrived in Duluth at 11:45AM. It returned at 5:30PM and arrived in the Twin Cities about 9PM. Towards the end it was run as the Northstar from Chicago to Duluth. Local patronage from the Twin Cities to Duluth dropped off because the train from Chicago was often late. They really needed 2to trains per day in each direction to give choices. The MN legislature became more conservative and withdrew the MN subsidy and that was the end of that.

#11 fairviewroad

fairviewroad

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,192 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 April 2013 - 03:51 PM

Seems like if you had a once-a-day frequency the schedule should be geared toward same-day round-trips from Duluth

into the Twin Cities. Leave Duluth at 7 a.m. getting into MSP at 9:30 a.m., and the return trip leaving MSP at 6 p.m.

arriving Duluth at 8:30 p.m. Train overnights in Duluth...repeat the process the next day, etc. If you had the funding/demand

you could easily squeeze in a mid-day round-trip as well.

 

Would be nice if it made for good connections on the EB for people heading to Chicago, but the current callings times

for 7/8 at MSP wouldn't make for good same-day connections to Chicago.



#12 Dovecote

Dovecote

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 831 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thomasville, GA

Posted 09 April 2013 - 03:52 PM

Remind me: Is Hinkley the casino stop they were looking at?

 

Hinckley does have a casino, Grand Casino Hinckley, so it is probably the "casino" stop in question.  My wife was born in the area and we frequent the casino when we go back visiting her family.


Amtrak Trains Traveled - Acela Express, Auto Train, Capitol Limited, City of New Orleans, Coast Starlight, Crescent, Empire Builder, Kansas City Mule, Lake Shore Limited, Maple Leaf, Northeast Regional, Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, Silver Meteor, Silver Star, Southwest Chief, Sunset Limited, and Vermonter.

#13 George Harris

George Harris

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,070 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:now in California
  • Interests:Track, construction, schedules

Posted 09 April 2013 - 03:57 PM

For a service over a distance of this length, once a day is hardly worth doing.  Twice to three times a day is better.  If you look at the North Carolina  example, if I recall correctly when they added the third Raleigh - Charlotte train, the ridership per each increased. 

 

It does not matter if the train is fast if you have to wait a long time between the time you want to go and the time you can go.  Over distances of this range, you simply drive instead rather than endure a long wait. 



#14 Train Rider

Train Rider

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 April 2013 - 10:21 AM

If you look at the map, the line would go to downtown Minneapolis instead of the St. Paul Union Depot, which will be the Empire Builder's station.   This lack of a connection could be addressed if Amtrak put a station NW of Minneapolis where the two lines would merge at Coon Rapids.

 

However, if an additional train between Chicago and the Twin Cities is ever put in place, it would be better for the Duluth line to marry up with Amtrak at St. Paul -- greater potential for cross use.

 

MN has to figure out how to get people to ride the Northstar Commuter line before it undertakes HSR to Duluth.   http://www.startribu...55.html?refer=y


Empire Builder (7), Texas Eagle (3), Lake Shore Limited (1), Southwest Chief (1), Hiawatha (multiple), Lincoln Service (2)


#15 jebr

jebr

    Engineer

  • Forum Manager
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,937 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"The Last Great City of the East," St. Paul, MN

Posted 10 April 2013 - 08:11 PM

MN has to figure out how to get people to ride the Northstar Commuter line before it undertakes HSR to Duluth.   http://www.startribu...55.html?refer=y

Yep. Realistically, the money would be much better spent extending the line to St. Cloud and increasing frequencies on the Northstar. They're halfway there already, they have equipment and crews, and there's already some service along the entire corridor already (when including the Link.) Minnesota needs to finish what it started before working on more lines.



#16 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,524 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 11 April 2013 - 12:08 AM

The long-term story seems to be that one train per day doesn't tend to work too well (there are a lot of places that a single daily frequency seems to have been/turned into a false start).  2x daily works alright as a rule, and 3-5x daily seems to be a sweet spot.


Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#17 Ispolkom

Ispolkom

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,076 posts
  • Location:St. Paul, Minn.

Posted 11 April 2013 - 07:26 AM

I don't see how this project is progressing without Anoka County on board.  I'd agree that it's much more important to finish the Northstar line to St. Cloud, especially because the present poor performance of the Northstar is used as a stick to beat every other rail transit project in the Twin Cities.  Almost as though it was designed intentionally to fail.



#18 Train Rider

Train Rider

    Lead Service Attendant

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 April 2013 - 11:52 AM

I don't see how this project is progressing without Anoka County on board.  I'd agree that it's much more important to finish the Northstar line to St. Cloud, especially because the present poor performance of the Northstar is used as a stick to beat every other rail transit project in the Twin Cities.  Almost as though it was designed intentionally to fail.

That is why bad rail projects are worse than no rail projects.


Empire Builder (7), Texas Eagle (3), Lake Shore Limited (1), Southwest Chief (1), Hiawatha (multiple), Lincoln Service (2)


#19 Aaron

Aaron

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 315 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tucson, AZ

Posted 11 April 2013 - 05:48 PM

I don't know anything about where would be best to put a rail line in MN, and I guess it's their money to do with as they please. But... When I read this, I can just imagine so many other places in the US where a new rail service would make much more sense. If someone was going to spend $1bil on linking two cities, I'd much rather it was AZ spending it to link Phoenix and Tucson, just for selfish reasons.

 

So, here's a game: If $1bil was up for grabs, like it just fell from the sky, and you could use it to create a new rail link or new service connecting two areas, where would you put it? Some basic rules apply to make it comparable to MN: <200 miles, up to 110mph. So, what would you do?



#20 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,524 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 11 April 2013 - 06:33 PM

I don't know anything about where would be best to put a rail line in MN, and I guess it's their money to do with as they please. But... When I read this, I can just imagine so many other places in the US where a new rail service would make much more sense. If someone was going to spend $1bil on linking two cities, I'd much rather it was AZ spending it to link Phoenix and Tucson, just for selfish reasons.

 

So, here's a game: If $1bil was up for grabs, like it just fell from the sky, and you could use it to create a new rail link or new service connecting two areas, where would you put it? Some basic rules apply to make it comparable to MN: <200 miles, up to 110mph. So, what would you do?

Not Duluth?  Joking aside, and depending on your definition of "new service", [RGH-]RVR-WAS would probably get my vote assuming it was feasible with that kind of money (most projects are more expensive, but they also tend to assume faster speeds).  After that, I start dumping money into Florida and I don't give a "hoot" if the FEC runs the trains and makes money off of the public investment.  Then it's into extending the CHI-Quad Cities service through to OMA.  After that?  Front Range in Colorado, followed by new services extending off the NEC such as serving Scranton, etc. (though a lot of those run into terrain issues), followed then by other Midwest projects.


Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users