Jump to content




Help Support AmtrakTrains.com by donating using the link above or becoming a Supporting Member.

Photo

Sumitomo/Siemens Contract for 137 Cars (former bi-levels)


  • Please log in to reply
954 replies to this topic

#1 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,880 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:04 AM

The news is out this morning that Nippon-Sharyo in partnership with Sumitomo Corporation has been selected to build the 130 corridor bi-level cars at their new plant in Rochelle, IL. The bid was only $352 million, well below the amount allocated by the FRA grants, although I'm sure there are overhead, training, and spare parts costs built into the HSIPR and CA allocated amounts. With the low price per unit, exercise of options to buy more cars if Nippon-Sharyo can deliver satisfactory cars on the initial order is likely.

Chicago Tribune AP article on the breaking news.

Excerpt:

CHICAGO — The company that makes cars for Japan's bullet train has been picked to build a fleet of next generation passenger cars for rail corridors in the Midwest and California.

Illinois, Michigan, Missouri and California teamed up to buy the 130 bi-level cars at a lower cost.

The cars will be made at a new plant opened up by Nippon-Sharyo's U.S. subsidiary in Rochelle, Ill. It submitted a bid of $352 million with partner Sumitomo Corporation of America.



#2 MikefromCrete

MikefromCrete

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,206 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Crete, IL

Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:06 AM

It's been reported on several other sites that a contract for 130 bi-level cars to be used in Illinois, Michigan, Missouri and California has been awarded to a joint bid from Nippon-Sharyo and Sumitoma Corporation of America. The cars will be built at Nippon-Sharyo's new plant in Rochelle, IL. That plant is currently building bi-level gallery EMU's for use on Metra's Electric Division. Cost for the will be $352 million with delivery to start in 2015. There's talk that California might add another 20-30 cars to the contract at a latter date.
Nippon-Shayro has built single-level EMUs for the South Shore, bi-level EMUs for South Shore and Metra, unpowered bi-level galleries for Metra and VRE.
So that's good news, Amtrak will be getting new equipment and Illinois will benefit from having the cars assembled in-state.

#3 Amtrak Cajun

Amtrak Cajun

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 667 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lafayette Louisiana
  • Interests:Amtrak, Building Computers, Amtrak, traveling in general, and umm did i mention AMTRAK!!!!

Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:13 AM

That is great news. These Bi-Levels will have a build similar to the California cars correct? I saw the plans for the Bi-Level cars on here a while back, and I was impressed.

Im happy to see that they have been green lighted. Maybe this will take some of the strain off of the current fleet once they are released for service.







Im Anthony.

Allll Aboooarrdd!!!!

#4 MattW

MattW

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,694 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East of Atlanta, GA

Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:06 PM

This sounds great! The company has a solid history of building bi-level commuter cars for railroads in this country, and I haven't heard of any big problems with the cars.
Forum's official broken record about expanded Georgia passenger service!

#5 Blackwolf

Blackwolf

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,388 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CIC
  • Interests:Public Safety, passenger rail, travel, hunting, fishing

Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:21 PM

I, for one, really look forward to climbing aboard one of these new cars in a few years time. I vaguely remember when the first-generation California Cars were first introduced and the hype surrounding them; they (rightfully) made the Horizon fleet then in daily use on the Capitol Corridor look downright embarrassing. It's the Midwest's turn to have the same shock value.

As for the company making them, I completely agree with MattW. Nippon-Sharyo makes a solid product, has a very strong reputation, and obviously made their bid as competitive as they possibly could in order to land this project. Their plant is established, their workers already experienced in making double-level passenger equipment, and minor to moderate retooling is really all that needs to be done; something that companies like CAF could not match.

Good news!

Amtrak
Capitol Corridor (too many times to count!); Coast Starlight (x21); California Zephyr (x7); Empire Builder (x2); Lake Shore Limited (x4); Maple Leaf (x1); Adirondack (x2); Cascades (x1); Pacific Surfliner (x6); San Joaquin (x8); Capitol Limited (x1); Cardinal (x2); Acela (x1)
VIA Rail
Ocean (x4); Windsor Corridor (x2); The Canadian (x1)


#6 Steve4031

Steve4031

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,222 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Riding Trains Often!!

Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:32 PM

I can't wait either. And they'll be riding on rebuilt tracks at 110 mph!!

#7 Guest_peremichel_*

Guest_peremichel_*
  • Guests

Posted 27 September 2012 - 02:09 PM

This sounds great! The company has a solid history of building bi-level commuter cars for railroads in this country, and I haven't heard of any big problems with the cars.


Agreed. They make good solid cars and they make sure that they run properly. Not a particularly flashy company but exceedingly competent. I am pleased.

#8 Hanno

Hanno

    Conductor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 586 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Central PA

Posted 27 September 2012 - 02:52 PM

Am I correct in my understanding that these cars are not like the Superliners and are more like commuter cars? I'm not familiar with The California cars.

#9 MikeM

MikeM

    OBS Chief

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 427 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wichita Falls TX

Posted 27 September 2012 - 02:56 PM

Am I correct in my understanding that these cars are not like the Superliners and are more like commuter cars? I'm not familiar with The California cars.


California cars have the same basic outside size / shape of a superliner, but have two doors. There is a larger stairway (ramp?) between levels. Lower level is more open, bathroom on bottom level is single stall but larger and handicap accessible. Can be used interchangeably with superliner cars, no issues. I rode them a few years ago, and thought they were pretty comfortable on San Diegan service; the only issue was they were crowded and it was hard to find seats at first.

#10 MattW

MattW

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,694 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East of Atlanta, GA

Posted 27 September 2012 - 03:13 PM

No, there is no ramp in them. On a whim, I once calculated what it would take to produce an ada-compliant ramp for a bi-level railcar, and it would have taken up most of one side of the car meaning loss of seating. Probably the best analogy is the California cars and upcoming bi-levels are like Amfleet-Is, while the Superliner coaches are more like Amfleet-IIs. It's not a direct comparison with stuff like window size of course, but similar idea.
Forum's official broken record about expanded Georgia passenger service!

#11 VentureForth

VentureForth

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,478 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Richmond Hill, GA

Posted 27 September 2012 - 04:00 PM

Nippon-Sharyo is responsible for the majority market share of the Shinkansen rolling stock, delivering over 3000 cars in the last 40 years. They have built the original 0 series, the 200, 100, 300, 500, 700, N700 and E2 trainsets.

I approve. :D

14,223 Amtrak Miles. Many more to go.
Completed Routes: Capitol Limited, Palmetto
Also Ridden: Carolinian, Crescent, Pacific Surfliner, Piedmont, Southwest Chief, Silver Meteor, Silver Star, Texas Eagle


#12 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,880 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 27 September 2012 - 05:13 PM

That is great news. These Bi-Levels will have a build similar to the California cars correct? I saw the plans for the Bi-Level cars on here a while back, and I was impressed.

Im happy to see that they have been green lighted. Maybe this will take some of the strain off of the current fleet once they are released for service.

The new bi-levels should free up the Amfleet Is and Superliner coach cars used in California and the Superliners that get used in winter in the Chicago corridors. I think Caltrans would be inclined to order as many as they need to have an entirely bi-level corridor car fleet of Surfliners, California cars, and the new bi-levels. Keep in mind if delivery starts in 2015, the initial units have to go through extensive testing, and only so many units will be delivered per month or quarter. So it probably will be 2016 or 2017 before enough bi-levels are delivered to free up the various Amfleets or Superliners to be used elsewhere. What happens to the Horizons is not known, but that is another topic.

That the bi-levels will be built in Illinois and that the CAF plant making the Viewliner IIs (or whatever they will officially be called) is in Elmira New York, states with strong support of passenger rail service, helps the politics of Amtrak placing follow-on orders with the 2 companies if Amtrak is satisfied with what they deliver. Easy to get the Senators and the Congressional delegation on board in support of funding for equipment orders if they realize that the cars will almost certainly be built in their state.

#13 Agent

Agent

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,242 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Iowa

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:30 PM

CHICAGO — The company that makes cars for Japan's bullet train has been picked to build a fleet of next generation passenger cars for rail corridors in the Midwest and California.

Illinois, Michigan, Missouri and California teamed up to buy the 130 bi-level cars at a lower cost.


And Iowa contributed nothing, so it will get nothing. :(

#14 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,880 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:36 PM

And Iowa contributed nothing, so it will get nothing. :(

Illinois is buying the rolling stock for the Chicago-Quad Cities service. IL got $177.3 million of the FY2010 $230 million Chicago-Iowa City corridor grant parceled off to proceed with its portion of the corridor track upgrades and buy the equipment. If Iowa decides to proceed with the extension to Iowa City and put up the 20% state matching funds, the remaining $52.7 million for Iowa is still available. By 2015 or 2016, the corridor bi-levels and new locomotives will be in service on the IL portion of the corridor. Then if Iowa takes the federal money and upgrades the tracks to Iowa City with new stations, voilà, the trains can continue onward to Iowa City. Makes for a very low hanging fruit at that point for extending Amtrak service to a new city.

#15 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,244 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:38 PM

CHICAGO — The company that makes cars for Japan's bullet train has been picked to build a fleet of next generation passenger cars for rail corridors in the Midwest and California.

Illinois, Michigan, Missouri and California teamed up to buy the 130 bi-level cars at a lower cost.


And Iowa contributed nothing, so it will get nothing. :(


True, but IA's train plans are (rather annoyingly) stalled out. To be fair, they could probably buy off some options at a later date.

Remind me...was the original allocation $500 million? If so, that's enough "spare space" to throw another 20-30 cars into the fleet without too much trouble. At $2.7 million/car, this is actually on par with the projected single-level car purchases ($2.5 million) and miles below the projected $4million per bilevel number.

Also, does anyone know how many options there are in the contract?
Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#16 afigg

afigg

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,880 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 27 September 2012 - 10:17 PM

Remind me...was the original allocation $500 million? If so, that's enough "spare space" to throw another 20-30 cars into the fleet without too much trouble. At $2.7 million/car, this is actually on par with the projected single-level car purchases ($2.5 million) and miles below the projected $4million per bilevel number.

Also, does anyone know how many options there are in the contract?

Yes, the total funding for the bi-level corridor cars worked out to right around $4 or $4.5 million per car times 130 as I recall. We have not seen the details of the award, so there may be additional costs for spare parts, training from Nippon-Sharyo and there should be overhead costs covered with the HSIPR & state funds. Still, the bid price per unit is way lower than the "loaded" placeholder amount of $4.5 million listed in the Amtrak Fleet Strategy Plan. Same goes for the single level cars being build by CAF at ~ $2.3 million each compared to the $3.5 million in the plan.

Besides allowing the states to exercise options to buy more cars from the remaining unspent funds, the lower actual bid prices means that the price of ordering 700 single level cars to replace the Amfleets I & IIs and, say, up to 300 bi-levels configured as sleepers, diners, lounge cars, LD coach cars to replace the Superliner Is is perhaps a billion dollars less than what Amtrak projects in their Fleet strategy plans.

According to the Illinois bi-level RFP document from April, the total options is for 200 cars. Amazing what can turn up with a Google search. :cool:

#17 Anderson

Anderson

    Engineer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,244 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia

Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:01 PM

200 options? *whistles* That could make a very real mark in the impending car shortage. At the very least, it should clear single-level cars (other than the Talgos) out of everywhere outside the NEC. Assuming that the plans play out in the timeframe in question, that could easily cover most of the plausible service expansions in the Midwest and West over the next decade. Heck, there are various "other" projects (most notably FEC's service) that could also "fit in" with the options available.

To be fair, unless there are service expansions and/or train lengthening plans in the Midwest that I'm not aware of (and of course, extending trains by a car or two wouldn't be an unrealistic ambition), I can only think of three plausible projects in the medium-range timeframe (Quad Cities-Omaha, CHI-MSP, and MSP-Duluth), though if Kaisch gets the boot in '14 it is at least possible that 3Cs might get restarted (and ditto the Madison project if Walker gets thrown out).
Capitol Limited (7), CA Zephyr (4) Lake Shore Limited (1), Acela (2), NE Regional (2), Sliver Meteor (4)

Upcoming: Silver Meteor (1), Lake Shore Limited (1), SW Chief (2), MO River Runner (1), Texas Eagle (1)

Possibly Upcoming: Either Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (2) or Texas Eagle (1), Capitol Limited (1), Silver Meteor (1)

#18 AlanB

AlanB

    Engineer

  • Honored Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,357 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, New York

Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:55 PM

To be fair, unless there are service expansions and/or train lengthening plans in the Midwest that I'm not aware of (and of course, extending trains by a car or two wouldn't be an unrealistic ambition), I can only think of three plausible projects in the medium-range timeframe (Quad Cities-Omaha, CHI-MSP, and MSP-Duluth),


Keep in mind that going from single level to bi-level cars is already going to increase capacity of the existing trains, assuming that they use the same number of cars.

though if Kaisch gets the boot in '14 it is at least possible that 3Cs might get restarted (and ditto the Madison project if Walker gets thrown out).


Won't help there, as IIRC Ohio's plan was for DMU's.

I suppose that they could change their minds, if they were to decide to go ahead.
Alan,

Take care and take trains!

#19 Guest_Nathanael_*

Guest_Nathanael_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2012 - 12:00 AM

The news is out this morning that Nippon-Sharyo in partnership with Sumitomo Corporation has been selected to build the 130 corridor bi-level cars at their new plant in Rochelle, IL. The bid was only $352 million, well below the amount allocated by the FRA grants, although I'm sure there are overhead, training, and spare parts costs built into the HSIPR and CA allocated amounts. With the low price per unit, exercise of options to buy more cars if Nippon-Sharyo can deliver satisfactory cars on the initial order is likely.

I'm now wondering how much "leftover" there is in the FRA grants for this. There will probably be a rush to spend the leftover. CA will probably simply buy extra cars with it; IL might too, given its penchant for expanding services. MI and MO, I'm not so sure.

#20 Guest_Nathanael_*

Guest_Nathanael_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2012 - 12:31 AM

The new bi-levels should free up the Amfleet Is and Superliner coach cars used in California and the Superliners that get used in winter in the Chicago corridors.

And I think it should free up the Horizons and Amfleet Is used in the Chicago corridors too! Well, eventually.

I haven't actually figured out what the state-for-state split is (they've been awfully vague about that). Thanks to the person who tracked down the RFP: It's 42 to Caltrans and 88 to "the Midwest Coalition" (no MI/MO/IL breakdown).

There are 96 Horizons, so the midwest order is not quite enough to replace the Horizon fleet. However, a whole bunch of those are used for the Hiawatha, and a couple for the soon-to-end Hoosier State. So I assume it's intended to replace everything except those. It still seems a bit tight, so I would expect them to take up some options just to have spares and room for expansion. Perhaps if they take the option, they'll get enough to use them for the Hiawathas too; Illinois does pay *part* of the cost of the Hiawathas. That would eliminate single-level cars from Amtrak in the Midwest (except for the long-distance trains heading east, obviously).

I assume California plans to keep the California Cars / Surfliners, replace the Amfleet set on the Surfliner and the ones on the San Joaquins, replace the 7 California-repaired Superliners, and replace the Comets they just bought. With an order of 42 this means they are already ordering enough for spares and more expansion.

(Reviews topic....)
Whoa. $551 (allocated) - $352 (bid) = 199 million. That is enough to get quite a lot of extra cars. Enough that some of the money might even be redirected to something else.

...
The freed-up Amfleets, Horizons, and Superliners will provide only a little relief; 7 coaches doesn't help the Superliner shortage much, and the acute single-level shortage is Amfleet IIs. (I wonder if Amtrak will convert some Amfleet Is to long-distance seating to alleviate the mid-term Amfleet II shortage.) That said, the Horizons are almost certainly going to end up on the NEC.

Here's hoping for a Viewliner Coach order in the new year, followed by a Superliner III order...




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users